Page 4 of 9 FirstFirst 12345678 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 177

Thread: The Reinstate Argentino Thread

  1. #61
    I don't email ads. That is correct. I haven't advertised in a decade. That is also correct.

    See, Mr.Mendelson, when you really do not know anything about someone or what they do, it might be best to not assume. The old line and all that.

    Argentino is lying. It is really strange that your default isn't to wonder if the guy is paranoid or off his rocker for claiming to have been getting texts from me. Your default is to be stunned I haven't used email ads or website advertising. LOL. What is wrong with you? Obviously if Argentino had email ads or advertising, he would have posted it already. Why don't you call the number he says is texting him? That should solve this quickly enough.

  2. #62
    [QUOTE=Alan Mendelson;62594]MiIn the past Rob has stated an infinite number of times, and he just did so recently at Gambling Forums, that he uses 400 credits at each bet level. That would total to $57,200. And that he uses three of these bankrolls so the money totals to $171,600. These are his numbers that he has used over and over and over again in the forums. Now he is trying to tell us something different. I'm not going for it.

    Rob has said an infinite number of times in the past that he will take a $57,200 bankroll to the casino and use his negative progressive tactic (martingale) to either book at least a $2500 win or play until he loses the $57,200. And he has said an infinite number of times in the past that he has an 85% success rate with it. These are the numbers I'm going with and I'm not going to allow him to muddy everything up by changing them.

    And he has said an infinite number of times in the past that he put his play down once a week for ten years. That's about 500 casino visits to put his play down. He's not going to be allowed to now change that either.

    These are the numbers I'm going to work with. Sure, Singerwelsher is going to jump in and try to muddy it up but anyone who has read his thousands of posts through several gambling forums knows these are the numbers he has used over and over again.

    444
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-06-2018 at 03:54 PM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #63
    Redietz I complemented you. What I wrote was this:

    "Really redietz, you don't email, you don't text, you don't advertise? And of course you don't promote yourself on websites, right?

    You are amazing."

    My compliments stand. You are amazing. And for the record I've never seen any text, email, ad, or promotion by you. Truly you are a giant in your field not having to promote yourself. I never knew.

  4. #64
    Mickeycrimm, Rob Singer is now posting. Please address all your questions about his methods to him.

    This also goes for Boz, V. Redietz, jbjb, RS, and everyone else.

    Thank you Dan for allowing Rob to post.

  5. #65
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Mickeycrimm, Rob Singer is now posting. Please address all your questions about his methods to him.

    This also goes for Boz, V. Redietz, jbjb, RS, and everyone else.

    Thank you Dan for allowing Rob to post.
    If you don't want the posts directed at you then quit speaking for him.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  6. #66
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Thank you Dan for allowing Rob to post.
    Yes, this should be fun as I'm going to rip his video poker tactics (not a system) a new asshole.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  7. #67
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Redietz I complemented you. What I wrote was this:

    "Really redietz, you don't email, you don't text, you don't advertise? And of course you don't promote yourself on websites, right?

    You are amazing."

    My compliments stand. You are amazing. And for the record I've never seen any text, email, ad, or promotion by you. Truly you are a giant in your field not having to promote yourself. I never knew.
    I've never gotten any emails, texts, PM's or anything from redietz promoting his sports picks. If someone says they have will they prove it with screenshots?
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #68
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Redietz I complemented you. What I wrote was this:

    "Really redietz, you don't email, you don't text, you don't advertise? And of course you don't promote yourself on websites, right?

    You are amazing."

    My compliments stand. You are amazing. And for the record I've never seen any text, email, ad, or promotion by you. Truly you are a giant in your field not having to promote yourself. I never knew.
    I've never gotten any emails, texts, PM's or anything from redietz promoting his sports picks. If someone says they have will they prove it with screenshots?
    Mr. Mendelson, as per usual vis-à-vis gambling, is out of his depth. Now let me correct his statement because he uses tenses incorrectly when he says, "You don't" as opposed to what I said. The problem with "you don't," which Mr. Mendelson knows (being an intrepid reporter), is that it would or could refer to someone's entire life as the present tense. That is not precisely what I said, so I will correct him.

    I was featured in ads and on website promotions, but that was roughly 10 years ago. I have not done anything with website ads since that time. I did bulk first class mailings back in the day, but have not done those for 20 years or more. I will send an actual letter to a handful of former clients each season to remind them I'm still alive. That's about it -- and when I say a handful, I mean less than half a dozen.

    I have never used bulk email as a way to advertise. I do not email anyone unless they have contacted me first. I have never solicited via the phone, either by calling or texting.

    Now all of this may and probably will change next August since I entered into an agreement with certain new partners who will take me into the capitalistic dark side. But as of now, there is no chance, zero, that Argentino received a text or email ad from me. I have never texted solicitations. I have never emailed solicitations. In fact, the only place my email address is out there in public is when it's listed as a contact next to my name in The Wise Guys Contest. Argentino has never first emailed me, which is the only way he would have received an email back.

    Mr. Mendelson's journalistic response, rather than admit his own ignorance of facts and Argentino's lying, is to surmise that I must be fibbing about the lack of recent advertising. Then he uses an incorrect tense to try to trap me into agreeing with something not quite what I said. Then he says not a word about Argentino's ridiculous lying in his first post here. Now there must be some reason for these two yahoos to do this stuff. Not sure what it is, but it won't mess with my Master's watching today.

    Mickey, if you get a chance, ask me why it's really, really strange that Argentino says I solicit business from him "EVERY SINGLE DAY?"

  9. #69
    See you folks, no need to post here anymore. Take care RE, KJ and Mick!

  10. #70
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    See you folks, no need to post here anymore. Take care RE, KJ and Mick!
    Boz, if you're bailing (and who wouldn't?), please PM some contact info at some point. I should be on a couple of sites come August, and I should be writing a bunch of features. I may occasionally need a memory boost from you, because you do know your stuff. So that would be greatly appreciated.

  11. #71
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    quahog, you lied. Never have I used my card when training or advising at a machine, and in fact, at least half of the time we do so with my money, and I've trained hundreds. Obviously, anything said on vp.com about me is going to be false. You just went with it because you wanted to--and still do. It's exactly the way everyone who can't stand my success reacts.
    People on vp.com forums made those claims. That is a fact not a lie. If you want to claim they are lying go ahead.
    Take off that stupid mask you big baby.

  12. #72
    Originally Posted by quahaug View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    quahog, you lied. Never have I used my card when training or advising at a machine, and in fact, at least half of the time we do so with my money, and I've trained hundreds. Obviously, anything said on vp.com about me is going to be false. You just went with it because you wanted to--and still do. It's exactly the way everyone who can't stand my success reacts.
    People on vp.com forums made those claims. That is a fact not a lie. If you want to claim they are lying go ahead.
    OK so that person lied and you're wanting to believe him I guess. It doesn't matter because I've never done it and would never do something like that. There's plenty of lies that are made up about me by anonymous people on forums.

    Using my card doesn't even make any sense. The majority of people come to me because they didn't want to pay Bob Dancer $250/hr. to learn basic expert strategy. They also want something more than he offers. I provide that, and we have made a number of decent friendships around the country because of it. Win-win..

  13. #73
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    See you folks, no need to post here anymore. Take care RE, KJ and Mick!
    Boz, if you're bailing (and who wouldn't?), please PM some contact info at some point. I should be on a couple of sites come August, and I should be writing a bunch of features. I may occasionally need a memory boost from you, because you do know your stuff. So that would be greatly appreciated.
    AKA, "You're a potential customer, and this is one of the ways I reel fish in"

  14. #74
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    See you folks, no need to post here anymore. Take care RE, KJ and Mick!
    Boz, if you're bailing (and who wouldn't?), please PM some contact info at some point. I should be on a couple of sites come August, and I should be writing a bunch of features. I may occasionally need a memory boost from you, because you do know your stuff. So that would be greatly appreciated.
    AKA, "You're a potential customer, and this is one of the ways I reel fish in"
    LOL -- almost as good as the $30 to $35 Super Bowl bet error. You know, I considered saying something sarcastic along just the lines of your quote, but I figured you might beat me to it, so I opened the door for you. God, Argentino, do you not know me well enough to understand I'm aware of what I write (at least the majority of the time)? Wake up, man. If I were doing that, I would have PM'ed him. If I were a scamdicapper, I wouldn't be a retard, for God's sake.

    You are such a maroon. Why do you think I didn't PM Boz in the first place?

    Boz actually does know his stuff. I don't know how, but he has a better recollection of the 70's, 80's, and 90's scamdicappers and events in sports betting than I do. I never thought I'd run into somebody who knows this stuff better, unless Boz is Jimmy Vaccaro in disguise.

  15. #75
    I see the problem with posting anything contrary to what the uneducated and under-educated do and think they've read, continues to apply to mickey.

    Once again, the strategy for SPS is 300 credits of BP & 100 credits of SDBP (or a game from the posted list) at each denomination of $1/$2/$5/10/$25/$100. That's $57,200. That's what the required bankroll is for one session. The required bankroll overall is 3X that amount--or $171,600.

    I've posted this time and again, only for some reason mickey doesn't want it to be this way.

    Have another gulp!

    It's difficult to follow everything in your rambling posts. You probably are confusing SPS with ARTT and RTT somehow. Either way, you didn't get much right.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 04-06-2018 at 08:58 AM.

  16. #76
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    Boz, if you're bailing (and who wouldn't?), please PM some contact info at some point. I should be on a couple of sites come August, and I should be writing a bunch of features. I may occasionally need a memory boost from you, because you do know your stuff. So that would be greatly appreciated.
    AKA, "You're a potential customer, and this is one of the ways I reel fish in"
    LOL -- almost as good as the $30 to $35 Super Bowl bet error. You know, I considered saying something sarcastic along just the lines of your quote, but I figured you might beat me to it, so I opened the door for you. God, Argentino, do you not know me well enough to understand I'm aware of what I write (at least the majority of the time)? Wake up, man. If I were doing that, I would have PM'ed him. If I were a scamdicapper, I wouldn't be a retard, for God's sake.

    You are such a maroon. Why do you think I didn't PM Boz in the first place?

    Boz actually does know his stuff. I don't know how, but he has a better recollection of the 70's, 80's, and 90's scamdicappers and events in sports betting than I do. I never thought I'd run into somebody who knows this stuff better, unless Boz is Jimmy Vaccaro in disguise.
    If you pal up maybe you can stay at his house too.

  17. #77
    Better to be gay than glum, you sexy man.

    Regnis, you catching this? Check out the time stamp. My timing of this stuff is beyond impeccable.

  18. #78
    Redietz, the $30 to $35 Super Bowl error was suppose to be 30k to 35k, correct? I thought you just said you don't wager in those amounts.

    Please point to any posts Boz made here with useful information, not a wise crack.

    Your good bye to Boz was obvious an attempt for Dans attention. Look Dan, your losing Boz, and all his valuable inside information from decades of gambling experiences he endlessly shares with your readers.

  19. #79
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    Redietz I complemented you. What I wrote was this:

    "Really redietz, you don't email, you don't text, you don't advertise? And of course you don't promote yourself on websites, right?

    You are amazing."

    My compliments stand. You are amazing. And for the record I've never seen any text, email, ad, or promotion by you. Truly you are a giant in your field not having to promote yourself. I never knew.
    I've never gotten any emails, texts, PM's or anything from redietz promoting his sports picks. If someone says they have will they prove it with screenshots?
    From what he says the informed mind understands that he's not interested in going to any wells with no water in them. Could you imagine the embarrassment if he were to bring you with him to the retired VP of Boeing's home?? That fellow would be talking about incredible aerospace engineering feats, while you babble on about guzzling a 30-pack of Bud Light, hoboing, fat boy Tuna, and vulturing
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 04-06-2018 at 09:16 AM.

  20. #80
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Redietz, the $30 to $35 Super Bowl error was suppose to be 30k to 35k, correct? I thought you just said you don't wager in those amounts.

    Please point to any posts Boz made here with useful information, not a wise crack.

    Your good bye to Boz was obvious an attempt for Dans attention. Look Dan, your losing Boz, and all his valuable inside information from decades of gambling experiences he endlessly shares with your readers.
    Now THAT is funny!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The WoV Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 10013
    Last Post: Yesterday, 11:35 PM
  2. The Genealogy Thread
    By mickeycrimm in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 115
    Last Post: 04-27-2018, 06:29 AM
  3. Closed Thread
    By coach belly in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 01-30-2017, 08:29 PM
  4. Sportsbetting ONLY thread
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 02-05-2016, 04:48 PM
  5. A thread for losses.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-26-2014, 02:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •