Originally Posted by
tableplay
Originally Posted by
accountinquestion
You've gone far beyond simple discussing. Pretty sure others have told you and Monet to get a room etc. If there was nothing to what I'm saying then surely they would not have said that.
Monet is an interesting guy. I can see why a guy like you might idolize him.
Monet is a nice guy and he likes to watch movies and discuss them just as I do. Mcap didn't like us posting film discussions in the wrong thread so he told us to get a room and then of course lemmings like you and Kuntstone fed off the joke since you have no original material of your own. As usual though, with no facts in hand you just make a statement full of hot air with no knowledge of the history of that. Just like you assumed Monet was not a top notch Vegas AP even though he is until others chimed in that you perceive are part of the AP establishment. You also observed others getting after Redietz and Kewlj so you jumped on the bandwagon. Same deal with Hunter Biden's laptop you fucking lemming. Basically motherfucker you are a 100% lemming.
Yes, I picked on Redietz and Kewlj because of some bandwagon effect. Clearly. Why else would anyone make fun of them? You're a real smart one.
I don't even know half of what you're talking about. Your making up of narratives is on par with me saying you were a victim of wedgies. BTW, if the wedgy abuse wasn't "original material" on my part, then what was IT!??! FACTS?! Did I nail it ?!? Hell yea I did !!
Funny how you can't even respond to me any longer without really foul words. I guess that is part of your "original material" and doesn't come from the simple fact that I've owned you mentally. Come up with another page telling this forum how you were a jock and blah blah. lolz
Anyway bro you're probably an ok guy. I don't want to pick on you anymore. If you can't realize you make up shit like I do then there is a mental defect/bias that I am never going to help you overcome.
BTW the Hunter Biden laptop would have been far more believable if Guiliani hadn't taken specific steps to hide the contents from open examination. He brought the doubt about. It has nothing to do with group-think. ... If he had nothing to hide then why did he hide it? You on the other hand just assumed it was true because you wanted to believe so. I'm not sure who was the lemming in that case. You also believe endless bullshit youtube videos. Lemmings? no, just endless projection. Projecting, projecting, projecting ...
Proceed with jerking off Monet.