This forum really SHOULD have a systems or voodoo subsection. And the second someone mentions baccarat, or any type of progression wagering/system, or any other voodoo nonsense, their post should go to the voodoo section.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I don't think I would trust this clown Soxfan to operate my folklift.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I've said that I'm willing, unlike the kewl-J, to submit to the challenge. It might take some times to get a sufficient sampled size, but I've got the time. I'm not a coconut, and I tested my baccarats style, buckin up against 11, 000 tested shoe before I stared to play for real cake, hey hey.
Axelwolf, I am curious as to why you picked Evenbob/Spike for your answer? Sure EvenBob's roulette claims are as silly and stupid as Singer and Mdawg claims, but they are so ridiculous, no one believes them. He isn't hurting anyone. Now some people say the same about Mdawg and Singer, but my God they try, with all the pictures and shit. Evenbob hasn't posted any ridiculous pictures trying to validate his stupid claims. He is just an old man mumbling to himself and his cats and forum members for amusement purposes.
And BTW, when I first joined WoV, evenbob and I talked some blackjack card counting. he claimed he counted cards. Not professionally or anything. And I doubt all that seriously. But he had some general knowledge, maybe a little bit more. He wasn't talking out his ass like he does with roulette.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Dude, are you a diabetic or something where you crave sugar and cake?
I will give you a full box of my tastykakes, if you stop with all your silly folksy talk of cake, and cats, and hey hey. Enough already!
(this is a time sensitive offer as I am somewhat quickly working my way through my recent order of several cases of tastykakes)
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Aren't winning sports ticket photos, jackpot photos, and even small keno win photos the equivalent of the photos you are talking about?
Are the wins legit as long as the evidence photo is captured on the wagering instrument, or do they have to be redeemed for cash and then photographed before they are considered legit, or do the post-redemption photos of the cash indicate that the winning claim is bogus?
I don't mind the jackpot thread and pictures of jackpots. Jackpots are a part of gambling and AP machine play. And they happen infrequently. If someone wants to take an post a picture of a jackpot they hit, that is fine. Just don't have the picture on a computer screen in your daughter's house next to some old exercise equipment. And don't have someone else's reflection on the screen.
But any jackpot picture posted proves nothing. First how do we know it was actually the jackpot of the person positing and not just some jackpot of a random player, they saw while walking around the casino? Or maybe the player 2 seats down. And the second thing about a jackpot picture is how do we know the person didn't already "invest" $12 grand into that machine to show some $4000 jackpot they hit?
So the pictures prove nothing. Most people on the forums aren't trying to prove anything though so it is all good.
The only jackpot picture that I have seen that is really proof that the person claiming hitting it did, was our old friend, Alan, when he did his little dance.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
Already covered it. It is fine. Whether AP or recreational -EV player, jackpots occur infrequently, so if someone wants to post a picture, it is fine. Just don't try to say it proves anything because it doesn't. It is a lot like some pictures of cash and chips. In no way does that prove you won anything.
And I don't see many if any of the real AP's trying to say that.
It is almost a tell. If you see someone posting pictures trying to prove anything important, chances are good, what they are trying to prove isn't real.
And don't confuse that with someone like mickeycrimm posting pictures of the places on his travels. That is just a general interest things and most do find it interesting. He isn't trying to prove anything.
Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".
I would accept most(no live play) online casino account history as proof of winning, but I would not accept B&M casino win/loss statements as proof of winning or losing since that is all too easy to manipulate wins and losses.
Showing sports tickets pre-games seems legit to me.
Before and after pictures may or may not tell the entire story it depends on the situation.
Tournament leaderboards are good enough to show where you are placed, but that may not tell the entire story, it depends on the situation. For example, an unlimited entry sports or poker tourney/content might be meaningless if theres no way to provide proof as to how many entries one used.
Evidence is important, but so is the math, angle, and logic that goes along with it.
It really comes down to who's telling the story, whether it makes sense, is there historical evidence of similar things, and can the math and logic to back it up.
And witnesses who can back up what you are saying.
Words to live by: if someone posts photos trying to prove anything important, chances are good what they are trying to prove isn't real. LOL.
What's implied (actually, beyond implied) is that one should accept the anonymous word of someone NOT posting pictures because ... well, because that's kewlJ(s)!
Have you ever read anything so utterly messed up? It's right out of Orwell.
I have a Vols ticket here, but I guess because I haven't posted it, I should be believed. Whereas if I post it, beware! Great stuff, kewlj(s). Makes perfect sense.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)