The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)

[kewlJ]

just like his trolling with the sock puppet Wellbush is agitating the masses over at WOV.

I wonder why Wellbush hasn't made his way here? Could it be because the instant he does I will request Dan Druff make both unmask from their VPN's and even if they attempt to post from public wifi somewhere Dan Druff will know they are one and the same and Druff isn't going to look the other way as Shack and friends do.

[monet]

GREAT JOB MDawg!!
I hope you burn WoV down to the ground and piss on the ashes!

[MisterV]

As long as you keep responding to him in the same mannerisms he is going to keep having organisms while reading your posts, and he will never stop. .

Endless organisms ... now there's an idea.

[Tasha]

just like his trolling with the sock puppet Wellbush is agitating the masses over at WOV.

I wonder why Wellbush hasn't made his way here? Could it be because the instant he does I will request Dan Druff make both unmask from their VPN's and even if they attempt to post from public wifi somewhere Dan Druff will know they are one and the same and Druff isn't going to look the other way as Shack and friends do.

It's possible that Wellbush has no idea what VCT is. I didn't know what VCT was until 2018 and I joined WOV in 2015. Wellbush just joined WOV this year. I found out what VCT was when someone linked my picture here without my permission and I was informed about it and then joined on here....

[Tasha]

To The Posters claiming that Mdawg is pushing a True Passage, a Website that only he seems to be the only Poster, I visited that Website and made an innocent reply to a question he asked about masks in Casinos..... I got a notification that my Reply wouldn't show up until a Moderator approved it.... I made my innocent reply MONTHS ago and it never showed up. How do we not know if the Moderators on that board only approve Mdawg's posts? Something to think about.... Because there was no way my innocent reply shouldn't have been approved....

[MDawg]

Tasha, I don't own that site just send a message to the Admin or a Mod at TruePassage.

I am a regular member at TruePassage not a mod so I can't help you with that.

[monet]

MDawg is obviously using a better program than AlphaGo Zero.
Think AI can't progress at mind boggling speeds?
You'd be wrong as they can learn and win any game achieving winning records of 100 wins in a row within 3 days.
And that's against the best humans and AIs in the world.
Only a matter of time before AI can figure out how to beat Negative EV Games.
Code has been Cracked.

[Tasha]

Tasha, I don't own that site just send a message to the Admin or a Mod at TruePassage.

I am a regular member at TruePassage not a mod so I can't help you with that.

Thanks for alerting the Admin to my post.... Sad that it say there unnoticed by the Admin for almost 4 months before you alerted him to it...
:/

[MDawg]

MDawg Wins.
The End.

MDawg is Number 1 in your minds and Number 1 in my heart!!

But no one has taken control of the forums and members like MDawg has. For that you have to give him credit whether you like him or not. He has made a fool out of everyone that challenged him.

MDawg is taken more serious than anyone on here currently.
He is taken so seriously that DarkOz gave him 2,000 dollars.
That wasn't good enough so he tipped the Wizard 500 dollars.
I'd say that MDawg is taken very seriously to some members.
DarkOz for starters.

On the other hand,

Who's the bigger retard? Alan, or MrV? Ha, don't forget all the hangers-on.

Jesus, I think that the Dawg is beginning to make sense.

KewJ, You are like a fucken sick talking parrot.

KewlJ, Being sneaky and underhanded like that has now been your reputation for a long time now and it hasn't stopped yet. Going back years all the way to Norm Wattenberger,Tthree even after he has not posted in what now is years, including Zen master flash and others right up to present day times.

Member, Kewlj, the biggest blowhard you’ll ever meet on any forum. In his case the word blowhard has actually two different meanings. 1) an arrogantly and pompously boastful or opinionated person, braggart, windbag, a self-important egomaniac who likes to toot his own horn. 2) In his own words “I enjoy sucking a nice cock”

This idiot will destroy any thread or post you make if your view doesn’t match his. You could end up with 20 pages of his alone posts cluttering up your thread, relentlessly repeating himself endlessly. Sadly, there is no one here that will ever put a leach around his neck and lock him up behind a fence.

I ask the entire board if not everything said in the above quote is not true? Because I could not find a single thing wrong or fabricated.

IvyLeagueGrad you are disgusting and I am sure MDawg's wife is beautiful from the way he has talked about her in the past. Also I am sure you never went to college because at WOV you didn't even know the difference between lose and loose!

[MDawg]

[MaxPen]

Congratulations on turning the Wizard into your puppet.

Are those posts real? ......lmao ;D

The Dog has the WoV on a leash.

[MDawg]

Wizard is merely verifying what anyone who saw the images could, but doing so in a way as to maintain my anonymity and privacy.

[redietz]

The problem from an integrity perspective is that Shackleford is making basic statements about what he saw absent what most in the scientific or mathematical or gambling worlds would consider proper contextualizing. If you see a cut paper check with a notation "casino winnings," it has the same credibility and lack of context as (to take an example from Todd's poker world) those graphics during televised WSOP events that label players as having "$3,000,000 in WSOP winnings". Nowhere does it say how many events or what the net is, so the networks and the WSOP misrepresent reality by not contextualizing the figures.

Does Shackleford have an obligation to state the obvious? That's the question. Should he constantly be adding disclaimers for the naive that he only witnesses a subset of this and an other-controlled example of that? Well, Shackleford's entire expertise is supposed to be in the realm of math. So if he is posting subsets of results without posting disclaimers, he's basically decided to cast aside his role as math expert.

Obviously Shackleford is either boosting views or intimidated by modest coinage or in need of some of that coinage.

Let me put this in perspective. There are probably 300,000 individuals in this country who make a million dollars a year, every year. There are far fewer individuals who make 10K a year gambling every year. These are facts -- mathematical facts.

So why is a gambling site featuring somebody because they have a check from a casino for 100K or because they have a 100K chip? What is the rationale for featuring them versus featuring the far more rare individuals who actually beat the casinos? The answer, of course, is because Shackleford has decided that's what he wants to do.

And that leads us back to the question, why?

You know, it's not so much that Shackleford is boosting hokum that annoys me. It's that he's boosting it while pretending to be something and someone else.

[AndrewG]

Saying that you viewed a picture is proof of what? It's proof that you saw a picture, that's all. It's not proof that the picture is a true representation of anything.

Holding a check with the memo "winnings" is proof of what? It's not proof of net winnings or even gross winnings. There may be no winnings at all.

This is no different than photos of a Newell at a campground.

[coach belly]

Holding a check with the memo "winnings" is proof of what? It's not proof of net winnings or even gross winnings. There may be no winnings at all.

Is there any evidence that MDawg could post on one of these forums
to convince you that he won $85K for March & April?

[MDawg]

It's Pearls Before Swine, coach belly.

Obviously Andrew G is just screaming out that "I'm a small time cash only player and have no idea how any of this works" and, "I've never been a high credit (only) line player," not much more.

It's one thing to not know, which is perfectly fine. I don't know much about some subjects, but I wouldn't make myself sound ignorant by attempting to speak authoritatively on them as he just did.

I actually won the entire amount, not just $85K, but again - Pearls Before Swine. Andrew G apparently hasn't won enough in his life to ever even receive such a large check, let alone have been around enough in such check winning circumstances to know that some casinos memo mark the checks and some do not.

What is indisputable is that any exclusively credit line only player who receives a check - receives it for net winnings. End of story. And that story - is what is evidently missing from Andrew G's life repertoire.

[redietz]

Holding a check with the memo "winnings" is proof of what? It's not proof of net winnings or even gross winnings. There may be no winnings at all.

Is there any evidence that MDawg could post on one of these forums
to convince you that he won $85K for March & April?

LOL. Who cares?

A friend of mine won 100K playing blackjack online in 48 hours. He printed out the record of the session for posterity, which he has kept, and I'm sure the site has a record. So what does that prove? That he wins at blackjack? Of course not. It proves that he won 100K in 48 hours. That's what it proves. That's it. It doesn't prove he reads the flow of cards or that he's a lifetime winner. So who cares?

Being impressed by an 85K win over a month or two says something about the gambling chops of the person who is impressed.

[MDawg]

Does the fact that you're back to posting in MY threads after a brief hiatus mean that you're done with sticking your head up your ass, and that you have, in fact, determined that eet fits?

[MDawg]

It proves that he won 100K

Wow. Other than the fact that you, UNKewl and BOZ resigned from the civilized human race when you came on record as being PRO DOXXING, that portion of what you wrote is an amazingly sensible and true statement.

[redietz]

It proves that he won 100K

Wow. Other than the fact that you, UNKewl and BOZ resigned from the civilized human race when you came on record as being PRO DOXXING, that portion of what you wrote is an amazingly sensible and true statement.

"Anonymous free speech" is an oxymoron, MDawg. Unless you're living in China or Russia, it serves no purpose except to allow adults to play pretend because they have no respect for who they actually are.