Originally Posted by
Rob.Singer
Here's why these ap's are hard to take seriously when they criticize what my strategy does: they never choose to understand whatever I explain about it.
Sling doesn't fully understand my play strategy, and that's only because I've never been able to sit down with him at a machine. But he's been smart enuf to know that I say playing your own variation of what I do is far better than strict optimal play or any other defined type of play. Why? Because it is an overall complex strategy, requiring the exact same circumstances as I have in order to be successful playing it. For instance, the player must have an above average aptitude for playing poker, and there must be no wavering from the key points. And this is just the start.
And this is what's even more interesting about these street people claiming what I say is impossible to do, and what they do is the only way to win at VP. I was an AP for 6 years, then I developed my own strategy that's grounded in optimal play. Have any of these guys ever even tried to fully understand the strategy....let alone PLAY it?
Until then their rage and envy will go on (and kew will keep on whimpering like a little bitch).