Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

Because it is the same whether VP or slots. Millions of dollars in total Free play played through. You guys want to break off a small piece and make a big deal about a hit. What about all the time we didn't get a big hit playing through FP, maybe didn't even get close to expectation for a block of FP.

You are confused, and I suspect you really are, because you don't know much about what I actually did. And yet you have an opinion on it. And awful lot like Dawg and Singer talking about shit they have no clue about. Big surprise. Do they teach that in trolling 101?
I don't feel I am confused. I've actually run cards and churned through FP on a small team. Did the whole process from start to finish. I put a lot of thought in that time to what machines were best for various things. I have no desire to wise-up the swarms of failing carders even though I'd be exceptionally unlikely to do it again. Just out of respect to whomever. You see a lot of dumb shit and all the other operators.

Actually I posted a fanny pack with $100k that was the result of that. It had VCT written on a piece of paper too just to kinda show it was mine. No one cares but just saying. People do have pics that sorta demonstrate something.

No - you don't hit 100k jackpots on normal VP. You'd need what? $25 a spin VP and hit a royal? It is not the same.

The fact is you and your team played very little as far as slots goes. You can't point to all the FP on the video poker that is totally irrelevant and has absolutely no impact on the odds of you hitting a $100k slot jackpot. It is about the math and the fact you played millions of coin-in on VP matters not one bit to the math which directly impacts the odds.
This is great! You are actually sharing a little something real and useful. I just don't have time for it right now. But please remind me to address this next time I am on.
No I'm not sharing anything useful. To the contrary. I'm just explaining why I am likely not confused. I will be honest I don't have the experience you had but I at least had receipts of some sort.

So we have established that you played very little slots. Given the amount your team played FP on slots, hitting 100K+, and the fact it was a relatively small amount you were churning through. The accumulated odds, or the odds of the union of those events just seems exceedingly small. Giving odds is weird because like .. Given a random person, what is the odds they are an AP and .. and ... but we're not looking at random people so I was a bit off in my thinking.

So I guess the better thing would just be to estimate the odds of playing very little FP and hitting a $100k jackpot. Mickey said he has played tons but that isn't what you did. You clearly said you didn't play many slots. Too bad you didn't know this slot machine - maybe we could estimate the odds of hitting that huge top line. I don't recall there being $100k jackpot machines.

I'm still curious the procedure the casino used when he won that $100k. It'd be interesting to have you walk us through it.