But for now, what strikes me as very odd about the above post is that you acknowledge casinos will not tolerate blackjack advantage play for long without taking countermeasures, which range from cutting off comps and freebies (often the first countermeasure that is sometimes missed by the player), to not allowing them to play anymore. Yet, with baccarat, you seem to think they don't care. They will allow a player to just keep winning and comp him on top of that.
Look every advantage play, from card counting, to very advanced stuff, was at one time unknown to the casinos. There are players that probably figured out something just today, or this week that the casinos are currently in the dark about. Unfortunately with traitors like Eliot, they don't stay in the dark for ever.

So my point is that just because the casino hasn't figured out exactly what a player is doing, doesn't mean they are ok, with him winning forever. There is a point where they say no more, regardless of whether they understand what is happening or not. You seem to understand this about blackjack, but not baccarat. That is weird to me.