Originally Posted by Lucky(St)Louis View Post
I suppose the Doctor could be selectively presenting data to support a desired conclusion, but I doubt he would be saying anything in an open, government hearing that would run afoul of an ethics code and put his many jobs in jeopardy. He's have to be a loon and I don't think he is.
I think the doctor stated "area", so technically he was correct. However, the conclusion he wanted, that cocaine and gambling are equivalent, is non supportable with today's brain technology.