Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
You must have missed the memo: speculation and innuendo, disagreement and arguing, name-calling and bad-mouthing, lies and disinformation, and disingenuous denials....these things make up the baseline of a gambling forum. And nobody proves anything on forums even if they could. You should know that. Comments are all opinion-based and derived from common sense interpretations based on reading and conversational experiences...aka, life experience. What makes easy sense to one person may seem very unlikely to another. It's what makes us who we are. Why do you think the very reasonable and caring platform President Trump lays out almost unanimously hits dense layers when it gets to the democrats?
Finally, I'd never snoop into Jean's life to find out what's really going on. I'm happy and sure about my assessment and how I arrived at it, and I wish them nothing but a comfortable remainder of their days.
MY final days?? Yikes!
I didn't get this memo. I appreciate you being honest though. I suspected that this was your approach to forum posting. Whenever you go full victim stance, and demand to know why someone doesn't believe you, they can just quote the above. You do understand that you are talking about you here, right?
I don't come to a forum for speculation, innuendo, name-calling, lies, disinformation, or disingenuous denials. I may wade through them, but they detract value. If someone has to resort to these to make a point, they should do a little reflection on whether they have a valid point to begin with.
I gather you have tried this approach at other forums and have worn out your welcome. I'm not sure why any forum would allow someone to spread lies and disinformation. I'm guessing that most who have crossed you on these forums have first hand accounts of how you rely on speculation, innuendo, name calling, lies, disinformation, and disingenuous denials to make your attacks. After a couple of days on this board, I had already learned that I couldn't believe anything you said about anyone.
So this is all a prelude to a simple point. I take offence at your insistence on smearing Jean Scott. It doesn't hurt me, and it I doubt that it hurts her. It's still wrong. Your spin is interesting. The simplest explanation as to why Jean isn't polarizing is that she is a nice person who tells the truth, not that she is protecting her brand. I recall some comment you made about her being too busy gambling to talk to you. First, there is nothing wrong with that. I was generally too busy at my job to stop and chat. Second, of the people who have recounted running into Jean, you are the first I've heard say that she was too busy gambling to talk.
You may think of me as some enemy, but I'm just sharing some truth on a gambling forum. If you are uncomfortable with any of it, I hope you make the changes you need to to find happiness. I assume that everyone on this board has confronted the need for self-change.
After seeing some of your posting history, I wanted to make sure that you were at least exposed to a couple of truths.
1. Diminishing someone's reputation does not add to your own.
2. Diminishing someone else's happiness is not going to make you happier.