Show me where I ever said anyone, should do what I am doing, sports betting, or blackjack or anything else? EVER!!
Don't disappear on me, Dietz...show me.
Printable View
Show me where I ever said anyone, should do what I am doing, sports betting, or blackjack or anything else? EVER!!
Don't disappear on me, Dietz...show me.
LOL. You are a joke. I said none of that.
I said people should not use you as a blueprint. That you set a horrendous example. That your "AP" recommendations will get people crushed. That your way of wagering on sports will create addicts, get flagged by sports books all the time, and will not work. That your manner of managing your accounts will result in accounts being flagged and withheld. That you are a bad, bad example.
So that raises the question -- again LOL. How are you different from MDawg?
MDawg never tells people to do as he does. He just does it. And you have spent years blabbing about how terrible that is for readers.
Here you are, not knowing "the math," doing stupid shit, and if I were the kewlJ, I guess I should be doing what? Exactly. Warning people off your bullshit style of betting sports, which is -- in my expert opinion -- likely to result in not just them losing money, but getting their accounts flagged and them becoming addicts.
I'm just following the kewlJ warn-them-off-MDawg blueprint. Don't let the evil blowhards con the unsuspecting into doing as the blowhards claim they do.
First of all.....NO he doesn't do it. NOT what he claims, AS he claims it.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
More importantly here is how I am different than Mdawg or Singer, or anyone that I challenge what they say. The math of what I do works! The math of what they claim does NOT work. They need "special plays" or some kind of voodoo thing like "betting into hot streaks" ect.
I have never challenged or questioned any player that claimed anything where the math works. Well, maybe Moses, but that is because, while the math worked, no player can or could do what he claimed playing primarily Reno for long. So it wasn't the math that didn't work with Moses's claims....it was the location.
Give it up Deitz. You wanted the narrative to be that you are the ONLY person that can do anything with sports betting, when the fact are that there are many advantage players and just players doing some stuff with sports betting at an advantage.
And if you had been able to do ANY of what you claimed, you wouldn't have needed to be a Tout. Just like Axelwolf and Kim lee said, you would have bet your own money and never looked back.
You really are just retarded dude. That isn't just some bust. You are freaking nuts....if you believe half of what you now troll at me and other.
Did your clients become addicts. Or were they already addicts? Were you working their addiction for a profit?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Bump
Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump
Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.
Mickey:
1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.
Or:
1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.
Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.
And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.
Sad.
Ditz says math plays no role in sports betting.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump
Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.
Mickey:
1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.
Or:
1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.
Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.
And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.
Sad.
I am going to copy these posts of yours and next time I have lunch with Munchkin, I'll hand over a copy of them and discuss them.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmDitz says math plays no role in sports betting.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Mickey:
1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.
Or:
1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.
Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.
And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.
Sad.
When you get caught blatantly lying in public, it's not a boost to one's credibility. It tarnishes everyone who gave you a platform.
Munch, ditz said math plays no role in sports betting. He also said he did not turn you down for a GWAE interview.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzI am going to copy these posts of yours and next time I have lunch with Munchkin, I'll hand over a copy of them and discuss them.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmDitz says math plays no role in sports betting.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
When you get caught blatantly lying in public, it's not a boost to one's credibility. It tarnishes everyone who gave you a platform.