It was 1 in 20 million for the sessions that Half Smoke summarized (800 hands per session over 12 sessions):
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...ll=1#post97399
It was 1 in 20 million for the sessions that Half Smoke summarized (800 hands per session over 12 sessions):
https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...ll=1#post97399
Yes, first hand, it really boils down to tolerance levels of play, lifetime winnings at that casino. Frequency of visits, length of visit and your act, and spread, speaking from playing a blackjack perspective.
Originally Posted by coach belly
Tell me this...if MDawg were to post his W/L statement from 2019 that showed an overall gaming win for last year, would you accept his claim that he is getting comped despite consistently winning? [/QUOTE]
Sorry, I do not take him seriously.
Originally Posted by coach belly
Regarding your post formats...instead of typing "member X wrote" before you quote another member, why not use the Reply With Quote function?
That way viewers can click onto the double arrow icon next to the quoted member's name, and read the original post that you have quoted.[/QUOTE] [/QUOTE]
Sorry, for my weird ways on the replys. I am going to try other various ways of doing so.
Last edited by BoSox; 03-17-2020 at 01:06 PM.
Are you assuming that MDawg fabricated his results for 2020 based on Half Smoke's premise for his 2019 play?
Half Smoke's premise was based on MDawg flat-betting for 12 sessions of 800 hands.
That almost certainly did not take place.
But what impact could MDawgs 2019 trips have on whether or not he won for the 2020 trips, which are documented in his trip reports?
His posts are (from WOV) "trip reports, with some examples of winning shoes and how I played them, and general strategies."
He posted many photos of hand-by-hand results for baccarat shes that he claimed to have played. Would it have been unlikely for him to win, playing those shoes in the manner that he reported?
My understanding is that if you're winning, then they want you to stay, and if you've left the property with winnings, then they want you to come back.
How else will they recover your lucky short term winnings, unless you come back to play more?
You believe that a casino would shut down the action of a winning baccarat player?...sounds like you don't actually know that's the case.
As long as you are talking about a negative expectation game for the player. That is how casinos should treat it. However, since there are often some real dumb humans running the business end of it, there is always room for a rare exception whereby someone in management makes a mistake "possibly because their own job may be on the line" and stops a player from playing who appears hot at the time.
coach belly wrote:
"You believe that a casino would shut down the action of a winning baccarat player?...sounds like you don't actually know that's the case."
What I actually said was:
Yes, I actually believe that some casino may, in fact, be stupid enough to shut down the action of a baccarat player who is currently getting the better of them over the SHORT term.
Expanding on this, depending upon the size of the casino and the size of the action that the casino takes a heavy better (not MDawg by any means) could actually hurt the short term casino numbers for the game in question resulting in a possible firing of some big shithole. Now I agree with what tableplay said on most of this and it seemed like you two were going nowhere on the subject. I am afraid you and I are not going to reach any kind consensus either so I will let you have the last word on the subject.
Last edited by BoSox; 03-17-2020 at 04:55 PM.
Since those posts also contained verbiage regarding the impossibility of the long term. In any event, the phrases by themselves do not demonstrate proof that someone can win long term in a negative expectation game regardless of context.
Here's an example of context changing meaning:
1) Tom: "Man, that is awful"
2 ) "Bro, I just won a million dollars !!!" said George. "Man, that is awful" said Tom sarcastically while he smiled and winked at George.
Here is another example of how context changes meaning:
Last edited by tableplay; 03-17-2020 at 05:34 PM.
Who said anything about Mdawg's 2019 trips impacting his 2020 trips ? The other questions were already answered regarding flat betting versus varying bets. I'm not sure why you keep asking questions that have already been answered but I doubt this will deter you from continuing to do it.
You did...when you wrote about his "aggregate outcome" you were talking about his consecutive winning trips for 2019...as though his claims of consecutive winning trips in 2019 counterfeited his reported winnings for his 2020 trips.
Isn't that what you implied?...since he could not have won overall for 9600 hands played in 2019, then his reported wins for 2020 were fabricated?
Last edited by coach belly; 03-17-2020 at 07:24 PM.
One of the things a casino host can judge a whale on is "Does he leave if he gets ahead?" A player that will hang around until they lose is much more valuable. So a casino host could cut a whale off if he wins for a few trips in a row and fits into the "leaves if he gets ahead" category.
But what MDawg is most likely doing is just not reporting his losing sesssions just reporting the winners. It's easy enough to do.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
There are currently 291 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 291 guests)