KewlJ, you do realize you are doing many of the same things you have gone apeshit over MDawg doing regarding blackjack?

1) You set bad strategical examples. You are up 22 net games and continue betting angles to work off a bonus even though you know nothing about what you're doing, and thereby blow the 22 net games.

2) You use lingo and language with no sense of conventions, propriety, or correctness. Then you double down and argue that it's okay. Go find an example in a legitimate sports column of the last 50 years where 8-4 is "two games over .500." It's ridiculous. How many hundreds of thousands of sports columns have been written in 50 years? You don't even bother to verify that you're wrong and then report it.

3) You try to use calculations for random events and apply them to non-random events and think nothing of it.

4) You blather on, defending yourself even when you're obviously wrong, thereby confusing inexperienced gamblers.

5) You set a bad sports betting example for inexperienced gamblers, which you criticize MDawg for doing vis-a-vis blackjack.

6) You cherry pick phrases and then present straw man arguments using those phrases.


An example of (6) is that you say I spend six months a year in Las Vegas. I have never once, in 10K posts over half a dozen forums, said that. And I haven't spent more than two weeks at a go in Las Vegas for several years, which I have reported here. But you ignore the facts, and you are worse than MDawg because at least MDawg posts direct quotes rather than summarizing what isn't true and hoping people believe it.

Have a good one.