"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Hey I see Welfare Rob is back on board. Rob is giving his permission for me to post the info on him. That means he has his little story all ready to go. Been working on that for 3 days Singer? For what it's worth, I don't need your permission to post....it's public info. But I have no more need to post anything further. I made my point, showing who we are dealing with and it surprised no one. And anyone who wants to verify it, do so. I am not going to do the work for you. Look it up...public info. Only reason it is relevant is it confirms who we are and have been dealing with.
For anyone investigating, I'd look up Alan Mark Mendelson, currently of Las Vegas, but you are going to want to search for info at former addresses, Canogo Park, Los Angeles, Ca, and Ventura Ca. Interesting reading. Again just sheds a little light as to who we are dealing with here.
Ok, so The trolls here in trollville have been busy today while I was out building EV. So let's get started:
No Alan, the supermarkets do not take EV as payment. But they do take cash. I have earned $1,147,000 in my AP career, now in my 15th years. $907,000 of that is from blackjack play, which is what we are discussing. Now unfortunately, I didn't track EV all 15 of those years. In the early years, I didn't even know about or understand EV, much like some of you.
So I only have EV data for the last 7 years 2011 thru 2017. During that time, my blackjack earnings were $507,142.50 vs EV (expected value for my amount of play) was $521,857. See how that works. Over the long run, and we can debate exactly what constitutes long run, but over the long run EV and actual results will be very close, IF you are playing a sound game. That is what EV is, expected results for your play. In the short term, like a day or a week, or even month(s) they may not be the same....the may look very different, like an $8800 loss vs EV of $350+. That is meaningless. That is just variance. But in the long run they MUST come reasonably close together. This is a mathematical fact. (Law of Large Numbers). So this is why many players track EV rather than meaningless short-term results, which is just variance or fluctuation.
Now I know this isn't going to mean anything to Alan, LarryS and those mocking me, mocking what they have no clue about. You know it's funny, on a couple of the blackjack sites I participate on, as a signature I used to use "I track daily EV rather than results, that way every day is a winning day and in the end the two will come together". Not one person ever challenged or mocked that signature because these were successful AP's who understood the math. Only here on this site, do a handful of idiots mock this concept, because they haven't got a clue. And yes, you guys are "idiots"!! Not because you don't understand the concept. There is no shame in not understanding something. You are idiots because you mock what you don't understand....don't have a F-ing clue about.
Alan, you in particular are blinded by your contempt for me and Larry S is right behind you. You refuse to see the facts or the proven math because you are blinded by hatred.
So let's see: I have made over $900,000 from blackjack card counting in 14.5 years, every year a winning year. By his own admission, Alan has never had a winning year! What is that 40, 45 straight losing years? I wonder who knows what the fuck they are talking about.
Last edited by kewlJ; 05-18-2018 at 06:11 PM.
This is Rob Singer nonsense. It is fantasyland. And very easy to disprove.
Flip a coin 10 times. What are the chances 8 head come up (out of 10)? Not that long right?
Now Flip a coin 1000 times. What are the chances 800 heads come up? About the same as 18 y.o.'s in a row.
So why is that? Why can't the short run of 8 out of 10, just keep repeating itself? Answer because it doesn't work that way. LAW of LARGE NUMBERS! Learn the math friend, because Life is Mathematics. And learn the real math, not Singer alternative math.
It doesn't ring true when you're not even willing to post a link.
Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus...false in one thing, false in everything.
This tewlj character is an admitted and proven liar, and now a complete fraud...nothing he writes can be believed.
If the Singer welfare/foodstamps accusation can be verified, I will humbly apologize to tewlJ and never post here again.
Does anyone have a link?
If the best you can do is cite that you called the wiz "unmanly" for waiving the tin cup RIGHT to his face.....oops i mean from the safe distance of another site(GG)...then I grant you that....then I stand corrected. Yet in doing that not one single eggshell was disturbed. And this is the best example you can come up with ?
And I dont "hate" the wiz. Life is too short to be consumed with "hate". That would cause me anxiety and angst. Hate does that. I dont even hate the nazi's that killed half of my family. I wont let them have that kind of power over me. So no I dont "hate" shackleford and his followers. I more feel sorry for them. The nerdy fraternity. I dont hate the mods. I dont hate you. I am just an observer/commentator of life....and like to point out hypocrisy among other things.
My posts in the past about the wiz and people at wov was not based on hate. If it was , I would sound more like WoN on GF, or TwaoDood on patrick site...or OAB on GF......now those are people filled with "hate" ..you can sense it in their manic ramblings, out of control..very much filled with emotion to the point where the anxiety caused by the hate came through in the posts.
While just last week KJ again referenced how he was treated with QFIT.....I generally stay away from the me me me stuff as then it would seem I am just self serving with my commentary. It would be viewed as "rants"....as things are when people things its all about me me me.
So no....I never hated him. That would make him a big winner. I wouldnt give him that satisfaction or power over me.
So you can cling onto your 3 year old "push back" from a distance while the eggshells on WOV remained in tact.
Completely untrue, LarryS. I referenced how Wizard was treated by QFIT.
Perhaps it went over your head. I asked if anyone had seen the useful posts that QFIT posted recently? That was a joke because QFIT hasn't posted in quite some time. Just like he hadn't for 5 full years before he showed up to use, bully and manipulate Shackleford. Once QFIT got what he wanted, he disappeared, leaving Shackleford laying there all used up like a little bitch.
Oh, boy, you are so stupid and blind to the truth. Put it back into its context, please. In the original post.
I referred to the "nightmare" Alan referred to. The nightmare of a bunch of stupid, nay, sick, grown-up "kids" with mothers in tow who think they matter. No, I mean that internal dialogue of the forever casino damned.
The "short run" of behaviour that "repeats" itself on also this very forum. The silly "conspiracy of dunces" that thinks everyone is against them no matter what is said. The ones who leave in a huff, every couple of weeks, only to return as if they've had a frontal lobotomy or other manner of drunken amnesia. The slimy jokes, threats and other sub-human verbiage.
Talk about a non-gotcha moment. Holy cow!
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
I guess that there are a lot of smarty pants characters on here that just insert whichever meaning causes them the most relief from their gambling pains. So be it. Arseholes like Crimm haven't seen anything, yet.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
It's very easy to ascertain that you have absolutely no training in simple mathematics or statistics. And not only that---you're probably also too stupid to realize how foolish you're looking to everyone here that you're dying to confirm your relevance to, namely, by reaffirming what a pathological liar you are as you come apart at the seams when confronted with a few simple truths about your gambling nonsense.
I kinda enjoy watching kew walking ever-so-lightly in his penny loafers, while he takes a page from the redietz method of duck & deflect, whenever anyone requests proof-of-assertions.
KJ, I have a degree or two in math, and then some. But you guys are like "hear no truth, see no truth, and speak no truth." Tip-toe guys like Tableplay with their Mickey Mouse math charts come and go, all the time. Understanding is the other side of the coin.
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
I love when people lie about “being educated” or “having a degree”. Like dude, if you’re going to lie, at least make it believable.
Like, dude, what's it worth to you to find out?
78255585899=317*13723*17989=(310+7)*[(13730-7)*(100*100+7979+10)]-->LOVE avatar@137_371_179_791, or 137_371_17[3^2]_7[3^2]1, 1=V-->Ace, low. 78255585899-->99858555287=(99858555288-1)=[-1+(72*2227)*(722777-100000)]={-1+(72*2227)*[(2000+700777+20000)-100000]}-->1_722_227_277_772_1. 7×8×2×5×5×5×8×5×8×9×9=362880000=(1000000000-6√97020000-100000)-->169_721. (7/8×2/5×5/5×8/5×8/9×9)={[(-.1+.9)]^2×(6+1)}-->1961=√4*2.24; (1/7×8/2×5/5×5/8×5/8×9/9)={1/[7×(-.2+1)^2]}-->1721=[(10*10/4)/(√4+110)].
Seriously, KJ, if you fail to post proof or a link to same as to your scurrilous accusations against your nemesis you will be deemed a prevaricator and a creator of false tales.
I did a quick google and found no proof as to what you said, at least not on the free sites (I refuse to pay for it).
I did find proof though about his bankruptcy tale: oh yeah, I'll post a link ...
https://bota.az.gov/sites/default/fi...01806-99-I.pdf
What, Me Worry?
There are currently 358 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 358 guests)