Originally Posted by
MaxPen
Originally Posted by
slingshot
Uhhhh,no. Triple is over $500,000. I love people who go by the.math.
Well, if you start with 171.6k and claim to have made a profit of 375k. What would your ending amount be...lol
Yet he wants to ask only if it's possible to double the starting bankroll. I'm trying to figure out the question that needs to be answered.
Claims that are highly questionable always seem to be surrounded in clouded descriptions and lacking in detail. I love people who are idiots.
All you're showing is not having or caring about an understanding of what's been said. I'll explain it YET AGAIN for the slow ones. (and this is especially for RS__, who like redietz, usually jumps at my posts without really knowing much about the substance at all).
The bankroll I used for playing starting in 2000 was $171,600. Simple enuf, right? My per-session bankroll was $57,200. 3 times that amount is $171,600 which as explained many times, was what I wanted to have just in case the strategy--which relied heavily upon getting high paying hands in higher denominations--experienced a devastating loss or two, which it never did other than one $33,000 loss.
Next, when I stated "double the starting bankroll" that simply means what the actual ending result was. Had I played it for 8 years instead of 4 and the profit ended up being $750,000, the wording would have said "quadruple the starting bankroll".
From what I'm seeing, people who want to be critical of what I say are very similar to the democrats who try so hard to criticize and debunk what impeachment witnesses favorable to Trump are doing. They don't really understand facts, so they turn to guessing, theory, and spin in order to claim their desired points.
The edit here is to ask WTF did RS__ multiply my total gambling bankroll by 3 for, and why did he use an addition and division of non-related numbers??
This is how the stupid people respond when they have no idea what they or anyone else is talking about.
AmI REALLY even more intelligent and capable than previously believed than this poorly organized collection of self-proclaimed "professional gamblers" here?