Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
if Eliot wrote "the big player called himself MDawg" then would the story be all a big lie?
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Not dealing in hypotheticals.
Eliot never stated that the casino was not just going to let a player just keep winning and winning and winning and then give high end freebies on top of that...his story did not mention anything about freebies and comps.

Eliot explained that MDawg's winning claims are not math-defying impossible claims.

But you still insist that they are.

Eliot tells a "winning at baccarat" story that you accept as truthful,
MDawg tells an equivalent story, and you label his story impossible and call him a liar.
KewlJ, I have no idea why you are arguing with coach belly you already won hands down 90 posts ago. Oh, wait sorry coach no one ever wins a debate with you.