Originally Posted by MDawg View Post
I could write point for counterpoint, but...why? The more you write the more stupid and ignorant you sound. And jealous.

You're just a self-educated bore who goes on and on about things he knows little about. The less you know about something, the more you write about it!

Which let's just say - for a moment - that it is okay to be uneducated, and education has little to do with being a successful gambler, fine - but at least stick to what you know don't presume to pass judgment on the stock market, the internet, SEO, financial transaction laws, casino or other credit, or anything that requires a little more than just whatever it is you have picked up off the streets.

You also have never played any big sums at a casino, you're a self-admitted small time player who hides his presence on the internet in offshore casinos, you never walked into a casino with a big credit line in your life, so stop commenting on what or what might not have happened in the world of high rollers - you've never been one.

I am not trying to put you down, you're doing that quite successfully half the time you open your mouth. Just stick to what you know, you just appear silly when you try to appear like an expert on everything, or some kind of seer who knows what is real and what is not.
Let's take this one step at a time so you can't steer the conversation into another Direction.

We've already went over all this before(perhaps somebody can help me find my response to this claim of his). Now you're completely lying and spinning s***. Please show me where I admitted I was a small-time gambler? Please show me this before you move on.

I believe I said, I don't care if I'm playing pennies a spin or thousands a round, I have done it all, I only care about extracting the most money from the casino with the least amount of risk possible. That's just smart gambling.

I'm 100% certain I put down much bigger bets and risked much more than you ever have. And no doubt, I've won more at one time than you ever have as well. But no I'm not some super high roller who dunks off his money and the high-limit room with no advantage. That's just f****** retarded in most people's opinion.

I tell you what, I'll be happy to dig out a box full of old W-2g's, pictures, Witnesses and testimony and whatever other legitimate proof you have going back as far as you'd like and present it to Michael Shackelford to verify and make an assessment. And then you show him all your legitimate proof throughout the years. Whomever he believes won more and put more in action, the other person will have to f*** off ALL the forums for 3 months. Oh, I would also be willing to presented to dandruff as well.