ASM revisited again!

[kewlJ]

Here's a math problem, and one KJ pretended to misunderstand last time I posed it:

What are the odds that if KJs backrooming story were true, and it had been covered by two local news stations as he claimed, and these stations actually aired footage of the pre-backroom incident, that no record of it the events, the news coverage, or anyone having seem them would appear anywhere online?

V would you like to hazard a guess? 1 in a million? Lower? Maybe 1 in a billion?

Those odds are easy. 1 in 1 or 100%.

The backroom story was 100% true. Everything I said occurred.

The lawsuit part not so much. I had to try to deflect from people that were looking to dig into the story to find information on me. I probably unfairly used MrV some to pull that off. If I haven't apologized to you before V, I do now. That was kind of unfair, but I think you can probably understand. I am also sorry Maxpen got caught up in the looking for the lawsuit thing. That was meant for the trolls looking to harm me and not Maxpen. I probably should have been honest with him about the lawsuit part, as soon as he got involved.

And if anyone needs proof. Here it is. Go back and read that thread from the very beginning. I only shared the experience weeks after it happened. And I clearly stated that I had decided not to pursue anything, that there is no way I wanted any part of going through a public type lawsuit. Re-Read what I just wrote you trolls.

So the lawsuit was NEVER something I would have done or considered. What I changed my mind on with the help of Axelwolf's suggestion (and maybe a couple others), was getting as much as I could get in a settlement. Not a lawsuit. Of course you have to tell the other party you are willing to go through all the legal actions. I am getting into the area I can't really talk about, but if they had read what I wrote at the very beginning, they wouldn't have settled as quickly as they did.

On the other hand, maybe somebody, lawyers or insurance company that would end up paying advised them this was an easy case that they would lose, and to do what they needed to do to make it go away and put it behind them. I don't care either way. Worked out well for me. And Yeah, I will probably get a little grief for this post. But guess what, as is usually the case....I don't care. I do what I want.

[smurgerburger]

Here's a math problem, and one KJ pretended to misunderstand last time I posed it:

What are the odds that if KJs backrooming story were true, and it had been covered by two local news stations as he claimed, and these stations actually aired footage of the pre-backroom incident, that no record of it the events, the news coverage, or anyone having seem them would appear anywhere online?

V would you like to hazard a guess? 1 in a million? Lower? Maybe 1 in a billion?

Those odds are easy. 1 in 1 or 100%.

The backroom story was 100% true. Everything I said occurred.

The lawsuit part not so much. I had to try to deflect from people that were looking to dig into the story to find information on me. I probably unfairly used MrV some to pull that off. If I haven't apologized to you before V, I do now. That was kind of unfair, but I think you can probably understand. I am also sorry Maxpen got caught up in the looking for the lawsuit thing. That was meant for the trolls looking to harm me and not Maxpen. I probably should have been honest with him about the lawsuit part, as soon as he got involved.

And if anyone needs proof. Here it is. Go back and read that thread from the very beginning. I only shared the experience weeks after it happened. And I clearly stated that I had decided not to pursue anything, that there is no way I wanted any part of going through a public type lawsuit. Re-Read what I just wrote you trolls.

So the lawsuit was NEVER something I would have done or considered. What I changed my mind on with the help of Axelwolf's suggestion (and maybe a couple others), was getting as much as I could get in a settlement. Not a lawsuit. Of course you have to tell the other party you are willing to go through all the legal actions. I am getting into the area I can't really talk about, but if they had read what I wrote at the very beginning, they wouldn't have settled as quickly as they did.

On the other hand, maybe somebody, lawyers or insurance company that would end up paying advised them this was an easy case that they would lose, and to do what they needed to do to make it go away and put it behind them. I don't care either way. Worked out well for me. And Yeah, I will probably get a little grief for this post. But guess what, as is usually the case....I don't care. I do what I want.

Once again you pretend to not understand the question.

[kewlJ]

Here's a math problem, and one KJ pretended to misunderstand last time I posed it:

What are the odds that if KJs backrooming story were true, and it had been covered by two local news stations as he claimed, and these stations actually aired footage of the pre-backroom incident, that no record of it the events, the news coverage, or anyone having seem them would appear anywhere online?

V would you like to hazard a guess? 1 in a million? Lower? Maybe 1 in a billion?

Those odds are easy. 1 in 1 or 100%.

The backroom story was 100% true. Everything I said occurred.

The lawsuit part not so much. I had to try to deflect from people that were looking to dig into the story to find information on me. I probably unfairly used MrV some to pull that off. If I haven't apologized to you before V, I do now. That was kind of unfair, but I think you can probably understand. I am also sorry Maxpen got caught up in the looking for the lawsuit thing. That was meant for the trolls looking to harm me and not Maxpen. I probably should have been honest with him about the lawsuit part, as soon as he got involved.

And if anyone needs proof. Here it is. Go back and read that thread from the very beginning. I only shared the experience weeks after it happened. And I clearly stated that I had decided not to pursue anything, that there is no way I wanted any part of going through a public type lawsuit. Re-Read what I just wrote you trolls.

So the lawsuit was NEVER something I would have done or considered. What I changed my mind on with the help of Axelwolf's suggestion (and maybe a couple others), was getting as much as I could get in a settlement. Not a lawsuit. Of course you have to tell the other party you are willing to go through all the legal actions. I am getting into the area I can't really talk about, but if they had read what I wrote at the very beginning, they wouldn't have settled as quickly as they did.

On the other hand, maybe somebody, lawyers or insurance company that would end up paying advised them this was an easy case that they would lose, and to do what they needed to do to make it go away and put it behind them. I don't care either way. Worked out well for me. And Yeah, I will probably get a little grief for this post. But guess what, as is usually the case....I don't care. I do what I want.

Once again you pretend to not understand the question.

Oh I understand the question. What are the chances it is true. I KNOW IT is true so 100%!

Now a question for you smurgerboog. Where you a "short bus" guy, because you seem a little slow to me asking the same shit over and over?

Not that there is anything wrong with havin ridden the short bus. The world need retarded people too.

[smurgerburger]

Those odds are easy. 1 in 1 or 100%.

The backroom story was 100% true. Everything I said occurred.

The lawsuit part not so much. I had to try to deflect from people that were looking to dig into the story to find information on me. I probably unfairly used MrV some to pull that off. If I haven't apologized to you before V, I do now. That was kind of unfair, but I think you can probably understand. I am also sorry Maxpen got caught up in the looking for the lawsuit thing. That was meant for the trolls looking to harm me and not Maxpen. I probably should have been honest with him about the lawsuit part, as soon as he got involved.

And if anyone needs proof. Here it is. Go back and read that thread from the very beginning. I only shared the experience weeks after it happened. And I clearly stated that I had decided not to pursue anything, that there is no way I wanted any part of going through a public type lawsuit. Re-Read what I just wrote you trolls.

So the lawsuit was NEVER something I would have done or considered. What I changed my mind on with the help of Axelwolf's suggestion (and maybe a couple others), was getting as much as I could get in a settlement. Not a lawsuit. Of course you have to tell the other party you are willing to go through all the legal actions. I am getting into the area I can't really talk about, but if they had read what I wrote at the very beginning, they wouldn't have settled as quickly as they did.

On the other hand, maybe somebody, lawyers or insurance company that would end up paying advised them this was an easy case that they would lose, and to do what they needed to do to make it go away and put it behind them. I don't care either way. Worked out well for me. And Yeah, I will probably get a little grief for this post. But guess what, as is usually the case....I don't care. I do what I want.

Once again you pretend to not understand the question.

Oh I understand the question. What are the chances it is true. I KNOW IT is true so 100%!

Still pretending to misunderstand. I assume you are hoping some.third party will read this and believe that you are "winning"?

[kewlJ]

Still pretending to misunderstand. I assume you are hoping some.third party will read this and believe that you are "winning"?

Again, you seem slow, in that you are repeating nonsense from the other trolls.

I don't care what any third party (whoever that may be) thinks. How does that help me in anyway? Doesn't put more money in my pocket. And I am not on here telling a freaking impossible story like these losing gambler types Dawg and Singer.

One of you trolls (I think Singer) came up with that and the rest repeat it. Sort of follow the leader for retarded Trolls .

[MDawg]

2021:

I promise that I am going to post the information for ALL to SEE and end these bullshit claims and adventure that Shackleford should have ended a year ago. I will have no problem revealing everything, right down to his Tax ID number (substitute for SS #) and DoB.

2024:

As for Mdawg, no one ever provided me with personal information about him. Not a name, not an address. certainly not bank statements of financial information. And I never suggested that.

2025:

But can you PROVE it? You just don't want to believe because you are a hater!

Right?

Right?

Is that not how it goes?

I CAN, but that would involve exposing his real name (doxing him) and would place others people (friends) in Jeopardy.

At some point you will realize you're dealing with a compulsive liar.

[smurgerburger]

Still pretending to misunderstand. I assume you are hoping some.third party will read this and believe that you are "winning"?

Again, you seem slow, in that you are repeating nonsense from the other trolls.

I don't care what any third party (whoever that may be) thinks. How does that help me in anyway? Doesn't put more money in my pocket. And I am not on here telling a freaking impossible story like these losing gambler types Dawg and Singer.

One of you trolls (I think Singer) came up with that and the rest repeat it. Sort of follow the leader for retarded Trolls .

This question is not addressed to KJ but something I invite any readers who share KJ esteem for mathematics to privately mull:

If you draw a card randomly from a deck of cards and it's the ace of spades, and someone asks "Wow, what are the odds you would draw the AoS", the answer would be 1 in 52.

If you walk up to a double zero roulette table and bet one number and hit it on your first try, and someone said "Wow what are the odds you would hit that?", the answer is 1 in 38.

If you have your arm broken in the year 2023 in a backrooming incident at a casino in Las Vegas, and two local news stations pick up the story including video coverage of the pre-backroom confrontation, and someone asks "Wow, what are the odds that nowhere online, on Reddit, twitter , or any site accessible through Google is there any mention of the incident, the new stories, or anyone commenting about them or having read or heard about them?", the answer is 1 in .... ?

[kewlJ]

Still pretending to misunderstand. I assume you are hoping some.third party will read this and believe that you are "winning"?

Again, you seem slow, in that you are repeating nonsense from the other trolls.

I don't care what any third party (whoever that may be) thinks. How does that help me in anyway? Doesn't put more money in my pocket. And I am not on here telling a freaking impossible story like these losing gambler types Dawg and Singer.

One of you trolls (I think Singer) came up with that and the rest repeat it. Sort of follow the leader for retarded Trolls .

This question is not addressed to KJ but something I invite any readers who share KJ esteem for mathematics to privately mull:

If you draw a card randomly from a deck of cards and it's the ace of spades, and someone asks "Wow, what are the odds you would draw the AoS", the answer would be 1 in 52.

If you walk up to a double zero roulette table and bet one number and hit it on your first try, and someone said "Wow what are the odds you would hit that?", the answer is 1 in 38.

You are mixing up past and present trials.

I before picking a card the chances would be 1 in 52. After you picked that ace, the chances that you DID (past tense) are 1 in 1 or 100%.

Now walking into a casino before the event if you asked what the chances are, that could be a legit question. But after it happened as you exit the casino if you ask the answer is 100%. It JUST happened.

I know the backroom incident happened, so the chances that it happed (past tense) are 100%.

[kewlJ]

What are the chances I took a crap this morning? Well guess what....I took a crap this morning, so 100%.

[smurgerburger]

Again, you seem slow, in that you are repeating nonsense from the other trolls.

I don't care what any third party (whoever that may be) thinks. How does that help me in anyway? Doesn't put more money in my pocket. And I am not on here telling a freaking impossible story like these losing gambler types Dawg and Singer.

One of you trolls (I think Singer) came up with that and the rest repeat it. Sort of follow the leader for retarded Trolls .

This question is not addressed to KJ but something I invite any readers who share KJ esteem for mathematics to privately mull:

If you draw a card randomly from a deck of cards and it's the ace of spades, and someone asks "Wow, what are the odds you would draw the AoS", the answer would be 1 in 52.

If you walk up to a double zero roulette table and bet one number and hit it on your first try, and someone said "Wow what are the odds you would hit that?", the answer is 1 in 38.

You are mixing up past and present trials.

I before picking a card the chances would be 1 in 52. After you picked that ace, the chances that you DID (past tense) are 1 in 1 or 100%.

Now walking into a casino before the event if you asked what the chances are, that could be a legit question. But after it happened as you exit the casino if you ask the answer is 100%. It JUST happened.

I know the backroom incident happened, so the chances that it happed (past tense) are 100%.

The question was not addressed to you but to persons familiar with the English modal verb "would".

[kewlJ]

here is another one. It rains in Las Vegas an average of 26 days a year. Even that is hard for me to believe. they must be counting days that it rains for 2 minutes.

But lets go with that number. That is a 7% chance it will rain tomorrow. But if you say what are the chances it rains yesterday, which has already occurred and it DID rain yesterday, then the chances are 100%. And that is what you are asking....what are the chances this event (past tense happened. Well it did happen so 100%.

And if you need proof try this. Look at the weather forecast someday. Maybe it says 50% chance of rain. Now as you are standing there in the rain, go back to that weather forecast for your location. It now says 100% chance of rain.

[kewlJ]

This question is not addressed to KJ but something I invite any readers who share KJ esteem for mathematics to privately mull:

If you draw a card randomly from a deck of cards and it's the ace of spades, and someone asks "Wow, what are the odds you would draw the AoS", the answer would be 1 in 52.

If you walk up to a double zero roulette table and bet one number and hit it on your first try, and someone said "Wow what are the odds you would hit that?", the answer is 1 in 38.

You are mixing up past and present trials.

I before picking a card the chances would be 1 in 52. After you picked that ace, the chances that you DID (past tense) are 1 in 1 or 100%.

Now walking into a casino before the event if you asked what the chances are, that could be a legit question. But after it happened as you exit the casino if you ask the answer is 100%. It JUST happened.

I know the backroom incident happened, so the chances that it happed (past tense) are 100%.

The question was not addressed to you but to persons familiar with the English modal verb "would".

You are going down a dumb path here attempting with all your might to troll.

[smurgerburger]

here is another one. It rains in Las Vegas an average of 26 days a year. Even that is hard for me to believe. they must be counting days that it rains for 2 minutes.

But lets go with that number. That is a 7% chance it will rain tomorrow. But if you say what are the chances it rains yesterday, which has already occurred and it DID rain yesterday, then the chances are 100%. And that is what you are asking....what are the chances this event (past tense happened. Well it did happen so 100%.

And if you need proof try this. Look at the weather forecast someday. Maybe it says 50% chance of rain. Now as you are standing there in the rain, go back to that weather forecast for your location. It now says 100% chance of rain.

It's ok KJ. The question is only for those who find it intelligible.

[MDawg]

"What are the odds" is one way to look at it.

Kewl goes to incredible lengths to validate himself as a guy who supports himself counting blackjack. There is some reason why he does this. He also has a habit of making shit up.

you can't help but insert fibs into your postings, and sometimes they're not very believable fibs, and the entire thing comes crashing down.

The manic pathology of desperation that compels UNKewlJ to keep piling nonsense on top of her lies, is another.

People tended to believe you until you jumped the shark.

[accountinquestion]

Say you are an AP or at least are networked with multiple APs. What are the odds an AP you know hit a $100,000 (or more) jackpot which was not a targeted as a MHB. Then what are the odds that happened while churning through $100 or less of freeplay? What are the odds this AP could not name the game?

1 in ?

Man I'd say .. gosh. I've never known any AP to hit a $100k jackpot as they're so rare. So it is hard to start that chain of calculation... I can only think of one person I ever was acquinted with to hit a jackpot over $100k and he was a known lifelong degenerate with a questionable rep.

But he banged on machines all his life and was in the high limit doing $10 if not $25 spins. Actually was a sub-contractor for the casino and they tried to stiff him.

I know a horse bettor who hit a $1 million lick and another guy who hit some huge multi-100 thousands table game jackpot but I am acquinted with tons of recreatonal/degenerate gamblers and know of most of the big ones if they haven't moved here the past 20 years.

That is 100s over decades .. and only 1 and he was churning far more than $50.

Like ... 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 ? It becomes hard to make such a small amount of freeplay.. the union of those 2 things may have never actually happened in the history of casinos. Well except the time it happened to Kewl. $50 in FP turned into $100k jackpot? Maybe only Kewl.

[MDawg]

I do find it hard to believe that a guy who's admittedly only given minimal action gets 21k in bonuses with only a 4.7 x rollover. No need to tell me you get better deals when negotiating with your account manager, I bet I told you that in the first place.

I have seen upwards of 20k+ losses and they are unwilling to give even 1k in deposit bonuses with less than a 10x rollover. Yet you, a small bettor managed to get 21k in bonuses with an average of 4.7 x wagering requirements. That's mostly unheard of today on any of the top 20 offshore joints. Obviously a complete big gambling degenerate might get something special.

The better lies worn smooth through years of use.

The not so good lies? The ones UNKewLyingJ didn't have time to perfect.

Next time you want to tell a whopper, talk to me and lets walk through it. I'll only charge you $200.

[mickeycrimm]

Say you are an AP or at least are networked with multiple APs. What are the odds an AP you know hit a $100,000 (or more) jackpot which was not a targeted as a MHB. Then what are the odds that happened while churning through $100 or less of freeplay? What are the odds this AP could not name the game?

1 in ?

Man I'd say .. gosh. I've never known any AP to hit a $100k jackpot as they're so rare. So it is hard to start that chain of calculation... I can only think of one person I ever was acquinted with to hit a jackpot over $100k and he was a known lifelong degenerate with a questionable rep.

But he banged on machines all his life and was in the high limit doing $10 if not $25 spins. Actually was a sub-contractor for the casino and they tried to stiff him.

I know a horse bettor who hit a $1 million lick and another guy who hit some huge multi-100 thousands table game jackpot but I am acquinted with tons of recreatonal/degenerate gamblers and know of most of the big ones if they haven't moved here the past 20 years.

That is 100s over decades .. and only 1 and he was churning far more than $50.

Like ... 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 ? It becomes hard to make such a small amount of freeplay.. the union of those 2 things may have never actually happened in the history of casinos. Well except the time it happened to Kewl. $50 in FP turned into $100k jackpot? Maybe only Kewl.

It’s not just one package of freeplay. I’ve played off hundreds maybe thousands of packages of freeplay. So what are the odds I would hit something significant in one of those packages? The chance is actually pretty good.

[accountinquestion]

Say you are an AP or at least are networked with multiple APs. What are the odds an AP you know hit a $100,000 (or more) jackpot which was not a targeted as a MHB. Then what are the odds that happened while churning through $100 or less of freeplay? What are the odds this AP could not name the game?

1 in ?

Man I'd say .. gosh. I've never known any AP to hit a $100k jackpot as they're so rare. So it is hard to start that chain of calculation... I can only think of one person I ever was acquinted with to hit a jackpot over $100k and he was a known lifelong degenerate with a questionable rep.

But he banged on machines all his life and was in the high limit doing $10 if not $25 spins. Actually was a sub-contractor for the casino and they tried to stiff him.

I know a horse bettor who hit a $1 million lick and another guy who hit some huge multi-100 thousands table game jackpot but I am acquinted with tons of recreatonal/degenerate gamblers and know of most of the big ones if they haven't moved here the past 20 years.

That is 100s over decades .. and only 1 and he was churning far more than $50.

Like ... 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 ? It becomes hard to make such a small amount of freeplay.. the union of those 2 things may have never actually happened in the history of casinos. Well except the time it happened to Kewl. $50 in FP turned into $100k jackpot? Maybe only Kewl.

It’s not just one package of freeplay. I’ve played off hundreds maybe thousands of packages of freeplay. So what are the odds I would hit something significant in one of those packages? The chance is actually pretty good.

Sure but Kewl was part-timer who just dabbled $50. So what is biggest slot JP you've hit? How about all the slot guys you've known. How many have hit 100k+ that was NOT a mhb they were targetting? You've played a life of full time slots which is likely 50-100x+ what Kewl has played. He just did VP stuff .. then was playing off his freeplay on slots for whatever reason.

[kewlJ]

Gosh, I really want to address your concerns AinQ. But I promised not to. Can I have a waiver to address this comments just this once? Pretty please?

[smurgerburger]

Say you are an AP or at least are networked with multiple APs. What are the odds an AP you know hit a $100,000 (or more) jackpot which was not a targeted as a MHB. Then what are the odds that happened while churning through $100 or less of freeplay? What are the odds this AP could not name the game?

1 in ?

Man I'd say .. gosh. I've never known any AP to hit a $100k jackpot as they're so rare. So it is hard to start that chain of calculation... I can only think of one person I ever was acquinted with to hit a jackpot over $100k and he was a known lifelong degenerate with a questionable rep.

But he banged on machines all his life and was in the high limit doing $10 if not $25 spins. Actually was a sub-contractor for the casino and they tried to stiff him.

I know a horse bettor who hit a $1 million lick and another guy who hit some huge multi-100 thousands table game jackpot but I am acquinted with tons of recreatonal/degenerate gamblers and know of most of the big ones if they haven't moved here the past 20 years.

That is 100s over decades .. and only 1 and he was churning far more than $50.

Like ... 1 in 1,000,000,000,000 ? It becomes hard to make such a small amount of freeplay.. the union of those 2 things may have never actually happened in the history of casinos. Well except the time it happened to Kewl. $50 in FP turned into $100k jackpot? Maybe only Kewl.

It’s not just one package of freeplay. I’ve played off hundreds maybe thousands of packages of freeplay. So what are the odds I would hit something significant in one of those packages? The chance is actually pretty good.

I don't make much of the $100k hit story because of course it could happen but...

Considering (1) KJ says he was rarely doing FP, (2) people typically use VP for freeplay with various exceptions that don't apply to KJ, (3) especially for small FP you would typically not choose a bet size where 100k is even possible, (4) the rare slot where 100k is possible would be WAPs which usually have a bad RTP and don't accept FP anyway, (5) he doesn't even remember the slot, (6) his history of lies (I guess you do not agree on this point)...