[QUOTE=Seedvalue;145202] So I have seen and heard as much, but I haven't done any serious vulturing since the Vision series, even then, I only vultured in between plays and before it became too saturated.
Sure, I have spent a few hours here and there messing around, but I don't know half the vultureable machines out there nowadays. My favorite "modern-day" was the TT and Cleo pinball.
I much preferred the linked stuff that you jump in and out of. Is there any of that around nowadays?
I got a little excited when I thought I found something that seemed like it was linked but it turned out not to be what I thought it was.
All of my jackpot pictures and sportsbook tickets were 100% Fake.
However, I did see some odd orbs in the sky going Mach 5 or faster.
I also seen other things that could of been drones going very slow and stopping as if they were analyzing the area around me.
My uncle was there... he seen that shit too and we were stone cold sober.
And many people have seen this shit around Nellis Air Force Base for decades.
ET?
I dunno... most likely some sort of secret government project.
I still think the white and orange orbs could of been some sort of spiritual being.
Please read my first post (#1317. pg. 66) before you read this one for the complete story.
Back to the $1.5 million hit...
So yes, what we are looking at is a computer screen. So Rob found a video of this hit and he wanted to pass it off as his own. For various reasons he didn’t simply take a screen shot off his phone. He had whom ever that is we see in the yellow in the picture, do his dirty work.
Looking at everything below together is what can’t be ignored as proof. Each item standing alone may not be all that significant, but looking at the totality of the evidence combined disproves Singers claim.
There are 2 images that were posted. The first picture is of the hand results, showing 10 hands of quad 3’s w/kicker and 3x multiplier on all 10 hands. The second is a “Jackpot Handpay” notice. The blue line with the - (dash) that we see at the top of both images is most likely the software that he is using to view the video, such as a media player.
On each picture you will also notice a “cursor” that is used on a laptop to move items and click to give the computer commands. I posted both pictures with the cursor’s circled. I find each cursor’s location interesting. The following about the cursor’s is not fact, it is my observation.
PICTURE #1- The cursor is near the top of the open media viewer right on the blue line, as well as fairly centered. I believe he just finished “dragging” the image to the very top of the computer screen.
PICTURE #2- This cursor’s location is more of a guess, it is near the bottom of the computer screen a couple inches from the bottom. Running horizontally across the screen right about where this cursor is would be the bar that shows the video length where you can jump further along in the video or go backwards, or stop the video. Once again, this cursor may also just be placed here randomly.
Remember Rob claimed this picture was taken by HIS SON, IN A CASINO. I will show that these pictures were taken in a HOUSE, specifically by that person wearing yellow.
The next couple pictures are only significant to show that the picture taken of the computer screen was taken in a HOUSE as well as the pictures were taken a fair amount of time apart.
PICTURE #3 - All the way on the far left there is a door that goes off to a room or office. I changed the tint on the picture (doesn’t change the picture itself) so it shows up better. Look just to the left of the yellow lines I drew or look at the original pictures which I posted at the very bottom of this thread. You can see the light comming out of the door. You can see the hinges on the door as well as the current position of the door. The position changes in the next picture.
PICTURE #4 - Unlike picture #3, the door is now completely open and there is a better view inside that room, even tho it is hard to tell exactly what is in the room. So there was time between pictures, not sure if this is significant.
These last few photos are fairly significant...
These next 2 pictures will show the person in yellow is sitting down in an “office style” chair.
PICTURE #5- This is going to be hard to see. In this picture if you look at the lower half of his body you can see it slouching as people do when they sit. Also, his elbow appear to be on the desk and his hands are both holding the camera taking the pictures.
PICTURE #6 - In this picture I outline the arm of the chair. You may want to see it’s location on the picture, then go to the bottom of this post here and zoom in on that area and you should see it a little better. This is clearly not the style of chair they have in casinos at slot machines.
PICTURE #7 - This picture proves that the man in yellow took this picture in front of the computer screen and not at a casino. As Rob claimed, his son may have opened the pictures on his computer and sent them from there. Rob claims the man in yellow WAS AT THE CASINO. Now, I will tell you why that reflection was not at a casino... On the bottom of the picture, you can see the plastic black frame of the computer. If the image of the man in yellow was taken at the casino and then displayed on the computer screen, the YELLOW REFLECTION WOULD NOT BE DISPLAYED ON THE COMPUTERS PLASTIC TRIM! Only on the screen itself.
You may have noticed in both pictures part of the images appear to be cut off. This happened because when the original person was filming off of the screen of the machine they purchased, they didn’t have a shot where The screen of the game was in full view. So Rob or his son had to cut of the top part of both images.
Here’s the thing, I can not guarantee this is all correct, I am sure most people could go through and find minor details that may be wrong. But as a whole, it is fairly accurate and any minor details that may be wrong doesn’t change the overall conclusion.
The original video is out there somewhere, I just prefer not to spend hours searching for it. I would be curious to find it.
PICTURE 1
PICTURE 2
PICTURE 3
PICTURE 4
PICTURE 5
PICTURE 6
PICTURE 7
ORIGINAL PICTURE 1
ORIGINAL PICTURE 2
Last edited by PositiveVariance; 06-08-2022 at 05:25 PM.
Positive Variance, the Brokeback Boys alway say I'm taking Rob's side when I point their inconsistencies out. They only want things pointed out that backs their narrative and to hell with being fair and balanced.
As for your evidence that the pic wasn't taken in a casino--I think you should know this about where Rob said he played the game. I've copied and pasted his words verbatim.
In post number 48 on page 3 of this thread Rob wrote:
I in turn asked them to give me privacy when I played if that were possible. They said I couldn't go anywhere that wasn't "public access" but they would try and come up with something....When we returned to the casino (which I am not going to name) I found that they had moved one machine to a different room (small with a desk and other stuff) for me but they weren't allowed to close the door. (While I played no one came in anyway)."
Does this fit in with your evidence?
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I've copied and pasted my exact words from posts 1345 and 1346. Here it is:
"I could have posted that the easy way to get a pic of a large jackpot was to buy a multi-game video poker."
"I had to smile when I read this. I wasn't going to expose the way to get a pic and the Brokeback Boys couldn't figure it out."
Could you point out to everyone on VCT where I said Rob took the pic from a machine? Take your time, idiot. Read every word as if your life depended on it. Then tell everyone where I said Rob took the picture from a machine. You can't do it because it's not there.
I never said Rob bought a machine, had a machine, borrowed a machine or took the pic from a machine. Nothing.
All I said was that buying a used video poker was a way to get a pic. That's something you idiots couldn't figure out.
So, maxie, you are one of either two things:
1. You are a stupid idiot with no reading comprehension
2. You are a lying piece of shit
So which one are you, number 1 or number 2?
Anyone that says you are both 1 and 2 would be correct.
And you keep writing about nine inchers. Whats up with that? How long have you and Keystone been packing each other up hershey alley.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 06-08-2022 at 06:42 PM.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Thanks for posting this, PV. It takes patience and discipline and an eye to debunking to lay it all out, Joe Friday style. Many thanks. That was a great job.
Mickeycrimm, what about your statement that you had no reason to doubt Singer, when according to what you are now saying, you had ever reason to doubt him because you knew he was lying.
Was that honest on your part?
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Aging gracefully is hard. I know. Cops stopped me the other night as I was about to start jogging in the ETSU parking lot. They asked me what I was doing there at 11 PM. I said, well, I'm slow and it's embarrassing how slow I am, and it's not hot, so it's comfortable for me as I plod along with nobody watching me.
We're looking at Rob and mickey vacillating between grasping-at-straws arguments and having a guffaw at everyone. I call it performance art because it's really an excuse for both of them to be nasty to people. That's all it really is. You know the cliche of the cranky old guy at his porch stoop cursing at every kid on a bike who rides by. Aging is hard. Dying is hard. Descending into childishness comes naturally.
I can't do better in terms of an analogy than the Cracked YouTube "We ReMade The Batman for $20." Except Rob and mickey are doing a remake of Bob Dancer's life for $20.
No but this shows you support Rob's machine theory by even asking the question. Why ask a question to support a fact that you claim to believe not true? You are as much a fraud as Rob.
If not more so. Because you should know better. But then again you know all all about posing as many of the things you try to project on me are pieces of your history. Right down to the Slots of Fun hotdogs and your stepandfetchit days with the old Laughlin river rat crew......RIP
Duplicate
To be honest, I didn't see what Rob wrote in post #48.
I saw the pictures on page 3 then I picked up around page 40 or so when I saw the thread growing at a fast rate. Figured it had good drama. So to be fair I missed that.
HOWEVER, if I did see what he wrote in post #48, I would have thought his claim of playing in the casino office on a regular computer was so outrageous I probably wouldn't have posted in this thread.
No one really believed Rob to begin with but I thought showing it was initially a video that Rob pulled the picture from would eliminate any doubt. But his claim of playing in the office really takes it to an entirely different level of unbelievability.
"Curses, the cursor"
Keep your friends close, keep your drinks closer...
I think mickey may have missed the significance of this being played on a computer.
William Bennett, the old family values guy who lost millions on video poker, talked casinos into wheeling machines into his suite so he wasn't exposed to the public. But he did his gambling on actual machines, not on a laptop.
Rob set this up with some ridiculous foreshadowing a few weeks back. I don't know why somebody would bother doing something this stupid. A person fails at gambling, no big deal, 99% do, but then decides he'll spoof his own columns, claims and literally tens of thousands of posts. The thing is, it's not good-natured spoofing. He inserts all kinds of vile nastiness and lies while defending his fictional positions. Maybe it's a medication problem. Nothing screams success like a safe full of fake money and ammunition.
There are currently 1816 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1816 guests)