What claim have I made that I'm wrong about? I'm just doing what you can't bring yourself to do. Asking fair and unbiased questions. Did you say you were a journalism major?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Printable View
What claim have I made that I'm wrong about? I'm just doing what you can't bring yourself to do. Asking fair and unbiased questions. Did you say you were a journalism major?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
KJ, do you acknowledge that maxie lied about the picture of the jackpot?Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJAt 10:30 when I read Singer's bullshit, I was over at UNLV taking a little walk around campus. I like UNLV because they have grass and trees that aren't palm trees. And no one is around right now until summer classes start in a few weeks. I figured at about 11:15 or so I would head down to SP. I wasn't going to make myself known, because I am pretty sure with Singer's proven obsession with me, he wanted to do something nafarious like snap a picture to pass to casinos like that asshole Maddawg did with information. I figured I would hide behind jbjb, who was hiding behind the trash can. Seriously I figured I would take a seat at a VP machine within view of the bar and if anyone figured out who I was, it would be MaxPen. But the lying sack of shit, 20 year troll had already renegged by then.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
And he wasn't in Vegas either. No where close. I don't even think you can get from Vegas to Phoenix in the 4 hours between when he announced he was leaving and he talked to Alan. The most direct route is 300 miles and isn't a main highway that you can drive 80 on. The old fucker never left his daughters house! I know he claimed that Dan Druff could check his location but I guarantee he was using a VPN and that location would have come up in Nebraska or some place and then he would have played dumb.
It is really pissing me off that Alan and crimm don't have the decency to tell the truth and aren't big enough to admit when they are wrong.
Yeah, the guy asking fair and unbiased questions has yet to ask Rob any questions. I'm not going to address Rob. But mickey never asked Rob any of the painfully obvious stuff. Like:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmWhat claim have I made that I'm wrong about? I'm just doing what you can't bring yourself to do. Asking fair and unbiased questions. Did you say you were a journalism major?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
1) What the hell were you thinking to arrive that early?
2) What the hell were you thinking to leave before the scheduled meeting?
3) What the hell were you thinking to not provide shots of you at South Point or some kind of video?
4) How is your son allegedly being with you at 10 AM and allegedly being drunk making any sense whatsoever?
5) Who was your son drinking with and why, if the meeting was at noon?
6) What happened to the money allegedly stashed with Nersesian?
7) Kewl said he called Nersesian. Rob, if I call Nersesian, what will he tell me about your escrow?
8) How likely do you think it is that someone like Bob Dancer would not have heard about your 1.5 million jackpot being hit?
9) Why would you sign an NDA and then blab about the jackpot on line? What is the purpose of that?
10) Why have just one photo of the jackpot? And why would you not be in it?
That took me roughly five minutes to write these down. Mickey has not asked Rob one of them. The whole thing is asinine.
So now the fair and balanced dude will respond by doing what? Asking the questions? Coming up with additional questions? Or ignoring how ridiculous he sounds because he doesn't ask Rob any questions?
Can you imagine mickey on GWAE fielding these questions?
The whole thing is beyond stupid. If it's supposedly wrong that I'm not asking Max for proof he was there, how completely horrendously stupid is it for mickey to pretend he's fair and unbiased? It's gotta be a joke.
Mickey, it's embarrassing to engage with you. Nobody should. I'm done. Write your Brokeback essays and nonsense. For years, I have not said a single negative thing about your personal history or hobo this or penny ante that. Not once. I have always defended your authentic life. Every time.
And the first thing you went for when I laid out my journalism and reporting experience was that I "washed out of journalism." That was your first and only response to the fact I had a decent idea what I was talking about. The fair and unbiased dude. And you were completely dead wrong, but the fair and unbiased dude didn't even acknowledge that he was completely wrong.
Pathetic. Have a good life.
Hey, Max, you could call the movie, "Getting Shit Done".Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnabbyYeah, sure, why not. It's the only thing that makes any sense in this thread, with the usual headcases. As per usual, usually the last and/or first parts of a quote.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenQuote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
If you were an advantage player and you weren't familiar with all of your opportunities. How would you know which specialty to pursue?
You're one of those weak willed academics with no fortitude or discipline going nowhere. Yet you want to try and sit in judgment of those that get shit done.
Get back to your anagrams loser.
---> Adios, America: The Left's Plan to Turn Our Country Into a Third World Hellhole.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
https://anagram-solver.net/%20If%20y...e?partial=true
Which makes perfect sense, coming from another closet Nazi. God help us if they ever get into power again.
Secret VCT codeword, RIP + ...
---> Message in a Bottle (Star Trek: Voyager).Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
https://anagram-solver.net/%20secret....?partial=true
From some distant shore, I guess, full of headcases.
Ray was right. All of you guys really and actually are "bat shit crazy". Red turned out to be just another old hag throwing "dishes", trying to sell but not solicit himself.
Maybe not Monet, but, yes, also definitely that nasty, Tablepooey. Ha. (Come on, Tablepooey, one more time!)
P.S. Can't believe I got the third lines, from the Russians helping Trump, and, him not winning the popular vote, to Russian and American losses in the air, and, Trump not winning re-election. All three lines correct. What were the odds of getting the last two lines in the same set of anagrams. Over a million times a million. The only proof of anything worthwhile, so far on any of the gambling forums. The only one not to waste a few hours here. Even the Wizard's crap makes more sense.
P.P.S. Max, you need to get Red to write the screenplay. And Alan, with queens and presidents in tow, to play you. With jbjb hiding behind a trash can, which is what he seems to keep popping in and out from thinking that anyone gives a shit. Singer will play himself, as usual.
But, the one thing that you will never be able to disprove was the anagrams, even the one that you tried to put me on the spot with. Then you tried to make it seem that I didn't answer it.
What a lying piece-of-shit, fuck-up you are. Ha.
P.S. Say, Max, if you were at the casino well before Rob said he'd be there, and was, then why didn't you reply to his message here about confirming the new time?
Imagine being Robert A. Nersesian and having to deal with a bunch of lunatics calling him about a dispute from VegasCasinoTalk.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Or Dancer. Being decent enough to answer me regarding whether he'd heard through any grapevine about a 1.6 million hit recently. This does not reflect well on Witteles, for sure. We may be lunatics, but Witteles allows this crap.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetImagine being Robert A. Nersesian and having to deal with a bunch of lunatics calling him about a dispute from VegasCasinoTalk.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Oh I see, your secret mission has always been to destroy this site and Dan Druff.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Well Played.
Thanks a lot as I look forward to Dan Druff's MLB picks.
Oh well, you will never destroy his Poker Fraud Site, I think.
lol at "Poker Fraud."
What really bothers me is where to put the quotations.
Before or after the period?
Ugh!
---> National Register of Historic Places listings in Devils Tower National Monument.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
https://anagram-solver.net/Imagine%2...0?partial=true
Monet, the period goes after, unless the phrase is a full sentence. Ask any English teacher. Besides, it just looks stupid, the way that you did it above.
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
741 ---> Just text 741741
Well Singer clearly won this round. He trolled you guys to the point where you were whipped into a frenzy of hate and pitted one against the other for days (years really). That's what he does. He's been doing it for 2 decades. "The Perfect Storm" lol...Sharps...lol.
"Strange game. The only way to win is not to play". Joshua.
Feeling Hurt.Quote:
Originally Posted by unowme
I agree that it does look stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Over the years I have seen conflicting information.
I guess I got it wrong and misunderstood.
Sorry.
--->Quote:
Originally Posted by unowme
Why You Always Gotta Start Something
Going All the Way Is Just the Start
Am I the Only One (Aaron Lewis song)
Some Things Last Longer than You
Easy Way Out (Elliott Smith song)
He Was Really Saying Something
Loose Woman: Getting Wet at Noon
The Argument (with annotations)
The Last Song I Am Wasting On You
https://anagram-solver.net/%22Strang....?partial=true
These guys seem to argue about where to put the period and it appears they blame the British for the confusion.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby--->Quote:
Originally Posted by unowme
Why You Always Gotta Start Something
Going All the Way Is Just the Start
Am I the Only One (Aaron Lewis song)
Some Things Last Longer than You
Easy Way Out (Elliott Smith song)
He Was Really Saying Something
Loose Woman: Getting Wet at Noon
The Argument (with annotations)
The Last Song I Am Wasting On You
https://anagram-solver.net/%22Strang....?partial=true
For the most part the consensus seems to be that it really doesn't matter as long as you capitalize the letter in the next sentence.
Whatever though, I will try to do it your way from now on, thanks for the information.
I'm dumb but you know that already.
https://style.mla.org/the-placement-...enth%20century.
And when you read this information you only see the quotes after the period or comma.
Confusing lol.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/quotation-marks/
“The problem with opinions,” Garnabby explained, “is that everyone has one.”
I have to disagree here. If you are using American English, as opposed to British (English) English, the period goes inside the quotation marks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby---> National Register of Historic Places listings in Devils Tower National Monument.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
https://anagram-solver.net/Imagine%2...0?partial=true
Monet, the period goes after, unless the phrase is a full sentence. Ask any English teacher. Besides, it just looks stupid, the way that you did it above.
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
741 ---> Just text 741741
The following is from Grammarly.com but if you google the rule is pretty clear.
Do commas and periods go inside or outside quotation marks?
Commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks in American English; dashes, colons, and semicolons almost always go outside the quotation marks; question marks and exclamation marks sometimes go inside, sometimes stay outside.
In British English it is the opposite with some exceptions. Garnabby--if you are in Canada I am not sure which would be correct but I assume your way would be correct.
OOOPS--didn't see Monet response above.
You continue to demonstrate what a pile of shit you are with your unprovoked attacks Bill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
Like I said... confusing.Quote:
Originally Posted by regnis
I always thought it was how Garnabby stated as he punished me with his insults.
However, years ago when I started to research it, it appeared that the quotes almost always went after the period or comma.
So I started to do it like that but like Granabby said, it looks stupid but whatever, lol.
As I previously stated, its a conflict between the British way and the American way to do it.
He means well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou continue to demonstrate what a pile of shit you are with your unprovoked attacks Bill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Well we certainly know that if the Maple Syrup has corn syrup as a listed ingredient then it's not the real stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetHe means well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou continue to demonstrate what a pile of shit you are with your unprovoked attacks Bill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Agreed but I'm worried about the stuff that is labeled 100% certified and is actually fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Of course this could never happen, right?
Nobody would ever cheat us like that!?
I read somewhere that it takes 40 gallons of Tree Water to make 1 gallon of Maple Syrup.
I can see why people would want to cut it like cocaine or heroin to make more profit.
Add in some Fentanyl... who cares if people die!
Yes that is a possibility. The FDA doesn't have the manpower to enforce it. Wales seems to adhere to high quality standards, but I don't know how good the supply chain is to the States from there or how freshness could be maintained.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetAgreed but I'm worried about the stuff that is labeled 100% certified and is actually fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Of course this could never happen, right.
Nobody would ever cheat us like that!?
I read somewhere that it takes 40 gallons of Tree Water to make 1 gallon of Maple Syrup.
I can see why people would want to cut it like cocaine or heroin to make more profit.
Add in some Fentanyl... who cares if people die!
A few years ago I watched a documentary about honey and how most of it on the store shelves is fake in one way or another and it is labeled genuine.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Let that sink in that 76% of Honey sold in America is fake in one way or another!
I also watched that documentary about the Maple Syrup Heist lol... idiots finally got caught but it's still an ongoing problem.
Pretty funny to be a guy who steals truck loads of Maple Syrup for a living, lol!
Meanwhile, kewlJ is the last Honest Abe in the Card Counting business.
That was the one thing that bothered me about that GWAE sports betting podcast.
The guy literally opened up with that he didn't abuse the Promotions during that time.
He stated that he only wanted to beat the Sportsbook with his mind and that it was mental warfare???
That kind of made me skeptical of anything he said afterward as it was conflicting and made no sense.
I mean this was literally the era of FREE MONEY EVERYWHERE and in ALL DIRECTIONS but he was playing it STRAIGHT???
Maybe he just didn't want it to be public knowledge that he Scamblered Millions.
I mean he does work both sides of the fence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Poor poor Mickey up all night trying any convoluted way to save himself and Singer. You are so biased you could have been there with me and you would still claim that I didn't show.
Everytime your boy got rattled thru out the challenge for me to show he would try and change some condition. When I would meet them he would change again.
You are running on an on all the way down to wanting to even know if I had 100k on me....lol.....the conditions were changed so much by your beloved I could be wrong, but I don't remember that being a requirement. But I've already proven that is a requirement I could easily meet. Unlike your boy with his stack of Amazon prop cash.
You really have fallen very far.
At 9:39 Rob claimed he was leaving Caesars for Southpoint. I live in the Southwest quadrant if Vegas. Much closer than Caesars. So without saying anything I headed out for the meeting. Why would I say anything. So he could change the conditions again?
The Silverado Bar was empty when I arrived at 9:55am. That is the time stamp on the pic in my phone.
I took up a seat dead center bar facing into the empty lounge containing not more than about a dozen tables. No one showed by 11am. Which is way more than enough time to get from Caesars even if you're driving some jalopy and it stalls out a couple times a long the way.
I wound up staying there until about 2:45 because at 11 I started doing my end of the month bookkeeping. I left my chair. The one pushed out from where I said I sat. Here is a picture. It is time stamped in my phone at 2:40
I also know how big of idiots you all are. So before leaving I cashed a slot ticket from where I was sitting as further proof.
Despite all this I don't expect an apology. What I expect is more of the same. This is how easy it would be for your beloved fake man to prove stuff.
But you and Alan are just lying trolls like him.....RIP
I'm actually done with the 3 of you. You all have been completely humiliated and anyone taking any of you seriously is a fool.
The Armenians might sell the real stuff on the Black Market/Dark Web ;-) Yes, the promotions in those days were crazy. Maybe since abuse is a subjective adjective he left himself with some wiggle room in regards to stating that he did not "abuse" promotions. I certainly hope that is the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetA few years ago I watched a documentary about honey and how most of it on the store shelves is fake in one way or another and it is labeled genuine.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Let that sink in that 76% of Honey sold in America is fake in one way or another!
I also watched that documentary about the Maple Syrup Heist lol... idiots finally got caught but it's still an ongoing problem.
Pretty funny to be a guy who steals truck loads of Maple Syrup for a living, lol!
Meanwhile, kewlJ is the last Honest Abe in the Card Counting business.
That was the one thing that bothered me about that GWAE sports betting podcast.
The guy literally opened up with that he didn't abuse the Promotions during that time.
He stated that he only wanted to beat the Sportsbook with his mind and that it was mental warfare???
That kind of made me skeptical of anything he said afterward as it was conflicting and made no sense.
I mean this was literally the era of FREE MONEY EVERYWHERE and in ALL DIRECTIONS but he was playing it STRAIGHT???
Maybe he just didn't want it to be public knowledge that he Scamblered Millions.
I mean he does work both sides of the fence.
Well done MaxPen. Not that it will matter to these lying fucktards.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Poor poor Mickey up all night trying any convoluted way to save himself and Singer. You are so biased you could have been there with me and you would still claim that I didn't show.
Everytime your boy got rattled thru out the challenge for me to show he would try and change some condition. When I would meet them he would change again.
You are running on an on all the way down to wanting to even know if I had 100k on me....lol.....the conditions were changed so much by your beloved I could be wrong, but I don't remember that being a requirement. But I've already proven that is a requirement I could easily meet. Unlike your boy with his stack of Amazon prop cash.
You really have fallen very far.
At 9:39 Rob claimed he was leaving Caesars for Southpoint. I live in the Southwest quadrant if Vegas. Much closer than Caesars. So without saying anything I headed out for the meeting. Why would I say anything. So he could change the conditions again?
The Silverado Bar was empty when I arrived at 9:55am. That is the time stamp on the pic in my phone.
I took up a seat dead center bar facing into the empty lounge containing not more than about a dozen tables. No one showed by 11am. Which is way more than enough time to get from Caesars even if you're driving some jalopy and it stalls out a couple times a long the way.
I wound up staying there until about 2:45 because at 11 I started doing my end of the month bookkeeping. I left my chair. The one pushed out from where I said I sat. Here is a picture. It is time stamped in my phone at 2:40
I also know how big of idiots you all are. So before leaving I cashed a slot ticket from where I was sitting as further proof.
Despite all this I don't expect an apology. What I expect is more of the same. This is how easy it would be for your beloved fake man to prove stuff.
But you and Alan are just lying trolls like him.....RIP
I'm actually done with the 3 of you. You all have been completely humiliated and anyone taking any of you seriously is a fool.
LOL at you bringing the Armenians into the conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Good One!
I probably messed up by saying he said he didn't abuse the promotions.
What I meant was that he said he didn't take part in any of the promotions.
Although, I am confusing myself now because I am going off of memory and am not 100% sure.
But that isn't the point.
He literally said that it was mental warfare and he didn't want to win using promotions.
Like it was beneath him?
Anyways, like I say, I suspect he did beat the promotions but didn't want to publicly acknowledge it.
However, after that statement it was tough for me to really take him at his word.
And, like I say, it is very tough for me to trust anyone who works both sides of the fence like he and Dancer does.
As I told you before, after Dancer did his first seminar at the El Cortel and they swept up most of the Full Pay Games one day after he left I never trusted him again.
Same goes for that Munchkin.
But that is just me.
The information they provide on their podcast is most likely good information.
I like how he mentioned Neteller but quickly got away from the subject.
Yeah... because there was a way to crush them for hundreds of thousands of dollars and he didn't want to admit to it lol.
Not that I would do any such thing.
I play it straight!
I'm a gambler!
Thanks Monet. I agree that it is difficult to take him at face value after that statement and also I agree that people working both sides (dark-siders are what they are sometimes referred to I guess) need to be treated with a great deal of skepticism.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetLOL at you bringing the Armenians into the conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Good One!
I probably messed up by saying he said he didn't abuse the promotions.
What I meant was that he said he didn't take part in any of the promotions.
Although, I am confusing myself now because I am going off of memory and am not 100% sure.
But that isn't the point.
He literally said that it was mental warfare and he didn't want to win using promotions.
Like it was beneath him?
Anyways, like I say, I suspect he did beat the promotions but didn't want to publicly acknowledge it.
However, after that statement it was tough for me to really take him at his word.
And, like I say, it is very tough for me to trust anyone who works both sides of the fence like he and Dancer does.
As I told you before, after Dancer did his first seminar at the El Cortel and they swept up most of the Full Pay Games one day after he left I never trusted him again.
Same goes for that Munchkin.
But that is just me.
The information they provide on their podcast is most likely good information.
I like how he mentioned Neteller but quickly got away from the subject.
Yeah... because there was a way to crush them for hundreds of thousands of dollars and he didn't want to admit to it lol.
Not that I would do any such thing.
I play it straight!
I'm a gambler!
Now with regard to Munchkin, I don't recall him working both sides, but that may be the case. What I did notice is that the online bonus hustling Munchkin talks about (not in that episode but in others) is way outdated. The stuff he mentioned was relevant 16 or more years ago, but not now. For example, the online bonuses and deposits associated with them now have a very limited max bet per spin - like $5 or $10 or even some percentage of the bonus to prevent rebate hustling (Munchkin mentions laying the whole thing down in one big bet) at most online casinos. Betting both sides on roulette,craps,sic bo, etc. is not permitted ("low risk" betting) and oftentimes slots are the only games given 100% weight in meeting the huge turnover requirements. VP is often given a weighting of 10% to 20% of the wager size or is simply not permitted for meeting turnover, so a player really has to do their online promotion shopping carefully these days compared to yesteryear as you know.
No surprise.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
Well played, BTW.
So now Rob's legacy is complete; instead of walking away, head held high while others thank him for his years of valuable posting he slinks away having once again been proven a liar and a fool (a fairly smart fool, but a fool nonetheless).
Another devotee of "the Big Lie."
Next you'll tell me that there is no santa claus and that size does matter.
Not that long ago if you knew how it worked you could run this Play both sides of a certain game that utilized live dealers on different sites in different states. You couldQuote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThanks Monet. I agree that it is difficult to take him at face value after that statement and also I agree that people working both sides (dark-siders are what they are sometimes referred to I guess) need to be treated with a great deal of skepticism.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetLOL at you bringing the Armenians into the conversation.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Good One!
I probably messed up by saying he said he didn't abuse the promotions.
What I meant was that he said he didn't take part in any of the promotions.
Although, I am confusing myself now because I am going off of memory and am not 100% sure.
But that isn't the point.
He literally said that it was mental warfare and he didn't want to win using promotions.
Like it was beneath him?
Anyways, like I say, I suspect he did beat the promotions but didn't want to publicly acknowledge it.
However, after that statement it was tough for me to really take him at his word.
And, like I say, it is very tough for me to trust anyone who works both sides of the fence like he and Dancer does.
As I told you before, after Dancer did his first seminar at the El Cortel and they swept up most of the Full Pay Games one day after he left I never trusted him again.
Same goes for that Munchkin.
But that is just me.
The information they provide on their podcast is most likely good information.
I like how he mentioned Neteller but quickly got away from the subject.
Yeah... because there was a way to crush them for hundreds of thousands of dollars and he didn't want to admit to it lol.
Not that I would do any such thing.
I play it straight!
I'm a gambler!
Now with regard to Munchkin, I don't recall him working both sides, but that may be the case. What I did notice is that the online bonus hustling Munchkin talks about (not in that episode but in others) is way outdated. The stuff he mentioned was relevant 16 or more years ago, but not now. For example, the online bonuses and deposits associated with them now have a very limited max bet per spin - like $5 or $10 or even some percentage of the bonus to prevent rebate hustling (Munchkin mentions laying the whole thing down in one big bet) at most online casinos. Betting both sides on roulette,craps,sic bo, etc. is not permitted ("low risk" betting) and oftentimes slots are the only games given 100% weight in meeting the huge turnover requirements. VP is often given a weighting of 10% to 20% of the wager size or is simply not permitted for meeting turnover, so a player really has to do their online promotion shopping carefully these days compared to yesteryear as you know.
Negotiate up to a 30k bonus depending on how much you were willing to deposit.
Length up to about 8inches is all most women can handle. I tend to bottom out and have to short stroke most women. However girth is what they desire. Most women like girth over length. So Robs 9.5 is not something women enjoyQuote:
Originally Posted by regnis
Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueLength up to about 8inches is all most women can handle. I tend to bottom out and have to short stroke most women. However girth is what they desire. Most women like girth over length. So Robs 9.5 is not something women enjoyQuote:
Originally Posted by regnis
PRO tip
Lay the women on her side and hit it from the back. This position allows you to get an extra inch or so in because apparently the angle makes it less painful in regards to the womens cervix. I had a special lady who wanted it all teach me this .
It's fascinating to think that you actually believe Rob was swinging 9.5 inches.
Then to top off this Neverending Story you pipe in about your "girth."
Rob may have left the building but I see there's a new kid in town, playing Paul the Apostle to Rob's Jesus.
Rob may have died on the cross but his "teachings," such as they may be, live on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Maybe the play is to let morons like you think that then actually place a bet you can’t win. Like for example my dick size or the play I posted about. Thats the problem with lawyers they think they know everything. However their profession is the same as the rest. Most of you are just idiots with a very small percentage of super intelligent stars. I say you are bottom 5 percent on onlyfans V.
Hopefully you will keep your word on this. But I don't expect you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
PS Slept like a baby last night.
Please keep your word about being done with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietzYeah, the guy asking fair and unbiased questions has yet to ask Rob any questions. I'm not going to address Rob. But mickey never asked Rob any of the painfully obvious stuff. Like:Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmWhat claim have I made that I'm wrong about? I'm just doing what you can't bring yourself to do. Asking fair and unbiased questions. Did you say you were a journalism major?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
1) What the hell were you thinking to arrive that early?
2) What the hell were you thinking to leave before the scheduled meeting?
3) What the hell were you thinking to not provide shots of you at South Point or some kind of video?
4) How is your son allegedly being with you at 10 AM and allegedly being drunk making any sense whatsoever?
5) Who was your son drinking with and why, if the meeting was at noon?
6) What happened to the money allegedly stashed with Nersesian?
7) Kewl said he called Nersesian. Rob, if I call Nersesian, what will he tell me about your escrow?
8) How likely do you think it is that someone like Bob Dancer would not have heard about your 1.5 million jackpot being hit?
9) Why would you sign an NDA and then blab about the jackpot on line? What is the purpose of that?
10) Why have just one photo of the jackpot? And why would you not be in it?
That took me roughly five minutes to write these down. Mickey has not asked Rob one of them. The whole thing is asinine.
So now the fair and balanced dude will respond by doing what? Asking the questions? Coming up with additional questions? Or ignoring how ridiculous he sounds because he doesn't ask Rob any questions?
Can you imagine mickey on GWAE fielding these questions?
The whole thing is beyond stupid. If it's supposedly wrong that I'm not asking Max for proof he was there, how completely horrendously stupid is it for mickey to pretend he's fair and unbiased? It's gotta be a joke.
Mickey, it's embarrassing to engage with you. Nobody should. I'm done. Write your Brokeback essays and nonsense. For years, I have not said a single negative thing about your personal history or hobo this or penny ante that. Not once. I have always defended your authentic life. Every time.
And the first thing you went for when I laid out my journalism and reporting experience was that I "washed out of journalism." That was your first and only response to the fact I had a decent idea what I was talking about. The fair and unbiased dude. And you were completely dead wrong, but the fair and unbiased dude didn't even acknowledge that he was completely wrong.
Pathetic. Have a good life.
I would like to thank KJ from the bottom of my heart for teaching us how to use our imaginations to conjure up all kinds of far fetched but slightly plausible theories and scenarios.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
It's easy when you get the hang of it.
That's fantastic Seedvalue. I hope you made a lot of money on that play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
[QUOTE=mickeycrimm;144474]Yes, well done. But not good enough. Maxie could have staged the whole thing. In and out quickly snapping pictures and grabbing a slot ticket.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
How does anyone here know maxie sat at the center of the place for 4.5 Hours like he said?
He could have sent an agent in to get the pictures.
And if he hid someplace and seen Rob he could haul ass without having to hand over money.
Maxiepad is a las vegas hustler. He damn well knows how to angle shoot a situation.
He lied about the jackpot picture. It proves he is capable of lying and setting things up. What else has he lied about?
KJ, once again, do you acknowledge that maxie lied about the jackpot picture?
Then play victim when someone calls you out about it, Block them, and create a steal fortress echo chamber of bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI would like to thank KJ from the bottom of my heart for teaching us how to use our imaginations to conjure up all kinds of far fetched but slightly plausible theories and scenarios.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
It's easy when you get the hang of it.
Seeing as to how I am still the main focal point of your sig line you can fuck off with any pleadings with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHopefully you will keep your word on this. But I don't expect you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
PS Slept like a baby last night.
Maybe if you change it to "I rode the Singer 9.5 and I was wrong".
Keep that for a month and then I may consider :cool:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThat's fantastic Seedvalue. I hope you made a lot of money on that play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Not much I just did it twice. Setting up multiple accounts and transferring large sums of money into other peoples accounts is not something many people want to get involved with. It was draft kings so almost everyone I know has some kind of fantasy thing going on with them so they didn’t want to risk their accounts.
[QUOTE=mickeycrimm;144476]And there goes the tramp ranting in the street again. What a loser....lolQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYes, well done. But not good enough. Maxie could have staged the whole thing. In and out quickly snapping pictures and grabbing a slot ticket.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
How does anyone here know maxie sat at the center of the place for 4.5 Hours like he said?
He could have sent an agent in to get the pictures.
And if he hid someplace and seen Rob he could haul ass without having to hand over money.
Maxiepad is a las vegas hustler. He damn well knows how to angle shoot a situation.
He lied about the jackpot picture. It proves he is capable of lying and setting things up. What else has he lied about?
KJ, once again, do you acknowledge that maxie lied about the jackpot picture?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHopefully you will keep your word on this. But I don't expect you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
PS Slept like a baby last night.
You want me to change my tagline. Okay, I will.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenSeeing as to how I am still the main focal point of your sig line you can fuck off with any pleadings with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHopefully you will keep your word on this. But I don't expect you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
PS Slept like a baby last night.
Maybe if you change it to "I rode the Singer 9.5 and I was wrong".
Keep that for a month and then I may consider :cool:
I think I will keep my new tagline for longer than a month. And you can look forward to years of me harassing the fuck out of you, poser pro. Now get back to sucking KJ's dick.
Redietz has alleged that Bob Dancer has said he doesn't know anything about a 1.5 million dollar video poker jackpot. Redietz somehow thinks that bolsters his argument that Rob Singer got the picture from someone else, i.e., that it was someone else's jackpot.
Here's the problem. maxie said the picture was taken months ago (although he has been discredited). Bob Dancer hasn't heard anything about a 1.5 million dollar video poker jackpot that was supposedly hit "months ago."
Bob Dancer is plugged in with all the top tier video poker professionals....and a lot of elites in other forms of gambling. He certainly knows more professional gamblers than any person ever has.
The largest video poker jackpot of all time would certainly be something to talk about. Even if there was an NDA the word would still surreptitiously get around.
So Dancer didn't hear of this jackpot two years ago, or one year ago, or six months ago, or two months ago? With as many people he is plugged in with, why hasn't he heard about it?
Could it be that he hadn't heard about it because the jackpot was hit just a few days ago? Late May.
One thing is for sure. The pic is evidence that someone hit a 1.5 million dollar video poker jackpot.
Who was the person that hit it? How could the story of the largest video poker jackpot in history stay under wraps for months if it was hit that long ago?
Why is Singer the only one with a picture of it?
It's unfortunate that the terms of bonuses these days are such that gaining a significant edge often involves such risks.Quote:
Originally Posted by SeedvalueQuote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThat's fantastic Seedvalue. I hope you made a lot of money on that play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Not much I just did it twice. Setting up multiple accounts and transferring large sums of money into other peoples accounts is not something many people want to get involved with. It was draft kings so almost everyone I know has some kind of fantasy thing going on with them so they didn’t want to risk their accounts.
It's entirely possible that it is a fake pic or from another country. Have you considered that? What is known is that your buddy who you've buried so deep inside of you isn't the one who hit it.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Maybe the queen's reporter will prove otherwise on the 16th. But any sane mentally functioning person knows that's not gonna happen.
This is all too funny to resist how embarrassing it will be for all of you, soon!
Item no. 1: do ANY of you idiots know the difference between an NDA and a verbal agreement? This tells me the level of dumbass we're actually dealing with. Kew may practice being stupid or it could be the result of one of his many diseases, but for the rest of you, stupidlty appears to come very easily.
Item no. 2: max "never lies"? Hahahahaha! -- his nose just grew again. And his "word" is "gold"? :) Yeah.... PURE gold. What an idiot.
Item no. 3: Naturally max and kew would love to distance themselves from this. Did you notice how after I identified the actual employees I talked to inside Caesars that max FINALLY realized anyone could go in there and verify exactly what I reported, so he went into emergency scramble mode and tried to insert CET "properties" in place of his reference to Caesars. And why was that? Because nervous posturing in the face of the ultimate truth is the ONLY chance at redemption from his confused supporters. You made a fool out of yourself with this lie max. Just admit it and you'll be able to stop shaking.
Item no. 4: Who exchanges $5000 (it wasn't "purchased" dummy) cash for a $5k chip to play a single hand of blackjack? Someone who has a bunch of cash in their bag.
Item no. 5: I see how max has never addressed, kew has failed to mention, and redietz has neglected to insert any of his weirdo comments, about the fact that max had AT LEAST 20 HOURS TO CONFIRM HE'D MEET MY SON AND I at SP, but he curiously refused to do it. And after we went into the Silverado Lounge about an hour early, THAT was the reason I left for home. The coward was too afraid to let anyone know he would show up, so he did the only thing he could and what he's best at--he LIED. What was he gonna do--just walk in and hand me $100k as my son showed him his ID? Of course not. If max was even there, he cowered somewhere, which was his only option....and the only option for a LV casino addict slug with no money to bet with.
Item no. 6: I just got off the phone with max's wife. She was a bit perturbed when I told her he had called my DAUGHTER, but when I told her about my girth that's all she needed before wailing about some short-boy penis that shoots piddly loads, but WILL fit inside that midget toilet seat.
Item no. 7: I'll let you clowns chew on this for a week or two. But before we leave for the summer (while the famous LV AP's remain in their rut) on the 16th, I'll be posting my W2G. Now I know you'll all have your "oh no it just can't be real!" denials prepared, but there's nothing like knowing that just like seeing the original jackpot pictures (which you people want to think my son took for YOU, but eh-em....they were only for ME) and seeing how everyone has failed to disprove the win, every little part of the jackpot I post eats away at everyone here a little more every time I cut into your souls. And the satisfaction value of that just cannot be discounted.
There's no interview on the 16th. You guys got to Alan. Just like I got to you.
I now turn control of this forum back over to the moron squad.
THE PERFECT STORM :)
You should have stayed in your hidey hole. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You really are mentally ill. There is no doubt anymore.
Bbbwwaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh, this toooooooooooooooooo funnneeeeeeeeee!!!! I never knew that this Alan character is a jewish cat of the Hebrew-persuasion. I assume that the Rob Singer is also of the tribe. Anyway, very much lookin forward to the interview on the 16th, gonna get well stock-up on the Guinness and cashew, hey hey!
There is no interview by Alan. Apparently the queen's reporter wised up and bailed out. It's one of the last things Grandpa Newell wrote.Quote:
Originally Posted by soxfan
We are just gonna get some computer generated copy of a w2-g
What Rob is going to get remains to be seen.
I have to admit I've lost any 'singer is amusing'. That is just pathetic. This whole thing.. good grief. At least it was low-grade entertaining to follow even though anyone with sense knew the outcome of this from the start.Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenYou should have stayed in your hidey hole. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You really are mentally ill. There is no doubt anymore.
Nah....Rob is a black man. A negro if you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by soxfan
Are you guys keeping up with maxie's BS?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
First he states "I've never seen a $25 UX."
Subsequent to that he says "I seen that picture months ago. The jackpot was hit at Caesar's."
When it gets pointed out that it's a $25 UX in the pic and prior to the picture being shown he said he never seen one before he move to "Well, maybe it was a $10 denom I seen."
Then it gets pointed out that $10 denom pic would be different than the $25 denom pic he moved to "Well I seen a pic of four 3's."
Then he moved to "It could have been hit at any of the CZR properties. They have a lot of them, you know."
Now he has moved to "The pic could be fake or came from overseas."
Maxie has more routes than United Airlines.
KJ and Redietz are predictably quieter than a mouse pissing on cotton over maxie's ever changing story. Silence is golden.
I haven't seen MaxPen change on a single thing. But you want to talk about quiet, not a word out of you when Singer flat out lied about placing $700k in escrow with Mr. Nersesian. Not a peep.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I can't speak for Redietz, but as I said the other night, there is just no reason for me, or anyone for that matter, but I will only speak for myself, to participate here any more. Absolutely no value of any kind. And it is a little disheartening to see YOU, someone most of us respected, turn into a lying, piece of shit, in serious mental decline. I just don't want to be a part of that or even watch as it continues to happen.
....Hook, Line, and Sinker!
Rob is an Internet Troll. He's a narcissist. He's been doing this for two decades. He gets pleasure by taunting you guys and getting you all riled up....some to the point of hatred, futile bets and agreeing to meetings to one up him.
In his 10,000 posts here has he ever said anything of value? Some here seem to have made it a life's work to debunk every Singer post. That's as pathetic as Rob's trolling. Others look for a shred of plausibility in anything he says and claim "It's not impossible"
I'm not sure whether this is funny or sad, but if you just take a step back you'll see he's manipulating you to respond to him. There is some real psychology going on here. You haven't won anything. You haven't one upped him. You never have. You've given him exactly what he wants. Attention. And you've done it for years. You're co-dependents.
That was a good unowme post. Completely correct.
I want to expand on a couple things regarding myself and Singer.
1) On half a dozen occasions, I have posited a list of positive things one could derive from Singer's proposed emphases and old Gaming Today columns. Without going into the entire spiel, the no tipping, don't get hooked on comps, hosts are not your friend were part of it. Part of it was back in the day, anyone playing whacko progressive massive change in level video poker would be interpreted as impulsive and a casino's best friend. So pumping the volume of coin in with the way Singer did it would (at least in the past) have generated better offers than steady state by-the-books optimal play for the same amount.
2) I have debunked gambling claims my entire life. Some of the debunking has been low yield fools' errands; some was not. Whether its sports handicappers claiming 80% winning or systems players with Rube Goldberg stuff or whatever, I have not shown a lot of discernment in the debunking. If I thought it would benefit one person, I debunked it. If I thought, for example, it was a bogus television show and the debunking benefitted a hundred or a thousand, I debunked it. I was also a card-carrying member of the Society for the Scientific Documentation of Paranormal Claims (SSDPE), which lasted maybe two years (CSICOP had more and better people than we did, obviously, if I'm on the evaluator list). So I do this stuff reflexively. Is it usually a waste of time? Yes, 90% or 95% of the time, it is. And occasionally, it's not.
3) I was in Las Vegas for 100 days a year when Singer's column was in Gaming Today. I read all of his columns when I was staying in LV, and that's for years. Some of my friends knew the folks who ran Gaming Today back then. I'm probably best positioned, unless Alan has read the majority of those columns, to comment on Singer. We traveled in the same circles at the same time. I feel an obligation to chime in when things like this come up.
4) Singer claimed people working for me solicited him. He's claimed it many times. It never happened, as nobody has ever had that authorization, and I do not solicit in that way. When I've debunked him, he's gone off the deep end, as he used to do with Arcimede$. He's claimed that my late wife committed suicide. He's said that multiple times in print (she died of cancer). So this is personal.
Having said all that, I think MaxPen pretty much buried him here. I am retiring any interaction. I will be contacting the state attorney general regarding his claims that people working for me solicited him. But that's it for me. I'll still debunk other gambling claims, of course, but Argentino has been pretty transparent that he's what unowme said -- just an off the rails attention seeker. Nobody with any sense buys any of it. He's become self-debunking in a sense.
To me the problem isn't Singer. Unowme pretty much nailed Singer. An attention craving narcissist. That is pretty much settled. If people want to say, I fight back against his claims that defy math and reality too much, putting in too much time and effort....GUILTY!. I just have a real problem with these bullshitters making claims that can't be, either because they defy math or reality. I feel like real players professional or not and even just math guys (experts) have a responsibility to say "no that is not the way it works", that is not reality.
And if these bullshitters make their BS claims a hundred times, then I an going to call them out as BS a hundred times. I am sorry if people get tired of hearing it but that is the way these BSers work. Repetition. Theory is they say their BS enough times and it starts to become accepted.
And Alan isn't even the problem. These people always need an enabler and Alan has provided that for years, so there is nothing new that he still is.
The problem in my book is mickeycrimm. Mickeycrimm is a highly regarded and respected advantage player. He has been on GWAE multiple times and everyone finds him credible and knows he is the real deal. For him to have joined with Singer in Singers narcissist games is downright nasty. To anyone reading that may not know the situation, Crimm is providing Singer credibility. And that is sickening. I suspect it is all a game to mickey, but I think many of us are alarmed at his behavior, attacks and trolling. It really seems like this guy is suffering some kind of mental decline or illness.
Sometimes 2 enemies will team up to fight a 3rd enemy. You guys just keep falling for it. Its pathetic.
This is what makes you part of the problem. You're giving a trolling narcissist the attention he craves. You've said you were going to ignore him more than once, but you just can't quit him. That's your problem not his. He only posts to get the reactions. You're feeding that behavior. I'm sorry you don't get it. The other bullshit here is simply an ongoing hate fest. But hey. If you want to spend your life fighting windmills then you've fallen for The Perfect Storm, Don Quixote.Quote:
Originally Posted by kewlJ
Hey, it's not as if this place is a font of wisdom without Singer.
Sure he's a troll, and a narcissist: that is a given, a fact that all regular posters understand.
We CHOOSE to respond to him, to dispute his ridiculous claims.
Why?
Because we can?
Just a bunch of bored guys filling up the time between trips to the casino and the toilet.
I would agree with this but when I started fucking with him he got all wound up and twisted - kewl style.Quote:
Originally Posted by unowmeRob is an Internet Troll. He's a narcissist. He's been doing this for two decades. He gets pleasure by taunting you guys and getting you all riled up....some to the point of hatred, futile bets and agreeing to meetings to one up him.
In his 10,000 posts here has he ever said anything of value? Some here seem to have made it a life's work to debunk every Singer post. That's as pathetic as Rob's trolling. Others look for a shred of plausibility in anything he says and claim "It's not impossible"
I'm not sure whether this is funny or sad, but if you just take a step back you'll see he's manipulating you to respond to him. There is some real psychology going on here. You haven't won anything. You haven't one upped him. You never have. You've given him exactly what he wants. Attention. And you've done it for years. You're co-dependents.
I had to tell him I was joking to get him to calm his tallywacker.
Yes there was real psychology going on but it told me that YES Singer takes his persona seriously.
So that throws your theory in question but you've known of him for far longer than me and seem sharp. so whatever.
These people are so stupid they take pride in learning to dance to my every command. All it took was to hit a few very large VP jackpots, and it was easy pickins' from there. The skillful use of my scalpel was and has been the defining touch.
But let's get back to the Itemization protocol. Max has not only faltered and stumbled thru his a-humma a-humma a-humma constantly changing story about how his "Caesars proof" is the evidence everyone who hates Singer needs to "put that liar in his place"...but mickey excoriated max's lying so articulately that it even brought kew to his knees (and if you're thinking it was for THAT reason, study the meaning of "disappointing").
Of course we have kew basically IMPLORING one and all to pretend my jackpot is fake. But after his strategy of "hey guys Singer has found a SECRET VP JACKPOT WEBSITE" that provides him these pictures!" went down the tubes because none of the anti-Singer sleuths here or anywhere else have been able to find a dealt four 3's with a 2, $1.5million jackpot on $25 ten-play UX. And OH MY GOD....isn't that absolutely INFURIATING for these losers to have to admit!?
Dan finally chimed in, only it only had to do with cleaning this thread up. But let's see what kew's big hopes are: first, he falsely claimed that Dan "debunked past Singer jackpot photos". But after a fact check --which no one here would ever do but me--its found that, while it's well known Dan is hardly a fan of mine, when he claimed my $100,000 win from the Wynn was a Photoshop job of some sort (which is way beyond my abilities) Alan eliminated that claim with a picture via a simple visit to the machine I hit it on. His other claim was that my RV Trader ad was a "fake ad". All it took to debunk that was a few calls or emails to RV Trader asking if proof of ownership is required from an ad placed from the state I placed it from, and if it's always required on an ad for half a million dollars sale. Yes, while I believe that Dan doesn't care much for me and would prefer my jackpot is somehow fake, he's also astute enough to know that, absent ANY evidence to the contrary, it doesn't do any good to lie about it. Most here very likely believe by now that, I hit this win, my son took two not great but adequate pictures, the jackpot existed NOWHERE ELSE prior to my posting it as mine, and every single attempt at proving it wasn't mine is nothing but blowing smoke.
Hit in a foreign country? You're getting THAT desperate max? What's next---he hit it on redietz' planet, Mars?
But just like when kew and max chose to hide instead of getting their weak hearts broken by viewing the Newell in Az., and just how everyone would rather obfuscate my visit into Caesars earlier this week where I completely and utterly demolished max's foolish claim about "knowing" they had picture proof that the jackpot I hit was instead hit there earlier....these cowards have shown again that they would rather live a lie that be destroyed by the truth.
There WILL be a corroborating W2G posted. When? Hahaha! I'm gonna let it fester with you fools for a while, and when I think that the P-A-I-N level is starting to subside, I'll make it surface once again in all it's agonizing glory. You see, just because a loser like kew wants everyone to believe it's "100% sure that Singer never hit this thing" and that he's right "because he says so" I'm gonna make it hurt as much and as slowly as possible. Sort of like waterboarding them!
BTW---the one time I posted a W2G only the haters claimed it was "fake!". No evidence given of course, only "it has to be fake because I said so". That'll happen here on this one doubtlessly. But OH the hurt it'll cause....
THE PERFECT STORM :)
Here's what is needed: enuf with the arguing about SP. It wasn't a good idea anyway. It's obvious max would NEVER have shown his face--even if he was there--once I walked in with my son. Max has proven not to be the sharpest tool in the shed, but he's not butt-stoopid like kew either. And just happily handing over his phantom bag of money is something he'd never ever do.
I achieved my main goal anyway. The utter destruction of his foolish Caesars story was worth it's weight in platinum. Expecting the same to have any chance at happening--especially kew, when max never confirmed the meet after I added in that I'm bringing my son and the $100k bet--was not at all needed. He already suffered defeat, and he made it worse by trying to babble a new set of tunes afterwards.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Your schtick is wore out.
Let's get the money in escrow. I say it's not your jackpot. Simple.
Take my money.
If you could you would. It really is that simple.
At this point you don't need any more back and forth. What you need is an intervention.
You're ill. I will not be entertaining your delusions anymore.
Post #227 is pretty definitive. Hard to wriggle away from it. Free money.
I'm sure coach and mickey will be lining up for the free money, too. No reason to pass it up, after all.
Should be fun. I'll hire a videographer and narrate. Coach and mickey have no problems being on video, I take it.
Ditz, how will maxiepad prove it's not Rob's jackpot? Is he going to offer up all of the imaginary scenarios dreamed up by himself and the other Brokeback Boys, YOU and KJ, as evidence. Then proclaim victory?Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
So far, the only person with a pic of the jackpot is ROB SINGER? All you have to do is debunk it. But you can't. At least you haven't so far. It's a pic of a 1.5 million dollar jackpot for Christ's sake. You can't trace that down? WTF?
You've been given some names of Caesar's employee's by Singer, a slot person named "Mahina," another slot person named Rick Simon/Simeon, and a high limit slot operations manager named Kenda High. Why are you three hiding from them?
All three of you are to chickenshit to even make a phone call over there much less show up in person. Could it be you don't want to hear what you think you will hear?
But I will say this. maxiepad is deceptive. He may have gone over to Caesar's but didn't like what he heard so is keeping it under wraps.
KJ is plain out to afraid of his own shadow to show up anywhere.
And you live in a shack in Tennessee with your toothless girlfriend.
Post #227 seems pretty definitive. Hard to wriggle away from that one. Money in verifiable escrow. Wager is Singer must provide definitive proof of the jackpot. That would have to be defined. I'd think casino employees identifying and verifying the jackpot winner, along with the W2G, would work.
Free money? Who doesn't want free money?
I'll pay for the videographer. And do the narration. Very exciting. I'll work on my radio voice. Maybe my filmmaker friend, Dennison, could do the narration instead. He has a better radio voice. I have a semi-Philly accent.
Who doesn't want free money?
So much entertainment value from just a couple jealous people! And SO many pages.
Allow me to simplify things for everyone.
Item no. 1: A few weeks ago I asked for help finding $25 five-play UX for my final video poker exercise. Reason: I now feel uncomfortable playing such a game at my ridiculous age, so I wanted to risk quite a bit to possibly go out with a final meaningful win.
Item no. 2: max presented the idea of negotiating with hi-limit rooms with a commitment because it was doubtful that game was available anywhere. So I researched and/or called every Hi-limit slots room across Nevada that exists, and as expected, the game did not exist. So shortly afterwards, I asked my son to accompany me on the short trip as I hit the HL rooms in LV. His job was to carry the bag of cash. The first room I went to accepted, and the rest is history.
Item no. 3: Surprising deals can appear at any time. I just had one of those on a $5 machine recently. Denomination doesn't matter and paytable doesn't matter. They happen. And this wasn't me---claiming to "beat the math" or "use special plays" or whatever. This was me receiving a Pure Luck Deal--apparently when all (or at least most of) the stars were aligned. And that's all it is. If it were anyone other than me, congrats would have been given for the stunning win and no one would be forcing themselves to make believe it wasn't real.
Item no. 4: No one here has experienced the extraordinary chaos a hit like this creates, even in the middle of the night. People show up, the machine gets opened up and is checked, re-checked, and checked again. Video I'm sure gets reviewed. I had to review the correct amount of the taxable wins log, choose how I wanted to be paid, sign paperwork etc., so I asked my son to take a couple pics for his mom. And believe this: the LAST thing on my mind was thinking about what posting it was gonna create. It just isn't important at that point in time.
Item no. 5: When I got home I actually thought about NOT posting it. All it would do is be one more reason to be hated, the squad would jump thru hoops to try and discredit it, and there would be non-stop insults and arguments. And as time passed with no evidence to the contrary being possible, as I of course already knew, the pages of hate grew. And as everyone should know, the best way to separate yourself from the noise is to simply stay away and the feeling will quickly pass. That's where I am now--a brief read of a few posts for flavor, while I toss in a few of the refining ingredients.
Item no. 6: Ignore my latest trip to Caesars and SP. The only part of it that was helpful was the CP part, and all that did was cause even more insults. Alternatively, just think: this was the largest VP jackpot of all time. The squad wants to believe it existed prior and that I "stole it from somewhere else". OK it's their right to want to believe that. But while I've completely debunked the Caesars theory, if this exact win existed before, why can nobody else find it.... especially after a computer-clunker like myself supposedly found it? Does that make any sense? And afterwards, it's certainly a casino's right to ask that this event not be publicized to their embarrassment and it is my choice to abide by their wishes or not. And my choice is not to identify where I hit this unless and until they do, if that ever happens.
Item no. 7: I took the unusual step of giving the person I worked with to set this play up (as well as it was this same person who told me the game was also available in ten-play) a two-stack tip. This wasn't me just handing out money in a state of euphoria. I was "paying" someone for their work in making this moment possible. It was the right thing to do.
Item no. 8: I already know the tax form won't give any of the squad a warm and fuzzy because they won't let it. Redietz has already chimed in with some weird scenario where I call the people in who were at the original scene and repeat their performances from that morning. Naturally that's not happening. But I've got the form right here....can't you hear it crackling as I run it thru my fingers?
THE PERFECT STORM
It is clear you're a loser who can't put up evidence of anything. <snicker>Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
I talk to a few sharp people from this forum and they universally quit reading these pages of nonsensical repetitive text. It works with Kewl and that gives your life meaning but honestly bro lots of others don't even pay any attention to you. Maybe you should take a nap or find a different forum where people aren't familiar with your rep. Stick with Kewl?
....HOOK, LINE AND SINKER!!!!!!!!
For this to be a valid theory I think we'd need to measure the lengths of the posts made in these threads. Im fairly certain Rob has put far more effort into this shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb
Quote:
Originally Posted by regnisI have to disagree here. If you are using American English, as opposed to British (English) English, the period goes inside the quotation marks.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby---> National Register of Historic Places listings in Devils Tower National Monument.Quote:
Originally Posted by monet
https://anagram-solver.net/Imagine%2...0?partial=true
Monet, the period goes after, unless the phrase is a full sentence. Ask any English teacher. Besides, it just looks stupid, the way that you did it above.
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
741 ---> Just text 741741
The following is from Grammarly.com but if you google the rule is pretty clear.
Do commas and periods go inside or outside quotation marks?
Commas and periods always go inside the quotation marks in American English; dashes, colons, and semicolons almost always go outside the quotation marks; question marks and exclamation marks sometimes go inside, sometimes stay outside.
In British English it is the opposite with some exceptions. Garnabby--if you are in Canada I am not sure which would be correct but I assume your way would be correct.
The way I figure it is that a word that is emphasized or whatever by quotation marks can be shifted throughout a sentence from its start to its end. Then there is no reason to punctuate it in a different way. A comma, or period, in the quotation marks can't change the emphasis or whatever, and, to shift the quotation marks past the end of the sentence, to include the period or whatever, neither, makes much sense.Quote:
British vs. American English
There are many differences between British and American punctuation, spelling, and grammar. Neither version is more correct than the other; which version you should use just depends on who your primary audience is. Here are some of the most common differences between British and American academic English.
'do it.'"
Commas and Periods Within Quotation Marks
British English puts commas and periods (full stops) outside the quotation marks unless the quotation is also a complete sentence or the punctuation is part of the quotation.
The UWSC says that British people write it "this way".
American English puts commas and periods inside the quotation marks.
The UWSC says that American people write it "this way."
When it comes to other punctuation, both versions write it similarly. Colons and semicolons go outside quotation marks, and exclamation points and question marks depend on whether they're part of the quote or the sentence as a whole.
I was kind of "tongue in cheek" with the remark to ask any English teacher about it. It's one of the never-ending arguments about the language.
Here is one question about it at an English forum. Yargs is one of the top experts there.
https://english.stackexchange.com/qu...&s=7%7C52.9207
Secret VCT codeword, RIP + ...
--->Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
The Empire Writes Back: Theory and Practice in Post-Colonial Literature.
Comprehensive list of Threats to Authentication Procedures and Data.
Hidden Terrors: The Truth About U.S. Police Operations in Latin America.
North of Ireland Operative Butchers' and Allied Workers' Association.
https://anagram-solver.net/Secret%20....?partial=true
Well, the first line must have to do with, spilled over from, the above dispute about English and usage. Tablepooey's "comments" came on the heels of Regnis' reply.
Yeah, threats, terrors, and butchers, form and emanate from the aura of Tablepooey.
Maybe, if old Tablepooey got his "shit" in order, than old, "introspective" Monet might be able to follow suit. Monet has a very hard time trying to figure out what is real. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetHe means well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou continue to demonstrate what a pile of shit you are with your unprovoked attacks Bill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Garnabby
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Bill the troll is an evil old soul. He stirs the pot and he does it a lot.Quote:
Originally Posted by GarnabbyMaybe, if old Tablepooey got his "shit" in order, than old, "introspective" Monet might be able to follow suit. Monet has a very hard time trying to figure out what is real. Ha.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetHe means well.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I give him a pass because, you know, he has to live in Canada.
Not Easy.
He has a Prime Minister who is pretty darn close to Hitler.
They make the best Maple Syrup though.
That is, if you can actually get the authentic version.
I read somewhere that 76% of Honey sold in the United States is Fake.
This makes me wonder how much of Canadian Labeled Maple Syrup is genuine?
Fixed it up for you, the one speaking in tongues.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
--->Quote:
⑬ill the troll is an 3vil ol6 soul. He stirs the pot and he 6o3s it a lot.
I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. [What you're actually saying. Ha.]
https://anagram-solver.net/%E2%91%AC...0?partial=true
Note that 36 = (-1 + 37) ---> 137, and, 63 ---> 36 = (-1 + 37) ---> 1√97 ---> 197. And, that with a = 1, b = 2, ... z = 26, and, ⑬ = 0, the above expression resolves to 666. Or, 720 ---> 72, in reverse ordinal, with z = 1 to a = 26, which, I guess, is the me-part of all of this without getting directly into the "secret VCT codeword, RIP" part. As in July 2.
http://www.gematrinator.com/calculator/index.php
Quote:
Speaking in tongues, also referred to as gift of tongues or glossolalia, is a phenomenon that occurs when a person experiencing religious ecstasy or a trance utters incomprehensible sounds that they believe are a language spoken through them by a god or deity.
Today, 08:13 PM #239
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
750 ------> 720, with 5 ---> 2, the other way.
The great part about the above is that I had to put in the 36's, which each lowered the count by 36, to get the reverse ordinal count of 720, which was my part in all of it. Ie, the ordinal count was 666 with only the numeral 13 as zero in it. Pooey's part as 666 with 13 was invariant wrt the 36's. Some really and actually bad "shit" going on there. Ha.
Anyway, it's was bitch to try to find one of those seven-segment display numerals, so, I attached merely an image of such a 2, and a 5. Oh well.
I group the integers up to a dozen, number base 12, as {0, 3, 6, 9}, {1, 2, 7, 8}, and, (4, 5, 10, 11} in between, as in {0, √9 = √(3^2), 6, 9}, and, {1, 2, 7, 2^3}. There's a slightly different way with , say, {1, 4, 7}, but, it goes back to {1, 2^2, 7}.
--------------->
resolves to 666.Quote:
⑬ill the troll is an evil old soul. He stirs the pot and he does it a lot.
Incidentally, the full reduction, and reverse full reduction, gematria counts were 243, and 306. The 306 ---> 36, or 2*153, and, the 243 = 3^5^1 ---> 153.
243 is 3303 in base 4, 300 in base 9, 183 in base 12, and, 113 in base 15.
306 is 132 = 2*66 in base 16, 216 = 6*6*6 in base 12, 370 in base 9, and, 1230 = 30*41 in base 6.
306 = (9^2 + 15^2), and, is the telephone area code for Saskatchewan, Canada - likely home to some good maple syrup, the real stuff.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/saska...yrup-1.3579794
Garnabby
Garnabby is online now
Gold
Garnabby's Avatar
Join Date
Aug 2020
Posts
751 ----------> Pretty sure that it's a prime, but, it goes 721.