Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 67

Thread: AxelWolf...come here to finish our chat

  1. #1
    You complained about your hurt vag and got me a yellow card over there, and I don't even know what the insult was.

    But over here the kid gloves come off...so don't you be yellow.
    Last edited by coach belly; 01-10-2020 at 08:11 PM.

  2. #2
    Coach, As an observer and none AP I somehow at some time stumbled into the WOV forum, and then from there ended up in a couple of other gambling forums to include here. Having gambled all over the world I occasionally shared an experience or two or three. But, for the most part (and being retired now with lots of spare time) I seem to be addicted to reading the endless (unconfirmed) bullshit on these sites. It’s obvious all entertainment to me, especially when I participate with personal input. (Usually with combative but honest personal opinion).

    No doubt certain AP’s made millions with well known and written about plays. But, for the most part all others likely are making a few bucks here or there, or may even be able to support themselves AP’ing. I’m guessing with all the AP stories you read about on these forums maybe 2% could be true. That would be 2 out of a 100 for you people not good with math.

    Even Mike Shank (the king of gaming math) that all AP’s seem to look up to went broke but got bailed out by online gaming interests. If online casinos thought Mike Shanks fans and members posting on his sites were the cream of the crop gamblers able to beat casinos (like Mike S. did lol) why would they spend the alleged million plus dollars to get their hands on them to gamble and take money from their casinos.

    Why would you even think about taking on an argument with the likes of Axel or that stupid bitch BBB. Wizard of Nothing (remember him) one of WOV own superstar members turned out to be one of the biggest online shysters ever.

    After reading tons of Axel posts all over the place and sharing personal pm’s with him, I can’t help but reach the conclusion that he’s one of the biggest bullshit artists going. I’m not saying he’s not making AP money but to the extent he seems to always be trying to convince everyone that he is convinces me he’s actually not. There were tons of people who claim to know him said he was a drunk. The amount of posts he has made over the years with 99 percent of them being stupid comments or insults to others, is another indication he has problems. I’m talking about what is it 20K posts? Just not adding up. I wanted to meet him in Vegas while I was staying at a hotel there for two weeks. He claimed he didn’t trust me and was busy anyway. I think he didn’t in fear of me being able to expose the truth. Something familiar happened with WON in A.C., he was a no show. I would add that while I always trashed and challenged Redietz with many different exchanges, his posts about sports betting seem to be clever. In addition, he reached out to meet me in person in Vegas. As soon as this cancer shit is squared away, I plan on taking him up on it. This is the season I should be in Nevada and am looking forward to getting back there.

    You deserve being banned from WOV just for going there and trying to make a different point than the masses.

    Don’t waste your time with Axel. You’ve already been blacklisted from all the phonies so why waste time. Then again if you enjoy the fight like I do with plenty time to kill, then just have a good time.

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Coach, As an observer and none AP I somehow at some time stumbled into the WOV forum, and then from there ended up in a couple of other gambling forums to include here. Having gambled all over the world I occasionally shared an experience or two or three. But, for the most part (and being retired now with lots of spare time) I seem to be addicted to reading the endless (unconfirmed) bullshit on these sites. It’s obvious all entertainment to me, especially when I participate with personal input. (Usually with combative but honest personal opinion).

    No doubt certain AP’s made millions with well known and written about plays. But, for the most part all others likely are making a few bucks here or there, or may even be able to support themselves AP’ing. I’m guessing with all the AP stories you read about on these forums maybe 2% could be true. That would be 2 out of a 100 for you people not good with math.

    Even Mike Shank (the king of gaming math) that all AP’s seem to look up to went broke but got bailed out by online gaming interests. If online casinos thought Mike Shanks fans and members posting on his sites were the cream of the crop gamblers able to beat casinos (like Mike S. did lol) why would they spend the alleged million plus dollars to get their hands on them to gamble and take money from their casinos.

    Why would you even think about taking on an argument with the likes of Axel or that stupid bitch BBB. Wizard of Nothing (remember him) one of WOV own superstar members turned out to be one of the biggest online shysters ever.

    After reading tons of Axel posts all over the place and sharing personal pm’s with him, I can’t help but reach the conclusion that he’s one of the biggest bullshit artists going. I’m not saying he’s not making AP money but to the extent he seems to always be trying to convince everyone that he is convinces me he’s actually not. There were tons of people who claim to know him said he was a drunk. The amount of posts he has made over the years with 99 percent of them being stupid comments or insults to others, is another indication he has problems. I’m talking about what is it 20K posts? Just not adding up. I wanted to meet him in Vegas while I was staying at a hotel there for two weeks. He claimed he didn’t trust me and was busy anyway. I think he didn’t in fear of me being able to expose the truth. Something familiar happened with WON in A.C., he was a no show. I would add that while I always trashed and challenged Redietz with many different exchanges, his posts about sports betting seem to be clever. In addition, he reached out to meet me in person in Vegas. As soon as this cancer shit is squared away, I plan on taking him up on it. This is the season I should be in Nevada and am looking forward to getting back there.

    You deserve being banned from WOV just for going there and trying to make a different point than the masses.

    Don’t waste your time with Axel. You’ve already been blacklisted from all the phonies so why waste time. Then again if you enjoy the fight like I do with plenty time to kill, then just have a good time.
    But Coach isn't banned from WOV. He is only suspended for three days for a personal insult.

  4. #4
    Look at the math that Top Dog put up in the thread. A 46% chance to be ahead at bacc after 10 hands. At one hand you would be at about 49%. So why the drop to 46% after 10 hands. It called the "compound effect of negative expectation gambling." Each hand you play has a negative expectation so multiplied out 10 times gives one just a 45% chance of being at breakeven or ahead. Another way to look at it is with 100 players playing 10 hands each over and over again it will average to 46 players being ahead after 10 hands and 54 players being behind after 10 hands.

    It is wrong to say it is "impossible to beat a negative expectation game." That might be true through infinity but no one plays through infinity. Everyone has a chance to win thru a given number of games played. The more games played the less chance you have of winning. With Top Dog's math 13 out of every 100 players will be ahead at bacc thru 10,000 hands. So it's not impossible and people need to quit using that terminology.

    But Top Dog's math glaringly shows why you shouldn't be beating your head against the wall trying to beat a negative expectation game. You have little chance to win....and the more you play the less that chance becomes.

    I won't get involved in any gambling game unless at least 51% of the players have a chance to be ahead after a given number of games.

    PS: As applied to bacc whoever said 70% of players are ahead at some point during their gambling session is full of shit.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #5
    A couple of points...

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Look at the math that Top Dog put up in the thread. A 46% chance to be ahead at bacc after 10 hands.
    If you are talking about the math that "Dog Hand" put up in the thread, it was for 100 hands of flat-betting on Banker.

    https://wizardofvegas.com/forum/info...on-parodies/7/

    I was suspended before I could press him to consider the effect of alternating bets between Banker and Player, and increasing bets to press into streaks, or "runs" as MDawg calls them, whereby the winning bets pay 2X (or more) than the table min, where the min would be the flat-bet amount.

    The screen shots that MDawg posted representing "good shoes" indicate that he's pressing up the streaks (both Banker & Player streaks) and winning up to 80% of those bets, so he's not flat-betting on the Banker.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    PS: As applied to bacc whoever said 70% of players are ahead at some point during their gambling session is full of shit.
    In a VCT thread discussing the merits of "quitting when ahead", Mission calculated that the probability of a player behind ahead at some point during a max-bet VP session was pretty high, and especially high when considering short sessions. My recollection is that he estimated 70% or so.

    This was not applied to Baccarat, it was for VP.

    But there is no opportunity to alternate bets (ala Bacc) in VP...you can only bet on the Player in VP.

    Does the opportunity to alternate bets on Banker & Player, plus the opportunity to press bets into streaks, affect the probability of winning for a session...even if the session is one million hands or more?

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by Tasha View Post
    But Coach isn't banned from WOV. He is only suspended for three days for a personal insult.
    This is "pedantry"...excessive concern with minor details and rules, like those who insist there is a difference between "quitting when ahead" and "pausing when ahead".

    I'm banned for a period of 3 days...OK?

    The "personal insult" was referring to Axel as "Captain Morgan".

    Manchild Axel was absorbing quite a beating, so much so that he was becoming hysterical and could not adequately defend himself.

    His vag got hurt, he cried that calling him "Captain Morgan" was an illegal blow, and his big sister came to his rescue and stopped the fight.
    Last edited by coach belly; 01-11-2020 at 10:49 AM.

  7. #7
    coach belly wrote:

    "Does the opportunity to alternate bets on Banker & Player, plus the opportunity to press bets into streaks, affect the probability of winning for a session...even if the session is one million hands or more?"

    Coach belly, I think you better forget about that line of thinking, as that is how casinos pay their bills. You cannot predict the occurrence of when a streak starts or ends. No one can do this.

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    I think you better forget about that line of thinking, as that is how casinos pay their bills. You cannot predict the occurrence of when a streak starts or ends.
    Relax...casinos won't be paying their bills by me thinking along one line or another.

    I understand that the streaks cannot be predicted.

    But looking at the screen shots that MDawg posted, I see that streaks of 5 winners in a row did occur multiple times during several different shoes.

    These are what he calls "good shoes"...where multiple winning streaks occur.

    Having declared beforehand that his strategy was to press into streaks, it's likely that's exactly what he did during those shoes...he ended up betting more on the winning hands, and won overall for the shoe.

    Is there a method to mathematically analyze this playing strategy, or is flat-betting on one-side the only strategy that can be analyzed?

  9. #9
    There's nothing like bringing up and reading topics from a different forum to give this place some life.

    First, it was the typical chickenshit move for that useless retard BBB to give coach one of those stupid WoV suspensions. So he called axel Captain Morgan? Axel supposedly has a past history of being a bit too close to the Captain? BFD. He can handle it. What a bunch of snowflake pussies over there.

    You people get too entangled over what and how Alan (AM) thinks and operates for your own good. What he does is throw things out there without some sort of backup, and hopes some will disagree and/or challenge/badmouth him which allows him to follow up with non-stop antagonistic postings just so the topic can go on and on and on. The more he infuriates, the bigger his win percentages. He doesn't care one bit if anyone believes him or not.

    1. 18 yo's in a row. Beyond comprehension--but physically & mathematically possible. People can rightfully claim he's full of it, but because it's a remotely, remotely possible event, whenever anyone calls him names or says anything negative about him regarding it directly or indirectly, he scores more points. And the topic never ends.

    2. No one has yet proven he's this AndrewG poster, so bringing up any of his claims and saying "it's Alan!" is irrelevant. There are some likenesses, but having been the victim of MANY such false claims in the past, let's leave it to Dan to investigate this if he chooses to.

    3. As usual, redietz just had to interject himself into that WoV thread to both tout himself with zero proof as always....and to make his ongoing moronic claim about it being possible to count 2 tables accurately simultaneously. So he used "tape measures" in a controlled environment without players being in the line-of-site, without him having to have his money on the line at the table he's sitting at, and without drink servers or other moving customers getting in the way. Red knows all this, yet because Alan said the opposite and that wussie kew cowardly refused to get with Alan to prove what a crock this all was, Red and his "journalistic integrity" decided to put together this lie. Just because.

    Most importantly, I see the topic of being able to win on -EV games came up again....which OF COURSE is possible. But first, someone said there's a 70% chance of being ahead at some point within the first 100 hands of VP, which was defined as a "guess". Well, that's a very poor guess, and it was presented to the WoV group of Mensa and math "geniuses" w/o parameters or challenge, probably bcause one of their government subsidized libtard "moderators" created that number. I wrote a GT article on this in the past and reiterated the findings several times online over the years. Flat betting JoB VP, I can't say. But I CAN say that being ahead any amount at any time within 100 hands of 8/5BP in a continuous climb from $1 to $125 of play (one $1 credit to five $25 credits--as in bet $1, bet$2, bet $5, bet $10, bet $25, bet $50, bet $125) and going back to get $1 whenever two-pair or higher is hit, is in the 94% range.

    In vp, whether you play a 99.2% game or a 100.2% game EVERY TIME YOU PLAY, there will rarely if ever be any difference in the amount of cash in your pocket when you walk back out onto the street. And this is especially true if you use win and loss goals. And that's just for flat betting. Switch over to a complex strategy like mine and you can expect all that -EV blather to be nothing but another criticism to laugh at as you're homeward bound.

    As I've said many times, when there's an 85% chance of winning ANY session played, why would anyone expect to end up a loser after any amount of time? And the most ridiculous part of this is there's people out there who claim I lose (somehow) but IF I were playing games that were ONE POINT TWO PERCENT HIGHER, then I'd win! Sessions that don't usually last very long at all! It's really an incomprehensible argument they're making.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 01-11-2020 at 06:07 PM.

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    There's nothing like bringing up and reading topics from a different forum to give this place some life.

    First, it was the typical chickenshit move for that useless retard BBB to give coach one of those stupid WoV suspensions. So he called axel Captain Morgan? Axel supposedly has a past history of being a bit too close to the Captain? BFD. He can handle it. What a bunch of snowflake pussies over there.

    You people get too entangled over what and how Alan (AM) thinks and operates for your own good. What he does is throw things out there without some sort of backup, and hopes some will disagree and/or challenge/badmouth him which allows him to follow up with non-stop antagonistic postings just so the topic can go on and on and on. The more he infuriates, the bigger his win percentages. He doesn't care one bit if anyone believes him or not.

    1. 18 yo's in a row. Beyond comprehension--but physically & mathematically possible. People can rightfully claim he's full of it, but because it's a remotely, remotely possible event, whenever anyone calls him names or says anything negative about him regarding it directly or indirectly, he scores more points. And the topic never ends.

    2. No one has yet proven he's this AndrewG poster, so bringing up any of his claims and saying "it's Alan!" is irrelevant. There are some likenesses, but having been the victim of MANY such false claims in the past, let's leave it to Dan to investigate this if he chooses to.

    3. As usual, redietz just had to interject himself into that WoV thread to both tout himself with zero proof as always....and to make his ongoing moronic claim about it being possible to count 2 tables accurately simultaneously. So he used "tape measures" in a controlled environment without players being in the line-of-site, without him having to have his money on the line at the table he's sitting at, and without drink servers or other moving customers getting in the way. Red knows all this, yet because Alan said the opposite and that wussie kew cowardly refused to get with Alan to prove what a crock this all was, Red and his "journalistic integrity" decided to put together this lie. Just because.

    Most importantly, I see the topic of being able to win on -EV games came up again....which OF COURSE is possible. But first, someone said there's a 70% chance of being ahead at some point within the first 100 hands of VP, which was defined as a "guess". Well, that's a very poor guess, and it was presented to the WoV group of Mensa and math "geniuses" w/o parameters or challenge, probably bcause one of their government subsidized libtard "moderators" created that number. I wrote a GT article on this in the past and reiterated the findings several times online over the years. Flat betting JoB VP, I can't say. But I CAN say that being ahead any amount at any time within 100 hands of 8/5BP in a continuous climb from $1 to $125 of play (one $1 credit to five $25 credits--as in bet $1, bet$2, bet $5, bet $10, bet $25, bet $50, bet $125) and going back to get $1 whenever two-pair or higher is hit, is in the 94% range.
    Having known Alan since I first posted here, I have never known him to lie. And playing free play artt style has always been my favorite way to play. On some occasions, when I played this way I have had 30 or more hands on just $10-playing 1,2,&5 credits playing nickels.

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    There's nothing like bringing up and reading topics from a different forum to give this place some life.

    First, it was the typical chickenshit move for that useless retard BBB to give coach one of those stupid WoV suspensions. So he called axel Captain Morgan? Axel supposedly has a past history of being a bit too close to the Captain? BFD. He can handle it. What a bunch of snowflake pussies over there.

    You people get too entangled over what and how Alan (AM) thinks and operates for your own good. What he does is throw things out there without some sort of backup, and hopes some will disagree and/or challenge/badmouth him which allows him to follow up with non-stop antagonistic postings just so the topic can go on and on and on. The more he infuriates, the bigger his win percentages. He doesn't care one bit if anyone believes him or not.

    1. 18 yo's in a row. Beyond comprehension--but physically & mathematically possible. People can rightfully claim he's full of it, but because it's a remotely, remotely possible event, whenever anyone calls him names or says anything negative about him regarding it directly or indirectly, he scores more points. And the topic never ends.

    2. No one has yet proven he's this AndrewG poster, so bringing up any of his claims and saying "it's Alan!" is irrelevant. There are some likenesses, but having been the victim of MANY such false claims in the past, let's leave it to Dan to investigate this if he chooses to.

    3. As usual, redietz just had to interject himself into that WoV thread to both tout himself with zero proof as always....and to make his ongoing moronic claim about it being possible to count 2 tables accurately simultaneously. So he used "tape measures" in a controlled environment without players being in the line-of-site, without him having to have his money on the line at the table he's sitting at, and without drink servers or other moving customers getting in the way. Red knows all this, yet because Alan said the opposite and that wussie kew cowardly refused to get with Alan to prove what a crock this all was, Red and his "journalistic integrity" decided to put together this lie. Just because.

    Most importantly, I see the topic of being able to win on -EV games came up again....which OF COURSE is possible. But first, someone said there's a 70% chance of being ahead at some point within the first 100 hands of VP, which was defined as a "guess". Well, that's a very poor guess, and it was presented to the WoV group of Mensa and math "geniuses" w/o parameters or challenge, probably bcause one of their government subsidized libtard "moderators" created that number. I wrote a GT article on this in the past and reiterated the findings several times online over the years. Flat betting JoB VP, I can't say. But I CAN say that being ahead any amount at any time within 100 hands of 8/5BP in a continuous climb from $1 to $125 of play (one $1 credit to five $25 credits--as in bet $1, bet$2, bet $5, bet $10, bet $25, bet $50, bet $125) and going back to get $1 whenever two-pair or higher is hit, is in the 94% range.
    Having known Alan since I first posted here, I have never known him to lie. And playing free play artt style has always been my favorite way to play. On some occasions, when I played this way I have had 30 or more hands on just $10-playing 1,2,&5 credits playing nickels.
    I also don't see Alan as a liar. He may remember things a little differently than he saw them and gave a general recollection greased with a bit of personal enhancement just to yank a few chains. I can see how when his son "hit 5 royals in 24 hrs. and lost overall" it was him simply recounting how his son had one helluva up and down day, highlighted by a glaring weakness shown by way too many vp players--running into the high limit rooms after a mid-range royal with a ton of false confidence.

    Hey--if a guy can get married half a dozen times and anonymous people believe he's still breathing breathable air, then they shouldn't have too much trouble with 18 yo's.

  12. #12
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    I think you better forget about that line of thinking, as that is how casinos pay their bills. You cannot predict the occurrence of when a streak starts or ends.
    Relax...casinos won't be paying their bills by me thinking along one line or another.

    I understand that the streaks cannot be predicted.

    But looking at the screen shots that MDawg posted, I see that streaks of 5 winners in a row did occur multiple times during several different shoes.

    These are what he calls "good shoes"...where multiple winning streaks occur.

    Having declared beforehand that his strategy was to press into streaks, it's likely that's exactly what he did during those shoes...he ended up betting more on the winning hands, and won overall for the shoe.

    Is there a method to mathematically analyze this playing strategy, or is flat-betting on one-side the only strategy that can be analyzed?
    Flip-flopping and pressing bets will not change the fact that every bet is negative. Put up screenshots of results of flipping coins and you will see instances of five heads in a row or five tails in a row. That’s the thing. If flip-flopping and pressing bets will work at bacc it will also work at flipping coins.

    DOES ANYONE WANT TO BUY A WINNING BETTING SYSTEM FOR FLIPPING COINS? Just use mdawgs bacc system instead for free and all your dreams will come true.

    Two things these bacc guys with the fancy claims of winning never do is (1. Never quantify their edge percentage wise (2. Never give up their day job and play bacc full time.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    DOES ANYONE WANT TO BUY A WINNING BETTING SYSTEM FOR FLIPPING COINS? Just use mdawgs bacc system instead for free and all your dreams will come true.
    Which casinos take action on flipping coins?

  14. #14
    Mickey, if any poster were seriously interested in knowing anything about probability, they wouldn't ask anonymous people on the internet questions, rhetorical or otherwise. They would, if they had any money and actually did serious wagering:

    1) Buy some certified probability courses and watch/read them. I recommend as a starting point "What Are The Chances? Probability Made Simple" by Michael Starbird from the University of Texas at Austin.

    2) Either sign up for live courses at local universities or consulting probability professors at local universities. Call them, offer to pay some consulting fees, and then listen to what they have to say or hire them to provide worksheets describing the questions. If they live near Atlantic City, for example, Rutgers would be a good school. If Ivy League schools in the Philadelphia area have expensive professors, maybe try Temple, St. Joe's, or a Penn State branch campus.

    3) Ask Shackleford over at Wizard of Vegas.

    4) All of the above.

    If posters prefer to believe that they are more expert than professional mathematicians, then why are they asking anonymous, uncredentialled internet folks, anyway? It makes no sense. If posters are somehow trying to demonstrate that they know more than anonymous, uncredentialled forum members, well, that's fine, but it certainly isn't going to provide accurate answers to statistical questions.

    If posters refuse to do (1) through (4) above, the only logical conclusions are:

    (A) They consider themselves more expert than credentialed experts or
    (B) They know what experts will say and do not want to hear it or
    (C) They full well know what experts will say and prefer to work in the casinos' best interests or
    (D) They need to expose family members or other people who might frown on their behavior to non-expert summaries and explanations.

    I'm going to do a blog entry on this very curious subject. It is fascinating. One possibility: any poster asking these questions has already consulted mathematicians and prefers to not publicly report what has been said or learned. If someone is asking similar odd questions for years to a parade of anonymous posters, doesn't it make sense, especially if they themselves continued high stakes gambling, that they would have gotten around to hiring some experts for minimal fees to provide them advice?

    There is a meta-element to this that I'll explore in my blog in the months ahead. The posters asking these kinds of questions take the tack that the posters reporting continual repetitive wins are "not lying," but are merely the surviving tip of the winning iceberg as probability theory would predict must exist somewhere. This is, in essence, something that can't be refuted. But then the same posters, from that point forward, continue with the same stories of continual winning, making them longer and longer odds-against, So what started as a 1 in 1000 survivor becomes, years later, a 1 in 100,000 survivor, then a 1 in a million. And somehow the posters defending the systems winners don't question the problematic aspect of this vis--vis reality. The systems winners who were end-of-the-bell-curve survivors/winners should revert to chance going forward unless blessed by God. But, guess what, they almost never do. Hard to explain, eh?
    Last edited by redietz; 01-12-2020 at 09:21 AM.

  15. #15
    To quote Stanford Wong in his book Professional Blackjack page 241:

    "Trying to bet more when you are winning or less when you are losing is an exercise in futility; it will not win any money. Streaks occur, but they cannot be predicted."

    He backs this up with a study of 2 million hands-on table 94 page 241.

  16. #16
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    DOES ANYONE WANT TO BUY A WINNING BETTING SYSTEM FOR FLIPPING COINS? Just use mdawgs bacc system instead for free and all your dreams will come true.
    Which casinos take action on flipping coins?
    You don't need a casino. You can hustle your friends and acquaintences. Everyone has flipped coins before. Everyone knows how to play. Everyone thinks it's fifty-fifty. But those that know how to read the flips for streaks and press bets accordingly will be the big winners right, right? If it will work in bacc it will definitely work flipping coins.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #17
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    You don't need a casino. You can hustle your friends and acquaintences.
    Do you really think all dreams will come true by hustling friends?

    C'mon man.

  18. #18
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Streaks occur, but they cannot be predicted.
    Do they need to be predicted? Can't they be "caught" as they occur?

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    You don't need a casino. You can hustle your friends and acquaintences.
    Do you really think all dreams will come true by hustling friends?

    C'mon man.
    There's a lot of home poker games between friends. Someone is taking advantage of their friends in those games.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  20. #20
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    If posters prefer to believe that they are more expert than professional mathematicians, then why are they asking anonymous, uncredentialled internet folks, anyway?
    The question-asking posters believe themselves to be more expert?

    Is that the hypothesis here?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Finish to the Vikings-Saints game
    By kewlJ in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-21-2018, 04:28 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •