The UNKewl Challenge - did UNKewlJ receive any settlement money for his fictional backrooming incident?

"The confirmation from regnis".

Talk about grasping at straws...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

"The confirmation from regnis".

Talk about grasping at straws...

---

What "straws?"

Do you doubt that regnis meant to say what he posted?

Are you accusing him of lying?

Please clarify, specifically, the basis for your seeming disbelief of regnis and his confirmation.

Not taking sides in anything but regnis was a dice influencer. Also a horse bettor that worked inside information. Also a lawyer. I've read his posts for like ten years. He's archived. Go back and read thru what he has written if you want to gage his credibility. I already have. If he says he confirmed something then bet the farm its confirmed.

But you guys carry on. It's some funny shit. Rob's got the best stuff. The rest of you guys are weak.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Please clarify, specifically, the basis for your seeming disbelief of regnis and his confirmation.

---

It's simple MrV. The basis for not believing regnis is that he is saying something they don't want to hear or believe. :D Sadly it has been this way for quite a while.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

If he uses the word "confirmed" then bet the farrm that it was confirmed.

---

And this is precisely what the haters don't want to hear. :confused:

I'd like to get back to the questions I asked this morning. How do you haters think it helps or benefits me that anyone believe anything I have shared? Not selling more copies of anything. Not getting more clicks on youtube or however it works. :rolleyes:

That you even pretend to ask such a question shows how lost you are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

KJ is different because (1) I initially believed him, more or less, and (2) he is imo a complete fraud. I don't mean a liar, I mean a complete fraud, like catfish style. And that is not something you see every day and is really kind of fascinating.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

What’s crazy about all this is that any normal person would realize that his ever changing story and desperate attempts to put out fires is just confirming that his story is false, and making him look even worse, but a sociopathic liar can’t help himself, and keeps lying just to cover up other lies.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Not taking sides in anything but regnis was a dice influencer. Also a horse bettor that worked inside information.

---

Was there any inside information on that dice influencing? As Alan used to claim, it's not about controlling the dice, but, about influencing them.

More baloney from the man who shares a leg (or two) with Redietz. Ha.

You really are one dumb son of a bitch, Garnabby.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

My attorney told me I could be hauled back into court

---

What does this mean "hauled back into court"?

Did you make a court appearance in this matter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

When I started talking about a lawsuit having been filed, do you think I didn't KNOW that no evidence of a lawsuit would be found?

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Please clarify, specifically, the basis for your seeming disbelief of regnis and his confirmation.

---

How could regnis have confirmed the identity of the injured party in the backrooming and settlement that he investigated?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

What’s crazy about all this is that any normal person would realize that his ever changing story

---

Let's discuss ever changing story Fido.

I won every day for 7 months totaling 500k vs "I am about even for this trip" (same time period)

I purchased a 'mid 7 figure mansion' vs No Mansion.

Mdawg has claimed different things he does that allow him to win, everything from loss rebates (which you actually have to lose some sessions to benefit), to card counting, to betting into streaks, to.....and this is my favorite, that he is Rainman with total recall of every card. Talk about your changing stories!!!:D

....among others.


Funny thing about you people. You will say "ever changing story" and then in the next breath say my story "was believable because it was worn smooth" (Maxpen)

Mdawg and Moses both doxxed me by posting the address where I live, then at different times later, both would post that I didn't live there. Moses went as far as to say I didn't even live in Las Vegas until Dan Druff confirmed that I did.

I know there is no rules to your trolling. It is just about hating on someone. You can and will say whatever you want. But come on. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Not taking sides in anything but regnis was a dice influencer. Also a horse bettor that worked inside information. Also a lawyer. I've read his posts for like ten years. He's archived. Go back and read thru what he has written if you want to gage his credibility. I already have. If he says he confirmed something then bet the farm its confirmed.

But you guys carry on. It's some funny shit. Rob's got the best stuff. The rest of you guys are weak.

---

Bbbwwwaaaahhh, so yer gonna give credence to things and stuff what a self-proclaim dices-"influencer" got to say, hey hey????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

How could regnis have confirmed the identity of the injured party in the backrooming and settlement that he investigated?

---

What do you think there are two, almost identical back-rooming cases at the same casino, during the same time period?

Coach belly and his stupid trolling game playing has turned the whole forum into such ridiculous game players. :( For years I tried to warn Dan Druff that the forum was heading further and further into the sewer. All I wanted was a little bit of normalcy. People acting somewhat normal.

And now here we are. A dozen people, most ganging up and hating and trolling and telling whatever lie they can think of to attempt to assinate someone's character. What a beautiful forum. :rolleyes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

What do you think there are two, almost identical back-rooming cases at the same casino, during the same time period?

---

I don't think there were any back-rooming cases that involved you.

How could regnis have confirmed that you were involved?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mcap

You really are one ∂um6 son of a 6itch, 6arna66y.

---

---> Reason: The Only Oracle of Man.

https://anagram-solver.net/You%20rea....?partial=true

Quote:

---

Ethan Allen's Reason: The Only Oracle of Man is a hard hitting attack on superstition and "revealed" religion while encouraging the replacement of superstition in our lives and in our ideas concerning God with innate God-given reason. Ethan Allen was an American Revolutionary War hero.

---

Well, I guess that we're all the way back to square-one, with Coach back on the trail. Ha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

"The confirmation from regnis".

Talk about grasping at straws...

---

What "straws?"

Do you doubt that regnis meant to say what he posted?

Are you accusing him of lying?

Please clarify, specifically, the basis for your seeming disbelief of regnis and his confirmation.

---

I am saying that someone posting something is confirmed, especially when that thing is highly improbable, and that person would seemingly have no way of confirming it, and did not explain how they know it or even whether they were serious, is not in fact confirmation.

I think the point is obvious enough. You have suggested that others are eager for the story not to be true but it seems to me you are the one that is grasping at virtually nothing as proof of a story that is almost impossible (if we include the media aspect that I commented on earlier in this thread).

See my counter example regarding Seedvalue which you apparently took at face value.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MaxPen

This is your problem you lie and distort all reality. I never said you were playing $5 and $10 bets. The times I would see you at a table in Eastside you had red and green chips. Nothing that would support your mid level black claims. I dismissed that though. The only time I ever took the time to actually observe you was when you were standing behind your sugar daddy at the VP machine in Club Fortune before heading to the cafe for dinner.

---

I never played red to green at East Cannery. Never ever, EVER. I played green to mid black. Spread of $25 to $250 or $300. And THAT spread was a little lighter than my usual spread because certain places like East Cannery, El Cortez, and a few other smaller places in my rostion just wouldn't tolerate anything bigger.

If you saw someone playing red to green...IT WASNT ME, despite what you may have thought. And you describing that person as Asian proves you had the wrong person.

Now what nationality was the person you are describing at Club Fortune? My partner and I did frequent Club Fortune for a while. It was in our VP rotation, which he was handling at the time. Anyone familiar with the CF mailers knows they used to have 7-8 different 3 day periods with offers, meaning you had to visit 8 times a month instead of once a week, so we swung by there a lot and often timed it to eat at that cafe, which we both liked (and had comps and coupons for).

But that said, if you are again referring to an Asian person, you are WRONG. I have nothing against Asians.....I am just not Asian. :rolleyes:

---

Of course you're an Irish surfer. Give it a break. Pacific Islander describes you well and your sugar daddy husband that you've denied and claimed didn't exist was a fat white dude about 20 years your senior. Here's the deal I'm not going to argue about this nonsense with you anymore. You're a complete fraud. If you're still really around the pits in Vegas I will run into you soon enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

My attorney told me I could be hauled back into court

---

What does this mean "hauled back into court"?

Did you make a court appearance in this matter?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

When I started talking about a lawsuit having been filed, do you think I didn't KNOW that no evidence of a lawsuit would be found?

---

---

You caught him again coach. He repeats that he never went to court over this fake incident--then he says he will be "hauled BACK into court".

Zing!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

I am saying that someone posting something is confirmed, especially when that thing is highly improbable, and that person would seemingly have no way of confirming it, and did not explain how they know it or even whether they were serious, is not in fact confirmation.

I think the point is obvious enough. You have suggested that others are eager for the story not to be true but it seems to me you are the one that is grasping at virtually nothing as proof of a story that is almost impossible (if we include the media aspect that I commented on earlier in this thread). See my counter example regarding Seedvalue which you apparently took at face value.

---

Ask regnis, not me: but he's credible.

C'mon man...do you SERIOUSLY find Seedvalue to be credible?

Him, Singer, Mdawg...the three (insert slur here)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

I am saying that someone posting something is confirmed, especially when that thing is highly improbable, and that person would seemingly have no way of confirming it, and did not explain how they know it or even whether they were serious, is not in fact confirmation.

I think the point is obvious enough. You have suggested that others are eager for the story not to be true but it seems to me you are the one that is grasping at virtually nothing as proof of a story that is almost impossible (if we include the media aspect that I commented on earlier in this thread). See my counter example regarding Seedvalue which you apparently took at face value.

---

Ask regnis, not me: but he's credible.

C'mon man...do you SERIOUSLY find Seedvalue to be credible?

Him, Singer, Mdawg...the three (insert slur here)

---

The whole point is that just because someone asserts something doesn't mean it's "confirmed".

I think the issue here, beyond any bias for or against particular posters, is that you do not share the same assessment of how improbable KJ's story is vs how likely he is to make up such a story.

The interaction I had with regnis here was over that he was claiming, incorrectly, that a CTR could be issued where currency was not even involved at any stage in the transaction.

CTRs are issued for transactions:
"involving cash-in and cash-out of more than $10,000."
but he kept arguing otherwise.

At the same time that he was claiming to have written the regulation or have had something to do with its drafting, he didn't understand it.

CTR = Currency Transaction Reports. Currency.

So, no, you cannot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

bet the farm

---

over everything this guy has to say. No.

My interactions with him have not been other than quite civil. That's not to say that he is incapable of making a mistake.

He also says he was "bored" one day and started the threads, The Adventures of DawgPoop—or how I made millions at Sic Bo and Do you beleive MDawgs claim of winning bacarat play, nearly every session, every trip for years now? so he's not above trolling type threads, but he's not involved in the day to day drama here, no.

Sounds like a bit of a kook, and loner, who, certainly, never was computer savvy. Ha. Someone who didn't post enough to be considered for further scrutiny.

Quote:

---

Blackhole and I talking about cheating and race fixing may have given some the wrong impression. First of all, race fixing usually involves multiple trainers and owners "stiffing" their horses to wind up with set result so that the trifectas and other gimmick bets pay huge. This takes a lot of collusion--think the Black Sox Scandal. While this does happen it is not that prevalent. On the other hand, there is probably only a small number of races in which illegal drugs or other supplements are not being used. I don't consider that race fixing--the trainer is trying to win at any cost. While the use of drugs may effect the outcome, it is different than trying to lose.

I agree with Key that the percentage of losing horse players is extremely high. I do not agree with Kewl's assessment that they are all losers and non-professionals based upon what he sees at the race book. There are a lot of pros, many way better than I will ever be, and they for the most part are quiet and keep to themselves. They also keep their opinions to themselves or their group. The loudmouths that you see at the race book are exactly what you think all horseplayers are. However, you are not seeing the pros. I socialize at the track but I don't discuss my picks other than with one or two friends who rely on me. I also try to avoid hearing the loudmouth's picks because I then find myself doing the Richard Dreyfuss and taking myself off of horses that I like just because I know the idiot touting that horse is a loser. So yes--the losers you see in the race book are just that.

Kewl--the inaccuracies in the workouts etc. is probably overstated. Yes they exist. But any pro does not rely on those numbers. They either keep their own charts and/or watch every race. I know what I see--I don't need the racing form to tell me. I no longer keep my own charts because I am getting too old for the time that it takes. But I have decades of charts in organized boxes in my basement. I do try to watch every race but that also takes a ton of time. That is a reason to limit the number of tracks or races that one plays. But please don't have the misconception that we are all losers and that you can't beat the game. There are many doing just that.

https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post130670

---

Another Redietz, as someone who "can just tell" while "swimming in an endless bog" of internal rumination.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

I think the issue here, beyond any bias for or against particular posters, is that you do not share the same assessment of how improbable KJ's story is vs how likely he is to make up such a story.

---

I suppose that's one way to look at it.

Bit I am impressed that regnis, a seemingly neutral outsider and an attorney chimed in as he did.

It supports KJ's claim obviously and thus far has not been debunked.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

It supports KJ's claim obviously and thus far has not been debunked.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I confided some things in regnis, MrV

---

Did kewlj provide you with enough information for you to confirm that he was involved in the back-rooming incident?

Then why didn't KJ have, or pay, the actual attorney to write, here a long time ago, that the claim was filed, etc.?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by soxfan

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Not taking sides in anything but regnis was a dice influencer. Also a horse bettor that worked inside information. Also a lawyer. I've read his posts for like ten years. He's archived. Go back and read thru what he has written if you want to gage his credibility. I already have. If he says he confirmed something then bet the farm its confirmed.

But you guys carry on. It's some funny shit. Rob's got the best stuff. The rest of you guys are weak.

---

Bbbwwwaaaahhh, so yer gonna give credence to things and stuff what a self-proclaim dices-"influencer" got to say, hey hey????

---

No, I'm giving credence to what a credible lawyer has said.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The interaction I had with regnis here was over that he was claiming, incorrectly, that a CTR could be issued where currency was not even involved at any stage in the transaction.

CTRs are issued for transactions:
"involving cash-in and cash-out of more than $10,000."
but he kept arguing otherwise.

At the same time that he was claiming to have written the regulation or have had something to do with its drafting, he didn't understand it.

CTR = Currency Transaction Reports. Currency.

So, no, you cannot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

bet the farm

---

over everything this guy has to say. No.

My interactions with him have not been other than quite civil. That's not to say that he is incapable of making a mistake.

He also says he was "bored" one day and started the threads, The Adventures of DawgPoop—or how I made millions at Sic Bo and Do you beleive MDawgs claim of winning bacarat play, nearly every session, every trip for years now? so he's not above trolling type threads, but he's not involved in the day to day drama here, no.

---

Your premise is you are right about CTR's and regnis is wrong. I don't know a damn thing about CTR's so I have no way of knowing which one of you is right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garnabby

Then why didn't KJ have, or pay, the actual attorney to write, here a long time ago, that the claim was filed, etc.?

---

If KJ can get him to do it will you pay the lawyer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

I think the issue here, beyond any bias for or against particular posters, is that you do not share the same assessment of how improbable KJ's story is vs how likely he is to make up such a story.

---

I suppose that's one way to look at it.

Bit I am impressed that regnis, a seemingly neutral outsider and an attorney chimed in as he did.

It supports KJ's claim obviously and thus far has not been debunked.

---

How could one possibly debunk the statement "I confirmed this"?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The interaction I had with regnis here was over that he was claiming, incorrectly, that a CTR could be issued where currency was not even involved at any stage in the transaction.

CTRs are issued for transactions:
"involving cash-in and cash-out of more than $10,000."
but he kept arguing otherwise.

At the same time that he was claiming to have written the regulation or have had something to do with its drafting, he didn't understand it.

CTR = Currency Transaction Reports. Currency.

So, no, you cannot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

bet the farm

---

over everything this guy has to say. No.

My interactions with him have not been other than quite civil. That's not to say that he is incapable of making a mistake.

He also says he was "bored" one day and started the threads, The Adventures of DawgPoop—or how I made millions at Sic Bo and Do you beleive MDawgs claim of winning bacarat play, nearly every session, every trip for years now? so he's not above trolling type threads, but he's not involved in the day to day drama here, no.

---

Your premise is you are right about CTR's and regnis is wrong. I don't know a damn thing about CTR's so I have no way of knowing which one of you is right.

---

Didn't read the thread but CTRs only apply to cash. This has some practical implications for avoiding them while still using a player's card.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garnabby

Then why didn't KJ have, or pay, the actual attorney to write, here a long time ago, that the claim was filed, etc.?

---

If KJ can get him to do it will you pay the lawyer?

---

I 100% would pay any reasonable legal fees if KJ's lawyer came on here and gave convincing evidence of KJ's story.

$100 to write a letter. If not the actual lawyer, find a different one. But, it makes no sense to cajole, pester, etc. the ones around here for free.

lmao.

Since Kewl went to him and the ability of the lawyer suggests that a post on here that professionally acknowledges the rough details of Kewl's story would infact be some very shrewd advertising.
'

You people, on an internet forum, are always treating everyone like they are on trial and need to prove this or that. And now you are literally expecting that someone should provide their attorney to vouch for them. You grow more and more detached from reality every day. No wonder this forum is what it is....a dozen or so crazy people trying to out-"crazy" on another.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

You people, on an internet forum, are always treating everyone like they are on trial and need to prove this or that. And now you are literally expecting that someone should provide their attorney to vouch for them. You grow more and more detached from reality every day. No wonder this forum is what it is....a dozen or so crazy people trying to out-"crazy" on another.

---

"Detached from reality".

I have become quite fond of you Kewl. You keep doing you. Lots of smiles on people's faces and Mister V can learn useful stuff.

No one is more desperate to prove himself than UNKewlJ. That he won't, is because he can't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

KJ, I might believe you, however, you just have way too many interesting things/stories Etc that for some reason or another you can never provide any proof. There's always some, for lack of a better word, Bullshit reason why you can't/won't. It seems as if it would be in your best interest to not mention anything in the first place if you can't provide one iota of proof for whatever reason.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobSinger

If there's ever been anybody more incapable of trying and trying to change other people's opinions about himself, that person hasn't been born yet.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

"Detached from reality".

I have become quite fond of you Kewl. You keep doing you. Lots of smiles on people's faces and Mister V can learn useful stuff.

---

Dude, do you ever step back and think about some of this shit?

You are proposing that I, or anyone for that matter, contact their attorney or any other person they deal with in real life matters, and request them to come to an anonymous message board forum consisting of about 12 goofy people to prove whatever it is that these 12 goofy members are demanding proof of? :confused:

Come on man....this is not normal behavior or thoughts.

(now if it were Rob Singer that this attorney silliness were being demanded from, we would have said attorney, show up at the forum, and said attorney would be using the same IP address as Rob, or perhaps trying to hide it with a VPN, as he did with real estate expert GirlFriday, vouching for him)

Funny, but seriously, this is not normal behavior. Prove this. Prove that. Let's here from your attorney or your accountant or whomever like it is a court of law and you are on trial. Do you really NOT see how ridiculous this is? :confused:

This is an internet message board forum. :D Sorry to keep repeating that but some of you people don't seem to get that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

No one is more desperate to prove himself than UNKewlJ. That he won't, is because he can't.

---

Anybody that attempts to prove anything to people on an anonymous internet forum, is almost assuredly lying. No normal person has the need to prove anything to people on an internet forum. Period!!

Case in point Singer and his Newell. Singer and his prop money. Singer and his jackpot pictures on a computer screen in his daughter's house, and yes, you Fido and your pictures of cash, chips, watches.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

"Detached from reality".

I have become quite fond of you Kewl. You keep doing you. Lots of smiles on people's faces and Mister V can learn useful stuff.

---

Dude, do you ever step back and think about some of this shit?

You are proposing that I, or anyone for that matter, contact their attorney or any other person they deal with in real life matters, and request them to come to an anonymous message board forum consisting of about 12 goofy people to prove whatever it is that these 12 goofy members are demanding proof of? :confused:

Come on man....this is not normal behavior or thoughts.

(now if it were Rob Singer that this attorney silliness were being demanded from, we would have said attorney, show up at the forum, and said attorney would be using the same IP address as Rob, or perhaps trying to hide it with a VPN, as he did with real estate expert GirlFriday, vouching for him)

Funny, but seriously, this is not normal behavior. Prove this. Prove that. Let's here from your attorney or your accountant or whomever like it is a court of law and you are on trial. Do you really NOT see how ridiculous this is? :confused:

This is an internet message board forum. :D Sorry to keep repeating that but some of you people don't seem to get that.

---

No. He is saying he will pay the man's expenses. Attornies run businesses. People hire them. This is actually how the normal everyday real world works my friend.

I don't have a need for an attorney, kewl... that is actually "not normal".

We're not asking you to prove anything necessarily. We're trying to give you a chance to demonstrate that any of these claims of yours are factual. :(

I'll pay an for an hour of his billable to sweeten the pot on top of what he wishes to bill Smurger as reasonable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

"Detached from reality".

I have become quite fond of you Kewl. You keep doing you. Lots of smiles on people's faces and Mister V can learn useful stuff.

---

Dude, do you ever step back and think about some of this shit?

You are proposing that I, or anyone for that matter, contact their attorney or any other person they deal with in real life matters, and request them to come to an anonymous message board forum consisting of about 12 goofy people to prove whatever it is that these 12 goofy members are demanding proof of? :confused:

Come on man....this is not normal behavior or thoughts.

(now if it were Rob Singer that this attorney silliness were being demanded from, we would have said attorney, show up at the forum, and said attorney would be using the same IP address as Rob, or perhaps trying to hide it with a VPN, as he did with real estate expert GirlFriday, vouching for him)

Funny, but seriously, this is not normal behavior. Prove this. Prove that. Let's here from your attorney or your accountant or whomever like it is a court of law and you are on trial. Do you really NOT see how ridiculous this is? :confused:

This is an internet message board forum. :D Sorry to keep repeating that but some of you people don't seem to get that.

---

No. He is saying he will pay the man's expenses. Attornies run businesses. People hire them. This is actually how the normal everyday real world works my friend.

I don't have a need for an attorney, kewl... that is actually "not normal".

We're not asking you to prove anything necessarily. We're trying to give you a chance to demonstrate that any of these claims of yours are factual. :(

I'll pay an for an hour of his billable to sweeten the pot on top of what he wishes to bill Smurger as reasonable.

---

I am sorry, but I can't imagine any Attorney agreeing to go to some message board, create an account, and post verifying something for a group of people on an internet forum, even if being paid. :confused: MrV and regnis can weigh in. Maybe I am wrong. maybe there are some that will do anything for the money. probably are I guess. But it isn't the attorney that handled my situation and I probably would steer clear of an attorney that I saw do something like that.

Again, it all boils down to that I don't think you and others here understand what an internet forum is.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Dude, do you ever step back and think about some of this shit?

You are proposing that I, or anyone for that matter, contact their attorney or any other person they deal with in real life matters, and request them to come to an anonymous message board forum consisting of about 12 goofy people to prove whatever it is that these 12 goofy members are demanding proof of? :confused:

Come on man....this is not normal behavior or thoughts.

(now if it were Rob Singer that this attorney silliness were being demanded from, we would have said attorney, show up at the forum, and said attorney would be using the same IP address as Rob, or perhaps trying to hide it with a VPN, as he did with real estate expert GirlFriday, vouching for him)

Funny, but seriously, this is not normal behavior. Prove this. Prove that. Let's here from your attorney or your accountant or whomever like it is a court of law and you are on trial. Do you really NOT see how ridiculous this is? :confused:

This is an internet message board forum. :D Sorry to keep repeating that but some of you people don't seem to get that.

---

No. He is saying he will pay the man's expenses. Attornies run businesses. People hire them. This is actually how the normal everyday real world works my friend.

I don't have a need for an attorney, kewl... that is actually "not normal".

We're not asking you to prove anything necessarily. We're trying to give you a chance to demonstrate that any of these claims of yours are factual. :(

I'll pay an for an hour of his billable to sweeten the pot on top of what he wishes to bill Smurger as reasonable.

---

I am sorry, but I can't imagine any Attorney agreeing to go to some message board, create an account, and post verifying something for a group of people on an internet forum, even if being paid. :confused: MrV and regnis can weigh in. Maybe I am wrong. maybe there are some that will do anything for the money. probably are I guess. But it isn't the attorney that handled my situation and I probably would steer clear of an attorney that I saw do something like that.

Again, it all boils down to that I don't think you and others here understand what an internet forum is.

---

WHat are you talking about? You are his client. You would be asking him to verify something. I suppose he could do a letter but that would be mean that he has to be contacted to verify the letter. It is weird but the world has changed. Lots of sharp guys around here impressed by what the attorney did. It is a sharp play for him to advertise. He knows the ins and outs of casinos.

You act like there is some ethical line they are crossing?

You did use the N word. Is that your concern?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

WHat are you talking about? You are his client. You would be asking him to verify something. I suppose he could do a letter but that would be mean that he has to be contacted to verify the letter.

---

If you are serious about this and seriously think this is normal and acceptable, then I don't know what to tell you. You have blurred the lines between real life and some kind of second city, virtual internet life and existence.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

WHat are you talking about? You are his client. You would be asking him to verify something. I suppose he could do a letter but that would be mean that he has to be contacted to verify the letter.

---

If you are serious about this and seriously think this is normal and acceptable, then I don't know what to tell you. You have blurred the lines between real life and some kind of second city, virtual internet life and existence.

---

I like how some fraud that didn't know if he was a plaintiff or a defendant at the onset of his fairy tale thinks he knows how the world works.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

hHow could one possibly debunk the statement "I confirmed this"?

---

By attacking his credibility, the same way you and others here have attempted to discredit KJ.

Oh wait a minute...that's tough to do since regnis doesn't play in any of the reindeer games here.

Gotta love these guys that do and say everything they can think of to discredit someone who says something they don't want to hear or believe, and then they pretend that they don't know that is what they did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Gotta love these guys that do and say everything they can think of to discredit someone who says something they don't want to hear or believe, and then they pretend that they don't know that is what they did.

---

Lol bro you discredit yourself.

MrV. No court accepts "confirmation" of anything from peek-a-boo, self-styled, and nameless, lawyer(s) on gambling forums who claim that it doesn't mean anything. That "dog" won't hunt.

On the contrary, KJ has clearly acknowledged that he will, and already has gone that route. So, why not more easily do it for real?

One simple letter of a short paragraph to verify the filing of the supposed claim. $100 . KJ could post it in his signature, as a lifetime achievement of sorts. Liar, and bullshitter, Mickey, and, next, you, might try to "rub it in our faces".

If not, it's further evidence that Regnis is more of a "hound" than MDawg may be.

Harumph.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

hHow could one possibly debunk the statement "I confirmed this"?

---

By attacking his credibility, the same way you and others here have attempted to discredit KJ.

Oh wait a minute...that's tough to do since regnis doesn't play in any of the reindeer games here.

---

This is incorrect. We have discredited KJ's numerous lies on their own merits.

It is true that he has lied so many times that now I simply don't believe anything he says, but the argument against the backrooming story was never ad hominem. It was against the story itself (and KJ's constant backpedaling when caught in a lie or implausibility).

You don't even know whether regnis was joking or baiting Mdawg (which contrary to what you say he apparently has done).

But again I don't think you grasp how implausible KJ's story is in the first place which makes this exchange pointless.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garnabby

MrV. No court accepts "confirmation" of anything from peek-a-boo, self-styled, and nameless, lawyer(s) on gambling forums who claim that it doesn't mean anything. That "dog" won't hunt.

---

Garnabby, I cannot speak as to how the law works in your home country, Canada, but here in the USA it happens this way ALL THE TIME.

Of course, this is not a court of law, it is a gambling forum where no proof is required.

But were this a courtroom, regnis would be free to make his claim, and it could be questioned by cross-examination.

So...why don't you and the others cross-examine regnis?

It seems he doesn't want to go public with the specifics of his investigation so why not PM him and ask for more info?

MrV. You don't receive 'em, but, I don't send 'em, the PM's on message boards. And, again, it's not my claim to prove.

The Wizard had to show up in court, to be sworn in as Michael Shackleford, to give detailed testimony about some gambling context, for the case(s) in which he was an expert witness.

But, here, it appears that Regnis was always more or less goofing around. Even our man "Tuesday" is more straightforward. Heck, Regnis still has "papers in his basement", I guess, in case someone asks about a horse race bet from thirty years ago. Ha.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Garnabby

MrV. No court accepts "confirmation" of anything from peek-a-boo, self-styled, and nameless, lawyer(s) on gambling forums who claim that it doesn't mean anything. That "dog" won't hunt.

---

Garnabby, I cannot speak as to how the law works in your home country, Canada, but here in the USA it happens this way ALL THE TIME.

Of course, this is not a court of law, it is a gambling forum where no proof is required.

But were this a courtroom, regnis would be free to make his claim, and it could be questioned by cross-examination.

So...why don't you and the others cross-examine regnis?

It seems he doesn't want to go public with the specifics of his investigation so why not PM him and ask for more info?

---

Obviously if regnis is reading this thread he understands that everyone wants him to elaborate (except KJ of course).

As far as regnis, I exchanged a couple PMs with him and he didn't even address the matter of the backrooming incident, all he wanted to discuss with me was why someone like me bothered to even engage with someone like UNKewlJ. I pointed out simply that by posting what he posted he was stirring the pot, and asked him how that made him any better than UNKewl or MrV? He pointed out that he goes months without posting and stays out of the all day trolling, which is true. Disclosing that he said something like that I don't think he would mind, doesn't violate any real confidentiality.

But, no, via PM he did not explain why he posted what he posted or elaborate on it.

Anyway, I haven't had a negative interaction with regnis. He seems like a reserved decent person. I do point out that he was mistaken about the CTRs but to his credit he didn't keep up with arguing about it, he let it go.

He doesn't seem like the trolling type but then he did create those two mischievous trolling threads that I pointed out.

In any case, we have no idea what UNKewlJ gave him, I doubt UNKewlJ even remembers exactly what he told him because he gave so many different versions of his lie to so many different people, including altering the fable online day to day, that he couldn't even keep track of his ever changing lies.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

He didn't give anyone any proof. At best, he gave one of his victims who was forced to listen to his lie a version that made more sense.

And exactly, yes, why did he not give V the same story he gave regnis, assuming even that's what happened here.

And as I've said from the beginning,

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

What happened here, is that something happened to someone - to more than one person, and UNKewlJ took it upon himself to put together a composite story about a series of events.

The latest story from the perennially UNKewl one is actually a composite of things that happened on more than one occasion to more than one person, and includes all the dramatic elements of being back roomed and roughed up, with a broken arm and ambulance ride to boot.

---

in which case revealing the name of some casino where something happened

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

What I did share with him (last year), was the casino involved.

---

doesn't prove anything.

Seriously, UNKewlJ should just keep his mouth shut. The more he opens it the more desperate his lies seem. And the more he contradicts himself and makes his lies more evident.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Gotta love these guys that do and say everything they can think of to discredit someone who says something they don't want to hear or believe, and then they pretend that they don't know that is what they did.

---

Lol bro you discredit yourself.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Punkcity

Yes you must be so sad as your posts are about everything YOU do here this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand how often you contradict yourself, sometimes one post to the very next post you post this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand how often you post hypocritical posts this forum, you condemn the very behaviour you, yourself post about here this forum.

You must have a mental problem as you just fail to understand that you constantly discredit YOUR OWN character yet claim others are discrediting you.

You must have a mental problem because you display homophobic dislike of yourself for being gay. It’s a nasty queer trait of self loathing homosexuals that manifests with ugly queers. We’ve all meet at least one in our lifetime. It’s that trait you display that give all the good gays a bad name.

As stated you’re a slow moving car wreck. I got beer and popcorn, I love watching you unravel.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

...that's tough to do since regnis doesn't play in any of the reindeer games here.

---

No so fast V.

I looked up the thread regnis started that MDawg has referred to: The Adventures of Dawg-Poop... 4/25/2021:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by regnis

I am coming clean. Tired of all the fiction here. I am going to show how I went from bust out bum to multi millionaire crushing Sic Bo. For security purposes, I have held this story back so the timelines may be months or even years ago.

After my divorce, dis-barment, and a brief fully comped stay in a state facility, I moved to Vegas to start over. Fronted two months at the Downtowner so now I needed a bankroll. No fancy watches but I was able to get 1.95 for my broken Timex at the local pawnshop. Needed another nickel for my exacta bet when an idea hit me. There was a blind guitar player on the overpass. I pretended to put $$ in his cup but actually stole a nickel.

Off to the local race and sports. Hit the exacta for 28.60. And so it starts.

---

Clearly the guy likes to pull dawg's chain and has a sense of humor. You can draw your own conclusions as to the intentions behind his "confirmation" post.

Context is everything.

Obviously he is spoofing the hound's way of braggadocio posting.

But the subject at hand is KJ, not the hound: I think we all agree that MDawg is full of shit: regnis is simply one of many in that regard.

As for the term "reindeer games" I was referring to the ongoing threads about discrediting KJ, which regnis has stayed away from.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by regnis

For security purposes, I have held this story back so the timelines may be months or even years ago.

---

You don't think this is a dig at kewl??

But even if you don't, you do agree he's goofing on MDawg. What better way to get under the MDawg's skin than to confirm kewl's story? And wind everybody up here at the same time?? I can't think of one.

I really don't have time for another day of this shit, so I will just say this and be gone:

Regnis made a sarcastic post mocking Mdawg, where he announced the mocking intent in the first sentence. Jdog is comparing that to a post made about "confirming" something that would change his reputation and credibility built up over a decade?

Really Jdog, you seen no difference in these two posts? :confused:

KJ ... Put up, or, shut up. Ha.

You're the one who put the U in Urinal.


Garnabby Garnabby is offline
Gold
Garnabby's AvatarJoin Date
Aug 2020
Posts
888

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

In any case, we have no idea what UNKewlJ gave him

---

What information would regnis need to confirm that tewlj was involved in the incident?

Anyone with details of the incident could claim that they were the "victim", if no name is attached.

So wouldn't regnis need to know his real name to confirm that tewlj was involved?

Is it plausible that tewlj gave regnis his real name, without remembering that he did?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I had sort of forgotten my conversation with regnis until I just went back and just re-read it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I really don't have time for another day of this shit, so I will just say this and be gone:

Regnis made a sarcastic post mocking Mdawg, where he announced the mocking intent in the first sentence. Jdog is comparing that to a post made about "confirming" something that would change his reputation and credibility built up over a decade?

Really Jdog, you seen no difference in these two posts? :confused:

---

I believe the point is that regnis likes to bs a bit, mix it up and have fun. Which greatly lowers the chance he is sincere in his "confirmation".

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

---

Why haven't you taken the next logical leap that Regnis is actually Singer? :rolleyes:

Red makes a big thing of anonymity, but, when it really matters, he has nothing to say about his big online chum, Regnis.

I'm actually quite glad that Regnis didn't officially confirm anything. Ha. Things remain where they were, with KJ merely another piece of online garbage. Sigh.

Say, perhaps Regnis can "confirm" that Red doesn't hold down the family house with the old man buried out back.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

For fucks sake. Regnis is Singer spelled backwards. That is clown on the crowd 101 type stuff. Embed a troll in the name itself. Lol Kewl.

---

Why haven't you taken the next logical leap that Regnis is actually Singer? :rolleyes:

---

Do you think it is coincidental ?

Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

No one is more desperate to prove himself than UNKewlJ. That he won't, is because he can't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

KJ, I might believe you, however, you just have way too many interesting things/stories Etc that for some reason or another you can never provide any proof. There's always some, for lack of a better word, Bullshit reason why you can't/won't. It seems as if it would be in your best interest to not mention anything in the first place if you can't provide one iota of proof for whatever reason.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RobSinger

If there's ever been anybody more incapable of trying and trying to change other people's opinions about himself, that person hasn't been born yet.

---

---

Among the more ridiculous lies UNKewlJ told this weekend, is that violating his fictional settlement agreement privately versus publicly was somehow okay. Every time he opens his mouth he confirms further that he is lying.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I can say whatever I want privately.

---

:eek: As if that would make any difference (if any of this were real, that is), lol.

Yes, he'd better head out it's the weekend, and there are UNKewl tricks to be turned. The more he opens his mouth the more he gets caught in contradictions and lies.

---

**yawn**

"no soup for you"....troll. :cool:

**yawn** says kewl.

Still hard for me to take the cat serious when the boy claim to bed the dices-"influencer", hey hey.

KJ has serious real life stuff to do, like shoot hoops with the boys and book his 20th consecutive year card counting in LV.

He's clearly not a guy with time to spend on the forums.

Does Kewl ever sit around and smirk at any of this? Or is it 100% all serious business in his brain?

I'd like to think he finds some humor in his bs but I tend to give people too much credit. He's probably 100% serious about all of it.

The kewl-J is one of them 3-cards monte cats and that's how he makes his cake. I don't begrudge him, though, as to me the 3-crads monte is no worse than 6-5 21 or 3-zero roulettes, hey hey.

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Do you think it is coincidental ? Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

---

AIQ, you need a bit of background info.

Robert Argentino changed the last name on his internet handle to Singer as a spoof on his then nemesis, Bob Dancer.

Get it? singer ---> dancer

Regnis similarly spoofed Singer by choosing to reverse the letters from SINGER to REGNIS, just because; obviously he wanted to remain anonymous so why not?

No, has ZERO to do with whether regnis, a lawyer, is trustworthy, and everything to do with forum humor.

As for how regnis could confirm things: independent investigation via asking casino personnel would be a good start; he would need "connections."

You're out of your mind V. You should take more drugs.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Does Kewl ever sit around and smirk at any of this? Or is it 100% all serious business in his brain?

I'd like to think he finds some humor in his bs but I tend to give people too much credit. He's probably 100% serious about all of it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

I'm not sure what to think of Singer but at the end of the day he laughs most of this shit off. You can't. That's pretty much the sum of this whole situation between you 2.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

---

I quoted you earlier in this thread. You said you were busy watching and playing basketball.

I guess that one just slipped out?

Lets get something else straight, because you trolls that comment on 20 winning years seem clueless. If you are a professional card counter playing high stakes, traveling a lot, with limited actual play, you might encounter a losing year now and then. It is a simple case of not getting in enough play to overcome the occasional bad variance.

But if you are a grinder type player, who plays a lot, 50, 60 thousand rounds, you shouldn't have a losing year. You have enough trials to overcome any bad variance, 92, 3 standard deviations). In the case of this grinder type player that plays enough to overcome variance, a "bad" year will be a year some level below expectation but likely still a "winning year".

And even though I currently play a little higher stakes and a little less than I used to, I am still in this grinder type catagory. I play enough that it is unlikely that I will have a losing year (not impossible but unlikely). A bad year is a year way below expectation. And I have had a number of those, most recently 2020 (covid year) when my blackjack results were less than 15k vs expectation of 80k. THAT is a bad year for a grinder type player that puts in enough play to overcome variance. Kapeesh? :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kewlJ

I am watching hoops, having wagered on most games, working through my rollover requirements.

And my 20th straight year of winning blackjack was last year. Only 15 in Vegas though.

If you are going to troll, at least get the facts right.

---

I quoted you earlier in this thread. You said you were busy watching and playing basketball.

I guess that one just slipped out?

---

Where? Where did I say I was playing basketball? Please link or quote.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MDawg

The above post is a classic example of an UNKewlJ typical lying post:

1. Provides no evidence - other than sometimes mentioning that, "the math works" or "the math doesn't work."

2. Repeats the same things over and over - "manually rephrase the same old nervous essays over and over."

3. Tries to shoe horn his now worn smooth fable about being a multi year blackjack player into the topic. "I've been a professional player for X years and made X million dollars already blah blah blah so I know how it works."

3. Includes some kind of rant about MDawg / Singer / etc.

4. Misstates most of what he even references. Frequently contradicts himself.

5. Refers to unknown never will be seen APs or other experts who know him, will vouch for whatever it is he is claiming, or work with him.

6. Tries to distill any opposition to whatever it is he claims to "trolling" and "a witch hunt." – “poor poor KJ always the victim.” *

* 7. (Optional) Mentions that he doesn't really care what people think about him and that no one need prove anything.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MisterV

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by accountinquestion

Do you think it is coincidental ? Or do you just think the choice of name has no bearing on how trustworthy Regnis is?

---

AIQ, you need a bit of background info.

Robert Argentino changed the last name on his internet handle to Singer as a spoof on his then nemesis, Bob Dancer.

Get it? singer ---> dancer

Regnis similarly spoofed Singer by choosing to reverse the letters from SINGER to REGNIS, just because; obviously he wanted to remain anonymous so why not?

No, has ZERO to do with whether regnis, a lawyer, is trustworthy, and everything to do with forum humor.

As for how regnis could confirm things: independent investigation via asking casino personnel would be a good start; he would need "connections."

---

Who has these random connections to casino employees that could actually verify both the incident, the substance of the incident, and that it was connected to KJ (whose name regnis doesn't even know)? And this almost a year after the "fact".

Although to be fair that's actually setting a higher bar, unlike Mdawg I don't think the incident is even halfway grounded in reality so I would be very surprised if there is a roughly correspondent incident that just involved someone other than KJ.