Originally Posted by
redietz
I have a great idea. Why don't we divide the forum into two parts? Maybe four parts, in fact.
We can have:
1) Verifiable wins versus casinos by people with real names.
2) Verifiable wins by anonymous people (in case you're wondering how that works, a sports monitor and a handicapper who wishes to remain anonymous or assigns the winning to an AI).
3) Non-verifiable stories by real people.
4) Non-verifiable stories by anonymous people.
These are four distinctly different things. Readers can then decide what degree of make believe or hearsay should be attached to each category and each poster.
The problem with the KewlJ(s) narratives is that they're basically all hearsay. Not admissible in court. Not even entered into evidence. The only difference between the KewlJ(s)' stories (which is what they are) and MDawg's is that the KewlJ(s) attach "This is the way LV works" to their stories. MDawg attaches photos.
Do you consider people such as Anthony Curtis and other public figures who use a pen name anonymous?
Pictures are meaningless unless you have witnesses and people who can back it up. Anyone can get pictures of anything, but that doesn't mean they are truly their pics.
Anything can be faked.
The past is meaningless. What are you doing now, what can you do now?
My previous offers still stand, put your skill up vs me(you don't believe I have any so it's an easy win for you). If you don't want to reveal your pics, fine. Dan Druff/Mike/someone we both agree on gets access to our accounts. The winner(whoever makes the most profit) over x period of time wins 5k, 10k+, you choose. Somthing like that, if you are willing to put up your skill, we can hammer out the details and come up with something.