Originally Posted by
redietz
I have a great idea. Why don't we divide the forum into two parts? Maybe four parts, in fact.
We can have:
1) Verifiable wins versus casinos by people with real names.
2) Verifiable wins by anonymous people (in case you're wondering how that works, a sports monitor and a handicapper who wishes to remain anonymous or assigns the winning to an AI).
3) Non-verifiable stories by real people.
4) Non-verifiable stories by anonymous people.
These are four distinctly different things. Readers can then decide what degree of make believe or hearsay should be attached to each category and each poster.
The problem with the KewlJ(s) narratives is that they're basically all hearsay. Not admissible in court. Not even entered into evidence. The only difference between the KewlJ(s)' stories (which is what they are) and MDawg's is that the KewlJ(s) attach "This is the way LV works" to their stories. MDawg attaches photos.