When I interviewed Rob about machines not being random he said he only suspected it, he had no concrete proof of it and it wasn't clear if the non-randomness helped or hurt the player. That's what he told me ON VIDEO. I am sure that over the years his statements have been embellished and misquoted. The latest example of this comes from redietz:

"Argentino claims to have turned sub-optimal play into something superior to optimal play via his remarkable systems."

No. His suboptimal play gives him a chance to get lucky with a bigger win. He's not changing the optimal math, but hoping to do better than what's expected.

In fact a lot of what he's said has been embellished and misquoted.

I only wish there were a true Q and A with Rob with EVERYONE refraining from attacks.