It depends how much value you put on ribs as to the determination of "long term winner." As the days pass, those ribs are going to be worth more and more.

Seriously, the thing about anonymous posting. Anyone can claim they are doing anything. Now let me give you an example of how this anonymity can screw up language and communication.

"MDawg" is a fictional character. Maybe the person who posts as MDawg is one person. Maybe it's more than one person. Maybe "MDawg" is a subset of someone who is also posting under other names. So the exploits of "MDawg" could be total fiction, or maybe they are just the gambling adventures of the originating person or people when that person wins. And maybe the losing adventures get filed under another name or, more likely, not filed at all. Maybe "MDawg" is a moniker assigned after the fact to a winning session. Maybe he spices it up with "whatever happens on Tuesday is also MDawg." If you put a legal question to him in court, then "Does MDawg win?" the answer would be affirmative. If you put the same question to the originating person as to whether they themselves win overall, it's a different answer.

That's the problem with anonymous posting. I get a kick out of all of the people horrified at doxing. What are you, children wearing masks at recess? This isn't Communist China. If you have something to say, why not just say it, as you have to do when you do research or write a letter to the editor?

When "Rob Singer" or MDawg" post something, your default should be that it's fiction. If it were real, they'd be posting under their real name and taking responsibility for it.