Are you using the word impossible? Said the guy who claims to have seen 18 yo's in a row. WOW, HOW RICH IS THAT?
I don't see how it is impossible or even close it is if you start at .25c and keep bumping up levels. You could eventually hit a $2500 win goal once you are at the higher denomination. So no, it's not even close to being impossible. I would say its very likely. And since you claim to know very little about his system I have no clue why or how you would think hitting a $2500 win goal is hard to obtain. For all you know he plays .25c for 10 hands and if he loses all 10 hands he bumps up to the $25 denomination.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Why don't you ask Rob? It's his system and I don't play it. Frankly I shouldn't have responded except that I know Rob starts at $1 or $2.
Are you afraid to ask Rob directly? You can. He's here.
Why are you asking me when I don't play anything like how Rob plays? Oh, I know why! You still want me to say Rob's system can't work. Sorry I'm not going to pass judgment on a system I don't know enough about and don't even use.
And kewlj that answer applies to you too... vehemently.
No, you need to wise up. He plays the DDB type games where quad aces pay 160 for 1 or higher.
BTW, Rob's denom martingale is 1/2/5/10/25/100. I wouldn't have a problem if Rob said he wins most sessions playing this progression. It's his reported success rate I have a problem with. Rob never seems to run into a quad draught. The failure rate is higher than he reports.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 07-17-2018 at 06:24 AM.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
My play strategy, again, begins at dollars and ends up at $100.
400 credits = 80 hands....if you lose every one of them. This is why it's easy to tell mickey is a school dropout: he can't read.
One thing you guys should EASILY get is that playing progressive denomination/game volatility video poker for a minimum $2500 win goal with a session bankroll of $57,200, is SLIGHTLY more difficult than figuring out how to wipe your ass with your opposite hand.
And mickey----I mean with using toilet paper.
You've been around long enough mickey. Rob doesn't answer questions. He just posts insults and rehashes the same fabrications over and over and over and over and over and over again until the questions and comments he cannot address get buried.
With all the posting he's done lately one has to wonder if his wife really did kick him out of the trailer again. Was it was due to his infidelity or his perversion to online kiddie porn in between his forum postings?(6210 posts and counting on this site alone!)
Given what you just posted.
What's your average coin in amount (Let's say over 20 sessions)
What percentage and or dollar amount are you making? How long is your average session?
Am I understanding correctly.
You have a win goal of $2500 during a session. Using your system you claim to hit that each time before you ever run out of the 57k?
I don't mind answering decent questions like this. And naturally, an obsessed sicko like eddie won't like that we've stopped back here at Tahoe for a week on our way back to S. Dakota after going to a SF wedding, so I have the time to.
I'd say about 2000 hands on avg., which is 10,000 coins in. My speed was 1400 accurate hph as an AP, but since the new strategy was developed I don't rush.
An avg. session is about four hours. One ended on the second hand, another took more than 12 hours. Given that my avg. win/session played (including losing sessions) has been over $3000, my % of bankroll win is nearly 6% overall. In just the winning sessions, it's quite a bit higher. However, this includes sessions where I lose money as well as "failed" sessions where I have to quit after winning anywhere from $1 to $2499. Having to quit means I've played thru all of my credits. There is never a total loss of bankroll, because of the numerous amounts of soft profit 40+ credits cashouts along the way.
Ah, yes, the soft profits. This is where Rob plays a game with himself. He will occasionally cash out a ticket, stick it in his pocket, then insert more money into the machine. He says he usually does this after a full house. Does it change his results? No. He is still up or down the exact same amount. There is zero effect on outcome. But what it does serve to do is muddy up the waters for anyone trying to draw a bead on what he is doing.
He starts with a 57K bankroll. And he had three 57K bankrolls. He says he has an 85% success rate at getting the $2500 or higher win with just one 57K bankroll. From these two stats one would assume he has a failure rate of 15% of losing the 57K. Failure rates are important. You can calculate things from it. Like you would have a 1 in 44 chance of losing two 57K bankrolls in a row. And a 1 in 267 chance of losing all three 57K bankrolls in a row.
A trip a week to the casino is 50 times a year. Ten years and its 500 visits. That would be like a dozen times Rob would have lost two bankrolls in a row, down to his last bankroll and sweating bullets. And he dodged the bullet of losing three bankrolls in a row, which would wipe him out, even though it should happen about twice in 500 sessions.
Thats what the overview is. But Rob muddies all that up with the soft profit bullshit about not really losing all of the 57K bankroll. So much so that any math professor would be driven nuts by his bullshit.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 07-18-2018 at 03:53 AM.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
The "soft profits" concept isn't a bad idea for "regular gamblers" who keep playing till nothing is left.
If you've ever "run free play through once" you've also used the concept of "cashing out soft profits."
Sure, it's not going to change the paytable and it's not going to increase your chances for a royal, but it does make you stop and think about what you just got back from XXX of coin in.
What's so horrible about stopping and thinking for a moment?
mickey you just haven't learned to listen to the facts. It's difficult dealing with an uneducated soul such as yourself. You keep making up things pretending that's how you want them to look, because you just can't get yourself to see things clearly.
There is no "losing the $57k session bankroll" as I've repeated many times. My largest session loss has been around $33k; 2nd largest, $11k. And those soft profits you can't understand? They don't come because of "full houses" or whatever stupid assertion you wrote. They come whenever I get 40+ credits ahead on a particular denomination, OR when I get a quad that recovers my losses on BP and the advanced game along with making a 40+ credit profit....and is the gateway to immediately going back down to a lower denomination. I wouldn't expect you to even get close to figuring this out and why it's effective, but maybe axel might.
This is the craziest mumbo jumbo I've read so far! It is a make believe world created by make believe math! My son made thousands of dollars as a computer analyst selling virtual property to people who were unable to program them in their make believe cities, etc. I couldn't believe anyone would purchase something that didn't exist so they could operate in a make believe world- but now I see it's possible. Use make believe math to create make believe sessions. It's easy to put it on paper- but it comes out different in the real world.
No...this rebuttal is the craziest mumbo jumbo, posted so far. "Make believe math?" There is only one person (and his followers) that is using fake or alternative math. You are backing a guy ho keeps telling you that 2+2=5. And that is all this whole bag of nonsense comes down to.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)