Printable View
she has to be IMHO. no woman has ever accomplished anything remotely like what she has. unless you consider what she did cheating, which I don't. Phil Ivey was just there to absorb the risk and get a cut for doing that. she was the one that did the work and had the skill.
so my hat is off to this classy lady.
https://www.888casino.com/blog/casin...cheung-yin-sun
New Jersey denied she and Ivey's appeal on the 10 million. I think the mistake they made was overkill.
There's mickey again....researching and commenting on someone else's topic so he can pretend to belong in the only world he makes believe accepts him :)
Here's Rob making an idiot out of himself again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
You're not liking it mickey are you, when someone points out the reason for your paltry existence on this forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHere's Rob making an idiot out of himself again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Let's hear more about that moron Tuna :) You've got his failed life down pat. Only problem? Nobody ever cared!
Hey Singer, can you explain why Dan left you back here multiple times after banning you?
Is it because you add so much or he was just desperate for hits?
And any comment on how Alan screwed his son over? My understanding is you actually help your kids.
And does Alan appear to have a gambling addiction in your opinion.
Rob, can't get me out of his head. At least it was a short post of ignorant blather instead of a long post of ignorant blather.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerYou're not liking it mickey are you, when someone points out the reason for your paltry existence on this forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmHere's Rob making an idiot out of himself again.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Let's hear more about that moron Tuna :) You've got his failed life down pat. Only problem? Nobody ever cared!
Mind your own fucking business BOZOQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackholeQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
Mind your own fucking business BOZO
BOZO, that’s fucking original. Never heard that before. What fucking hole did you crawl out of? Always assumed you were one of Singers socks who shows up from time to time to bash AP’s.
Just another worthless loser jealous of others smarter than you. It’s sad good people get sick and die daily and you and Alan are still alive draining the system.
Please do everyone involved, including your family a favor and quit gambling.
The Boz has been on the War Path since his return lol!!Quote:
Originally Posted by The BozQuote:
Originally Posted by blackholeQuote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
Mind your own fucking business BOZO
BOZO, that’s fucking original. Never heard that before. What fucking hole did you crawl out of? Always assumed you were one of Singers socks who shows up from time to time to bash AP’s.
Just another worthless loser jealous of others smarter than you. It’s sad good people get sick and die daily and you and Alan are still alive draining the system.
Please do everyone involved, including your family a favor and quit gambling.
I notice Maxpen hasn't really talked much either but he is on the War Path against MendleMartian as well.
High Five... High Five.
'Sup, cuckhole?Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhole
I got my local social security office to chop up my benefits in two payments a month. If I got it all in one payment I’d only get to a casino once a month. Now I get to go twice.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
I’ve been reduced to 5 cent slot machines so I could at least get a couple of free drinks while I’m there before I go broke. I could only imagine how short my stay would be if I played the same way I did when I had money, before I lost it all. In fact, I don’t think my benefits could’ve even supported my tips back then.
Living in a hole, sock puppet, worthless loser, dumb and jealous, pity I’m alive draining the system.
Yep, you nailed me to the cross. I’m sorry for the BOZO comment, not sure what came over me. Hope you understand how us dumb idiots roll. Shit just shots out of our mouths. We shouldn’t even be allowed to post, or at least be forced to take a test before participating.
Please except my apology as I hold my head down in shame and disgust.
Double post
She was on GWAE, correct? She came across as large and in charge. There was no question who was calling the shots with her and Ivey...and it wasn't Ivey.
She was. Very impressive woman, plays for huge stakes and literally takes money from casinos.
You are no longer in denial. Great. Have you tried Gamblers Anonymous? Admitting you are a troll was also good. Go and sin no more.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackhole
Not really sure why I got reinstated twice (not thrice). I never complained about being banned nor asked to return. Owner's prerogative I guess.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Boz
I didn't know anything about Jason other than the couple times I've met him, he and his dad seemed fine. I did get the feeling that his son had a head on his shoulders, but so does Alan. I do help my kids quite a bit, and maybe more than I should. But my son's a wounded Army vet with 3 tours, and my daughter doesn't really need my help but....she's my daughter.
I'm not an expert on Alan's gambling habits, but I've always thought--and said here--that in my opinion he plays too much and couldn't stay away from the LA to LV trips to hit Caesar's. But yes, he could afford what he was doing, and now as mostly a retiree he's doing the right thing by not digging into his 401k to keep gambling like he did prior, but playing lower denominations with his lower retirement income. It's entertaining watching kew keep harping on how Alan just HAS to be hitting RR big time on the first of the month when pensions get deposited in a mocking way when in actuality, Alan's retirement account from working real jobs all his life on its own, is far more than what kew will ever see as any type of income over his entire lifetime.
Yes Alan can be infuriating when arguing about issues. Why do you think he has so many ex's? But he never does it just to stir the pot. He really believes what he says and in many cases, I think he's right. There has always been two correct answers to the two dice problem, there's no way to count a 2nd table better than the one you're at and within reason just jump over to play it, I don't doubt he saw the 18 yo's as far fetched as it sounds, and anyone with a fair mind would agree that if redietz was so intent on proving something about himself he'd simply post it via links and positively identify himself rather than snail mailing some foolish pkg. to Alan to post for him--which of course was impossible to do....stuff like that.
Alan's no fool and he's contributed a lot more to this country than many of the people who attack him. I see a lot of this crap as originating from the "I'm sick of that guy being able to play at such high limits when I can't even play dollars comfortably for a few days" side of the tracks.
Rob is also king of the false premise.
If Alan lied/ embellished/ made up/misremembered his son hitting 5 SINGLE LINE Royals(it was only ONE BTW) in 24 hours(and he swore to this on many occasions). What makes you believe he saw 18 yo's in a row?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Let's not forget that he claimed to know 8/5 bonus poker strategy 99% perfect. From his own self-incriminating videos, that's not even close to being true.
Honestly, I dont believe, even you believe, he saw 18 yo's in a row. You guys just find it beneficial to each other as allies.
For the record, Argentino has it completely wrong. I never requested Mr. Mendelson post anything of mine. If I wanted it posted, I would have done it myself. I requested that he look over the materials and simply verify that I'm me, which was also the reason Mr. Mendelson had an open invite to visit when I lived in Orange County. Since he had the address, I think a google search would have verified it was a safe neighborhood...except for the occasional coyote.
Now about that G2E roundtable Argentino headed last year. Anybody have any information on the topics? Or who was scheduled to join Rob on the panel? I heard Bigfoot was busy, but the Abominable Snowman had been penciled in as a replacement.
How are Alan and I "allies"?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfIf Alan lied/ embellished/ made up/misremembered his son hitting 5 SINGLE LINE Royals(it was only ONE BTW) in 24 hours(and he swore to this on many occasions). What makes you believe he saw 18 yo's in a row?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Let's not forget that he claimed to know 8/5 bonus poker strategy 99% perfect. From his own self-incriminating videos, that's not even close to being true.
Honestly, I dont believe, even you believe, he saw 18 yo's in a row. You guys just find it beneficial to each other as allies.
I understand why you would believe Alan not 100 per cent correctly recalling all of his son's jackpots during that 24 hrs. as being a sort of predictor to his 18 yo's "faulty" recollection. But what you're missing is Alan TRIES to be honest in his reporting, and people of his type are more often correct than not. That's why I tend to believe him on this.
Red we can see pushing which buttons agitates you the most, and in your reacting in this manner tells everything anyone needs to know about what a total lying phony you are.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Your whole gig on that stupid "pr pkg." was to get somebody to post your incomplete nonsense in the hope that we'd all just look past the fact that you sent unproven, unidentifiable pieces of paper. Why would Alan post a pile of unverified, unsupported anonymous info when the sender wouldn't do it? He did the right thing by rebuking you. And as much as this all was due to me announcing what a nobody you were and are in the gaming community, your response? Soliciting money from me for your can't-miss picks. Scumbag sleazeball are the only two words that come to mind.
No wonder you are sooo offended when you get called out.
That G2E roundtable headed by Argentino must have been something. So secret, it was held in a hotel room with no listing on any conference webpage or schedule. I'm sure Mr. Mendelson is proud to be among those in the know regarding who attended and the topics covered.
And Argentino, I don't even know what a "gaming community" is. I gamble; I don't "game."
Meanwhile, some of my records from "Tipsters or Gypsters?" are in the Retro Road Trip thread, courtesy of mickeycrimm's posting assistance, along with a San Francisco bio piece regarding the publisher, Mike McCusker. I'll bump the thread in case Boz or anyone missed it.
Keep bringing it up and keep watching people ignore you.
You're such a phony.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
No mirrors in the Singer house. What a fucking moron! LOLZ
Under normal circumstances, I might accept that someone(Alan in this case) tries to be honest with his reporting, however, if you look at the history surrounding the 5 Royal yarn, you will notice he had been very confident it happened for years, over at least 2 different forums, and with God only knows how many people reading it. It was brought up over and over, so much so that he wanted to involve money (5k)Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.SingerHow are Alan and I "allies"?Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfIf Alan lied/ embellished/ made up/misremembered his son hitting 5 SINGLE LINE Royals(it was only ONE BTW) in 24 hours(and he swore to this on many occasions). What makes you believe he saw 18 yo's in a row?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Let's not forget that he claimed to know 8/5 bonus poker strategy 99% perfect. From his own self-incriminating videos, that's not even close to being true.
Honestly, I dont believe, even you believe, he saw 18 yo's in a row. You guys just find it beneficial to each other as allies.
I understand why you would believe Alan not 100 per cent correctly recalling all of his son's jackpots during that 24 hrs. as being a sort of predictor to his 18 yo's "faulty" recollection. But what you're missing is Alan TRIES to be honest in his reporting, and people of his type are more often correct than not. That's why I tend to believe him on this.
How can you tell me he tries to report honestly and accurately when his source was his VERY OWN SON who had even been posing at times, during this time? Shouldn't he have just asked his son for the truth many years ago, like after the first claim and argument? Look how easy it was for me and I don't even know him, I didnt even know his son's forum name untill recently. Alan sounds like the worst reporter and trier EVER.
Allies in the sense that you guys both seem to have a disdain for AP's And you guys blindly back each other up on many things that don't seem likely to be true. Alan backs off on backing you up a little when he knows better.
And pedophile Catholic priests TRY not to molest every young boy they come in contact with.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Sorry, but "trying" just won't cut it.
The only thing Alan deserves to be backed up with is a swift kick in the ass. Get him out of the casino and pay his kid the back money he owes.
Singer is just a degenerate drifter cruising the highways in his camper truck that he refers to as a "Class A motor coach"....what a fuckin joke.
These 2 are built for each other.
You mother fucking son of a bitch. Now you come out and say you never asked me to post it? And all along I said I never doubted you. You fucking asshole. All you did was troll me and insult me and tried to damage my reputation while now admitting you wasted your time, my time, Tony's time and the time of Dan and everyone else on this forum for absolutely nothing. You made a big fucking deal over a package that you now admit that you told me I just had to keep and didn't have to do anything with it. And I even posted your message to me saying that but you and your cronies still attacked me. Fuck all of you. Fuck you. Fuck you.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
How does posting about him and ignoring him work? You can actually do both at the same time? How do you pull it off, Rob?Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Very good point, Axel. As I posted previously I only saw Jason hit the royal and get the hand pay at Gold Strike. We did not play together at Caesars. Care to guess how I was given the info about his royals at Caesars? Did you expect me to doubt my son? I was surprised and found myself under the bus when he produced those photos.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I was at the table when the random roller rolled 18 yos in a row.
Once again, the original message from redietz asking me to do NOTHING with his package. And this is what you all trolled me over? Read it yorselves... again. And fuck off.
I didn't expect you to post what I sent. I expected you to look it over, and verify to me that you acknowledge Rob doesn't know what he's talking about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
You only stated that AFTER you found yourself under the short bus.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan MendelsonVery good point, Axel. As I posted previously I only saw Jason hit the royal and get the hand pay at Gold Strike. We did not play together at Caesars. Care to guess how I was given the info about his royals at Caesars? Did you expect me to doubt my son? I was surprised and found myself under the bus when he produced those photos.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolf
I was at the table when the random roller rolled 18 yos in a row.
I find it hard to belive your son told you he hit 5 SINGLE LINE ROYALS.
You had plenty of time and opportunities to let us know it was hearsay regarding the extra 4. I would have said your son didn't tell you the truth.
You kept on as if you knew all this happen first hand. You purposely omitted information to make it sound/seem as if you did see all five, or at least had some type of solid proof.
If anyone goes back and reads everything ever said about this(Prior to him telling us the truth) they would feel as if you were being deceptive and purposely leading everyone to believe you did see all five or had some type of solid proof.
Perhaps you are you are so used to playing tricky little deceptive and misleading word games while purposely omitting information so you can later call on some technically and if people find out what is really going on you can just pretend to have an out. What's ingrained this into your personality, that makes you constantly have to do this? Is it years of practice due to all your embellishing and made up stories?
If I can find a post where you claimed or indicated to have been with him at both locations or that you seen all five what would you say to that?
Axel wrote: "If I can find a post where you claimed or indicated to have been with him at both locations or that you seen all five what would you say to that?"
Jason wrote on this forum just recently that we did not play together.
Go ahead and find the post where you allege that I posted that we played together at Caesars. I'd like to see it. Now be careful -- we were at Caesars together but you have to produce a post that says I was with him watching him win and get the handpays like I did at Gold Strike.
Now produce it AxelWolf.
Didn't you mean to call out redietz over his package and all the grief you ticks put me through?Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPenQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I had a feeling you would only focus on that and ignore the rest. I should have asked that in a separate post. For now, I can't find all the posts where we talked about this. I'm not saying there is anything to produce, I'm not trying to trick you. I generally don't play games like you do. If I knew for sure that you directly said that, I would find it and just post it up without asking that question. I was just curious what you would then say. NVM, that for now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Why didn't you just tell us all that crap in the first place? I can't see any GOOD reason for you to not have told us that in the first, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th ...place. We all know why you didn't. You were trying to fool us into thinking your claim had way more merit than it actully did. It seems to me that you love to make statements and then you attempt to back up those statements with highly embellished stories.
Let me ask you this, just to confim. Are you claiming that your son told you that he hit 5 SINGLE LINE ROYALS(I bet he didn't even tell you he hit 5 period)?
If you are saying he did tell you that, then you seem to be saying your son does, in fact, lie to his father, at least about gambling? And, if so, do you think he gets that from you?
There are some things a father is just not going to say.
Why do you persist, Axel?
Jason produced his photos. What I posted was wrong.
Redietz and the rest of you made a big fucking deal over a package whose contents I was supposed to do nothing with.
Are your lives so empty that this is what has become your life's purpose? I'm so sorry that you've become professional trolls.
I will try to refrain from asking your son if he actully told you that. I feel sorry for him since he has allready had to embarrass his own father on here more than once. It can't feel good as a son to have to keep embarrassing his own father in any situation, let alone on a forum in front of the masses.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I allready gave you my take on packagegate. You kept making excuse after excuse why you couldn't/wouldn't confirm. I think it all came down to you not wanting to be the one that confirmed Red claim and shut down RSinger and made him look even more foolish than he does. You wanted to leave RSinger a little room to continue his BS.
You should have just said, true or not, I have no interest in messing up RSingers Troll game. That would have ended it.
Regarding RoyalGate, You should have originally posted....
Sure, you can lose after hitting a few Royals in a shot period of time. My son hit a few in one day and still seems to have lost. I saw one single line for sure and heard about 2 others, He had many jackpots that day, so It may have even been as many as five Royals that day.
Stop your bullshit Axel. Just read the last paragraph of Redietz's message to me. I'm done with you and him and the rest of the useless trolls.
Ask Jason whatever you like. I'm not saying another word.
Alan, I am not going to pile on about the 5 royals "misclaim", or as Axel is now calling it "royalgate". To me, it is just one of many incidents where you have been dishonest. I think that I the point Axelwolf is trying to highlight by harping on it. And unlike a simple "mis-speak", you repeated this 5 royal claim over and over for years.....a lot like 18 y.o.'s. :rolleyes:
But I do have one simple question regarding the Redietz package, that you are back on to: Why did you give out your mailing address and request that redeitz mail you the package? You now say that you always believed him and had no intention of posting anything, so why did you even volunteer to get involved?
As someone who witnessed that whole package incident, the appearance is that you were volunteering to act as "referee", verifying redietz's information and identity, but when it came time to do so you balked. And it appears you did so to protect Rob Singer. You simply didn't want to publicly post that Redietz was correct in this matter, so you did you little 6 month tap dance of avoiding the package, that you requested he send to you, and a variation of that tap dance continues Today, a year later.
What all these different things, including your participation in the tracking two tables situation and many more incidents involving you, all have in common is that they clearly show a pattern of dishonesty and manipulation.
Kewlj and redietz et al, read this.
I never received any message from you expecting me to say anything but below are two more texts to illustrate how you set me up for ridicule when I was totally innocent and it certainly looks like you let the other forum members blast me without admitting you set me up.Quote:
Originally Posted by redietz
Below are two messages. One in which I told you I believed you and another message from you saying I didn't have to do anything with your package.
You set me up.
Kewlj to answer your other questions. I'll take full responsibility for getting the info wrong about Jason's royals. I'm not going to dump on my own son.
I stand by what I saw at the Caesars craps table.
I'm waiting to see if the rest of you will question redietz for the stunt he pulled on me. Of course you'll probably blame me again. Par for the course.
If necessary I will post every message redietz sent me and I sent to him.
I noticed you didn't answer the question I asked. That is a playbook troll manure of deflection.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The simple question remains: Why did you publicly provide your mailing address and request that Redietz send you the package, if you had no intention as acting as impartial "referee"?
Isn`t that exactly what you`ve done asswipe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Here's your answer kewlj: redietz would not take NO for an answer. He insisted he send the package. So I gave him the office address with the understanding I wouldn't have to do anything with the package. After all, that's what he told me, right? Instead I get bombarded with accusations and troll messages. Here are more screen shots of my messages to redietz telling him it's a waste of time. Yet he insisted on sending the package and setting me up.
I'm not going to discuss family matters here keystone/elaine/asshole.Quote:
Originally Posted by Elaine MIsn`t that exactly what you`ve done asswipe?Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Why don't you question redietz about his scheme?
Those messages don`t absolve you dumbass...they just make you look even more like the slithering, tap-dancing weasel that you are....smarten up dummyQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The screen shots speak for themselves. He sent me a package and said I didn't even have to acknowledge I had it. Read what he wrote. Open your eyes and shut your fucking mouth you piece of shit.
LMAOQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Yes they do, you obviously complied with the ditz's pestering requests.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Maybe he had other expectations that he did not send to you in writing,
he must have sent them telepathically, but you weren't tuned in.
As for your son, he probably said something along the lines of
"I can't believe I hit 5 royals in one day and still ended up down $500"
He meant "the equivalent of 5 royals" but you took his statement at face value,
you obviously believed his statement as the truth since you were willing to bet on it,
so you were never dishonest or deceptive about the 5 royals.
In the face of the truth, these ticks contiunue to insist that you have done something wrong.
The truth doesn't matter to them, as it doesn't fit their narrative.
What was it? You only go to the office once a week, once a month, or once a year? Or you just retire and never go again? Make up your mind, Alan.
Awwwww, the 3rd member of Butt Boys Inc. coming on to defend one of the 2 men he idolizes...touchingQuote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyYes they do, you obviously complied with the ditz's pestering requests.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
Maybe he had other expectations that he did not send to you in writing,
he must have sent them telepathically, but you weren't tuned in.
As for your son, he probably said something along the lines of
"I can't believe I hit 5 royals in one day and still ended up down $500"
He meant "the equivalent of 5 royals" but you took his statement at face value,
you obviously believed his statement as the truth since you were willing to bet on it,
so you were never dishonest or deceptive about the 5 royals.
In the face of the truth, these ticks contiunue to insist that you have done something wrong.
The truth doesn't matter to them, as it doesn't fit their narrative.
I moved to Vegas. Tony opened the package and told me what it contained. When I was pressed I posted on the forum what was in the 50+ pages. Tony isn't a sports bettor either. If redietz wanted someone to analyze what he sent in the package he should have sent it to someone else or posted photos. I told him it was a waste of time sending it to me. I know NOTHING about sports betting.
He insisted because he was setting me up. Fuck him and all of you.
But you gave him the address....yeah, makes sense you dumb fucking pile of rocksQuote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
First off, Mr. Mendelson has other PMs, which he did not bother to post. I will get into those in a minute. I expected Mr. Mendelson to at least read the material, which would confirm that Argentino was dead wrong and I was correct. He was under no obligation to report it, as far as I was concerned. What I was hoping was that he would pull Argentino aside and tell him that he was dead wrong, and that redietz is R.E.Dietz and that what I said I had done, I had done. This would have been in both my and Argentino's best interests, as it would end Argentino lying about me, making comments about my late wife, and it would save Argentino from continually posting while always being wrong, which frankly makes him look stupid. But Mr. Mendelson was under no obligation to do that, either. What I think he was under obligation to do was read the material, so that if indeed my plane went down, he could step forth and then publicly explain that Argentino was wrong and had been wrong.
Now understand that all this time, and I've even posted photos of myself that match photos in national magazines, Argentino has been claiming the redietz posting here is not the Bob Dietz in handicapping contests and who had presented papers and such. Pretty weird.
Mr. Mendelson didn't bother to read the material. That's really poor. Because if my plane had gone down, Argentino's nonsense regarding me would have gone unchecked without Mr. Mendelson correcting it. I expect a journalist to, in that case, make things right. But Mr. Mendelson didn't bother to read the stuff.
Next up, I'm not in the habit of putting PMs out in public, so I won't do it here, either. But Mr. Mendelson received a link from me after I won the Race to the Super Bowl Contest, against thousands of other entrants, and won 25K in Super Bowl wagers. I mentioned winning the contest in a post here, and Argentino said it didn't happen. I had previously sent the link to Mr. Mendelson. He saw the splash panel, acknowledged he had seen it, and suggested in a PM that I post it. Being a shy and retiring sort, I said no. Again, I let Argentino play the fool. People who believed me, believed me. I didn't take Mr. Mendelson to task for not backing me up. He wasn't obligated to do that. It would have been swell if the journalist in him had come to the fore and told Argentino, either publicly or privately, that I had won the contest, and that Argentino was making an ass of himself for saying I did not. But Mr. Mendelson kept that to himself. His prerogative. Then Argentino claimed I wasn't betting between 25K and 35K on the Super Bowl, which of course I was, as I was taking proposition middle shots to balance out the 25K. Mr. Mendelson was under no obligation to, privately or publicly, again correct Argentino, and he chose not to.
There seems to be a theme here.
Anyway, to kewlJ's points above. If Mr. Mendelson were sharing all PMs in this time and space, he could have mentioned the Race to the Super Bowl PMs just now, but chose to not mention them. That doesn't seem, if you'll pardon the term, kosher.
Alan-I can't fathom why you or Rob even spend the time answering these people. All these posts are doing is attracting more scum like Elaine who hide in the dark just licking their chops to have a chance to add delusion and rift to common sense. I only come back occasionally to see if anyone's brave enough to accept Rob's original challenge without trying to squirm out of it. Naturally. the only way to weasel out is to start foolishness.
Redietz I did in a phone call tell Rob many things including that your wife died. Are you really going to blame me for Rob's crap? Grow up.
Mr Faceshot, please assume your usual position of being in front of Singer on your knees and STFUQuote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Hey alan, you find a new wife yet?
Or if not a wife, then maybe a shack up?
It sure looks like you need some soothing, feminine wiles to help calm you down and keep you centered.
A retained excess of unevacuated testosterone in the scrotum is probably not a good thing.
Just sayin'.
Either redietz has no clue how to photograph and post something....or he's the biggest liar ever to come down the forum pike.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
I do enjoy how this is all about pleasing me however. I really do get inside the empty heads around here.
Try as he may with his dodgy, corny, and poor writing though, redietz continually looks the other way whenever he's been asked to identify himself to go along with whatever name/accolades he's constantly claiming. Nobody knows if he's simply assuming the name of some hero of his, as groupies of his type would readily do. Which, of course, is why he put in the effort to solicit business from me until, that is, he got exposed.
Any wonder why his wife took the easy way out?
Sling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
Mr and Mrs Singer (#s 2 and 3) going for a nice early morning walk
Only a thoroughly despicable human being would needle someone about their deceased wife. Robert Harry Argentino (Rob Singer) relishes in it. It demonstrates just how deranged and evil Argentino is. To say his character is bad is a severe understatement. He is the lowest of the low. No redeemable qualities. There are no boundaries as to how low he will stoop. Just this characteristic alone demonstrates that Argentino (Singer) has zero credibility in anything he writes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
I'm sorry redietz has to read the crap Rob often posts. I've also been a victim of Rob. Unfortunately we've had an absentee owner/moderator here and now it's getting worse. Formerly banned participants are back and Rob should have been reigned in.
100% true...and then you have coward idiots like Betty, Faceshot and Mendelputz defending and endorsing himQuote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmOnly a thoroughly despicable human being would needle someone about their deceased wife. Robert Harry Argentino (Rob Singer) relishes in it. It demonstrates just how deranged and evil Argentino is. To say his character is bad is a severe understatement. He is the lowest of the low. No redeemable qualities. There are no boundaries as to how low he will stoop. Just this characteristic alone demonstrates that Argentino (Singer) has zero credibility in anything he writes.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Shit seeks its own level in a cesspool.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson
The turds that float to the top are just the lightest weight.
Well, you had me looking. anyway. I couldn't find Kim Lee accepting his original challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmSling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
You can't hide behind that bullshit. You couldn't find it because you don't want to find it. Rob, who in an earlier post said he thinks the one that makes the challenge should put money in escrow first. That was over Dan making a counter offer. When Kim Lee accepted Rob did the "put your money in escrow" tap dance on him. Rob made the challenge, Kim Lee accepted. Rob should put his money in escrow first. That's the kind of bullshit your fucking hero plays. Go suck his dick.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshotWell, you had me looking. anyway. I couldn't find Kim Lee accepting his original challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmSling, it helps to have some common sense before you criticize others for not having any. And Kim Lee accepted Rob's challenge. Rob did his usual, went into a tap dance. Do you see Rob doing any serious negotiations with Kim Lee here? No, you don't. Wise up. Rob's propositions are designed not to get any action....and in the rare times someone accepts Rob goes into his stipulations routine. In short, Rob doesn't want a challenge, he only wants to appear to want a challenge.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshot
In any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.
When you play table games, you put your money on the table.
When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.
When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.
If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.
Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.
It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.
Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.
Here's the truth Mickey, since you can't handle it.
Kim jumped in with zero terms of his bet, and he made it clear he wanted nothing to do with an escrow. As soon as I did his thinking for him he wandered away, which is why I'm giving him another chance when my bet goes public in LV.
Mickey SOOO needs an idol in all this as he anonymously shouts insults from the sidelines. And he'll be the first one to "rewrite history" with "Rob changed the bet (whimper whimper)" the moment after his fabled ap pals fizzle out again.
.................................................. .............................................
this is kind of interesting to me; it's from an N.I.H. funded study on compulsive gambling. N.I.H. (The National Institutes of Health) is probably the most respected medical organization in the world.
from the study:
"Two common classes of distortion that have been widely studied in the laboratory are the illusion of control and the gambler's fallacy. The illusion of control refers to irrelevant features of a game that create a sense that one is developing some kind of skill over an outcome that is in fact determined by chance alone. Gamblers are more risky and more confident when they can make an irrelevant choice or when they can exert instrumental action (e.g., throwing dice.)
The gambler's fallacy occurs when observing sequences of random outcomes, like coin tosses or red/black outcomes in roulette. Following a run of the same outcome (e.g., four successive roulette spins landing on red), players typically predict that the other outcome (i.e., black) will occur next. Most psychological accounts of the gambler's fallacy refer to the law of small numbers, that people expect small fragments from a distribution to be representative of the distribution itself, whereas in reality, runs and streaks are fairly common in random sequences. The gambler's fallacy is described in choosing lottery numbers and in casino data for roulette. As preliminary evidence that this effect is linked to gambling disorder, a higher level of gambling distortions in students predicted gambler's fallacy decisions, and at-risk gamblers preferred a slot machine simulation that delivered more “clumpy” outcomes"
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4285202/
When Singer says the one that makes the challenge should put his money in escrow first it means THE ONE THAT MAKES THE CHALLENGE SHOULD PUT HIS MONEY IN ESCROW FIRST. Rob made the challenge. He got called. He is the ONE WHO IS OBLIGATED TO PUT HIS MONEY IN ESCROW FIRST.Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIn any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.
When you play table games, you put your money on the table.
When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.
When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.
If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.
Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.
It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.
Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.
Petunia, you are just jealous because Rob has been packing Sling up the ass lately. Don't worry. He'll get back around to you. I'll bet you squeal like a pig too.
No, you made the bet, bitch. He accepted. You're a dirty little coward that won't take the bet that you made. You carry a portable tap dance floor with you everywhere you go:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EMwRk_Qn5bY
Portable Tap Dance Floor! LOL! The powers that be will truly sell anything to anyone.
Awww,phooey. I thought this time maybe things would be different. I'll just go back to making a few bucks and enjoying my free stuff with artt-a far less complicated strategy. So go ahead with all your filthy assumptions about me as a sock puppet. Never mind that I've actually played the strategy. I'll check back in later to probably the same stuff. Just a waste of one's time here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIn any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.
When you play table games, you put your money on the table.
When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.
When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.
If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.
Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.
It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.
Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.
Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.
For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.
Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.
This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.
THIS is the Kim Lee acceptance? When I saw the opening paragraph, I thought it was on! Then comes the second paragraph. Really? Let me join in with Alan and say I see 18 ho,ho,ho's in a row!Quote:
Originally Posted by DeechQuote:
Originally Posted by coach bellyIn any betting scenario, the bettor puts his money up.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
When you play machines, you put your money in the machine.
When you play table games, you put your money on the table.
When you make a legal sports bet, you put your money up and buy the ticket.
When you bet or raise in poker, you move your chips over the line.
If Kim Lee wants to bet Rob Singer, then Kim Lee needs to put his money in escrow.
Once he does that, Singer either calls or folds.
It's that easy, arguing about it is the tap dance.
Nancy can't stop thinking about Singer's dick, that is too obvious.
Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.
For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.
Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.
This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.
When God said brains you thought he said rain and ran for cover. The 1st paragraph was written by Kim Lee. The 2nd paragraph was written by your lover, Rob Singer.Quote:
Originally Posted by slingshotTHIS is the Kim Lee acceptance? When I saw the opening paragraph, I thought it was on! Then comes the second paragraph. Really? Let me join in with Alan and say I see 18 ho,ho,ho's in a row!Quote:
Originally Posted by DeechQuote:
Originally Posted by coach belly
Originally Posted by Kim Lee
Rob Singer, since you have been making extraordinary claims for years, it is not my obligation to jump through hoops. But $114,600 in mutual escrow is acceptable. Let me know where and roughly when you want to meet.
For the mathematically challenged---the $114,600 is how much I could, if everything went very badly for two sessions of play, lose. I would have to pay you $114,600, or twice my session bankroll of $57,200. You following this? However, since my strategy plays dollars thru the $100 machines and I theoretically could be ahead $2499 just before hitting a $100 royal in each session, you would owe me $402,499 X 2, or $804,998. But I'll accept your escrow, from all that "capital" out there, of just $402,499 because whatever amount I win in one or two sessions, it will be more than gratifying to watch a phony like you and your "capital-heavy backers" go down in humiliating flames.
Wise up before you make any more uninformed post that get mickey wet.
This was the last "challenge" of terms (on another thread). The public can decide how the escrow should be handled.