Originally Posted by Dan Druff View Post
Regarding Rob, while the double-up-bug story is interesting to debate, the point is now moot from a legal perspective.

The statute of limitations has run out to prosecute Rob for this, and the statute of limitations for Alan to sue Rob for lying to him (which would be a stretch anyway) has also run out.

This isn't like a murder case. The statute of limitations for nonviolent criminal matters and civil matters tends to be fairly short.
I think there is a bigger issue than the statute of limitations. For a decade Rob's existence here was his progressive strategy claim that he claims he played for 10 years to the tune of over a million dollars. All the challenges and name-calling were about that claim. The math guys saying it couldn't be so. You, yourself weighted in several times and while you didn't use the word "impossible" like I have, you indicated from a mathematically viewpoint Rob's claim was very unlikely. Actually I think you used language even a little stronger than that.

So now Alan is claiming that Rob confided in him that this initial claim was a lie. That is sort of a big deal isn't it? I mean it isn't your responsibility to check out every person and their claims and stories. But for 10 years Rob turned this forum into a cesspool with all the name calling based on challenges to his claim, that Alan says Rob confided in him that was all made up. That doesn't bother you Dan?