Professional Sportsbetting

[kewlJ]

Show me where I ever said anyone, should do what I am doing, sports betting, or blackjack or anything else? EVER!!

Don't disappear on me, Dietz...show me.

[redietz]

LOL. You are a joke. I said none of that.

I said people should not use you as a blueprint. That you set a horrendous example. That your "AP" recommendations will get people crushed. That your way of wagering on sports will create addicts, get flagged by sports books all the time, and will not work. That your manner of managing your accounts will result in accounts being flagged and withheld. That you are a bad, bad example.

So that raises the question -- again LOL. How are you different from MDawg?

MDawg never tells people to do as he does. He just does it. And you have spent years blabbing about how terrible that is for readers.

Here you are, not knowing "the math," doing stupid shit, and if I were the kewlJ, I guess I should be doing what? Exactly. Warning people off your bullshit style of betting sports, which is -- in my expert opinion -- likely to result in not just them losing money, but getting their accounts flagged and them becoming addicts.

I'm just following the kewlJ warn-them-off-MDawg blueprint. Don't let the evil blowhards con the unsuspecting into doing as the blowhards claim they do.

[kewlJ]

MDawg never tells people to do as he does. He just does it.

First of all.....NO he doesn't do it. NOT what he claims, AS he claims it.

More importantly here is how I am different than Mdawg or Singer, or anyone that I challenge what they say. The math of what I do works! The math of what they claim does NOT work. They need "special plays" or some kind of voodoo thing like "betting into hot streaks" ect.

I have never challenged or questioned any player that claimed anything where the math works. Well, maybe Moses, but that is because, while the math worked, no player can or could do what he claimed playing primarily Reno for long. So it wasn't the math that didn't work with Moses's claims....it was the location.

Give it up Deitz. You wanted the narrative to be that you are the ONLY person that can do anything with sports betting, when the fact are that there are many advantage players and just players doing some stuff with sports betting at an advantage.

And if you had been able to do ANY of what you claimed, you wouldn't have needed to be a Tout. Just like Axelwolf and Kim lee said, you would have bet your own money and never looked back.

You really are just retarded dude. That isn't just some bust. You are freaking nuts....if you believe half of what you now troll at me and other.

[mickeycrimm]

LOL. You are a joke. I said none of that.

I said people should not use you as a blueprint. That you set a horrendous example. That your "AP" recommendations will get people crushed. That your way of wagering on sports will create addicts, get flagged by sports books all the time, and will not work. That your manner of managing your accounts will result in accounts being flagged and withheld. That you are a bad, bad example.

So that raises the question -- again LOL. How are you different from MDawg?

MDawg never tells people to do as he does. He just does it. And you have spent years blabbing about how terrible that is for readers.

Here you are, not knowing "the math," doing stupid shit, and if I were the kewlJ, I guess I should be doing what? Exactly. Warning people off your bullshit style of betting sports, which is -- in my expert opinion -- likely to result in not just them losing money, but getting their accounts flagged and them becoming addicts.

I'm just following the kewlJ warn-them-off-MDawg blueprint. Don't let the evil blowhards con the unsuspecting into doing as the blowhards claim they do.

Did your clients become addicts. Or were they already addicts? Were you working their addiction for a profit?

[mickeycrimm]

Bump

What about a prop bet of over/under 21 pass completions in a game by a certain quarterback? Is it non random whether it goes over or under?

Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.

If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.

[redietz]

Bump

What about a prop bet of over/under 21 pass completions in a game by a certain quarterback? Is it non random whether it goes over or under?

Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.

If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.

Mickey:

1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.

Or:

1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.


Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.

And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.

Sad.

[mickeycrimm]

Bump

What about a prop bet of over/under 21 pass completions in a game by a certain quarterback? Is it non random whether it goes over or under?

Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.

If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.

Mickey:

1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.

Or:

1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.


Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.

And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.

Sad.

Ditz says math plays no role in sports betting.

[redietz]

Bump



Ditz keeps going on and on about flipping coins on non random events. Nobody is doing that.

If it's non random then an astute sports bettor, that knows the math (that excludes redietz), should be able to beat this kind of prop bet.

Mickey:

1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.

Or:

1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.


Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.

And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.

Sad.

Ditz says math plays no role in sports betting.

I am going to copy these posts of yours and next time I have lunch with Munchkin, I'll hand over a copy of them and discuss them.

When you get caught blatantly lying in public, it's not a boost to one's credibility. It tarnishes everyone who gave you a platform.

[mickeycrimm]

Mickey:

1) Go find those things you claim I unequivocally said. Take your time.
2) Use whatever forum you like.
3) Use whatever time frame you like.
4) Collect your 10K.

Or:

1) Buy me a cup of coffee.
2) Admit you lied.


Either you lied or you did not lie.
Pick one.

And this is the guy on Gambling with an Edge half a dozen times.

Sad.

Ditz says math plays no role in sports betting.

I am going to copy these posts of yours and next time I have lunch with Munchkin, I'll hand over a copy of them and discuss them.

When you get caught blatantly lying in public, it's not a boost to one's credibility. It tarnishes everyone who gave you a platform.

Munch, ditz said math plays no role in sports betting. He also said he did not turn you down for a GWAE interview.

[Rob.Singer]

This is to assist any of you wannabee "ap pro sports bettors" who made the mistake of moving to LV for a "better life" among the degenerates, losers and freaks in that POS city: Redeem yourself tonight! Put it all (and of course, if you're a gambling addict living in LV -- and WHO isn't) on the Dodgers to make it look pretty easy tonight.

Last night's game had an amazing ending. If LA were gonna lose this series it would've been last night. THIS was their game 7. Toronto did what all overmatched/over-achieving teams do in the World Series: they failed to take advantage of tremendous opportunities.

When Boston lost to the Mets in '86 game 6 in NY that was the Mets' game 7. Buckner blew his play and the Mets made the Red Sox pay. Game 7 was a mere formality after that.

And now, LA has the best player ever to put on a uniform in MLB history. And he'll prove it tonight.

[Rob.Singer]

This just in---only one guy here listened to me and "put it all" on LA tonight. Kew of course. I live in his head.

He's now $40 richer.