I was never the advocate for the turbo-genius, hey hey.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Almost afraid to ask what this dork is talking about?
Is this person really this dumb? :confused:
https://i.imgur.com/3nmNeg9m.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
So it does appear MDawg has a an AI program setup to reply to fuck with KJ every time he posts.
I find it fucking Genius! Is this the future of trolling online?
Who knows? But I give him credit for it.
Dan Druff could and should put an end to the tick-ridden hound flooding the forum as referred to but of course he won't: "free speech" and all...
Might finally be time to block the hound...I don't mind reading what HE says, but fuck AI...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punkcity
LOL
Boy, that post didn't last long at WoV.
Thanks for trying, Boz.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MDawg
Another post proving yet again, how little this person knows or understands about blackjack/card counting and advantage play.
These 3 statements do not contradict one another as this clueless fool seems to think. They are talking about team play yes, but 3 very different situations and only 2 of them involving blackjack.
The first one is talking about a small amount of slot advantage play I worked on with an AP friend for short periods. he was helping me out as much as anything, but he also needed an extra person to lock down the machines.
The second quote is talking about the traditional blackjack card counting teams, with spotters and big players (sometime Gorillas). I was asked flat out twice on blackjack forums to join such a team, and another well know guy that runs such teams (for 40+ years) said at WoV that he looked me up thinking of recruiting me, unbeknownst to me. It is these teams that recruit "throw-away players" that I said I had no interest in.
The third, refers to a two man EMFH team that both my late partner and I played (on out of town trips) and later my brother and I played for 1 year. This is very different as teammates don't play together, not even in the same casino or same time. All they do is combine results, resulting in a smoother, (less variance) ride.
I will bet anyone that knows even a little bit about card counting understands the difference in these teams and why the statements don't contradict as Know nothing Mdawg thinks.
All you are doing is embarrassing yourself further Dawg, further proving your complete lack of knowledge about a subject you claim to have won millions at.
Its actually ducking stool not dunking stool. Common mistake though.
Interestingly enough before it was called a ducking stool it was called a cucking stool.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ducking_stool
Thanks: yes, a common mistake.
While looking into it I came across this bit of trivia from "the good old days:"
"Witches were not the only ones put in the hot seat as it were, they were also used as punishing ‘scolds’ a term for nagging or gossiping wives, who were dunked by their husbands who paid for them to be put in the stool in the hope their supposed bad behaviour would improve."