Obvious Observations and Ramifications of the NBA Scandal(s)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

My god, look at your tag line.

You actually had to type that...what is wrong with you?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

a depressed, lonely, & miserable old curmudgeon lol

---

---

This is coming from the same retard that spends countless time just posting stupid mindless drivel to try to troll people,

Not to mention the same genius who dropped the “N bomb” over on WOV not realizing it would get him banned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

the “N bomb” over on WOV

---

Nobody here cares about WOV.

Get a grip....you and your cocks in mouth and ass fantasies.

What is wrong with you? Serious question.

Anybody want to bet DGB won't answer my question?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

the “N bomb” over on WOV

---

Nobody here cares about WOV.

Get a grip....you and your cocks in mouth and ass fantasies.

What is wrong with you? Serious question.

Anybody want to bet DGB won't answer my question?

---

What is wrong with you?

You obviously don’t know anything about math or gambling & you never contribute anything meaningful here.

Your whole purpose for existing just seems to be to try to annoy people.

Are you sad, bitter, lonely, or all 3?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

You obviously don’t know anything about math or gambling

---

I know everything about math and gambling.

I also know that someone who writes about dicks in mouth and ass is disturbed, and not contributing anything about math or gambling.

So what is wrong with you? Serious question.

You are fucked up. What happened to you to make you so fucked up?

Are you a man? Are you a heterosexual man?

Are you married? Do you have children?

Aren't you ashamed of the things that you have written here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Ditz still refuses to admit he turned Munchkin down for an interview.

---

The dispute is whether or not redietz turned Munchkin down for an interview.

That is your contention...and it amounts to hearsay.

redietz has been here consistently disputing your hearsay, and we haven't heard from Munchkin.

redietz is willing to fly you in to sit with him and Munchkin in order to set the record straight.

If you're not interested in clearing this up, then why do you keep bringing it up?

---

Here you go:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

You obviously don’t know anything about math or gambling

---

I know everything about math and gambling.

I also know that someone who writes about dicks in mouth and ass is disturbed, and not contributing anything about math or gambling.

So what is wrong with you? Serious question.

You are fucked up. What happened to you to make you so fucked up?

Are you a man? Are you a heterosexual man?

Are you married? Do you have children?

Aren't you ashamed of the things that you have written here?

---

If you know everything about math & gambling you sure could have fooled us.

Only thing I’m ashamed of is spending more than a few seconds responding to you, but I’m going to fix that right now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Here you go:

---

So we've heard both sides of the story...conflicting testimony...but nothing in the presence of the other.

redietz is willing to have you sit with him and Munchkin to set the record straight.

I think Munchkin will recant in redietz's presence...what do you think?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DGenBen

I’m going to fix that right now.

---

LOL...cowardly last words that have been written many times before.

But all you degenerate incels have no self discipline...and have been owned.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Here you go:

---

So we've heard both sides of the story...conflicting testimony...but nothing in the presence of the other.

redietz is willing to have you sit with him and Munchkin to set the record straight.

I think Munchkin will recant in redietz's presence...what do you think?

---

Fact: Mickey Crimm says I have avoided interviews and have no intention of being interviewed.
Fact: I have offered, and still offer, to fly mickey to Las Vegas to interview me.
Fact: I have offered to pick up any tab to have a videographer present to tape the interview, and I have offered to invite Richard Munchkin. My lead choice for videographer would be the second director from the recent film, The Art Thief. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/art_thief
Fact: Mickey doesn't want to do it.

Conclusion: The statement that I refuse to be interviewed is silly. I'd be shelling out money for what would clearly be an adversarial interview with an allegedly knowledgeable professional gambler who has been on GWAE half a dozen times.

Conclusion: Mickey likes to post things he doesn't really believe. Interesting hobby.

Also, back to the topic at hand.

Here's a pretty clear-cut affirmation of what I indicated in the opening couple of posts on this thread. It puts the presumed savviness of the local "APs" in perspective. I'm sure this information is all wrong because, as account says, it's all from "lowlifes." LOL.

And yes, Sheldon, that was sarcasm.

How can you folks go through life not knowing you are wearing serious blinders?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTUDvMO6n_8

Note: I co-wrote a radio script during the actors' strike that featured two made guys in prison discussing high-stakes card games (not poker, by the way, because poker could be rigged) and massaging sporting events. Everything was based on real conversations I either had or heard.

If anyone wants to read the script, I'm sure Dennison has a copy on file. By the way, "fixing" and "rigged" aren't really popular words when discussing this stuff, as the script explains.

The radio show had some scripts and did some "dummy" tapings, featuring former Sopranos actors and scripts sans sound effects and editing. The project went on likely permanent hiatus when the strike ended and everyone had better projects to work on.

Redietz, what, in concrete terms, is the thing you want us to praise you for?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by smurgerburger

Redietz, what, in concrete terms, is the thing you want us to praise you for?

---

lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Here you go:

---

So we've heard both sides of the story...conflicting testimony...but nothing in the presence of the other.

redietz is willing to have you sit with him and Munchkin to set the record straight.

I think Munchkin will recant in redietz's presence...what do you think?

---

Mind your own business you f’n old lady

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Here you go:

---

So we've heard both sides of the story...conflicting testimony...but nothing in the presence of the other.

redietz is willing to have you sit with him and Munchkin to set the record straight.

I think Munchkin will recant in redietz's presence...what do you think?

---

You just seen the pic of my text exchanges with Munchkin on Twitter in May 2024. You just read Munchkin saying ditz turned him down for an interview. The DM archives on twitter are a record that cannot be edited and they are there forever. I forever have a record of it. You just read what Munchkin said.

But now you believe ditz is going to meet up with Munchkin? Hahaha! But hey, if he meets up with Munchkin it would be a great time for Munchkin to interview him, wouldn't it?

But it will never happen, coach. Ditz don't intend to ever do an interview. He's just stringing everyone along. Besides, I'm no longer interested. If he ever does an interview I probably won't be listening to it.

Coach, tell us what Munchkin said in the DM.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redietz

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by coach belly

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Here you go:

---

So we've heard both sides of the story...conflicting testimony...but nothing in the presence of the other.

redietz is willing to have you sit with him and Munchkin to set the record straight.

I think Munchkin will recant in redietz's presence...what do you think?

---

Fact: Mickey Crimm says I have avoided interviews and have no intention of being interviewed.
Fact: I have offered, and still offer, to fly mickey to Las Vegas to interview me.
Fact: I have offered to pick up any tab to have a videographer present to tape the interview, and I have offered to invite Richard Munchkin. My lead choice for videographer would be the second director from the recent film, The Art Thief. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/art_thief
Fact: Mickey doesn't want to do it.

Conclusion: The statement that I refuse to be interviewed is silly. I'd be shelling out money for what would clearly be an adversarial interview with an allegedly knowledgeable professional gambler who has been on GWAE half a dozen times.

Conclusion: Mickey likes to post things he doesn't really believe. Interesting hobby.

---

More deflection from assclown ditz. I don't have a podcast. Munchkin has an established audience. You have committed to getting Munchkin to show up. That's a first. It would be a great time for him to interview you.

You have just committed yourself to getting together with Munchkin in Las Vegas for an interview. Make it happen. We are watching.

I'm going to DM Munchkin to tell him about your intention to get together with him for an interview in Las Vegas.

So mickey not wanting to interview me means I don't want to be interviewed.

Makes perfect sense.

Free flight, a couple of meals, chance to debunk me on film. I'm sure mickey's fans are bummed. Oh well. I'll offer again next month.

And the following month.

And the following month....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

I'm no longer interested.

---

I think that you're the only one who's ever been all that interested, and it sure seems like you are still interested, considering the fact that you keep bringing it up.

Munchkin can write whatever he wants in DMs, everybody can.

But that doesn't mean that Munchkin's recollection of his conversation with redietz, or the impression he got from that conversation, is completely accurate. It's likely that their discussion about the show involved more than what Munchkin relayed in his DM...we don't have all the details.

I can't recall whether redietz admitted to unilaterally declining any interview, but he's certainly not declining an interview right now.

And, Munchkin's DM doesn't even say that he declined an interview.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mickeycrimm

Coach, tell us what Munchkin said in the DM.

---

Here you go..."I asked about him coming on the show, and he declined".

Whatever happened to Red's Dan Druff interview? He said yes, I kept asking, and it never happened. I agreed to be a guest as well, and I also said time was of the essence for me to be a guest. Red zigged and zagged, made BS requests and excuses. I.E, it needs to be in person.

Once I told him I was asking people for help, gathering information that he posted and whatnot, he suddenly said I wasn't qualified to interview him. I wasn't trying to interview him; I was just going to be an adversary guest(his words).




I don't care what this, that, or the other person has said; the fact is, it's been a long time, and Red has not made it happen yet. The ball has been in his court to do so, a simple appearance on some kind of show, and he has yet to do so.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AxelWolf

Whatever happened to Red's Dan Druff interview? He said yes, I kept asking, and it never happened. I agreed to be a guest as well, and I also said time was of the essence for me to be a guest. Red zigged and zagged, made BS requests and excuses. I.E, it needs to be in person.

Once I told him I was asking people for help, gathering information that he posted and whatnot, he suddenly said I wasn't qualified to interview him. I wasn't trying to interview him; I was just going to be an adversary guest(his words).




I don't care what this, that, or the other person has said; the fact is, it's been a long time, and Red has not made it happen yet. The ball has been in his court to do so, a simple appearance on some kind of show, and he has yet to do so.

---

What is the deal here? Doing the same damn thing over and over and hoping for a different result? THAT is the cycle we are in with this redietz being interviewed by ANYONE. He claims he wants to be interviewed and will do so anytime, anyplace. BUT he has claimed that for 2-3 years now and guess what? No interview ANYWHERE.

And really what can he say in an interview broadcast wherever, that he can't say right here? If he has something earth shattering to say, that is going to convince everyone that he isn't just a tout and Kim Lee was wrong about everything, why can't redietz just say it here?

All this redietz fella does is talk and drop names, tell us how smart he is, or was 50 years ago and then just like Singer, Turtle, and the other trolls, he lies about people that don't believe him, trying and hoping to discredit them.

Redietz was/is a sports betting tout. Period! That is a guy that sells picks rather than betting and making money off his picks. He can dress it up and call it sports investing or whatever he wants, but he is making money off other bettor that he is selling to, NOT off betting sports like he told us. And all these contests that he tells us about from 40 years ago, through right now 2025, are just a tool of touts. They want to be able to go to perspective suckers and say "see how well I did in xxx contest".

Now if redietz really has something to say, something earth-shattering that is going to change everyone's opinion, he should say it right here. I mean THIS is the place he was exposed (partly his own doing).

Lets stop all this nonsense about podcasts and interviews that are never going to happen. If he wanted them to happen, they would have by now.

And while we are at it, stop all the name dropping Redietz. Nobody cares. And that goes 5 times for this Dennison that nobody know or cares about.