My Apologies to MDawg and coach belly

Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Is this like the 10th time you've announced you're leaving? Why are you still here?

---

Why isn't this retard out winning 80% of his tie bets?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I didn't follow all of the posts, but I never thought that Kim Lee and kewlJ were the same person or were sharing posts and writing and all that. But, the more the posts get examined, well, there's a good chance I'm a real dumb-ass.

I find it hard to believe the lack of substance/details and reliance on declarative statements without evidence are a simple coincidence. My naivete has, I must admit, embarrassed and surprised me. I guess when Kim Lee began making declarative statements that were dead wrong that I finally heard echoes of kewlJ. Academics, in general, don't go making declarative statements in public without some kind of evidence; they'd get ripped to shreds doing that in a paper or at a conference. But KewlJ does that all the time. No evidence for the rants; just a reliance on "I know how things work." And we should trust him.

How the hell did you two figure out there was some kind of forum cross-pollination between the two handles? I just didn't see it at all until "Kim Lee" started the dead wrong declarations. Did you run a program comparing content/style? No, don't tell me. I feel dumb enough as it is.

I need to restrict my responses to real people or people I've met. The weird resonance between the KewlJ and Kim Lee handles is at the far end of credibility. Why would an established semi-professional gambler declare things he has completely wrong? I have no answer. And why would an academic import my comment regarding Mike Lee and try to attach it to Billy Walters and Fezzik with no reason to do so?

Now KewlJ, similarly, does this kind of thing all the time. You debunk him six ways and he comes back with a response to your weakest of the six. He ignores the other five and hopes everyone else does. Kim Lee, when confronted with the fact he had completely wrong information regarding the Wise Guys, doesn't apologize for declaring things that he got utterly wrong (like, say, describing something as having 10 participants when it sometimes had 70 or 80 and usually had 40-some). Kim Lee just goes on to the next thing while ignoring what he got wrong. You can't really do that in academia.

Bizarre stuff. If you two have a moment and want to enlighten me as to what tipped you off to the possible kewlJ/Kim Lee posting incest, please do. Very rarely do academics declare things they really have zero idea regarding, but Kim Lee does that as if he knows his stuff. And he obviously does not.

That whole idea that Mr. Walters employed me as a runner is so out there. I saw runners in the Stardust all the time. Half of them looked like burly bikers with sidearms. What a strange theory. How does one come up with that? Are you misinformed or just making shit up?

Anyway, I bow to MDawg and coach. I can't believe you two saw this coming and I did not at all. I need to stay in my lane. Forensic online analysis is obviously not my thing.

---

Discrediting Kim Lee and trying to make him out to be a kj sockpuppet is not going to work for you, dumass

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Academics, in general, don't go making declarative statements in public without some kind of evidence

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Discrediting Kim Lee and trying to make him out to be a kj sockpuppet is not going to work for you

---

If the Kim Lee, that's posting here now, is the math professor (the options guy) then he has discredited himself.

He acted wonky when he attacked Jacobsen, came off like a jealous cunt.

I recently called him out as a misbehaving gaping asshole after minimal posts.

There's no way a respectable Ivy League assistant professor would act as he has...unless he had a peculiar malfunction of some sort...(wink wink nudge nudge nudge y'know what I mean?)

Hahahahahahahaha!--Kew you complete liar and idiot. YOU GOT CAUGHT AGAIN!!

And you wonder why so many posters here keep telling you what a total phony you've always been?

Taking you degenerate addict mommy out for an "early mama's day dinner". What a bunch of LV losers :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I didn't follow all of the posts, but I never thought that Kim Lee and kewlJ were the same person or were sharing posts and writing and all that. But, the more the posts get examined, well, there's a good chance I'm a real dumb-ass.

I find it hard to believe the lack of substance/details and reliance on declarative statements without evidence are a simple coincidence. My naivete has, I must admit, embarrassed and surprised me. I guess when Kim Lee began making declarative statements that were dead wrong that I finally heard echoes of kewlJ. Academics, in general, don't go making declarative statements in public without some kind of evidence; they'd get ripped to shreds doing that in a paper or at a conference. But KewlJ does that all the time. No evidence for the rants; just a reliance on "I know how things work." And we should trust him.

How the hell did you two figure out there was some kind of forum cross-pollination between the two handles? I just didn't see it at all until "Kim Lee" started the dead wrong declarations. Did you run a program comparing content/style? No, don't tell me. I feel dumb enough as it is.

I need to restrict my responses to real people or people I've met. The weird resonance between the KewlJ and Kim Lee handles is at the far end of credibility. Why would an established semi-professional gambler declare things he has completely wrong? I have no answer. And why would an academic import my comment regarding Mike Lee and try to attach it to Billy Walters and Fezzik with no reason to do so?

Now KewlJ, similarly, does this kind of thing all the time. You debunk him six ways and he comes back with a response to your weakest of the six. He ignores the other five and hopes everyone else does. Kim Lee, when confronted with the fact he had completely wrong information regarding the Wise Guys, doesn't apologize for declaring things that he got utterly wrong (like, say, describing something as having 10 participants when it sometimes had 70 or 80 and usually had 40-some). Kim Lee just goes on to the next thing while ignoring what he got wrong. You can't really do that in academia.

Bizarre stuff. If you two have a moment and want to enlighten me as to what tipped you off to the possible kewlJ/Kim Lee posting incest, please do. Very rarely do academics declare things they really have zero idea regarding, but Kim Lee does that as if he knows his stuff. And he obviously does not.

That whole idea that Mr. Walters employed me as a runner is so out there. I saw runners in the Stardust all the time. Half of them looked like burly bikers with sidearms. What a strange theory. How does one come up with that? Are you misinformed or just making shit up?

Anyway, I bow to MDawg and coach. I can't believe you two saw this coming and I did not at all. I need to stay in my lane. Forensic online analysis is obviously not my thing.

---

Discrediting Kim Lee and trying to make him out to be a kj sockpuppet is not going to work for you, dumass

---

I don't know if he's a sock puppet or just sharing accounts or it's a case of incest, but he got everything about me provably (see that word, mickey?) wrong. And he got my attitude towards Mr. Walters and Fezzik completely wrong while misapplying a quote (a kewlJ fave trick). And he supposedly is a sports betting guy who was unaware of the biggest selling weekly sports newsletter on newsstands across the country for 30 years. Then he took a look at it and decided that (A) there were 10 people in the contest and (B) a newsletter on virtually every newsstand for decades was, the word he used, "obscure." That was very odd. As if the only newsletter that wasn't "obscure" would have been one that he read.

It's tough to get all those things wrong and be right. It's the way he declared things as if he was an expert that really threw me. He was wrong about almost everything but acted as if he was quoting scripture. One of the most bizarre self-presentations I've ever seen.

And lacking details that would explain why or how he drew these bizarre conclusions that he declared.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Anything UNKewlJ hasn't had time to "study up" on (and we're talking YEARS, it takes him that long to wear one of his fables smooth enough to pass muster, we're dealing with a very dim witted individual here) he ends up sticking his fat foot in his wide loose mouth over.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Academics, in general, don't go making declarative statements in public without some kind of evidence

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Discrediting Kim Lee and trying to make him out to be a kj sockpuppet is not going to work for you

---

If the Kim Lee, that's posting here now, is the math professor (the options guy) then he has discredited himself.

He acted wonky when he attacked Jacobsen, came off like a jealous cunt.

I recently called him out as a misbehaving gaping asshole after minimal posts.

There's no way a respectable Ivy League assistant professor would act as he has...unless he had a peculiar malfunction of some sort...(wink wink nudge nudge nudge y'know what I mean?)

---

fuck off

Redietz is now in bed with mdawgs lying bullshit. Totally dishonest

Crimm, you know when I shared with you privately the information I found on BeachedWhale, you agreed with the conclusion.

So do not assume that I am any less careful with what I found on the connection between UNKewlJ and Kim Lee, which incidentally has now matched on at least one factor with PositiveVariance, another character who emerged out of nowhere implied to be UNKewlJ's "California AP who had heard of the backrooming incident." The more matches, the less possibility of coincidence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

It didn't take long but I found the connection between KimLee's posts and UNKewlJ's that establishes that either they are the same person, or share the exact same lack of education. So far I see no one else on this site that shares the same precise grammatical ignorance.

---

What are you trying to say, that UNKewlJ's bag of dog cal doesn't include creating sock puppets or finding mouthpieces to try to further her nonsense? Remember always that she is the

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

Boy Who Cried Wolf of these AP forums

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

who has lied so many times that it's impossible to believe any stories he tells

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Redietz is now in bed with mdawgs lying bullshit. Totally dishonest

---

Redeitz, Mdog, coach belly. THIS is the current 'troll patrol'. Whether battling me, or axelwolf or any other AP. Add in Singer's occasion comments if they are battling me. They may be a small group, but they are very vocal and persistent with their lies and dishonesty.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

KewlJ you're so busted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Crimm, you know when I shared with you privately the information I found on BeachedWhale, you agreed with the conclusion.

So do not assume that I am any less careful with what I found on the connection between UNKewlJ and Kim Lee, which incidentally has now matched with PositiveVariance, another character who emerged out of nowhere implied to be UNKewlJ's "California AP who had heard of the backrooming incident." The more matches, the less possibility of coincidence.



What are you trying to say, that UNKewlJ's bag of dog cal doesn't include creating sock puppets or finding mouthpieces to try to further his nonsense? Remember always that she is the

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

who has lied so many times that it's impossible to believe any stories he tells

---

---

Well why don't you post your accusations, so those accused might have the opportunity to respond, Mdog? Instead of secretly PMing a few people. You claim to be an attorney. Isnt that the way it is done? Your PMing peoplr behind the scenes is extremely cowardly. Why am I not surprised. :rolleyes:

How about if I offer my findings in confidence to someone who is clearly not against UNKewlJ, for opinion. Why in confidence, because UNKewlJ is rather stupid and will make the same mistakes again if he isn't privy to how he failed again, this time.

Without even realizing it, one of your posts above gave yourself away, again. As Rob.Singer would say, That's called Music To Everyone's Ears!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

KewlJ you're so busted.

---

---

NOT a chance in hell I am busted, because we are neither the same people (sock puppet) nor have I fed Kim Lee information. He is NOT that kind of person. he is an expert advantage player, who unbeknownst to me before last week, has a big interest in sports betting and handi-scamming, especially from last century. he has all the publications, has studied them and came to the same conclusions as myself, mickeycrimm, axelwolf. THAT Redietz is NOT a successful 40 year sports better. He is a 40 year tout that uses a couple good years results in some contests as a sales pitch.

If anybody is busted, it is Mr Dietz. He talked Kim Lee up, as a scholar, as someone who had all the publications. And then Kim Lee showed up and shot down Red's little game. Exposed him.

I am sure you all will drive Kim Lee from the forum, same as many real APs over the years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

How about if I offer my findings in confidence to someone who is clearly not against UNKewlJ, for opinion. Why in confidence, because UNKewlJ is rather stupid and will make the same mistakes again if he isn't privy to how he failed again, this time.

Without even realizing it, one of your posts above gave yourself away, again. As Rob.Singer would say, That's called Music To Everyone's Ears!

---

Would you do that in court? "Your Honor, how about I show my evidence to an 3rd party. I don't want to show it to the accused". I mean that is, if you are actually an attorney, which you probably made up as well.

Look if you have something to say, fucking say it and let Kim Lee and myself respond. That simple.....simpleton.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

which then leads to people putting in the work to disprove it, which then leads to you first acting outraged for being questioned, and then ultimately admitting you fibbed.

It's been the same song for years. Nobody else seems to have this issue on these gambling/AP forums. Ever wonder why?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

he is an expert advantage player

---

He's a loony.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Would you do that in court?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

this is an anonymous gambling forum, not a court of law.

---