Biggest Bulls-Shitter of All Times?

[redietz]

If you see someone posting pictures trying to prove anything important, chances are good, what they are trying to prove isn't real.

And don't confuse that with someone like mickeycrimm posting pictures of the places on his travels.

What about the before & after photos of his machine plays?

How about monet's photos of his sports tickets?

Then there's the links to tournament leader boards.

Aren't they evidence of something important?

I would accept most(no live play) online casino account history as proof of winning, but I would not accept B&M casino win/loss statements as proof of winning or losing since that is all too easy to manipulate wins and losses.

Showing sports tickets pre-games seems legit to me.

Before and after pictures may or may not tell the entire story it depends on the situation.

Tournament leaderboards are good enough to show where you are placed, but that may not tell the entire story, it depends on the situation. For example, an unlimited entry sports or poker tourney/content might be meaningless if theres no way to provide proof as to how many entries one used.

Evidence is important, but so is the math, angle, and logic that goes along with it.

It really comes down to who's telling the story, whether it makes sense, is there historical evidence of similar things, and can the math and logic to back it up.
And witnesses who can back up what you are saying.

And this is why third-party verification of actual straight play won/loss records has been so important in the history of sports handicappers. There's Tipsters or Gypsters?, The Absolute Truth, Handicapper's Report Card, The Sports Monitor, and the simple publishing of weekly plays in newsletters like Playbook.