Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by redietz View Post
KewlJ, you do realize you are doing many of the same things you have gone apeshit over MDawg doing regarding blackjack?

1) You set bad strategical examples. You are up 22 net games and continue betting angles to work off a bonus even though you know nothing about what you're doing, and thereby blow the 22 net games.

2) You use lingo and language with no sense of conventions, propriety, or correctness. Then you double down and argue that it's okay. Go find an example in a legitimate sports column of the last 50 years where 8-4 is "two games over .500." It's ridiculous. How many hundreds of thousands of sports columns have been written in 50 years? You don't even bother to verify that you're wrong and then report it.

3) You try to use calculations for random events and apply them to non-random events and think nothing of it.

4) You blather on, defending yourself even when you're obviously wrong, thereby confusing inexperienced gamblers.

5) You set a bad sports betting example for inexperienced gamblers, which you criticize MDawg for doing vis-a-vis blackjack.

6) You cherry pick phrases and then present straw man arguments using those phrases.


An example of (6) is that you say I spend six months a year in Las Vegas. I have never once, in 10K posts over half a dozen forums, said that. And I haven't spent more than two weeks at a go in Las Vegas for several years, which I have reported here. But you ignore the facts, and you are worse than MDawg because at least MDawg posts direct quotes rather than summarizing what isn't true and hoping people believe it.

Have a good one.
KJ: My record is 56-31
Ditz: you chould have changed your betting strategy when you got 25 games above .500
Mickey: 56 and 31 is not 25 games above .500.
Ditz: No sports column has ever said 8-4 is two games above .500
Mickey: But 56 and 31 is not 25 games above .500
Ditz: KJ shoulda changed strategy when he got 25 games above .500
Mickey: KJ was never 25 games above .500
Ditz: Don't confuse me with the facts
Good catch mickeycrimm. Like myself, even redietz used the wrong terminology several times. Thats all it is...terminology. If I had only said 25 games above .500, someone could call me out for the wrong terminology if they thought it important, but I stated my record after 2 weeks 3 different ways including by the numbers 56-31, so there was no confusion about anything. Just some dude arguing about terminology as if that really matters.