Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
Alan, you are changing the meaning of what I stated. Naturally, you would do that since you don't want to take responsibility for your actions. I said nothing about reporting from a "be careful" standpoint. I stated you reported from a "it may be true" standpoint telling people that they should try it if they think it might work for them. That is completely different ... and disgusting.

Regnis ... get a clue. Your comments are becoming increasingly silly while trying to support Singer. Why is that? Do you not understand mathematical proofs? Do you not understand that these are 100% verification of what I am saying? Do you really think giving a person maybe a 5% chance of winning is a good thing? Do you believe promoting a system where 95% of people who try it will lose (and many losses quite large) is moral? Are you working with Singer?
At least he's not charging for the privilege of losing huge sums like Dancer is. Thats truly a scam!