The Package

Today`s story is that Weaselson is now retiring...wonder what new story he will thrill us with tomorrow....Never seen anyone tapdance quite like Mr Alan Bojangles

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Typical diverting when pinned to the wall. The easy way out would be to simply tell us his name. But noooo....you've got to make it a drama by doing the two-step again--just like your plethora of silly excuses why you won't post your so-called accolades yourself.

---

Yeah, I'm pinned to the wall. That's why I invited a journalist half an hour away to show up anytime and verify everything.

Rob, you're a clown. If you want to wager on this, the bank's open, dude. One of us is a liar; one ain't. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see if this advantage play beats the great Rob Singer. Or is somebody lacking confidence in his opining these days?

---

Ha! I've got you so flustered that you can't even identify what you're wanting to lose money on :) And thank you for the blistering name-calling. That tells me you're likely developing boils over me.

---

It's very simple, Rob. I'll make it easy for you. Overnight a cashier's check to Alan for $1000. When he receives it, he announces that, then I'll hoof it over to Alan's and drop off $1000. Thereupon, I will provide photos and a video shot that day of the aforementioned person with me, with his wife, with his dogs, and with his sister, hanging in my office in his house.

If I don't provide the above, I lose. if I do, you lose.

Easy peasy.

Now I'm sure you'll want to ship that check as fast as possible so you can debunk all of the BS I've posted on this site. Please, don't do it, man. I can't afford to lose the money. I beg you, don't do it.

What a clown.

Revealing my true identity and my take on the package: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LZmUfUBqE-s

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Jerry Logan: People from WoV tend to remember when somebody gives them a good licking (careful kew....again!). No I'm not JL, as much as the WoV crowd wanted and apparently still wants me to be. But Jerry is a friend if mine (and former student who made big money playing my strategy jbjb--yes, you who constantly claims no one plays it even after he posted his results on WoV for quite a while). He also keeps in contact with me and lives in Mesa or Tempe.

---

Boy, you are a really mentally ill dude. It was apparent from my first minute at this forum that you are one of those cowardly, internet troll, bullies....such a big man hiding behind your keyboard. An insecure bitter old man. But you are far worse than that with multiple accounts, pretending to be other made up people. Classic...multiple personalities. Yikes! Reminds me of the quote from Seinfeld where Jerry tells George he needs mental help. And not just one doctor. He needs a team working round the clock.

I know nothing of your made up Jerry Logan personality. If you perpetrated this multiple personality scam at WoV, it must have been before my time there. Either that or I just didn't care enough to even read. But multiple people here have informed me, your M.O. is to have this multiple personality back you up on multiple sites. I have been told that several times, you became so screwed up you mixed up your personalities. geez...are you bad at everything you do?....even the multiple personalities thing. :rolleyes: How very sad for you. What a sad existence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

I'm really sorry kewlj but I've made changes in my life. And soon I am moving OUT of Southern California and then I will rarely if ever go to the office again. I'm retiring, guys. I'm already collecting my pension and starting October 11th my Social Security starts.

I've already told my clients that after December I will no longer be doing a weekly Best Buys TV Show. I will continue to do Infomercials and from time to time I will do a Best Buys Special. We are thinking about doing a Best Buys Special for Presidents Day Sales and then another for Mothers Day Sales and then another for Fathers Day and graduations. But the weekly grind is ending for me. It's time to be "semi retired."

Tony (who is actually about 8 years my senior) is also retiring (he's in his 70s as you can figure) which is why he isn't in the office so much anymore.

Kewlj, Tony has told me what's in the package and so far, redietz has not disputed what Tony told me. What are you expecting for me to see in the package that will change things? Please tell me. Use red font if you must.

edited to add: I'm not going to ask Tony to rewrap the package (redietz would you care to describe the intricate wrapping and over-wrapping you used?) and then take it a mile and a half away to the post office to mail to me. Everything we do is by email, or by phone. Even with the TV stations there is no more snail mail. Even contracts are "signed" via email. Payments are made electronically -- no one sends paper checks anymore, and when they are sent that way, there is an outgoing mail slot in the lobby of the building. And the package won't fit in the mail slot.

If it's so important, kewlj, ask redietz to send the stuff to you. redietz says he has plenty of copies and he's obviously not worried about the copyright laws affecting photo copies but he is concerned about taking photos of his byline and names. Go figure.

And redietz, why don't you get Dan's address and mail him the package directly. This way kewlj will not accuse me of altering the contents of the package. Yeah. that's coming. Can't you tell?

---

Just to correct -- I never said I have "plenty of copies." I don't even have two full copies -- almost, but not quite. I felt it inappropriate to simultaneously mail material that was copyrighted, so I kind of followed the old manuscript submission rule of sequential submission but not simultaneous submission. Remember that rule of thumb, Alan?

So I just want to be clear on that. I don't have the stuff organized. I'll have to rewrite the intro blurbs for the various things, which is fine when I get the time.

I'll check with Dan sometime soon.

This is ridiculous. Now my retirement is being challenged? I'm 65 and a half years old. Soon I will be 66. Yes, I'm retiring. And I am moving out of Southern California.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

This is ridiculous. Now my retirement is being challenged?

---

Not by me. I am not challenging your retirement....I welcome it. The world needs one less "shyster", scam artist.

Only thing I have challenged is your honesty....your integrity. And that really isn't even in question.....You have none. :(

I sure wish you would sign your real name, kewlj. But it's easy for you to say the things you say as kewlj, isn't it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

I sure wish you would sign your real name, kewlj. But it's easy for you to say the things you say as kewlj, isn't it?

---

I am an Advantage Player, who plays blackjack for a living. And Alan would like me to sign my real name on an anonymous message board. :confused:

Could anything possible demonstrate more clearly, Alan's total lack of understanding of advantage play, advantage players and the relationship between AP's and the casino industry.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Yeah, I'm pinned to the wall. That's why I invited a journalist half an hour away to show up anytime and verify everything.

Rob, you're a clown. If you want to wager on this, the bank's open, dude. One of us is a liar; one ain't. Put your money where your mouth is, and we'll see if this advantage play beats the great Rob Singer. Or is somebody lacking confidence in his opining these days?

---

Ha! I've got you so flustered that you can't even identify what you're wanting to lose money on :) And thank you for the blistering name-calling. That tells me you're likely developing boils over me.

---

It's very simple, Rob. I'll make it easy for you. Overnight a cashier's check to Alan for $1000. When he receives it, he announces that, then I'll hoof it over to Alan's and drop off $1000. Thereupon, I will provide photos and a video shot that day of the aforementioned person with me, with his wife, with his dogs, and with his sister, hanging in my office in his house.

If I don't provide the above, I lose. if I do, you lose.

Easy peasy.

Now I'm sure you'll want to ship that check as fast as possible so you can debunk all of the BS I've posted on this site. Please, don't do it, man. I can't afford to lose the money. I beg you, don't do it.

What a clown.

---

And there you go again....hoping that an obscure photo or video without identifications is some type of proof. So now MORE snail mail? You thinking of mailing it from your boyfriend's home on the west coast?:)

Where's his name? Let's have it red. Post SOMETHING thus time other than your bs.

Since you are afraid to sign your real name kewlj stop your libelous statements calling me a shyster and scam artist. If you want to libel me sign your real name.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Jerry Logan: People from WoV tend to remember when somebody gives them a good licking (careful kew....again!). No I'm not JL, as much as the WoV crowd wanted and apparently still wants me to be. But Jerry is a friend if mine (and former student who made big money playing my strategy jbjb--yes, you who constantly claims no one plays it even after he posted his results on WoV for quite a while). He also keeps in contact with me and lives in Mesa or Tempe.

---

Boy, you are a really mentally ill dude. It was apparent from my first minute at this forum that you are one of those cowardly, internet troll, bullies....such a big man hiding behind your keyboard. An insecure bitter old man. But you are far worse than that with multiple accounts, pretending to be other made up people. Classic...multiple personalities. Yikes! Reminds me of the quote from Seinfeld where Jerry tells George he needs mental help. And not just one doctor. He needs a team working round the clock.

I know nothing of your made up Jerry Logan personality. If you perpetrated this multiple personality scam at WoV, it must have been before my time there. Either that or I just didn't care enough to even read. But multiple people here have informed me, your M.O. is to have this multiple personality back you up on multiple sites. I have been told that several times, you became so screwed up you mixed up your personalities. geez...are you bad at everything you do?....even the multiple personalities thing. :rolleyes: How very sad for you. What a sad existence.

---

Looks like my "fairy" comment is having its desired effect :)

I was banned at WoV while Jerry posted there. Was he banned too? So I imagine there's evidence RS = JL? Please provide it. And it would be better for you if you didn't get so excited over me. I know how you people have hypertension problems.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Since you are afraid to sign your real name kewlj stop your libelous statements calling me a shyster and scam artist. If you want to libel me sign your real name.

---

It's typical of these anonymous "AP's" to lie about themselves then libel anyone who disagrees with them. They're a bunch of sissies really, only very few produce proof of it as kew has done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Since you are afraid to sign your real name kewlj stop your libelous statements calling me a shyster and scam artist. If you want to libel me sign your real name.

---

Right out of the internet troll playbook...threats (although veiled) of legal action/intent.

Alan, since this is yet another topic you apparently don't know about (but yet have an opinion), allow me to educate you. There is nothing libel about my statements. If I said that you murdered someone, or committed a crime and there was no such evidence of these actions, that could be considered libel. But me voicing my opinion that you are dishonest and manipulative and a "shyster" is just that....my opinion.

You have more than earned the title "shyster" with you many dishonest and manipulative actions against me and others. So just stop your crying you old fool.

But I am going to end this exercise of exposing you before you break down in tears and have a stroke. You really did all the exposing yourself. There wasn't much for me to do, except highlight a few things and wrap it all in a nice little package for everyone to easily see.

And just in case you are wondering why, I would go to the trouble. It's your arrogant, "holier than thou" trolling. In my case you set out to discredit me because you didn't understand or comprehend a technique. And then after intentionally dishonesty and manipulating the facts (and photos), you made trolling comments like "you got caught buddy" and "it hurts to et cough doesn't it kewlj?" When the fact is you hadn't caught me in anything. All you proved was that you were an old man who had made up his mind on a subject he knew nothing about and set out to dishonestly manipulate statements and even photos to back up your viewpoint that you knew nothing about (confirmation bias).

And the final kicker was this little comment. "And Kewlj I am not going to let up on you". Nothing but a threatening, trolling statement and worse of all about a subject matter you know nothing about and are 100% wrong in your predetermined opinion of.

So, just stop your trolling old man. And stick to subject matter that you know what you are talking about. In your case I guess that would be degenerative gambling and how to have unsuccessful marriages.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Ha! I've got you so flustered that you can't even identify what you're wanting to lose money on :) And thank you for the blistering name-calling. That tells me you're likely developing boils over me.

---

It's very simple, Rob. I'll make it easy for you. Overnight a cashier's check to Alan for $1000. When he receives it, he announces that, then I'll hoof it over to Alan's and drop off $1000. Thereupon, I will provide photos and a video shot that day of the aforementioned person with me, with his wife, with his dogs, and with his sister, hanging in my office in his house.

If I don't provide the above, I lose. if I do, you lose.

Easy peasy.

Now I'm sure you'll want to ship that check as fast as possible so you can debunk all of the BS I've posted on this site. Please, don't do it, man. I can't afford to lose the money. I beg you, don't do it.

What a clown.

---

And there you go again....hoping that an obscure photo or video without identifications is some type of proof. So now MORE snail mail? You thinking of mailing it from your boyfriend's home on the west coast?:)

Where's his name? Let's have it red. Post SOMETHING thus time other than your bs.

---

Rob, if you're such a lean, mean betting machine, put up some cash, my friend. Otherwise it's not an advantage play.

Obviously, the person I'm talking about has current Facebook, LinkedIn, and various professional organization postings and links where his photo appears in every listing. There are videos of him accepting awards, and his smiling face is there in each one. He was featured in at least one Aviation Weekly profile.

So if his smiling face winds up in the same video as my smiling face, did I recruit someone off the street to have plastic surgery? And if the video takes place in his home, what, I rented his house and recruited someone to have plastic surgery? Not even you could believe that.

Rob, I never fully realized you don't really believe your own garbage, but now I do. I have a pretty narrow definition of troll, as I believe naysayers and disbelievers should have their say, but it's pretty clear you don't really believe what you're saying. You just ramble to try to get some reaction. I mean, if you had any commitment to your opining, the cashier's check to Allan would be in the mail, and the bet would be made.

But you're just clowning around in a mean-spirited, psychotic way.

In any event, I've never really viewed you as a complete clown, but that is what you are. I hate using the word "troll," but you're it. You don't believe what you write. Man, that is sad. Five thousand friggin' posts, and you don't really believe your own narrative and conclusions.

Or maybe you do. Why don't you send Alan into retirement with a bet to remember us by? Send him a check. Alan, you let me know when that check arrives, and I will hand deliver cash to your doorstep.

C'mon, Rob, Believe what you write, man. Have some integrity.

P.S. I hope all gentle readers realize Rob will never make the wager. Alan already has the name and has probably googled it. Alan already has the address and may have googled it. Rob knows the reality. He's just trying to get me to cough up a name with no money changing hands. Good luck with that, Rob.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

I have a pretty narrow definition of troll, as I believe naysayers and disbelievers should have their say

---

I have a less narrow definition of a troll (I guess that would be wider definition...lol). I think there are people that only post to get a reaction. Singer is clearly the worst case of this I have run across. He freely admits he is only looking for certain reactions. Others like LarryS from our previous site, disguise their intent with words like "lively debate". These 'trolls' are not after debate or discussion. They are after attention...plain and simple. Their life is apparently so empty, this is how they get their jollies. I put Alan, in the same class as these guys. Alan is a little more sneaky though as he is often able to hide his real intent of trolling and because he is much politer about it, it comes off as more mild. But it is that same 'trolling' mentality and need.

Now, I want to be clear that "naysayers and non-believers" of AP or AP claims are not all trolls, IMO. That isn't a label I put on someone just because they are a non-believer of AP or disagree with me on any topic. People have the right to believe what they like and even question claims. I am more than fine with that. But when these so called non-believers don't even believe what they are saying (Singer) or manipulate what is said and even worse photos (Mendelson), to try to discredit someone...that crosses the line into trolling for me.

And when someone has a history of doing nothing but these behaviors, making it clear their intent is to only troll and be disruptive, I don't think they should be welcome on any forum regardless of the forum topic. It's not fair to the owner/administrators of the forum and it's not fair to the members that want to participate in a constructive manner.

I hate sinking to the level of these trolls with the nastiness and name-calling. But why should I let some bitter old dude (and they almost all are) with an empty life, in need of attention, ruin a forum for me? :confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Alan, since this is yet another topic you apparently don't know about (but yet have an opinion), allow me to educate you. There is nothing libel about my statements. If I said that you murdered someone, or committed a crime and there was no such evidence of these actions, that could be considered libel. But me voicing my opinion that you are dishonest and manipulative and a "shyster" is just that....my opinion.

You have more than earned the title "shyster" with you many dishonest and manipulative actions against me and others. So just stop your crying you old fool.

---

You seem to have forgotten "scam artist".

What's your real name?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

You seem to have forgotten "scam artist".

---

I didn't forget scam artist at all. A person with a "TV show"....with the premise of finding bargain for consumers, when in actuality all these bargains are paid advertisers is the quintessential definition of scam artist. You are presenting yourself and your "show" as something that it is not.

It's dishonest and manipulative. While not against the law, it is so misleading that the government requires a disclaimer to protect viewer. Dishonesty and manipulation seem to be the traits that make up Alan Mendelson, on and off message board forums.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

What's your real name?

---

Continuing to show how detached from reality you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I hate sinking to the level of these trolls with the nastiness and name-calling. But why should I let some bitter old dude (and they almost all are) with an empty life, in need of attention, ruin a forum for me? :confused:

---

Kewlj,
You say you hate sinking to this level, but it seems you have gotten quite comfortable doing so. I don't mean to attack you but this back-and-forth with Alan has become more than ridiculous. I don't agree with everything Alan says, and I get it, you took offense, but a lot of your responses are just plain mean. He said some things, you vehemently disagreed and you made your points. Can we just move on now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dannyj

He said some things, you vehemently disagreed and you made your points. Can we just move on now.

---

I will sincerely try to.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dannyj

He said some things, you vehemently disagreed and you made your points. Can we just move on now.

---

I will sincerely try to.

---

So sensitive.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

It's very simple, Rob. I'll make it easy for you. Overnight a cashier's check to Alan for $1000. When he receives it, he announces that, then I'll hoof it over to Alan's and drop off $1000. Thereupon, I will provide photos and a video shot that day of the aforementioned person with me, with his wife, with his dogs, and with his sister, hanging in my office in his house.

If I don't provide the above, I lose. if I do, you lose.

Easy peasy.

Now I'm sure you'll want to ship that check as fast as possible so you can debunk all of the BS I've posted on this site. Please, don't do it, man. I can't afford to lose the money. I beg you, don't do it.

What a clown.

---

And there you go again....hoping that an obscure photo or video without identifications is some type of proof. So now MORE snail mail? You thinking of mailing it from your boyfriend's home on the west coast?:)

Where's his name? Let's have it red. Post SOMETHING thus time other than your bs.

---

Rob, if you're such a lean, mean betting machine, put up some cash, my friend. Otherwise it's not an advantage play.

Obviously, the person I'm talking about has current Facebook, LinkedIn, and various professional organization postings and links where his photo appears in every listing. There are videos of him accepting awards, and his smiling face is there in each one. He was featured in at least one Aviation Weekly profile.

So if his smiling face winds up in the same video as my smiling face, did I recruit someone off the street to have plastic surgery? And if the video takes place in his home, what, I rented his house and recruited someone to have plastic surgery? Not even you could believe that.

Rob, I never fully realized you don't really believe your own garbage, but now I do. I have a pretty narrow definition of troll, as I believe naysayers and disbelievers should have their say, but it's pretty clear you don't really believe what you're saying. You just ramble to try to get some reaction. I mean, if you had any commitment to your opining, the cashier's check to Allan would be in the mail, and the bet would be made.

But you're just clowning around in a mean-spirited, psychotic way.

In any event, I've never really viewed you as a complete clown, but that is what you are. I hate using the word "troll," but you're it. You don't believe what you write. Man, that is sad. Five thousand friggin' posts, and you don't really believe your own narrative and conclusions.

Or maybe you do. Why don't you send Alan into retirement with a bet to remember us by? Send him a check. Alan, you let me know when that check arrives, and I will hand deliver cash to your doorstep.

C'mon, Rob, Believe what you write, man. Have some integrity.

P.S. I hope all gentle readers realize Rob will never make the wager. Alan already has the name and has probably googled it. Alan already has the address and may have googled it. Rob knows the reality. He's just trying to get me to cough up a name with no money changing hands. Good luck with that, Rob.

---

Just a reminder that Rob could get that check in the mail today to Alan and provide a little further suspense in today's VCT proceedings. If he really wanted to make a quick 1K, he could overnight it. I'm curious as to Rob's courageous response. Surely he'll have something to say.

Red you look foolish. It's too similar to your silly "PR Pack", and it's apparent how you still don't get how or why you're being laughed at over your a-humma...a-humma...bbbbut tries to talk your way out of the "I mailed it from someone else's house in Calif. where I put HIS return sticker on the envelope!" or some such crap..

If this guy has a name, just post it. We can all look him up and see you two together. And I wouldn't waste my time with a $1k bet. But typical of all the things you claim, you never, ever support any of it with evidence and give a bevy of dumb excuses instead, hoping it'll all just go away and be forgotten so you can feel safe again.

That spells phony.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Red you look foolish. It's too similar to your silly "PR Pack", and it's apparent how you still don't get how or why you're being laughed at over your a-humma...a-humma...bbbbut tries to talk your way out of the "I mailed it from someone else's house in Calif. where I put HIS return sticker on the envelope!" or some such crap..

If this guy has a name, just post it. We can all look him up and see you two together. And I wouldn't waste my time with a $1k bet. But typical of all the things you claim, you never, ever support any of it with evidence and give a bevy of dumb excuses instead, hoping it'll all just go away and be forgotten so you can feel safe again.

That spells phony.

---

Hey Rob, there's about half a dozen people on this forum, including Alan, who have his name and have probably looked him up. You're just not in the loop, buddy. Everyone is appreciating the extent to which you're out on a limb, opining from your perch and making a horse's ass of yourself. Mickey wasn't kidding in his earlier post. You're making an idiot of yourself -- again. My living here has not been a secret project.

Hell, anyone, including Alan, is welcome to drop in anytime. Rob, you'll need the address, I take it.

But if you want to put a few buckaroos where your mouth is, be my guest. Make it a 5K bet, if you choose. I await your courageous decision.

You're such a doofus red. Why are you always writing as if you're actually speaking to another while patting him on the shoulder? Your style is so poor....

That aside, you also used too many words to deflect posting his name here. And with all your corny wordsmithing, as usual none of it gives any clarity as to why you don't or can't. And you wonder why you look like such a phony??

Actually, I don't have his name. Redietz told me in advance that he was mailing it from a friend's home while traveling. That made perfect sense to me. I didn't even bother to ask Tony what the return address was because I think it's a non issue.

But in preparation for when I do get to see the envelope, I asked redietz to comment on the address because you'd all expect to see a photo of the envelope and I would take one and post it. I would however, block out most of the address including the name because it's no one's business.

Even if redietz had put his own address on the envelope I would have blocked out his address.

But now I'm curious: why didn't you put your own return address on the envelope? Is it because you are away from home for a considerable time, OR is this a second home? People do have SECOND homes. And before you react Rob, you have told us of SEVERAL homes including your place in Arizona while you lived in your RV in Nevada.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

You're such a doofus red. Why are you always writing as if you're actually speaking to another while patting him on the shoulder? Your style is so poor....

That aside, you also used too many words to deflect posting his name here. And with all your corny wordsmithing, as usual none of it gives any clarity as to why you don't or can't. And you wonder why you look like such a phony??

---

Rob, you seem to be struggling for a response here. I have no interest in providing clarity to you. Why would I? Put up the cash or stay out of the loop. Makes no difference to me, except I'm going to have a helluva shopping spree at Kohl's if you do.

If you get that cashier's check to Alan today, I get $10 Kohl's cash for every $50 I spend. That's a boatload of Kohl's cash.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

If you get that cashier's check to Alan today, I get $10 Kohl's cash for every $50 I spend. That's a boatload of Kohl's cash.

---

Hold out for the Macys Cash offer. I think it's the same 20% rebate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

This is ridiculous. Now my retirement is being challenged? I'm 65 and a half years old. Soon I will be 66. Yes, I'm retiring. And I am moving out of Southern California.

---

Yes--your retirement is going to be challenged. We will need to see a copy of your social security check as well as a picture of you in your plaid bermuda shorts and white loafers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by regnis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

This is ridiculous. Now my retirement is being challenged? I'm 65 and a half years old. Soon I will be 66. Yes, I'm retiring. And I am moving out of Southern California.

---

Yes--your retirement is going to be challenged. We will need to see a copy of your social security check as well as a picture of you in your plaid bermuda shorts and white loafers.

---

Even better: I'm joining the Early Bird Special Club. I save an extra 20% before 4pm. I'll post a photo of my membership card.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Actually, I don't have his name. Redietz told me in advance that he was mailing it from a friend's home while traveling. That made perfect sense to me. I didn't even bother to ask Tony what the return address was because I think it's a non issue.

But in preparation for when I do get to see the envelope, I asked redietz to comment on the address because you'd all expect to see a photo of the envelope and I would take one and post it. I would however, block out most of the address including the name because it's no one's business.

Even if redietz had put his own address on the envelope I would have blocked out his address.

But now I'm curious: why didn't you put your own return address on the envelope? Is it because you are away from home for a considerable time, OR is this a second home? People do have SECOND homes. And before you react Rob, you have told us of SEVERAL homes including your place in Arizona while you lived in your RV in Nevada.

---

Well, I was going to be in Orange awhile, so what I tried to do was put my name on the label. There's a nice printer in the front office, and I have a little printer in the back office (it's a really big house), but frankly I don't know how to use either one very well. Anyway, I typed in my name and the Orange address for the label, on the nice printer, but it somehow defaulted to his name, and I figured the hell with it. I wasn't going to try to fix it because I didn't know what went wrong in the first place. If it wound up being returned due to some postal snafu, I'd be at the house anyway.

No, it's not my home. I'm just doing the Magnum PI thing.

Perfectly valid explanation redietz.

Rob don't try to twist it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Perfectly valid explanation redietz.

Rob don't try to twist it.

---

What's psychotic about Rob is (1) you asked the initial question about the label, (2) I answered it, figuring you had said you'd post a photo of the front of the mailer, so I assumed people would possibly google the name and address and figure out whose house I was staying in, so (3) I answered the question honestly. Somehow that became a whack job attack regarding the idea I couldn't possibly be hanging out with a former VP of Boeing.

I've been staying here on and off for years. If I knew it was such a far fetched claim to fame, I would have mentioned it a couple of years ago.

Rob has real mental issues. He should get help.

There's no reason to provide personal information. I was sent tax returns once. Imagine the personal info I had? Still kewlj is afraid I'll blow his cover? If you only knew the secrets I've kept. Once I almost went to jail because I refused to give info in court.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Rob has real mental issues. He should get help.

---

This is beyond contestation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Still kewlj is afraid I'll blow his cover?

---

Alan this is trolling. This is you trying to 'goat' me into more fighting. And when I respond, I will be the bad guy for being "mean" to you, as I was accused of yesterday. I was asked to just let it go and said I would. I respectfully ask the same of you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Rob has real mental issues. He should get help.

---

This is beyond contestation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Still kewlj is afraid I'll blow his cover?

---

Alan this is trolling. This is you trying to 'goat' me into more fighting. And when I respond, I will be the bad guy for being "mean" to you, as I was accused of yesterday. I was asked to just let it go and said I would. I respectfully ask the same of you.

---

Good call KJ....it`s just Alan slithering around as usual

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Rob has real mental issues. He should get help.

---

This is beyond contestation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Still kewlj is afraid I'll blow his cover?

---

Alan this is trolling. This is you trying to 'goat' me into more fighting. And when I respond, I will be the bad guy for being "mean" to you, as I was accused of yesterday. I was asked to just let it go and said I would. I respectfully ask the same of you.

---

The only thing Alan wants us to let go is packagegate. From what I can see he had to retire over this so he could keep the truth from comming out.

What is the truth Axel?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

What is the truth Axel?

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1WwfI_3H94

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

What is the truth Axel?

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1WwfI_3H94

---

Axel, you will be happy to know I was a card carrying member of the rather short-lived Society for the Scientific Documentation of Paranormal Events about 35 years ago. I was more a Scully type. I have also attended a fair number of CSICOP and Randi Foundation events in my time.

The point is, I appreciate your reference mightily. Chris Carter actually was a featured speaker at one of the CSICOP conferences.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by regnis

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

This is ridiculous. Now my retirement is being challenged? I'm 65 and a half years old. Soon I will be 66. Yes, I'm retiring. And I am moving out of Southern California.

---

Yes--your retirement is going to be challenged. We will need to see a copy of your social security check as well as a picture of you in your plaid bermuda shorts and white loafers.

---

Even better: I'm joining the Early Bird Special Club. I save an extra 20% before 4pm. I'll post a photo of my membership card.

---

Happy Rosh Hashanah Alan.

"Shanah tovah"

Thank you dannyj. As is the custom for the Jewish New Year I forgive all those who have hurt me. A good and healthy new year to you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

As is the custom for the Jewish New Year I forgive all those who have hurt me.

---

You are such a douchbag! But happy and healthy New Year to you anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

As is the custom for the Jewish New Year I forgive all those who have hurt me.

---

You are such a douchbag! But happy and healthy New Year to you anyway.

---

Thank you and I forgive you.

So is this settled now?

Or is the only remaining question whether the R. E. Dietz featured in the article is the actual poster here who goes by "redietz".

I would be shocked if the redietz who has posted here for years is a fake R. E. Dietz. Like, why pick that guy to impersonate, of all people?

This can also be easily settled. redietz can either meet someone here (I'll volunteer), or he can send me a picture holding up his driver's license (he can cover up the number with this thumb), where I can clearly see his face while holding it up. That should settle it.

But honestly, I'm very good at seeing through bullshit online, and it would absolutely shock me if this guy wasn't actually redietz.

I think it's time for redietz's doubters to concede that the guy has been honest about himself, and move on.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

So is this settled now?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think redietz has proven himself.

---

Proven himself to be what?

What's in the package? the ditz won't tell us or show us, so nobody knows.

What is he trying to prove anyway? That he wrote letters to the editor?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

So is this settled now?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think redietz has proven himself.

---

Proven himself to be what?

---

It has been proven to all; except a few that will never admit that. I understand why redietz sent the package, he was called out. It was just never necessary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

So is this settled now?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think redietz has proven himself.

---

Proven himself to be what?

What's in the package? the ditz won't tell us or show us, so nobody knows.

What is he trying to prove anyway? That he wrote letters to the editor?

---

I still haven't seen the package but Tony made it clear: it contains copies of articles by Robert Dietz and copies of displays showing Robert Dietz won sports contests. Do I really need to see the package? It's finished.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dannyj

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

I think redietz has proven himself.

---

Proven himself to be what?

---

It has been proven to all; except a few that will never admit that. I understand why redietz sent the package, he was called out. It was just never necessary.

---

Exactly. It was never necessary.

I never had any doubt redeitz was who he said he was. But Rob's agenda is to never be satisfied no matter how strong the evidence is. That's the modus operandi of a troll.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

So is this settled now?

Or is the only remaining question whether the R. E. Dietz featured in the article is the actual poster here who goes by "redietz".

I would be shocked if the redietz who has posted here for years is a fake R. E. Dietz. Like, why pick that guy to impersonate, of all people?

This can also be easily settled. redietz can either meet someone here (I'll volunteer), or he can send me a picture holding up his driver's license (he can cover up the number with this thumb), where I can clearly see his face while holding it up. That should settle it.

But honestly, I'm very good at seeing through bullshit online, and it would absolutely shock me if this guy wasn't actually redietz.

I think it's time for redietz's doubters to concede that the guy has been honest about himself, and move on.

---

Dan, the only thing that's been settled about redietz is that he for some reason refuses to put anything about himself up here, and he won't positively identify if it's him or not. He instead chose to divert and deflect at every turn, all the way up to and including the bs about the strange method of snail mail via some Boeing VP boy-toy's house or something.

He's the type person we've all run into that never gives a straight answer. Those people by and large are trying to hide and/or exaggerate things they claim. And what exactly are his claimed "accolades" anyway? That's why no one should ever be satisfied with something as clouded as this nonsense without absolute proof of identity. Another serious question is, if these claims are real, why are they not identifiable on the internet?

The common denominator here is smelling a rat.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan Druff

So is this settled now?

Or is the only remaining question whether the R. E. Dietz featured in the article is the actual poster here who goes by "redietz".

I would be shocked if the redietz who has posted here for years is a fake R. E. Dietz. Like, why pick that guy to impersonate, of all people?

This can also be easily settled. redietz can either meet someone here (I'll volunteer), or he can send me a picture holding up his driver's license (he can cover up the number with this thumb), where I can clearly see his face while holding it up. That should settle it.

But honestly, I'm very good at seeing through bullshit online, and it would absolutely shock me if this guy wasn't actually redietz.

I think it's time for redietz's doubters to concede that the guy has been honest about himself, and move on.

---

Dan, the only thing that's been settled about redietz is that he for some reason refuses to put anything about himself up here, and he won't positively identify if it's him or not. He instead chose to divert and deflect at every turn, all the way up to and including the bs about the strange method of snail mail via some Boeing VP boy-toy's house or something.

He's the type person we've all run into that never gives a straight answer. Those people by and large are trying to hide and/or exaggerate things they claim. And what exactly are his claimed "accolades" anyway? That's why no one should ever be satisfied with something as clouded as this nonsense without absolute proof of identity. Another serious question is, if these claims are real, why are they not identifiable on the internet?

The common denominator here is smelling a rat.

---

Rob, have you forgotten I offered to personally meet you so you could review the package materials? Let me know when I can hand them off to you at G2E.

And I expect you've forgotten that Alan has an invitation to drop in anytime in the next few weeks. Tony has the address, and Alan's only 30 minutes or so away. Alan doesn't even have to call in advance.

And Rob, you will be posting some of those folks who are willing to go to bat for you as a "gambling expert," right? I have my list, ready to rumble, but we need yours so Alan or Dan or whoever can call and compare. Think of it as a job interview for the label of "gambling expert" at VCT. So get those names together, Rob, and send them along.

Thanks, man, for keeping me in the news. I'd hate for you to listen to Dan and just accept reality.

Now be a good boy, and instead of trying to ignore what I just posted, why don't you help all of your fans out and tell them when you'll be meeting me to investigate the package? That'll be a fine start.

I don't think a "reference list" for gambling experts would work. After all, the APs don't even want us to know their names, so how could we possibly check on their references? LOL

edited to add:

How do you define a gambling expert? Is it someone who wins? Someone who knows the game and its rules?

I'm probably an expert at craps, yet I don't win at craps.
I'm probably an expert at video poker, yet I don't win at video poker.
I am an expert because I know the games and the rules.

On the other hand, I am not an expert at roulette because I don't understand the payoffs. I am not an expert at blackjack because I don't even understand the rules of surrender and splitting.

Knowing the rules does not translate to being an expert.

There are different types of "gaming experts" (which is kind of a weird phrase I think). Just like there are football experts -- some are professional players, some are coaches, some are commentators, some dig deep into the game and know what's all going on right now like which players are out, how one team's offense matches up against the other team's defense, and all sorts of other stuff I don't know or really care about. Someone who just watches football on Sundays is not (necessarily) an expert on football and most are not.

Alan, the video poker expert, do you know how the following games work: UX, STP, DSTP, Chase the royal, multi-strike, dream card, hot roll, super triple play, wheel poker, barnyard poker, extra draw frenzy?

Or if you're an expert on video poker math, can you calculate the chance of not hitting a royal in 120,000 hands on 9/6 JOB [for example]? Do you know how or can you calculate how the payback changes if a royal pays 8000 instead of 4000? Can you figure out the optimal quit point (win) if you're playing a rebate and your expected value? If you're playing a machine with a 1.5% meter on the RF progressive, do you know how much that 1.5% meter add to the overall return of the game?

Or perhaps you're an expert on gaming law (in NV). What happens if you hit a taxable at a casino and refuse to show ID or give a valid SSN, or both? What happens if you go to the cage with $15,000 in chips you just won at the craps table and refuse to show ID and/or a valid SSN (and it's not on file)? If you do give them an SSN but don't have the card, what paperwork are you supposed to fill out? Is it a valid roll if one die lands square on top of the other or can a casino choose a set of house rules saying it's valid and other casinos say it's not valid?


In general, I'd say an expert is someone who has in depth knowledge and an understanding in a particular field.


I know the rules of chess but I'm not a chess expert.

RS__ everything you wrote supports my point. What is an expert?

And, not once did you mention the requirements of winning or winning a lot.

It's called the typical "AP dance" Alan. These people always only go in believing they're talking to clones if themselves. Thus, the selective ramble.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

RS__ everything you wrote supports my point. What is an expert?

And, not once did you mention the requirements of winning or winning a lot.

---

Your point is "what is an expert?"


Your point is.....a question.....?

That's right, RS___, how do you define an expert?

Is it by winning? No. Lucky players win.
Is it by knowing the rules and the procedures of the game? Yes, that's what I think an expert is.

And yes, it was a question.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

That's right, RS___, how do you define an expert?

Is it by winning? No. Lucky players win.
Is it by knowing the rules and the procedures of the game? Yes, that's what I think an expert is.

And yes, it was a question.

---

Since I just had a helluva day (in a good way), I'll chime in.

An expert is someone who has a comprehensive and authoritative knowledge or skill in a particular area. Now here's the kicker -- it takes other established experts to define who is an expert. That's the way reality works.

Rob, however, never provides names who'll go to bat for him. Every field has established high profile people. Rob just needs to pick a few who are in his corner. Maybe someone should give Eileen Di Rocco a call at Gaming Today and see what she thinks. Alan, you're an investigative kind of dude. If you don't want to make the 30-minute drive to verify me, maybe you could make a five minute phone call to verify Rob. Just a thought.

And you are always welcome on Meadowridge Road.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

That's right, RS___, how do you define an expert?

Is it by winning? No. Lucky players win.
Is it by knowing the rules and the procedures of the game? Yes, that's what I think an expert is.

And yes, it was a question.

---

Wait.....so, you're actually serious?! LOL

I know the rules and procedures of chess, that doesn't make me a chess expert.


You say you're probably an expert in VP & craps, yet your definition of an expert is someone who knows the rules & procedures of a game. Are you saying you probably know the rules & procedures in VP and craps (but you might not know, since probably implies something isn't definite)?

Expert and winning are not synonymous.

Expert is defined as an authoritative knowledge of a specific area.

Since there is no such thing as long-term luck (Rob), long-term winning players who have figured a way to win on a consistent basis, qualify as experts, but not all experts are long-term winners.

(Long-term) winning players are experts, based on their extensive knowledge (not necessarily their winnings). But not all experts are winning players. You can be an expert based on authoritative knowledge and still play a losing game (often by choice) as Alan does. Or you can be an expert and not play at all, or worse case scenario, you can be a expert on casino gaming or specific area there of, and "play for the industry". :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Expert and winning are not synonymous.

Expert is defined as an authoritative knowledge of a specific area.

Since there is no such thing as long-term luck (Rob), long-term winning players who have figured a way to win on a consistent basis, qualify as experts, but not all experts are long-term winners.

(Long-term) winning players are experts, based on their extensive knowledge (not necessarily their winnings). But not all experts are winning players. You can be an expert based on authoritative knowledge and still play a losing game (often by choice) as Alan does. Or you can be an expert and not play at all, or worse case scenario, you can be a expert on casino gaming or specific area there of, and "play for the industry". :(

---

I'm not sure you can prove your statements. Indeed expert and winning are not synonymous. There are expert players at the WSOP who lose, and they keep on losing because some people just get lucky and these experts don't.

I consider Dan an expert at his game... unfortunately he hasn't done well in recent years. The reality is when you face a thousand competitors, somebody is going to draw the lucky cards despite all your knowledge.

That is exactly what happens in video poker. We know what the correct holds are -- but the damn RNG just doesn't cooperate all the time.

And I disagree about long term luck. Yes, there are people who get lucky long term. All they have to do is hit one big jackpot like the lottery and they will never be lifetime losers. That's not to say, however, they won't go broke spending it all. And there are some people who just keep muddling through.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RS__

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

That's right, RS___, how do you define an expert?

Is it by winning? No. Lucky players win.
Is it by knowing the rules and the procedures of the game? Yes, that's what I think an expert is.

And yes, it was a question.

---

Wait.....so, you're actually serious?! LOL

I know the rules and procedures of chess, that doesn't make me a chess expert.


You say you're probably an expert in VP & craps, yet your definition of an expert is someone who knows the rules & procedures of a game. Are you saying you probably know the rules & procedures in VP and craps (but you might not know, since probably implies something isn't definite)?

---

Do you want to be specific? I'm an expert at craps, yes. I've been playing for 20+ years. Sometimes -- believe it or not -- when the dice mess up the placement of the chips the floorman will sometimes look at me to help reconstruct the table. Why? Ever since Caesars got rid of boxmen, I've been "playing" the role of the boxman and I memorize what's on the table. I do it to protect myself and to protect the other players... as well as the house. I want to keep the game going and don't want disputes. I know all the payoffs, for right way and wrong way players. Now does that mean I can control the dice? No. Does that mean I always win? Definitely not. But I know the game and the rules and if I was called on to be a dealer I could deal.

Video poker? I'm not an expert at every game, but I sure know how to play bonus and jacks or better. I also know triple double bonus. I know the correct holds but does the RNG cooperate with my knowledge? Not enough. You need luck along with your knowledge.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

I'm not sure you can prove your statements.

---

You posting this exemplifies the fundamental difference in thinking between you and I concerning message board posting. I just posted my opinion of what I consider an expert. You respond that I can't prove my opinion.

News flash Alan....I don't have to prove my opinion.

I don't have to prove anything, opinion or claims. That is the way an anonymous message board works. Part of the fun, the challenge is figuring out who is credible and knows what they are talking about and who isn't. You or anyone is within their right to be skeptical of anything said, but you are not within your right to demand proof of anything. No one is on trial and has to 'prove' anything....claims and especially opinions.

Demand proof of an opinion.....what planet are you from?:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

And I disagree about long term luck. Yes, there are people who get lucky long term. All they have to do is hit one big jackpot like the lottery and they will never be lifetime losers.

---

I though someone might bring this up and considered addressing it up front. But then I figured no one was ridiculous enough to conflate a one time big jackpot with long-term winning. But you proved (a word you seem to love) me wrong. Someone was ridiculous enough to conflate the two. :(

If you don't understand the difference between a one-time big jackpot winner and a long-term advantage winner, it is no wonder you can't grasp advantage play. You are on opposite ends of the spectrum in just the way you think.

If I won $100-million by picking 7 numbers would it matter how many hands of $5 Bonus Poker I lost over the next 30 years? LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

Do you want to be specific? I'm an expert at craps, yes. I've been playing for 20+ years. Sometimes -- believe it or not -- when the dice mess up the placement of the chips the floorman will sometimes look at me to help reconstruct the table. Why? Ever since Caesars got rid of boxmen, I've been "playing" the role of the boxman and I memorize what's on the table. I do it to protect myself and to protect the other players... as well as the house. I want to keep the game going and don't want disputes. I know all the payoffs, for right way and wrong way players. Now does that mean I can control the dice? No. Does that mean I always win? Definitely not. But I know the game and the rules and if I was called on to be a dealer I could deal.

Video poker? I'm not an expert at every game, but I sure know how to play bonus and jacks or better. I also know triple double bonus. I know the correct holds but does the RNG cooperate with my knowledge? Not enough. You need luck along with your knowledge.

---

Granted the original definition of 'expert' you gave is complete horse shit, yes, you should be a bit more specific than simply knowing the rules and procedures makes someone an expert.


I don't think knowing those things really makes you an expert. Or rather, I don't think every field can have someone of expertise. Expertise requires in depth knowledge and a true understanding, IMO. Sure, you can know optimal strategy to tic-tac-toe, but you can never be an expert in it....because there isn't a significant amount of information to be learned on the game -- it's a solved "problem" and is basic and straightforward. Just because some may not know the proper strategy doesn't mean others can be experts. To me, craps is the same thing. There's no depth to the game itself. If you want to say someone can be a DI expert, I agree there (not that I believe DI works, but someone can be an expert in that field).


As far as VP, I don't think knowing a strategy makes someone an expert. Not to mention, I don't think you even know the proper optimal strategy to any of those three games and you certainly don't play with the optimal or even basic strategy.

If I won $100-million by picking 7 numbers would it matter how many hands of $5 Bonus Poker I lost over the next 30 years? LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

If I won $100-million by picking 7 numbers would it matter how many hands of $5 Bonus Poker I lost over the next 30 years? LOL

---

Really? :confused: You want to post this not once...but twice? :confused:

I would be embarrassed to have even had this thought, much less post it.

I'm an expert at knowing who isn't an expert.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

I'm an expert at knowing who isn't an expert.

---

You know, I always thought my strength was knowing what I don't know. It's good to meet someone who knows when other people don't know that they don't know.

Actually, I can't explain how it posted twice??????

Putting 10,000 hours into some activity, job, game ect. makes an expert.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by quahaug

Putting 10,000 hours into some activity, job, game ect. makes an expert.

---

Quahaug, I would be careful using the Malcolm Gladwell definition. That makes all of us Americans porn experts.

More corn red. No wonder you're unmarried, riding busses, and incapable of mailing things with integrity or putting links up on the web.

You keep insisting on handing me your silly pr packet at G2E because you want to "prove" whatever it is you're trying to prove. But do you realize how stupid of you that sounds? Just what a doubting thomas who seems to be under your skin wants: papers from the claimant. Instead, SHOW US THESE ASSERTIONS ON THE INTERNET.

Now kew claims opining as an anonymous poster doesn't count. Imagine if he used that line at some gay bath house.

AP's continually toot their horns by claiming "long term success" because they're "experts in their field". Yet the best of the best--Mike Shack.--who has made millions off of his ability to run the numbers and put them up on the internet, had zero success in long term advantage play vp. But we're supposed to believe all these anonymous hacks who troll forums with their "I win, and the proof is in the theory....but don't ever ask me to support any if it in any real way". They're all like the whining libtards: "You have your right to an opinion, but if it differs from mine then you're dead wrong and a hater!"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson

If I won $100-million by picking 7 numbers would it matter how many hands of $5 Bonus Poker I lost over the next 30 years? LOL

---

Worth repeating.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

More corn red. No wonder you're unmarried, riding busses, and incapable of mailing things with integrity or putting links up on the web.

You keep insisting on handing me your silly pr packet at G2E because you want to "prove" whatever it is you're trying to prove. But do you realize how stupid of you that sounds? Just what a doubting thomas who seems to be under your skin wants: papers from the claimant. Instead, SHOW US THESE ASSERTIONS ON THE INTERNET.

Now kew claims opining as an anonymous poster doesn't count. Imagine if he used that line at some gay bath house.

AP's continually toot their horns by claiming "long term success" because they're "experts in their field". Yet the best of the best--Mike Shack.--who has made millions off of his ability to run the numbers and put them up on the internet, had zero success in long term advantage play vp. But we're supposed to believe all these anonymous hacks who troll forums with their "I win, and the proof is in the theory....but don't ever ask me to support any if it in any real way". They're all like the whining libtards: "You have your right to an opinion, but if it differs from mine then you're dead wrong and a hater!"

---

Rob, you're hilarious. Where are your claims to fame? On the internet? I don't see any. Anybody else see any? I don't see a damned thing on the internet regarding anything you've done. Nothing. Zip. Zilch.

Your interviews with Alan? What do they prove? That you don't know what you're doing and you need a new wardrobe?

Please point us in the direction of your internet expertise. You posted a couple of jackpots. You've gotta be kidding -- that's your proof? I won $2500 on a $20 bet yesterday. Should I post a photo of that as proof that I know what I'm doing? That's ridiculous.

You, the person with no internet proof, no references who will go to bat for your gambling expertise, no knowledge of anything other than martingale video poker, you criticize people for a lack of internet proof?

That's the very definition of a hypocrite. . . . man.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

More corn red. No wonder you're unmarried, riding busses, and incapable of mailing things with integrity or putting links up on the web.

You keep insisting on handing me your silly pr packet at G2E because you want to "prove" whatever it is you're trying to prove. But do you realize how stupid of you that sounds? Just what a doubting thomas who seems to be under your skin wants: papers from the claimant. Instead, SHOW US THESE ASSERTIONS ON THE INTERNET.

Now kew claims opining as an anonymous poster doesn't count. Imagine if he used that line at some gay bath house.

AP's continually toot their horns by claiming "long term success" because they're "experts in their field". Yet the best of the best--Mike Shack.--who has made millions off of his ability to run the numbers and put them up on the internet, had zero success in long term advantage play vp. But we're supposed to believe all these anonymous hacks who troll forums with their "I win, and the proof is in the theory....but don't ever ask me to support any if it in any real way". They're all like the whining libtards: "You have your right to an opinion, but if it differs from mine then you're dead wrong and a hater!"

---

Rob, you're hilarious. Where are your claims to fame? On the internet? I don't see any. Anybody else see any? I don't see a damned thing on the internet regarding anything you've done. Nothing. Zip. Zilch.

Your interviews with Alan? What do they prove? That you don't know what you're doing and you need a new wardrobe?

Please point us in the direction of your internet expertise. You posted a couple of jackpots. You've gotta be kidding -- that's your proof? I won $2500 on a $20 bet yesterday. Should I post a photo of that as proof that I know what I'm doing? That's ridiculous.

You, the person with no internet proof, no references who will go to bat for your gambling expertise, no knowledge of anything other than martingale video poker, you criticize people for a lack of internet proof?

That's the very definition of a hypocrite. . . . man.

---

https://www.google.com/search?hl=en-...Bd5L8uaMa_mDM:
You need to watch your appearance, Rob.

Sling, you must go through a ton of Charmin wiping all of Singer's shit off of that brown nose you've got!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rob.Singer

Now kew claims opining as an anonymous poster doesn't count. Imagine if he used that line at some gay bath house.

---

I have never been to a gay bath house. Not something that interests me. But since you are the expert Rob and obviously have....please tell us all how that would be received?

I figured it out. The post appeared twice because I was using my cell phone. The first post went thru but the outgoing post remained on my phone and at some point I pressed something on my phone which sent it again. (I was still on the reply page of the forum.)

What Rob wrote about The Wizard supports what I said. We all agree Mike is an expert at the math of gaming but that doesn't necessarily means he wins.

You don't have to win to be an expert.

If experts always won, APs would never have losing sessions.

It's luck that your expert knowledge coincides with the shuffle, or the roll, or the spin, or the choice of the RNG. Knowledge alone doesn't make anyone a winner -- it helps -- but you need luck.