Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
Originally Posted by
Alan Mendelson
I just want to say a few things and then you can all jump all over me, as usual.
First I'm glad that Dan is not censoring Rob and is allowing for readers to judge Rob themselves. Honestly there are valid things Rob says about playing video poker that the APs here refuse to accept because of their own stubbornness. And there are statements that the APs make against Rob because of their own ignorance.
Two examples:
1. Rob does not use a Martingale strategy but the APs will never accept it.
2. Rob uses the math of the games to play and the APs here will never accept that either.
But, with that said, Rob has made statements that lack proof and shouldn't be made. First this claim that redietz has solicited Rob. Without proof that he can provide Rob should drop that claim.
Also, let it be clear that Rob has never proven his million dollars of winnings but I'm going to say it again: I see no reason why a high limit video poker player couldn't win a million dollars over ten years.
I can't comment about the sports picking because I don't know a damn thing about sports betting. By the way with my random computer picks at Red Rock I'm now tied in 41st place, but more importantly I've won entries into six different drawings including the drawing for having picked only losing teams in one week. How about that for an accomplishment!
Rob uses a margtingale variant. That's a stone cold fact that does not require your concurrence.
What an idiot you are mickey. Even aging uses a "martingale variant". That lack of education thing keeps biting you right in the ass, doesn't it.
Alan, it is a "stone cold fact" that redietz has solicited me. I don't have proof because I don't retain text messages or record phone calls. However, exposing him for doing this is fair play, esp. for a scoundrel such as him.
True, I have not proven that I've won a million bucks with my strategy, but neither has anyone else, especially the AP's, who claim to do nothing but win. But....I am the only one I know of who publicly challenged the AP's that I could prove with detailed tax and financial records that I had won $640k to date at the time and I put up the verifiable--and verified $640k--in cash, but the disbelievers suddenly went silent and disappeared.
Now it's too bad they walked because I could have absolutely proven it. The end result is that they can keep on pretending and saying I didn't win. However, has anyone ever witnessed any gambler go as far as I have, AND IN PUBLICATION FORM WITH A REAL 6-FIGURE ESCROW, to prove their claims? That alone should allow my words to have some amount of merit to any fair-minded individual, and it all is retained in public records for anyone to go back and check. My guess is a few of the creepy armchair ap's here and on WoV have already done so. Why else do you think they hate and envy me?
Reply With Quote
