Originally you stated that the advice was for people that assumed it was B.S. . Now the goal posts move and you say it was advice for those believing it was likely fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Originally you stated that the advice was for people that assumed it was B.S. . Now the goal posts move and you say it was advice for those believing it was likely fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I don't think the nuance matters at all in this type of discussion. There was never a goalpost until I started to humor your pedantic OCDing weird ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayOriginally you stated that the advice was for people that assumed it was B.S. . Now the goal posts move and you say it was advice for those believing it was likely fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Do you even disagree with what I said ?
Why were the words "probably" and "likely" created if there is no difference between them and the word "certainty" ? You'll have to be specific about what you are asking me about disagreeing with or I cannot answer that question.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI don't think the nuance matters at all in this type of discussion. There was never a goalpost until I started to humor your pedantic OCDing weird ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayOriginally you stated that the advice was for people that assumed it was B.S. . Now the goal posts move and you say it was advice for those believing it was likely fake.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Do you even disagree with what I said ?
Todd need to add a "block thread" feature to this site so this bullshit can dissappear.
lol as if the ten members posting here are so entertaining and educational that a few other posters are ruining your VCT Experience lol... GTFOH!Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb
okey dokey. I am going to refrain from responding to you Coach Belly.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayWhy were the words "probably" and "likely" created if there is no difference between them and the word "certainty" ? You'll have to be specific about what you are asking me about disagreeing with or I cannot answer that question.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI don't think the nuance matters at all in this type of discussion. There was never a goalpost until I started to humor your pedantic OCDing weird ways.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Do you even disagree with what I said ?
Make me you fat son of a bitch!Quote:
Originally Posted by monetlol as if the ten members posting here are so entertaining and educational that a few other posters are ruining your VCT Experience lol... GTFOH!Quote:
Originally Posted by jbjb
https://www.wired.com/story/scientis...antarctic-ice/
This is an interesting one. Not really a flooding river but apparently a newly created river. Hmm where would a good place be before all the coastal dwellers decide to pack it in?
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...climate-crisis
Big die off of trees this year. Nothing to see but please realize it is just starting.
I'll be honest, the first spring after the trees die and they don't green out but have all the tiny branches still unbroken is surreal. So I guess there will be something to see!
Just to be clear. I used to care but like many things you have no power over, you just come to accept them.
You have grief - then you learn to accept it. Much like the stages of grieving for a loved one but this was all forseen many decades ago. It has bothered me personally for over 20 years but now I'm just like .. let the monkeys consume themselves. Not my monkeys - not my circus! I do feel sorry for the kids though but what'r'ya'gonna'do?
Mankind as we know it and our standard of living is on the way OUT.
The regional problems this will cause are just going to layer on top of this shit. Starving people close to equator gonna just give up and starve to death?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-..._medium=social
I didn't realize UK had a all time high this year too. Cool.
Literally nothing has changed for anyone. The same people who live in the desert will continue to Starve like they have done for hundreds of years, because they live in the fucking desert. Nothing to do with climate. Maybe we can pump the cum out of KewJblacksuckDs stomach to feed the starving idiots who stay in the desert.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The worst thing by far for the climate is Joe Biden and the democrats spending. They have put millions below the poverty line killing 100s of thousands, because they can’t afford to eat. But you don’t mind that he’s killed all these people because trump is gone.
IMO, Fuck climate change, it's all BS. If it's real then we deserve what we get.
With that being said.
BS or not, government con or not, it's probably a good thing to attempt to clean up our environment, improve transportation, improve solar, stop cutting down trees, recycle and conserve.
Electric vehicles/transportation may not be all that it's cracked up to be, but we got to start somewhere.
Wow, who knew?Quote:
Originally Posted by Seedvalue
Hundreds of thousands of Americans died from hunger since Uncle Joe beat the pants off the Orange oaf?
Funny, I never heard or read anything about that til you just made the claim.
Actually, as is typical of you, you just made up this shit to fit your agenda.
Just like your bullshit about casinos and three ways, LOL.
Fucking Trumpies...
Although some of us may deserve it - some were and are willing to live a lifestyle that would be sustainable. The vast majority of the world is just breed and consume what they can afford.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Some still stay it is BS which is why I don't bother posting any projections just things that have happened that shouldn't be happening with such frequency and across all continents.
Do you know what the "stressors" in the article are? They didn't want to say bark beetle. They did their best to make it sound like the climate is responsible. The bark beetle has been killing tree's in the northwest for years, not the climate. I've been seeing dead tree's like that for years around the northwest.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
They spent 20 paragraphs blaming it on the climate with just one sentence about "insects and disease" adding "stress." They're full of shit. It's common knowledge that the dead tree's are the result of the bark beetles.
But the climatards that wrote the article are trying to rewrite history.
Now, does anyone have a take on the recent nuclear fusion breakthrough? It will lead to the people of the earth no longer needing fossil fuels.
Hmm lemme see Bark Beetles well known for their damage for PINE trees must have all at once flew over to the FIR trees and killed them because clearly it has nothing to do with https://www.nbcnews.com/science/scie...etch-rcna40491 <- heat-wave-scorches-pacific-northwest-echoing-brutal-2021-stretch <-- true storyQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmDo you know what the "stressors" in the article are? They didn't want to say bark beetle. They did their best to make it sound like the climate is responsible. The bark beetle has been killing tree's in the northwest for years, not the climate. I've been seeing dead tree's like that for years around the northwest.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
They spent 20 paragraphs blaming it on the climate with just one sentence about "insects and disease" adding "stress." They're full of shit. It's common knowledge that the dead tree's are the result of the bark beetles.
But the climatards that wrote the article are trying to rewrite history.
Now, does anyone have a take on the recent nuclear fusion breakthrough? It will lead to the people of the earth no longer needing fossil fuels.
The research leading to the breakthrough was actually for the purposes of our nuclear arms arsenal, but nonetheless it can be leveraged to meet global energy needs. With AI-assisted modeling (due to the ultra-high complexity of all the factors involved), it's pretty clear that more steady advancement, such as the aforementioned breakthough, are going to occur (sort of like Moore's Law for microprocessor performance improvements) with greater frequency. With various groups around the world working on fusion advancements, I believe the consensus is 20 years out for practical grid-connected fusion Mickey. So that's pretty solid news.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Cheers, TP.
Ahh yes magic thinking. Someone else is going to fix this - they always have.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayThe research leading to the breakthrough was actually for the purposes of our nuclear arms arsenal, but nonetheless it can be leveraged to meet global energy needs. With AI-assisted modeling (due to the ultra-high complexity of all the factors involved), it's pretty clear that more steady advancement, such as the aforementioned breakthough, are going to occur (sort of like Moore's Law for microprocessor performance improvements) with greater frequency. With various groups around the world working on fusion advancements, I believe the consensus is 20 years out for practical grid-connected fusion Mickey. So that's pretty solid news.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Cheers, TP.
No way it'll be ready in 20 years. We can't even build a nuclear reactor in under 5. If and when they start to scale it then get back.
It took over 40 years of going from oil drilling to first mass produced car. The level of complexity is so much smaller for cars. 10s of thousands of dudes would be able to create a car with a decent machine shop. There are no way that many people could engineer up a working fusion reactor. 20 years? ha !
At least with fusion we could desalinate water from oceans at a massive scale, I suppose.
I wasn't answering the question "Is nuclear fusion going to fix climate change ?" I was answering Mickey's question "does anyone have a take on the recent nuclear fusion breakthrough?" . BTW, I totally get that what I just wrote won't stop you from arguing against answers that were never made to questions that were never asked.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
More like the humatards.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Best to save the fusion stuff for a permanent way off the planet, which is more than already doomed within the next five hundred years. If we could perfect, and, then, afford, one such power plant, over the next hundred years, then, maybe, by then, we will also have a way to get the CO2, etc, out of the atmosphere. But, cooling, or letting cool, the atmosphere would hardly be enough.
Generally speaking, each solution always leads to even more problems (in the long run). No matter how the energy is consumed, it will end up as even more heat.
I'm sure we are contributing some to global warming and fucking up the ozone but I don't believe it's anywhere near the degree some are claiming. Much of it is a political tool and a money grab. There are more important things we should be spending money on, those things might even cut down on global warming.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionAlthough some of us may deserve it - some were and are willing to live a lifestyle that would be sustainable. The vast majority of the world is just breed and consume what they can afford.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
Some still stay it is BS which is why I don't bother posting any projections just things that have happened that shouldn't be happening with such frequency and across all continents.
I have a feeling something else will get us long before global warming will.
Ahhh I guess Mickey wasn't implying it is possibly a solution to climate change. He just randomly brought it up in response to me. lol. You're right though, I guess you're not necessarily agreeing with that but it seemed like you were.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI wasn't answering the question "Is nuclear fusion going to fix climate change ?" I was answering Mickey's question "does anyone have a take on the recent nuclear fusion breakthrough?" . BTW, I totally get that what I just wrote won't stop you from arguing against answers that were never made to questions that were never asked.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I don't think there is a consensus about 20 years but perhaps. It took them DECADES to get to one of the most brief of demonstrations. You're telling me they're going to scale it up to grid application in 20 years? I think any scientist not blinded by being in these and related programs will disagree. You know there is no AI that is going to solve this. I'm not aware of AI solving ANYTHING outside of beating games (very specific domain) or spitting out seemingly intelligent text.
Regardless, I was going to say after watching the video that it was informative and best reference for us lay people. I fell asleep towards the end but such is life.
I'm sure we are contributing some to global warming and fucking up the ozone but I don't believe it's anywhere near the degree some are claiming. Much of it is a political tool and a money grab. There are more important things we should be spending money on, those things might even cut down on global warming.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I have a feeling something else will get us long before global warming will.[/QUOTE]
Global warming will get some of mankind far before anything else. Or at least they will need to emigrate.
There will be lots of secondary effects and it is very possible that one of those will get many of us.
Steven Hawking's predictions ...
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/15/step...l-warming.html
It makes a lot of sense, intuitively, and otherwise. Certainly someone who knew his own stuff. Let alone the gambling quacks like Jacobson. And, the egghead fucktards like AxleWolf, and Crimm.
He may be curious about it as a potential solution to energy demands - I'm not going to assume that is why he is asking though. I guess there may be a few other people who think it might be as well, since billions have been spent trying to develop it as such over 60 years. Since this type of research was started way before climate change was considered the issue it was now, I think that energy demand fulfillment is much more likely the reason for asking about the fusion breakthrough. Anyway assume away about people's reasons for asking questions.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
No, I'm not. I'm delivering information about what nuclear sector corporations have stated.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
The video I posted had a scientist in charge of modeling stating that the design of the fusion experiment was AI-assisted. I think that may have been while you were asleep. Any scientist that's not a nuclear scientist isn't nearly as qualified to make an estimation compared to one that is.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
You said you weren't going to reply to my responses or posts.
Hahahahahhaha!! Firs are part of the pine tree family. And they are being killed by the bark beetle no matter what bullshit you come up with.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHmm lemme see Bark Beetles well known for their damage for PINE trees must have all at once flew over to the FIR trees and killed them because clearly it has nothing to do with https://www.nbcnews.com/science/scie...etch-rcna40491 <- heat-wave-scorches-pacific-northwest-echoing-brutal-2021-stretch <-- true storyQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmDo you know what the "stressors" in the article are? They didn't want to say bark beetle. They did their best to make it sound like the climate is responsible. The bark beetle has been killing tree's in the northwest for years, not the climate. I've been seeing dead tree's like that for years around the northwest.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
They spent 20 paragraphs blaming it on the climate with just one sentence about "insects and disease" adding "stress." They're full of shit. It's common knowledge that the dead tree's are the result of the bark beetles.
But the climatards that wrote the article are trying to rewrite history.
Now, does anyone have a take on the recent nuclear fusion breakthrough? It will lead to the people of the earth no longer needing fossil fuels.
But if tree's are dying because of drought you climatards blame it on climate change. You blame everything on climate change. That's your catchall. Droughts have been going on for thousands of years but climatards say they are man made? Get a clue.
The sky is falling! The sky is falling!Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
One thing is for sure. YOU ain't going to fix shit.
Why don't you just go ahead and shoot yourself in the head and get it over with, Mr. Doomsday.
I'm sure he is curious about it as a solution to potential energy demands but if one looks at context as they would with any conversation..... people don't always ask "Why are you asking this?" before they respond to everything. Unless you have a hard time with such issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
How autistic you must be.......
I've never or seen Mickey have any interest in such matters but sure .. just ignore context and justify your flimsy beliefs. My response was still on subject.
Ok, what "nuclear corporation" was this and what info? All these guys on here were going on about how you can't trust the scientists because there are money motivations.. then here comes a corporation with either a product or wanting grant money and it is somehow the truth regardless if it flies against most reasonably educated guesses.Quote:
No, I'm not. I'm delivering information about what nuclear sector corporations have stated.
My degree is in CS and from a decent public school. I've done far far more computer programming than I have AP stuff. I disagree about the "any scientist" part. The nuclear scientists aren't going to see the big picture or even be aware of many things outside their sphere of influence. I'd rather go by history (and complexity estimation) over hype.Quote:
The video I posted had a scientist in charge of modeling stating that the design of the fusion experiment was AI-assisted. I think that may have been while you were asleep. Any scientist that's not a nuclear scientist isn't nearly as qualified to make an estimation compared to one that is.
Ahh yes I heard that buzzword dropped. I just didn't put much stock in it. You went the other way and thought he/she implied AI was going to help them with a "solution". What someone like that says "AI", I'm sure there was something very AI like.
What is "intelligent" in context of computers? Question has been the basis of the Turing test for possibly longer than nuclear fusion research. *I* don't think the AI involved in here is particularly intelligent outside of whatever domain the algorithm was written for. I'm sure this is something many would call "AI" but see if that "intelligence" can generalize itself in any way on its own. I'm sure if whatever they use is setup to solve for some solution (or close approximation) it won't get past that.
If you want to believe these guys have AI systems that are going to help them throughout the dev pipeline then feel free to believe a few words dropped at a news conference.
I retract. As long as you obsess harder over what I say than Monet's dick I will often be responding.Quote:
You said you weren't going to reply to my responses or posts.
Well if you say so about Firs then I can be completely wrong about that aspect. I'm not a tree guy. I read something about bark beetles and it said pines. Whatever. I guess pine trees managed to fade bark beetles and the huge back to back heat wave had nothing to do with it. You know.. a heat wave outside of what the plants evolved to exist in...Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When heat-waves are records all the time how can you really say that is the same thing going on forever? If you apply this sort of thinking to all domains you're going to come up with some truly goofy results.
I get too much pleasure trolling your dumb ass over your Trump loving ways and whatever other backwards ass thinking you feed me.Quote:
Why don't you just go ahead and shoot yourself in the head and get it over with, Mr. Doomsday.
Helion Energy, Common Wealth Fusion Systems, and General Fusion to name a few. The CEO of Helion Energy says they will have commercial fusion energy for sale in 10 years for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I was replying to Mickey about a question regarding the progress of a type of technology and you say I am proposing a fix by answering a technological progress question - that was why I responded to your post - I'm not obsessing about anything you say. I could care less if you ever post here again.
People around here don't want to believe respected scientists but readily believe CEOs. Thats some late stage capitalism bullshit if ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayHelion Energy, Common Wealth Fusion Systems, and General Fusion to name a few. The CEO of Helion Energy says they will have commercial fusion energy for sale in 10 years for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I was replying to Mickey about a question regarding the progress of a type of technology and you say I am proposing a fix by answering a technological progress question - that was why I responded to your post - I'm not obsessing about anything you say. I could care less if you ever post here again.
You realize that CEOs of publicly run companies have pretty much only one objective and that is to keep the stock price high. The future doesn't even matter to them. What matters is the stock price up until the point they leave. They are ALWAYS going to say something is coming earlier than reality.
Regardless, glad to see you came up with some companies. I sorta thought you were talking about the video clip but again my bad. I assume a lot of things :) Helion has 2 billion in venture capital. That is impressive but lets be honest if you want to sell hopes and dreams fusion is probably top 3 things you coul0d choose.
Anyway, cynacism aside I hope I am wrong about all this and it comes online in 10 years. It is a huge leap for humanity. My understanding from the video is these pulverized/vaporized things they create are very very skilled labor intensive. Wouldn't they have to make those at scale?? Goooooooooood luck.
Here is one for Mickey. https://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/environment/spruce-trees-arctic-alaska-climate-change/
Here the trees are growing from earth warming. Yay?
I am curious how the trees spread so much...... so quickly.
Here is one directly pertinent to Las Vegas. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/di...ns/ar-AA15nYKe
You asked me for specifics about who it was that was stating that commercial nuclear fusion would be available within 20 years and I provided you the answer to your question. Why the fuck do you think I believe or don't believe a CEO ? I am just answering your fucking question that you asked about who it was that was making these claims. You then conflate this with what you think I believe when I made no assertions to this in any way shape or form.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionPeople around here don't want to believe respected scientists but readily believe CEOs. Thats some late stage capitalism bullshit if ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayHelion Energy, Common Wealth Fusion Systems, and General Fusion to name a few. The CEO of Helion Energy says they will have commercial fusion energy for sale in 10 years for example.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I was replying to Mickey about a question regarding the progress of a type of technology and you say I am proposing a fix by answering a technological progress question - that was why I responded to your post - I'm not obsessing about anything you say. I could care less if you ever post here again.
You realize that CEOs of publicly run companies have pretty much only one objective and that is to keep the stock price high. The future doesn't even matter to them. What matters is the stock price up until the point they leave. They are ALWAYS going to say something is coming earlier than reality.
Regardless, glad to see you came up with some companies. I sorta thought you were talking about the video clip but again my bad. I assume a lot of things :) Helion has 2 billion in venture capital. That is impressive but lets be honest if you want to sell hopes and dreams fusion is probably top 3 things you coul0d choose.
Anyway, cynacism aside I hope I am wrong about all this and it comes online in 10 years. It is a huge leap for humanity. My understanding from the video is these pulverized/vaporized things they create are very very skilled labor intensive. Wouldn't they have to make those at scale?? Goooooooooood luck.
You have to figure it all out by not believing anyone. Ultimately, there are no rules until all of the rules have been derived at once. We inhabit the corrupt version of the universe, and, so, none will admit, or accept, the truth. In general, the theory of everything is what no one else can agree on; otherwise, it would have been found a long time ago. It has to be something that is hidden in plain sight, already available to whomever can admit it. As I pointed out, several years ago, on this very site, mankind is merely the turning point in evolution, itself. What comes after us will be a product of our leaving the planet behind. With species that work their way back to the smallest of beginnings, which led to us, too, from the time of the "big bang", but, in an inverse proportionally sentient sense. As well, there are ways to prove that "we are alone in the universe", that Earth is, essentially, the center of the universe. For example, that life, too, is a matter of simple entropy, that to create us used it up, like creating energy. Biological arguments as well, such as how buds form, with one in the lead. Cynics welcome, can't change anything.
Due to this vastness that you have written about above Bill, I doubt anyone will remember the song No Go Betweens by the Memphis Horns, despite the fact that it is an excellent song:Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mwB21haeEVo
Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYou asked me for specifics about who it was that was stating that commercial nuclear fusion would be available within 20 years and I provided you the answer to your question. Why the fuck do you think I believe or don't believe a CEO ? I am just answering your fucking question that you asked about who it was that was making these claims. You then conflate this with what you think I believe when I made no assertions to this in any way shape or form.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionPeople around here don't want to believe respected scientists but readily believe CEOs. Thats some late stage capitalism bullshit if ever.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
You realize that CEOs of publicly run companies have pretty much only one objective and that is to keep the stock price high. The future doesn't even matter to them. What matters is the stock price up until the point they leave. They are ALWAYS going to say something is coming earlier than reality.
Regardless, glad to see you came up with some companies. I sorta thought you were talking about the video clip but again my bad. I assume a lot of things :) Helion has 2 billion in venture capital. That is impressive but lets be honest if you want to sell hopes and dreams fusion is probably top 3 things you coul0d choose.
Anyway, cynacism aside I hope I am wrong about all this and it comes online in 10 years. It is a huge leap for humanity. My understanding from the video is these pulverized/vaporized things they create are very very skilled labor intensive. Wouldn't they have to make those at scale?? Goooooooooood luck.
Why the fuck do you think I believe or don't believe a CEO ? <-- because you said companies were saying 20 years? Ok CEO didn't say it, spokesman for company did. Same shit.
Yes I reported what companies were saying dumbfuck, not my own personal opinion. It's only the same shit to a moron like yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
So saying the 20 years thing to suggest that commercial fusion will soon be available is not actually suggesting that you also believe it? *YOU* believe that? Really? Something wrong with you, son.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYes I reported what companies were saying dumbfuck, not my own personal opinion. It's only the same shit to a moron like yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, just to show I can hang with your level of pedantry .. when you said " I could care less if you ever post here again." you were saying the completely wrong thing and would likely have done it repeatedly. WHOSE THE DUMBFUCK NOW !!!??? haha.. oh man keep taking me so seriously bud
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGrimReaper
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/m96NeIg4czM
This is the kind of stuff those DumbFucks think and believe in.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
The study was funded by a $50K grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) literally titled "Encouraging Vaccine Confidence in Canada".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcBf8YgZaV0
Climate change won’t stop me from making unlimited money at will. Nor will it shrink the size of my giant meat monster. Thicker then ever with this new solid gold cock ring I wear. Purchased in Denver with the proceeds from a nearby casino. Mile high fucking is a little different then at sea level.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionSo saying the 20 years thing to suggest that commercial fusion will soon be available is not actually suggesting that you also believe it? *YOU* believe that? Really? Something wrong with you, son.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayYes I reported what companies were saying dumbfuck, not my own personal opinion. It's only the same shit to a moron like yourself.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Anyway, just to show I can hang with your level of pedantry .. when you said " I could care less if you ever post here again." you were saying the completely wrong thing and would likely have done it repeatedly. WHOSE THE DUMBFUCK NOW !!!??? haha.. oh man keep taking me so seriously bud
On a ship full of rats they all die because I will find a way to eat all the cheese
Exactly. It's saying that the consensus among nuclear scientists in commercial and government sectors is that it is 20 years out, and then posting/reporting their belief here on VCT, you cretinous, mindless fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Since I would experience no emotion whatsoever if you never posted here again, I stand by my statement regardless of your rhetoric.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Looks like the Dorester just exposed the scam:higher car insurance premiums for the unvaccinated since they don't follow rules (even though getting vaccinated isn't a law as Jimmy pointed out). Same country that tried to destroy the careers of truckers who wouldn't get vaccinated. Great link, thanks.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetThis is the kind of stuff those DumbFucks think and believe in.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
The study was funded by a $50K grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) literally titled "Encouraging Vaccine Confidence in Canada".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcBf8YgZaV0
What statement ? The statement where you meant to say you couldN'T care less? Buuuttt you didn't even understand when I corrected you because you stand by the fact that you could care less. Do you get this now? You want to say you're at the maximum of NOT CARING so it is COULDN'T ! Epic.Quote:
Since I would experience no emotion whatsoever if you never posted here again, I stand by my statement regardless of your rhetoric.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
To be absolutely clear - you meant to say "I couldn't care less" but you said "I could care less" and it is quite obvious you'd make this incorrect statement repeatedly given that you didn't even understand my first post about it. Don't feel bad. It is actually a common saying that is frequently misstated.
Again, the only reason I brought that up was to be a pedantic dipshit like yourself.
Anyway, no fucking way it'll be done in 20 years regardless of my half-assed reading of what you say (same thing with halfassed reading of that UX screen. lol). My problem is I don't pay attention to you enough to deal with your pedantry. One can write in an overly verbose manner to be in constant CYA mode for derelicts such as yourself but at some point in life you kinda quit bothering.
And you clearly do show emotion when I DO post here so you definitely care what I post but it is clear most of us won't miss others when they stop posting. (with the exception of your dearest Monet.
You argue about pointless semantics while some of argue about ideas and truths. Good for you.
AIQ shows once again he is just an idiot. His only claim to fame here is he zigs when someone else zags....and he zags when someone else zigs. Total stupid fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I get a big kick out of making you look like the shit for brains you are. You're not science. You're a goofball that thinks you are about science. You are actually anti-science. You got more routes than Greyhound Buslines. You make the facts up as you go. Tewlj taught you well.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionWell if you say so about Firs then I can be completely wrong about that aspect. I'm not a tree guy. I read something about bark beetles and it said pines. Whatever. I guess pine trees managed to fade bark beetles and the huge back to back heat wave had nothing to do with it. You know.. a heat wave outside of what the plants evolved to exist in...Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When heat-waves are records all the time how can you really say that is the same thing going on forever? If you apply this sort of thinking to all domains you're going to come up with some truly goofy results.
I get too much pleasure trolling your dumb ass over your Trump loving ways and whatever other backwards ass thinking you feed me.Quote:
Why don't you just go ahead and shoot yourself in the head and get it over with, Mr. Doomsday.
I ask a question about the fusion breakthrough and you go off like the pea brained idiot you are. Bitch, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. You're just a fucking flake running you're punk ass mouth.
Yep, the ol' "heat wave killed the tree's" climatard argument....even though the bark beettles been chewing on them for years. I seen a piece on CNN yesterday where tornadoes are caused by climate change.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionWell if you say so about Firs then I can be completely wrong about that aspect. I'm not a tree guy. I read something about bark beetles and it said pines. Whatever. I guess pine trees managed to fade bark beetles and the huge back to back heat wave had nothing to do with it. You know.. a heat wave outside of what the plants evolved to exist in...Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When heat-waves are records all the time how can you really say that is the same thing going on forever? If you apply this sort of thinking to all domains you're going to come up with some truly goofy results.
I get too much pleasure trolling your dumb ass over your Trump loving ways and whatever other backwards ass thinking you feed me.Quote:
Why don't you just go ahead and shoot yourself in the head and get it over with, Mr. Doomsday.
Climatards:
If it's raining? That's climate change!
If it's sunny? That's climate change!
If it's cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's partly cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's windy? Hey, that's climate change!
If the wind ain't blowing? Hey, that's climate change!
If it's 80 degree's? Climate change again.
If it's 200 degree's? Once again, climate change.
If there's a tornado? Climate change
If there's a hurricane? Climate change.
Oop's the sun came back out. That's climate change for ya!
You dumb motherfuckers.
So now your schtick is predictions don't come true....but what about YOUR prediction that climate change is going to kill us all? Cuba, Venezuela, or maybe North Korea could use more gaslighters like you.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I've posted links before and you said you won't read them. So YOUR links can fuck off to.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I'm using the term as an expression. Here you are you piece of shit:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionWhat statement ? The statement where you meant to say you couldN'T care less? Buuuttt you didn't even understand when I corrected you because you stand by the fact that you could care less. Do you get this now? You want to say you're at the maximum of NOT CARING so it is COULDN'T ! Epic.Quote:
Since I would experience no emotion whatsoever if you never posted here again, I stand by my statement regardless of your rhetoric.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
To be absolutely clear - you meant to say "I couldn't care less" but you said "I could care less" and it is quite obvious you'd make this incorrect statement repeatedly given that you didn't even understand my first post about it. Don't feel bad. It is actually a common saying that is frequently misstated.
Again, the only reason I brought that up was to be a pedantic dipshit like yourself.
Anyway, no fucking way it'll be done in 20 years regardless of my half-assed reading of what you say (same thing with halfassed reading of that UX screen. lol). My problem is I don't pay attention to you enough to deal with your pedantry. One can write in an overly verbose manner to be in constant CYA mode for derelicts such as yourself but at some point in life you kinda quit bothering.
And you clearly do show emotion when I DO post here so you definitely care what I post but it is clear most of us won't miss others when they stop posting. (with the exception of your dearest Monet.
You argue about pointless semantics while some of argue about ideas and truths. Good for you.
I gave you very valid info about fusion and that is there is 0 chance of it coming online and tied into a grid in 20 years. I gave multiple reasons why.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI get a big kick out of making you look like the shit for brains you are. You're not science. You're a goofball that thinks you are about science. You are actually anti-science. You got more routes than Greyhound Buslines. You make the facts up as you go. Tewlj taught you well.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I ask a question about the fusion breakthrough and you go off like the pea brained idiot you are. Bitch, you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. You're just a fucking flake running you're punk ass mouth.
There once was a group of hobos sitting around drunk off their asses as usual. This night they happened to be mourning the death of Pebo - a friend they had all liked and drank with many a night around countless campfires. Pebo had recently died in a tragic train accident and was cut in half. It was traumatic for those who saw the aftermath. One guy though had a different perspective. After taking another swill he informs the rest of the group that it wasn't the train that killed their friend, it was the goddam railroad tracks. What else cut him in half? Tracks been killing people for a long time now. Those idiot peabrained bitch flakes argued that the train was more at fault. Not the loudest hobo of them all. After all, he was much smarter than them. He was good with numbers. Logic was his strongpoint and he was not having it. It was as clear as day that the train didn't kill the man.
Do you really not understand that things have multiple reasons? Everything is so singularly black and white to you. (although you claim to be a moderate - likely because of that guberment money you get - It allows you to not see yourself as a big fat fucking hypocrite)Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYep, the ol' "heat wave killed the tree's" climatard argument....even though the bark beettles been chewing on them for years. I seen a piece on CNN yesterday where tornadoes are caused by climate change.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Climatards:
If it's raining? That's climate change!
If it's sunny? That's climate change!
If it's cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's partly cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's windy? Hey, that's climate change!
If the wind ain't blowing? Hey, that's climate change!
If it's 80 degree's? Climate change again.
If it's 200 degree's? Once again, climate change.
If there's a tornado? Climate change
If there's a hurricane? Climate change.
Oop's the sun came back out. That's climate change for ya!
You dumb motherfuckers.
Things have been killing trees forever - YES. We agree. We don't agree that whatever killed them before will be the singular cause going forward. hahaha... Especially when there have been big changes in the past year that have never occurred during written history and are KNOWN to kill things. Heat isn't magical. It really does kill things, Mick.
BTW - I have been posting countless links about where things have changed. It isn't even science I am posting. I'm posting empirical observations that can be verified if desired. I am not posting any studies or predictions.
There is literally something new in the news every fucking day but nah nothing to see. lol. Libtards need that money so they're just making up shit like usual. Trump though, he was the straight shooter. (Down with the Constitution says the #1 "Conservative" leader. And there is silence amongst his people.)
I have probably read every link you've given me. I have not listened to long droning on influencers that have a specific side to peddle. Once they say something that isn't logical and just pandering I go into "fuck that noise - got getter things to do" and close the tab. Jimmy Diore the whore is the most recent example but hey he's probably making more money than evah !!! Influencers going to influence.. (the feeble minded)Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI've posted links before and you said you won't read them. So YOUR links can fuck off to.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Yes, so many people started using the wrong version that it showed up in the dictionary. Some GIs who didn't know any better brought it to America.Cool, didn't know that. It is still the wrong version. For a guy as pedantic as you, I would think you would use the right version of the expression that makes logical sense. Why wouldn't you unless you didn't know any better?Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm using the term as an expression. Here you are you piece of shit:Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Just because the incorrect version is so widely used it is put in the dictionary doesn't mean you should use it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI'm using the term as an expression. Here you are you piece of shit:
Let's all be freer of the dictionaries. Ha. One who frees. All lies, well, almost.Quote:
The two versions of the given statement have been used so often that both are well understood. In addition, because they are based on informal slang and sarcasm, neither expression will be found in serious reporting or academic work. That means you are more apt to find these constructions in everyday speech and the occasional blog post.
The rules of grammar still apply in those kinds of situations, of course, but they aren’t as restrictive. So, while we would prefer that you use the better, clearer version of the expression (and use neither when you’re aiming to be a good student or professional), you aren’t likely to be corrected. Most people will know what you mean and simply move on.
That just might be good enough for you if you are the kind of person who couldn’t care less about the formalities of grammar in American English.
https://www.grammarbook.com/blog/def...dnt-care-less/
I've heard both versions. I could care less which version I use as long as the meaning is conveyed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I've heard both versions too. I wanted to point it out to you because you clearly didn't notice you were saying something nonsensical and not the way it was intended. You are a man of very precise language. I assumed you would appreciate this but again that is my chief problem. Assuming too much.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI've heard both versions. I could care less which version I use as long as the meaning is conveyed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Here is a question - Your answer to all this has been along the lines of,
A) I could care less
B) I couldn't care less
Which would be a better answer ?
[spoiler] The meanings are radically different.[/spoiler]
You really hit the nail on the head with your summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I like how the article mentions that the poor do not obey the rules.
Only the wealthy are good citizens.
I'm paraphrasing of course.
EDIT: The Washington Times decided to piggyback and upload an article about the study as well about 41 minutes ago.
Sickening.
Shit is all over the web now, when you search, saying that the unvaccinated are 72% more likely to get into a traffic accident.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ovid-19-are-m/
“One possibility relates to a distrust of government or belief in freedom that contributes to both vaccination preferences and increased traffic risks,” the study’s authors wrote. “A different explanation might be misconceptions of everyday risks, faith in natural protection, antipathy toward regulation, chronic poverty, exposure to misinformation, insufficient resources, or other personal beliefs.”
I don't get a dime from the government you stupid fuck. I involuntarily paid into an SS retirement account for 40 years, bitch. Social Security ain't the government's money, buffoon. It's my money. But you are to stupid to figure that out. Just one dumb fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionDo you really not understand that things have multiple reasons? Everything is so singularly black and white to you. (although you claim to be a moderate - likely because of that guberment money you get - It allows you to not see yourself as a big fat fucking hypocrite)Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmYep, the ol' "heat wave killed the tree's" climatard argument....even though the bark beettles been chewing on them for years. I seen a piece on CNN yesterday where tornadoes are caused by climate change.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Climatards:
If it's raining? That's climate change!
If it's sunny? That's climate change!
If it's cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's partly cloudy? That's climate change!
If it's windy? Hey, that's climate change!
If the wind ain't blowing? Hey, that's climate change!
If it's 80 degree's? Climate change again.
If it's 200 degree's? Once again, climate change.
If there's a tornado? Climate change
If there's a hurricane? Climate change.
Oop's the sun came back out. That's climate change for ya!
You dumb motherfuckers.
Things have been killing trees forever - YES. We agree. We don't agree that whatever killed them before will be the singular cause going forward. hahaha... Especially when there have been big changes in the past year that have never occurred during written history and are KNOWN to kill things. Heat isn't magical. It really does kill things, Mick.
BTW - I have been posting countless links about where things have changed. It isn't even science I am posting. I'm posting empirical observations that can be verified if desired. I am not posting any studies or predictions.
There is literally something new in the news every fucking day but nah nothing to see. lol. Libtards need that money so they're just making up shit like usual. Trump though, he was the straight shooter. (Down with the Constitution says the #1 "Conservative" leader. And there is silence amongst his people.)
And you didn't read any links I put up, buttfuck. The only degree you have is in buffoonery. You have a Master of Buffoonery degree. You're going back on ignore. I'm tired of exchanging with the village idiot.
I thought you guys were buddy, buddy after your meetup.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI don't get a dime from the government you stupid fuck. I involuntarily paid into an SS retirement account for 40 years, bitch. Social Security ain't the government's money, buffoon. It's my money. But you are to stupid to figure that out. Just one dumb fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionDo you really not understand that things have multiple reasons? Everything is so singularly black and white to you. (although you claim to be a moderate - likely because of that guberment money you get - It allows you to not see yourself as a big fat fucking hypocrite)Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Things have been killing trees forever - YES. We agree. We don't agree that whatever killed them before will be the singular cause going forward. hahaha... Especially when there have been big changes in the past year that have never occurred during written history and are KNOWN to kill things. Heat isn't magical. It really does kill things, Mick.
BTW - I have been posting countless links about where things have changed. It isn't even science I am posting. I'm posting empirical observations that can be verified if desired. I am not posting any studies or predictions.
There is literally something new in the news every fucking day but nah nothing to see. lol. Libtards need that money so they're just making up shit like usual. Trump though, he was the straight shooter. (Down with the Constitution says the #1 "Conservative" leader. And there is silence amongst his people.)
And you didn't read any links I put up, buttfuck. The only degree you have is in buffoonery. You have a Master of Buffoonery degree. You're going back on ignore. I'm tired of exchanging with the village idiot.
I don't know if all this trash talking is fake or real.
Sounds Real.
Keep it Coming!
^^ Beat me to it. I thought they had a good meetup, unlike you and the Wolf :)
Our "meetup" was decent enough but that doesn't change the fact that AW and ZK are Forum Phonies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
A better answer to what question ?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI've heard both versions too. I wanted to point it out to you because you clearly didn't notice you were saying something nonsensical and not the way it was intended. You are a man of very precise language. I assumed you would appreciate this but again that is my chief problem. Assuming too much.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayI've heard both versions. I could care less which version I use as long as the meaning is conveyed.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
Here is a question - Your answer to all this has been along the lines of,
A) I could care less
B) I couldn't care less
Which would be a better answer ?
[spoiler] The meanings are radically different.[/spoiler]
I'm totally fine using a well-known figure of speech which has a clear meaning and appears in American-English dictionary as an acceptable form. I didn't examine the phrase for its literal,logical meaning for this exact reason.
Thanks Monet.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetYou really hit the nail on the head with your summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
I like how the article mentions that the poor do not obey the rules.
Only the wealthy are good citizens.
I'm paraphrasing of course.
EDIT: The Washington Times decided to piggyback and upload an article about the study as well about 41 minutes ago.
Sickening.
Shit is all over the web now, when you search, saying that the unvaccinated are 72% more likely to get into a traffic accident.
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ovid-19-are-m/
“One possibility relates to a distrust of government or belief in freedom that contributes to both vaccination preferences and increased traffic risks,” the study’s authors wrote. “A different explanation might be misconceptions of everyday risks, faith in natural protection, antipathy toward regulation, chronic poverty, exposure to misinformation, insufficient resources, or other personal beliefs.”
All this goes to show that the mainstream media is worthless except for reporting the weather and sports scores. CA governor Gavin Newsom was caught red-handed without his mask at an expensive French restaurant while mask mandates were in place in CA at the same time as he was telling people they would be punished if they were violating mask mandates. So much for the rich being good rules followers, LOL. This all reminds me of when Hitlery Clinton called the same people getting attacked in this article "Deplorables". Vaccination is all about getting a read on if someone is a sheep or not as you know.
And you're a fat fucking pile of dung with a slanty pussied wife/girlfriend. Go jump of of Hoover Dam.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetOur "meetup" was decent enough but that doesn't change the fact that AW and ZK are Forum Phonies.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozzy
Been there, done that ... in the high school senior band. Three classes a week, for five years. No guitars, and like allowed. Anyway, as close as it seems, it's a "million miles away". I guess that time marches on no matter where, or what. Foreign worlds in each world.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Actually, it makes no sense to me that they may still be teaching that stuff. How many symphony orchestras could there be that are still financially afloat?
TBH I don't care you are on SS but I'd never claim to be moderate if I identified so strongly with the right. I really don't care or judge about SS. That being said you're just fooling yourself. Anytime government takes something involuntarily it is a tax. At that point it becomes theirs and not yours. Sure you deserve government money but call it what it is. Just because it is tied up into some ponzi scheme they forced you into doesn't make it any less government money. If people stopped paying into it today, where would your money be?Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Master of Buffoonery is pretty good. You got a RL friend sending me PMs informing me of my honorary degree.
Oh well Mickey has me on ignore so asking him which links I didn't read wouldn't be fruitful but I am definitely curious. I at least give things a skim until I figure out what they're about. Same thing with yourtube hack influencers.
Mostly heart felt but probably not particularly person or longterm. We're definitely not buddy buddy lol but I don't have any particular issues with him. If wants to go on about how I'm stupid for posting empirical observations then I will continue to respond. Ok, I do some editorializing too .. in fairness. But everyone knows that. At least I'm not posting bullshit hack youtube videos.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetI thought you guys were buddy, buddy after your meetup.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI don't get a dime from the government you stupid fuck. I involuntarily paid into an SS retirement account for 40 years, bitch. Social Security ain't the government's money, buffoon. It's my money. But you are to stupid to figure that out. Just one dumb fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And you didn't read any links I put up, buttfuck. The only degree you have is in buffoonery. You have a Master of Buffoonery degree. You're going back on ignore. I'm tired of exchanging with the village idiot.
I don't know if all this trash talking is fake or real.
Sounds Real.
Keep it Coming!
Here is the rundown of me meeting Mickey. I'm walking the floor, see an AP, looks like that real basic picture he has sitting at the bar, he is taking notes and writing stuff down. Has that scooter type thing. I'm like.. this must be ! So I approach him. He kinda laughs says something like "I guess I can't troll you anymore". (paraphrase) I show him some machines he wasn't aware of. We had a hamburger and parted ways. We talked a bit about the machine world and that was mostly it. Whatever, likely the same result if I was to meet most people on here that is a basic weirdo and not something special like Seedvalue / Singer.
You don't need to study it. It is just right there apparent to you. It seems like you'd use the one that is proper, makes sense, and was the original. Not the one that is basically slang and doesn't even make sense.. It really doesn't require any "examination". I just saw you had posted it, knew that is a common mistake, and decided to point it out to you since you weren't aware.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplayA better answer to what question ?Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionI've heard both versions too. I wanted to point it out to you because you clearly didn't notice you were saying something nonsensical and not the way it was intended. You are a man of very precise language. I assumed you would appreciate this but again that is my chief problem. Assuming too much.Quote:
Originally Posted by tableplay
Here is a question - Your answer to all this has been along the lines of,
A) I could care less
B) I couldn't care less
Which would be a better answer ?
[spoiler] The meanings are radically different.[/spoiler]
I'm totally fine using a well-known figure of speech which has a clear meaning and appears in American-English dictionary as an acceptable form. I didn't examine the phrase for its literal,logical meaning for this exact reason.
LOL! Life is great not having to read Acunt and Bumreaper's psychobabble anymore. I now have more time to read things that are actually educational.
LOL! Life is great not having to read Acunt and Bumreaper's psychobabble anymore. I now have more time to read things that are actually educational.
--->
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (Lambert-Eaton paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration).
https://anagram-solver.net/LOL!%20Li....?partial=true
Hmm. Weakness of the limbs. I guess when a person dies, he's the last one to find out about it.
Gee, same thing with the 6's.
LOL! Life is great not havin6 to read Acunt and 6umreaper's psychobabble anymore. I now have more time to read thin6s that are actually educational. ---> Same thing.
There once was a man named Mickey CrimmQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
He stopped reading acctinquestion's forum posts, it was grim
He used the ignore function to find peace
He improved himself and soared high, with ease
Rob Singer also learned a lot, even on his daughter's front lawn
Someone has "called" me, yet again?
---> The Concise Guide To Sounding Smart At Parties.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
https://anagram-solver.net/He%20stop...0?partial=true
I think that you guys, especially Tablepooey, and MrV, need something to clean the carbon out of your cylinders. Ha.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdPp...=RDMM&index=14
TheGrimReaper
TheGrimReaper is online now
Silver
TheGrimReaper's Avatar
Join Date
Sep 2022
Posts
33 <----------- Yet again, your "prayers" have been answered.
Nope. No desire to read anymore Acunt posts. To much psychobabble. And his pessimism is insufferable. I think the dude is bipolar. Anyways, ain't gonna waste anymore time with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetI thought you guys were buddy, buddy after your meetup.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI don't get a dime from the government you stupid fuck. I involuntarily paid into an SS retirement account for 40 years, bitch. Social Security ain't the government's money, buffoon. It's my money. But you are to stupid to figure that out. Just one dumb fuck.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
And you didn't read any links I put up, buttfuck. The only degree you have is in buffoonery. You have a Master of Buffoonery degree. You're going back on ignore. I'm tired of exchanging with the village idiot.
I don't know if all this trash talking is fake or real.
Sounds Real.
Keep it Coming!
Truth is a bitter pill. The red pill. I need to watch those movies. Life sux but people doing nothing but contributing to the problem then convincing themselves otherwise have no place in my world. Do what you wish but lets not lie to ourselves. This lying is what has prevented things from changing and has set us on this path we will not turn back from. Exceptionally fucked up. All this shit like COVID etc matters nothing. AIDs, Wokeness, antibiotic resistence, plastics in the ocean - in our food - in us, tornados and hurricanes. NONE of this is jack shit. The only thing comparable is a full on nuke war but we won't be avoiding this one.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmNope. No desire to read anymore Acunt posts. To much psychobabble. And his pessimism is insufferable. I think the dude is bipolar. Anyways, ain't gonna waste anymore time with that.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetI thought you guys were buddy, buddy after your meetup.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I don't know if all this trash talking is fake or real.
Sounds Real.
Keep it Coming!
I've accepted it and am a free man lol. I apologize those who love the blue pill but it is people like you who guaranteed this ending.
My other point here is legitimately make up for the lack of actual news. News needs to make money. They sell entertainment. This shit isn't entertaining unless you're further along in your place of acceptance. I'm sickly smirking at it all. I'm one nihilistic mother fucker these days.
It really is a human thing. I feel sorry for kids these days but they'd been the same little shithead apes had they been the ones that came first. Oh well. Thank you capitalism. Twas a good run.
As to Mickey's take on my mental health - I will say this. People in denial all the time in life do seem to do better in some regards.
Worst drought in Peru in 50 years? Problems with water supplies? Seemingly very signficant food shortages there? Civil unrest because people starting to starve?
We'll have bread for far longer than most folks, don't worry.
Here we go !
Ooops. Side-tracked and forgot the link https://www.aljazeera.com/gallery/20...southern-andes
You wouldn’t have the chance because I don’t risk being made by chatting with idiots on the floor. You don’t get it moron literally everything involved with my identity is fake. I haven’t played on a players card in my name since 2005ish there are zero pictures of me online. I don’t have emails in my name I don’t own property in my name, I don’t use devices online that are registered to anyone I know. Along with many other things. What you see is what I want you to see period. I often name devices after peoples family members who may be snooping lol. Things that make me laugh inside jokes if you will.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionMostly heart felt but probably not particularly person or longterm. We're definitely not buddy buddy lol but I don't have any particular issues with him. If wants to go on about how I'm stupid for posting empirical observations then I will continue to respond. Ok, I do some editorializing too .. in fairness. But everyone knows that. At least I'm not posting bullshit hack youtube videos.Quote:
Originally Posted by monetI thought you guys were buddy, buddy after your meetup.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
I don't know if all this trash talking is fake or real.
Sounds Real.
Keep it Coming!
Here is the rundown of me meeting Mickey. I'm walking the floor, see an AP, looks like that real basic picture he has sitting at the bar, he is taking notes and writing stuff down. Has that scooter type thing. I'm like.. this must be ! So I approach him. He kinda laughs says something like "I guess I can't troll you anymore". (paraphrase) I show him some machines he wasn't aware of. We had a hamburger and parted ways. We talked a bit about the machine world and that was mostly it. Whatever, likely the same result if I was to meet most people on here that is a basic weirdo and not something special like Seedvalue / Singer.
There’s nothing of value you could provide me anyway. I’m the source bitch
Now let’s talk about the Mashco-Piro tribe of Peru. Do you think they will survive this made up fairytale of yours ? My bet is yes !!
You have no legacy or family this is why you joined the climate cult of the rat ruck Elliot. Rat fucks like him hate life also. Freak