Printable View
Lately at baccarat, Matt has been handling the cards -- which he peels using a "lobster claw" grip:
Commenters hate it because his hand obscures the cards.
Now they're asking to put EJ back in because he keeps the cards visible to the camera.
They used to complain about EJ because they were like, peeling is stupid, just show me the cards.
I think there's a psychological lesson in there.
As EJ is setting up to film, this phat phuc lights a cigarette.
"I thought Val Kilmer was dead."
Dumbass blows his smoke toward EJ.
"Dad, can I beat him unconscious with my tripod?"
"No son, he sent a $5 super chat."
Whoa kind of sensitive to the man smoking. "Some guy" like Vegas Matt owns the entire casino. They have enough money, they don't need to make more dragging people into their demise. People here have said slot video viewership people dont gamble, bull shit.
If I were Vegas Matt I would have cussed out the smoker for blowing cigarette smoke in my son's face! :mad: A guy knocked out a cigarette smoker for blowing cigarette smoke in his BABY'S face. Baby was in a stroller and smoker deliberately bent down and blew the cigarette smoke in the baby's face! :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
As EJ is setting up to film, this phat phuc lights a cigarette.
"I thought Val Kilmer was dead."
Dumbass blows his smoke toward EJ.
"Dad, can I beat him unconscious with my tripod?"
"No son, he sent a $5 super chat."
If you want to look on the bright side, the smoke probably covered the guy's body odor.Quote:
Originally Posted by theywontpayontuesday
Full disclosure, the captions are from my imagination.
Matt has been a vocal proponent of the w2g threshold increase. He hates the handpay breaks (on machines without self-pay). But you don't get what you vote for.Quote:
People here have said slot video viewership people dont gamble, bull shit.
Insufficient punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
And I say that as someone who hates babies.
Yep, guy's an asshole for blowing cigarette smoke in a BABY'S face! :mad: I don't know how he thought that blowing cigarette smoke in a BABY'S face was okay for him to do. Dad has every right to knock him out, endangering his BABY'S health! Guy would have been an asshole blowing cigarette smoke in the Adult Dad's face, let alone a BABY. :mad:Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomInsufficient punishment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
And I say that as someone who hates babies.
What did this mean? I'll transcribe as best I can. Skip to 9:37:
https://youtu.be/4qQk4h4y2LE?si=tPVH3upz-aPCqCQ5&t=577
Jonathan Jossel (Plaza CEO): [to WBG] You're probably the guy I should be calling for all my promos. I have a couple of guys that I didn't kick out that I rely on for like, is this promo a good idea, or am I going to get abused on this -- advantage players are going to be coming in here and taking advantage of all of this. I'm going to start calling you for that.
Vegas Matt: There's nobody in the world, I would put [WBG] up against anybody in the world, as far as gambling knowledge Olympics, or Jeopardy.
Jossel: We should create that. I've seen so many scams here, like the guys pulling the cards on Ultimate X. The ones that get me is the ones that when you know they're really good is they know which games when they pull the card, doesn't have the persistent sessions. That's a really good [?], that's you're high level at that level. They figured out when you pull the machine whether there's persistent plays.
WBG: Of course.
Jossel: I don't even know how they figure that out, but that's inside knowledge ...
WBG: To, uh, fake losses.
Jossel: Exactly.
WBG: Yeah.
Jossel: Yeah. Um yeah, Matt doesn't even know what we're talking about.
Matt: No, I have no idea.
I understand how Ultimate X can be abused, but sounds like he's talking about games where you can pull your card before the final decision registers -- such as maybe when you trigger a slot bonus round.
I've experimented with the possibility, but never found anything viable. <dunce cap>
On the Vegas Matt & Friends live stream, they're promoting a sweepstakes/social casino called Chanced -- available in 39 states, excluding NV of course.
EJ says: "I appreciate all the positive support everybody, in the comments. It's been awesome."
Translation: Everybody in the comments is griping about the new grift :D.
Zcore on WOV who is a Casino Staff Member said that he and his Team knows when Players pull Player's Club cards when Bonuses hit. A Poster said something like, "My Friend who lives in a different State visited me one weekend and he and I went to my local Casino. He had a Promo for first time sign up, earn 50 points and get $200 in free play.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
He earned the 50 points and got the $200. We were leaving the Casino in a few minutes because he was going to catch a plane back to his State soon. He told me I could keep his Player's Club card and play the $200, just Zelle him his half of whatever I lost." I agreed and kept his card.
The next day, I played with his Player's Club card and got the Bonus. I pulled his Player's Club card out of the machine and put my own card in. I ended up hitting a HUGE Jackpot with my Friend's free play money but my card was in the machine when the Slot Technician came to verify my win and I claimed the Jackpot using my own Player's Club card and ID.
I Zelled my Friend $2,500 out of the $5,000 bonus. There is no way that the Casino will find out that I won the Bonus using my Friend's free play but just switched the cards when the Bonus started."
Zcore responded something like,"I am a Casino Staff Member and my Team and I know when Players pull out Player's Club cards when Bonuses start. You and your Friend MIGHT get away scot free since your Player's Club card was the one in the machine when the Slot Technician verified the win and the Casino thinks you pulled out your own Player's Club card impulsively and put it right back after using your better judgement, but you'll be pretty much screwed if they check the cameras and see that the Player's Club card you initially put in and were playing on was not your own Player's Club card and you pulled your Friend's Player's Club card out in your own Player's Club card when the Bonus started."
I'm surprised at Jossel's ingorance. When you pull the card in the middle of a spin it won't unregister until the spin is completed and the result is recorded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
So you make a $3 spin, the $3 coin-in is recorded, and you are awarded 10 free games. Pulling the card here won't work because you are still in the middle of the spin. The card won't unregister because the results of the 10 free spins are recorded in the spin that initiated the 10 free games. Once the free spins are over the card will unregister.
So AP's are in a quandary over this. They want the benefits the card brings but they don't want a record showing they are consistent winners. My advice is use the card in casinos you dont' spend much time in. Use the card sparingly in casinos where you are a frequent and long term gambler.
There are games out there like Regal Riches, Stack Up Pays, Rocket Rumble, where you pull the card when you get it close to the top. For example, you find a Regal with the yellow at 115 and it must hit by 125. When you get it up to 124 pull the card. Per the average you will be stuck about 120 units at that point. The average pay on the yellow is 210. So instead of showing about a 70 unit win you will be showing a 120 unit loss.
You don't have to pull every time. 1 out of 3 plays will show you as a moderate loser.
This is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm surprised at Jossel's ingorance. When you pull the card in the middle of a spin it won't unregister until the spin is completed and the result is recorded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
So you make a $3 spin, the $3 coin-in is recorded, and you are awarded 10 free games. Pulling the card here won't work because you are still in the middle of the spin. The card won't unregister because the results of the 10 free spins are recorded in the spin that initiated the 10 free games. Once the free spins are over the card will unregister.
So AP's are in a quandary over this. They want the benefits the card brings but they don't want a record showing they are consistent winners. My advice is use the card in casinos you dont' spend much time in. Use the card sparingly in casinos where you are a frequent and long term gambler.
There are games out there like Regal Riches, Stack Up Pays, Rocket Rumble, where you pull the card when you get it close to the top. For example, you find a Regal with the yellow at 115 and it must hit by 125. When you get it up to 124 pull the card. Per the average you will be stuck about 120 units at that point. The average pay on the yellow is 210. So instead of showing about a 70 unit win you will be showing a 120 unit loss.
You don't have to pull every time. 1 out of 3 plays will show you as a moderate loser.
There are a few casinos that use older players card systems where pulling the card will result in the win not being tracked, but these are rare today.
Many of the new players card systems if the card is pulled after the spin will display a message showing something like “Carded session in progress” or will continue to display players name, session points, etc even without card inserted since the spin is still live. For these systems the play is definitely still tracked for that spin with the card out,
Other systems when you pull the card out it stops displaying the players information on the screen and immediately looks like no card is being used at all even if in the middle of a spin that was initiated with the card. Most systems like this will still track all the information from the initial spin even if the card is pulled, but very rarely they won’t.
Not really related and pulling a card isn't some part of my playing strategy, but 2 days ago at the Reno Peppermill I was playing Super Aces at dollars, actually at 20 credits/spin, and I was dealt 4 Aces. So out of curiosity and thinking it would keep me off the winning radar, after holding the Aces I pulled my card prior to hitting draw.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimmI'm surprised at Jossel's ingorance. When you pull the card in the middle of a spin it won't unregister until the spin is completed and the result is recorded.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
So you make a $3 spin, the $3 coin-in is recorded, and you are awarded 10 free games. Pulling the card here won't work because you are still in the middle of the spin. The card won't unregister because the results of the 10 free spins are recorded in the spin that initiated the 10 free games. Once the free spins are over the card will unregister.
So AP's are in a quandary over this. They want the benefits the card brings but they don't want a record showing they are consistent winners. My advice is use the card in casinos you dont' spend much time in. Use the card sparingly in casinos where you are a frequent and long term gambler.
There are games out there like Regal Riches, Stack Up Pays, Rocket Rumble, where you pull the card when you get it close to the top. For example, you find a Regal with the yellow at 115 and it must hit by 125. When you get it up to 124 pull the card. Per the average you will be stuck about 120 units at that point. The average pay on the yellow is 210. So instead of showing about a 70 unit win you will be showing a 120 unit loss.
You don't have to pull every time. 1 out of 3 plays will show you as a moderate loser.
The floor attendants came over and did their thing etc., and they took my card to get the paperwork done. Soon, a suit came over with the $8000 cash but he also said "my people told me your card wasn't in the machine. Pulling cards doesn't work here."
I didn't say anything back because I didn't really know what I was doing. In my DU bug days I didn't play with a card until a handpay came. Then I tried to lose 5% of my jackpot on the highest denom of the machine before I got up and left--at the same denomination I was just paid at. THAT seemed to work as far as getting comps and keeping away from scrutiny.
Yes, potentially anything with a "must hit" component -- especially if the game often runs to the top. AGS River Dragons, for example. ISTR some of the IGT must-hits running to the top. I'm thinking of the "Classic Hits" Deluxe games: Money Storm, Coyote Moon & Lobstermania.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
You could also pull out before the final spin of a cycle on games such as Scarab.
In the podcast video, I thought they were referring to something more advanced than any of that.
But then if you found a specific machine or game in the casino that didn't trigger the "carded session," you'd be clued in to a possible loophole. I suppose the best prospects would be games from obscure manufacturers that may not be perfectly compatible with the tracking system.Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
This takes me back to Mickey's advice about playing uncarded in an AP situation:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
To avoid heat, you're uncarded for the entire session. But if you hit a taxable, I assume they'll tag the jackpot to your card. So that would be a risk when trying to stay under the radar.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
The "Chanced" sponsorship went over like a red balloon. Almost unanimous hate in the comments. I remember FanDuel got a lot of hostility, but this got a worse reaction because it's viewed as quasi-legal and scammy, and people are saying Matt specifically vowed not to promote this type of site.
People are also wondering how the quartet, who are all based in Nevada, were able to play a Nevada-disallowed site. Reportedly, they avoided "addressing" questions as to their filming studio location.
I see they quickly followed up today with a "normal" stream of only 1-hour duration. Maybe they wanted to push the disaster session down in the search results.
In another group, someone was speculating as to whether they're APs. I don't know anything really about W2Jesus or WBG. The latter has somewhat of a poker background. It appears that they often scout machines prior to playing. They'll play Buffalo Link (or similar) selections that are elevated toward the must-hit. Or they'll pick games with maxed-out progressives. But afaik, it's not often that they play (on-camera anyway) with an edge.
In Michael Kaplan’s new book, Advantage Players, the chapter on Matt is called The Man Who Turned Losing Into Winning. The latest reports I’ve read say their videos are making 400K per month. They probably dont lose 100K per month on the machines.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
They play inferior numbers on Buffalo Link. But the RTP when starting at 1000 is much higher than starting at reset. It cuts down their cost. And I’m sure they’ve found high numbers like 1500 or 1600 which they will spin off but wont show it on video.
They also play the Money Balls to low in the videos. Numbers like 9 or 10. And again, if they find a big number like 18 or 20 they’ll spin it off but wont film it.
I was told by someone in LV that he locks up slots at playable numbers for Vegas Matt and his son in exchange for a free-roll.
Another aspect to it is that some of the highest limit slots, even in LV, have very low RTPs. So some of the threshold configurations might be a lot lower than one would expect.
But I didn't know they were making that kind of money with their videos and whatnot. I assumed they had an insider source or a just a good math guy that was figuring out the playable numbers on high RTP slots.
Fwiw I've never watched any of their stuff, have just heard about it second hand.
He has 1.2 million subscribers on youtube and he is also on other platforms like tiktok.Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
The Vegas Matt channel posts a running tally in the video descriptions. YTD is just inside of -$200k, currently halfway through.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Sick brag :cool:.Quote:
Originally Posted by smurgerburger
I watch some of the videos, but I'm not an obsessed fan. I take time out to play with my cats: Matt and EJ :D.
I'll have to be more alert, but I would say they hide their acumen well. Sometimes they'll speculate as to whether a particular slot has true or perceived persistence, but they never talk about edges. That's probably good for their popularity as everyone hates APs.Quote:
I was told by someone in LV that he locks up slots at playable numbers for Vegas Matt and his son in exchange for a free-roll.
I watch youtube on my tablet in bed every night. I watch a large variety of things. Vegas Matt is in my youtube feed. I only watch the exploitabe games. Watching non exploitables is boring as shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
Let's check in on Matt's OCD. Just past 40 minutes:
https://youtu.be/MrStZYWlLRg?si=jumz1RvIB7Zdbejy&t=2400
EJ sets the barneys approximately into their circles.
Matt nudges the left chip into position.
The right chip looked okay to me.
This needs a complete overhaul.
It'll be worth the effort.
Now that's a straight edge! Ready when you are, dealer.
Giftgate on the July 16th VegasMattAndFriends live stream.
A fan gifted Matt a 3D-printed objet d'art. You see it's engraved: "Winner! Vegas Matt."
He held it up to the camera, and thanked the viewer.
Then in the final moments of the stream, Matt s-canned the item.
This was soon edited out, and now the video cuts from the bac table to the (high-limit?) cashier area.
Angry reactions ensued, and Matt jumped in with a pinned comment, explaining that the item had broken because W2 (idiot!) dropped it.
Sad and disappointing
Takesitinhisbigpussyontuesday is very sad and disapointed no one wants his big pussy this tuesday.
Celebrity status not always good for the ego. During a livestream interlude, a fan approached Vegas Matt.
"Ooh, I watch you every day!" <slight pause> "What's your name again?" :eek:
Your mom must have had a wonderful vagina and the whole neighborhood must miss her.Quote:
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Suckscockontuesdays also sucks cock on sundays
Come on, Mickey and Tuesday, your feud is stinking up a thread that is about Vegas Matt's playing technique. Really ridiculous and stupid. I honestly would have been pissed if I were Don and you guys hijacked my legitimate gambling thread with your ridiculous, stupid, and stinky feud. :mad:
Np, I have them both blocked.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
I assume they're still talking about each other's winky dinks.
They should be talking about why do we only have 11 emojis on this site? :mad:
Think of all the bots gorging on these guys posts and then feeding the info to artificial intelligence models. The artificial intelligence models will then someday be able to control the world.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
Let's get back on track here.
W2Jesus has an account here and has posted before.
W2Jesus looks a lot different today than in the pics posted of him earlier in the thread. He has lost a tremendous amount of weight. Here's a recent picture of WBG (left) and W2Jesus (right):
https://x.com/TheRealWBG/status/1947484854888825067
I know both of their identities and their backgrounds. Obviously I'm not going to reveal any of it, because it's their private business. I like both of them.
You have to understand that Vegas Matt is a business. Clearly they're not just firing off big $ on -EV slot machines for shits and giggles, or just for YouTube notoriety. When you see a sponsorship or hear rumors that they're getting special treatment by El Cortez or wherever, you need to understand that it's all part of the game. Casinos are built on favortism. Comps are based upon favortism. You are not owed anything as an AP -- not from the casinos, and not from other APs. You need to make your own way.
The only things I really frown upon in the AP world are:
- Scamming/deception of other APs
- Harassment/tricking of ploppies (such as predatory vulturing)
- Outright cheating (there's a big difference between advantage play and cheating) or theft
- Selling phony or exaggerated "systems" to the public
- Biting the hand that feeds you by spreading advantage information you were given to too many people, thus prematurely ruining the play for everyone
But Vegas Matt doesn't do any of this.
He isn't selling bullshit systems, isn't pretending to be something he's not, isn't scamming anyone, isn't bothering ploppies, and isn't ruining things for other APs.
I think some people get angry at him because they see him racking up huge views while appearing to lose big money gambling, when in reality he's getting enough on the back end to overcome that and actually profit. So to some people, especially APs, that feels inauthentic. However, Matt never denies he's making money from this venture. Basically, what he's doing is victimless.
He found a good formula. He created a slot channel which works because the stakes are high, he has a good personality, and his sidekicks are endearing. It's also nice to see that an older guy was able to succeed with a channel like this. It's a refreshing change from the channels where hot chicks spin slots, and the entire draw to the channel is for pervs to drool over them. It's 60-year-old Matt with his son and middle-aged sidekicks, and they're succeeding strictly based upon the content itself.
Entertainment wise, it's hard to beat a blackjack video like this one.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZu_uGnl2Fg
He is at least actually playing at the El Cortez, unlike UNKewlJ.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPen
He does wear an obnoxiously bulky gold chain necklace and bracelet (missing in this video) though. At least they are not Figaros.
Why isn't this retard pretending to gamble.
He churns out good content.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Druff
He's gotten probably the most hate for this:
But I think a lot of viewers just skip the Chanced videos, and continue enjoying the regular stuff as usual.
Sometimes commenters grumble about his MLM/network marketing background.
EJ is somewhat of a lightning rod because people think he exerts excessive authority. But someone has to do it, and Matt doesn't have the inclination to make all the decisions. I think the four of them have excellent chemistry, all considered.
Why are they filming with Tony Bigcharles? :eek:
Starts at 25:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYvLMtweNeo&t=1500
No, he did not say "versus" -- he said "verse" :mad:.
Idiot.
Read a book :(.
A lot of people make verbal typos, doesn't mean he's an idiot. A guy said he tried to insult an Idiot by trying to say,"He's not the sharpest tool in the shed," but ended up accidentally saying,"He's not the sharpest shed in the tool." He said he got instant karma for trying to insult someone else by accidentally saying the wrong thing himself when trying to insult someone else. That doesn't mean he's an idiot, he just made a verbal typo.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomStarts at 25:00
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYvLMtweNeo&t=1500
No, he did not say "versus" -- he said "verse" :mad:.
Idiot.
Read a book :(.
How do you feel about people saying "sooner than later"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
The traditional expression is "sooner rather than later" -- but either way I suppose the same meaning is conveyed.
The one that gets me is when people use literally for figuratively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomHow do you feel about people saying "sooner than later"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
The traditional expression is "sooner rather than later" -- but either way I suppose the same meaning is conveyed.
They are literally changing the word to the opposite of its intended meaning.
Figuratively, it would be like calling ice fire & calling fire ice.
Although I guess it would literally be like that too,
On another Website, I said something like,"Doesn't literally mean really?" A Poster responded something like, "It does mean really, but people use it the wrong way such as," That Comedy movie I saw last night at the movie theater was very funny. I literally died laughing!" If they "literally died laughing," they wouldn't be alive."Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThe one that gets me is when people use literally for figuratively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomHow do you feel about people saying "sooner than later"?Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasha
The traditional expression is "sooner rather than later" -- but either way I suppose the same meaning is conveyed.
They are literally changing the word to the opposite of its intended meaning.
Figuratively, it would be like calling ice fire & calling fire ice.
Although I guess it would literally be like that too,
Exactly. What they should have said was “I figuratively died laughing” unless they literally really did die, but then they literally would not have been around to tell you the story because they would literally be dead.Quote:
Originally Posted by TashaOn another Website, I said something like,"Doesn't literally mean really?" A Poster responded something like, "It does mean really, but people use it the wrong way such as," That Comedy movie I saw last night at the movie theater was very funny. I literally died laughing!" If they "literally died laughing," they wouldn't be alive."Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenThe one that gets me is when people use literally for figuratively.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
They are literally changing the word to the opposite of its intended meaning.
Figuratively, it would be like calling ice fire & calling fire ice.
Although I guess it would literally be like that too,
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
She got one retweet, but it did not catch on.
I could care less.
It's unlikely any of you people realize how boring almost everything you try to fill up your time with here, is. And back & forths with a waste of life like tasha does nothing towards improving your sad situations.
Why isn't this retard posting fake jackpots from his fake RV?
When I retweet, I also like. Am I doing it wrong?Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
I could care less too, since it’s too bad her idea didn’t catch on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don PerignomQuote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
She got one retweet, but it did not catch on.
I could care less.
I check in here every few years to see what's changed and see not much. Rob hanging out in the shit-hole that is Reno while telling the "little people" that they waste their meager lives posting here. All the while he's been posting here for 15 years, monitoring every post. Can't make that shit up...LOL...Please respond Rob, I love to see you wasting you old age away here. I'll check back 5 years from now, although I'll assume you will be dead by then.....Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
LOLQuote:
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer
Rob.Singer
Diamond
Join Date
Nov 2010
Posts
11,923
years and years and years ago, I talked to my father about doing videos just like this. Me and him playing VP and Slots. We decided against it because we didn't want to influence people to gamble at all...
On the positive side, think of all the people you saved from gambling.Quote:
Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK
+EV ?Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBenOn the positive side, think of all the people you saved from gambling.Quote:
Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK
LOL
Gambling videos when well done can entertain.
Most such videos are arguably viewed for folks who already gamble and who just want a vicarious fix.
Then posting videos of doing fentanyl should be very successful too.Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterV
Huh? Have you seen some of your father's gambling videos, posts, information, etc?Quote:
Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxNWPlmIqWA
Admit it, you guys sat around and laughed, thinking, who the hell is going to be interested in watching people play slots and video poker?
Honestly I think Alan would have done ok with a slot channel seeing that video. He surely was willing to not take himself too seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfHuh? Have you seen some of your father's gambling videos, posts, information, etc?Quote:
Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxNWPlmIqWA
Admit it, you guys sat around and laughed, thinking, who the hell is going to be interested in watching people play slots and video poker?
I have no doubt he would have done very well along with his son, especially if they got in early. It seems like they already had all the equipment and skills for filming and video editing. Alan has a good camera presence and is videogenic.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestionHonestly I think Alan would have done ok with a slot channel seeing that video. He surely was willing to not take himself too seriously.Quote:
Originally Posted by AxelWolfHuh? Have you seen some of your father's gambling videos, posts, information, etc?Quote:
Originally Posted by SLaPiNFuNK
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxNWPlmIqWA
Admit it, you guys sat around and laughed, thinking, who the hell is going to be interested in watching people play slots and video poker?
Dealer mistake dilemma. Baccarat hand starts at 54:32
https://youtu.be/BNQnZGlKfEg?si=6lvq3EEyI4mOCh4J&t=3272
Betting banker, the player hand is dealt 3-3; banker hand is dealt 6-5 and draws a 6 for a total of 7.
Because it's a no-commission table, the three-card banker 7 only pushes instead of winning. As W2Jesus is commenting that the main bet doesn't win, the dealer pays the main bet. After about 5 seconds of stunned silence, WBG reaches in and points out the incorrect pay. The dealer doesn't immediately understand, but finally comprehends and withdraws the chips.
Had the Matt crew not spoken up, I think they would've gotten grief from virtue signalers in the comments.
lol all the fucking side-bets on that felt.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Perignom
I guess casinos and gaming providers are smart enough to understand what is and isn't countable...
By the way can anyone please explain exactly what the “anal” means in this thread title?
Every time I see this thread pop up the anal part gives me a little cringe as I think is normal for most (but not all) of us & it just makes me curious what it means in the context of this thread?
Yes I know this thread is about Vegas Matt & I know the definition of “anal” but I’m not making the connection on the two put together.
Great question! It's the safest and most scientific abbreviation for "analysis."Quote:
Originally Posted by DGenBen
As the saying goes: Never use a big word when a diminutive alternative would suffice.
Would you like me to prepare a chart of abbreviation usage over time?
Great question! I don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by accountinquestion
I would feel conspicuous if I overloaded to a side bet, but there may be enough regular weirdos at table games that it would blend in.
Anal is anal retentive (sp?). I'm not sure if you guys are kidding or not.
I'm not the best equipped person to do anal, but there was a major influencer controversy last month. Mr. Hand Pay (1.0m YouTube subscribers) posted a video calling out his competitors.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-tB6KhtyZo
His primary target was NG Slot (1.2m subscribers). Mr. HP played extensive audio of his own negotiations with an online gaming operator seeking a paid endorsement. The operator insisted that he (per established procedure) must play with house money, which he would be prohibited from disclosing.
Because NG has a similar relationship, this was presented as evidence that NG is lying about using his own money.
Vegas Matt (1.3m subscribers) then posted in defense of NG:
https://www.youtube.com/post/Ugkxkg1...qaWtoMR3T0ZRRF
I don't have any way of knowing the exact finances, but that looks to me like an admission of guilt.Quote:
I want to say how humbled and grateful I am to be part of this amazing community of gamblers and gambling enthusiasts. This has truly been the most fun thing I have ever had the privilege of doing.
Thank you so much to everyone who has supported us and enjoyed the videos we’ve created over the years! ❤️
The last few days have been very interesting to say the least. Another gambling creator tried to make their candle shine brighter by attempting to blow out someone else’s. That just doesn’t sit right with me, and I’m not going to allow a flood of negativity to continue in this space.
It’s no secret that people with large audiences can make a very nice living. The people I choose to associate with are genuine, amazing individuals, and I’m grateful to know them.
I’m proud to say that we’ve created 12 jobs through what we do, and our merchandise is printed by a local shop right here in Vegas.
To question someone’s integrity in a “your word against mine” battle is not okay. It’s also not okay to slander anyone based solely on what one person says. If you are one of those people, please feel free to never comment on or watch our videos again. I’m certain many other creators share that sentiment.
My objective in all of this is simple: to have fun with my friends and family. It’s been incredible to watch my son and my friends experience so much success. Drama and negativity are not fun, and I’m not going to allow them in our comments anymore.
See you all tomorrow at 11:45 AM PST! I’m going to do my absolute best to win—because we’ve been getting WRECKED 😂😂 I only wish it was fake money 😉
Life Changing JACKPOT (no real money involved).
I think that's a new disclaimer. I don't see it on the older videos.