Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
The videos were enlightening. It's always best to get all points of view. Those that don't study both sides of an issue are just not informed on that issue.
And some people get so religiously fanatical on an issue that they become violent. Take accountinquestion, for example. This guy isn't going to listen to anything that goes against his religiously fanatical beliefs on climate change. He's a climate alarmist that means to tell you, by god, that the world is coming to an end so YOU better get your shit together, spend trillions of dollars by next week to fix the problem, or else.
It's the "or else" you have to watch out for. AIQ is only a couple of steps away from turning into the Unabomber. You remember the Unabomber. His schtick was technology was ruining the world. So when no one would listen he started crying out "WHY WON'T YOU LISTEN TO ME!!" He resorted to mailing bombs and letters decrying the advancement of technology to get people to listen to him.
AIQ is in the "WHY WON'T YOU LISTEN TO ME!!" stage. On climate change he is the equivalent of a religious fanatic. The only people he is going to listen to are those that are as fanatical as him on the issue.
It's reached the point where AIQ is probably quietly studying how to assemble IED's.
Don't reveal your mailing address on VCT.
It is funny how you avoid the argument in question and just go for the nonsensical insults. I'm just stating what I believe will happen. You're the one who keep on making up my views in a pathetic attempt at avoiding the argument on it's own merits. There is nothing religous about my beliefs. I've responded to the actual questions etc, unlike you. These are the same views I've had for near 30 years with some refinement. It is the same thing people far smarter and successful than you have been telling us for decades.
I won't listen to guys who start up making their point by bringing up Al Gore to make some connection with the audience who is there looking for reinforcement. Just like I won't listen to scientific papers who do similar things. (But TBH they wouldn't go anywhere in actual scientific community where finding the truth > being right.)
You just constantly put words in my mouth. I've said it is largely too late and addressed all your previous question directly but then it goes silent until you start it up with the insults. Whatever, tell yourself you're winning the argument. Thats how it usually is....
Glad you no longer have to eat a can of beans + ALPO for the protein with your friends around the campfire. Those were the days, no?
I'll leave it at the following, Mick ol' boy.
Climate change religion > Religion of Rob Singer.
PS -
It's always best to get all points of view. Those that don't study both sides of an issue are just not informed on that issue.
That simply is not true. You might like to read why people think the earth is flat because you feel a liberal education is important but many of us have no need to see both sides of that issue. Much like climate change. Bro, it is beyond decided. Like I said, don't shoot the messenger.
BTW I actually watched the first 2 videos Monet posted and yea they pretty much totally agree with me. lhaha... Anyway, avoid anything of substance and get back to the insults. I can do that too.... pointess, but I can do it too.