Nothing negative will be reported. That's just not Mike's style, he will report what he had seen regarding the betting or whatever else MDawg wants him to believe. If Mike sees something super scammy or blatantly off I think he would report that, but I doubt MDawg is going to mess up that bad. I never thought MDawg was dumb.
If Mdawg plays solo and places an average of 1k per hand over 57 hands then I will be more inclined to believe some of what he has been saying.
Sounds like you kind of agree and disagree with me, and what KJ suggested. With no clue how this ends up, I’m not sure what’s in it for MDawg if he can’t at least “prove” he plays high stakes, or have the cash to do it for this exercise. So if he does as you say and he bets close to 1K for 57 hands, it still doesn’t prove much to me in regards to his claims of wins.
It might show he is the rich guy I believe he is, or at least is acting like he is. And most people couldn’t pull this kind of bankroll trick off, and the bigger question is why would they even try? Not sure what’s in this for MD other than more attention.
I personally hope it happens, but you, I and others will still have more questions then answers. But even with all my issues with Mike, I do believe he will at least be able to confirm there is someone willing to admit they are MD and they have access to substantial funds and are willing to wager them.
Betting 1k avg bet over 57 hands, doesn't require that big of a bankroll. Once again proves NOTHING. If he were to bet 5x-10x that over the same span, thats a little different. With his "funds" he shouldn't sweat that action in the least bit.
MDawg can only present casino records as evidence of his past wins,
Mike can report on what he believes that the records prove.
But some have insisted that the entire Adventures of MDawg are totally fabricated,
that those aren't his photos, that he's not a H/L bac player, he has no line of credit,
he hasn't visited LV for weeks at a time, he hasn't been comped weeks-long stays in suites,
that he's not even in Vegas right now.
Mike's examination should reveal how much of all that is true.
Pot ---> kettle ---> blackOriginally Posted by coach belly
Your posts are much more hostile than mine, generally speaking.
Oh sure, I get ramped up on a few issues, such as DoofDawg's claim that he never loses and drove his daddy's Rolls to a nightclub when he was a teen, but most of my posts are actually NOT hostile.
Think it over, coach: you are in somr sort of serius denial if you cannot see yourself as a hostile poster.
What, Me Worry?
I'll return whatever instigators initiate that's directed towards me,
but generally I make statements or ask questions without hostility.
On the other hand, most of your posts are unprovoked attacks.
Review your posting history, it's filled with vile name-calling and hatred.
Like I pointed out earlier, you returned from a 21-month hiatus
and began posting unprovoked insults towards other members
within the first 5 days back.
Nobody comes close to posting as much worthless filth as you do.
Last edited by coach belly; 04-06-2021 at 04:49 PM.
^^^^^ No contest who the winner of hostility is. Its like asking someone who's a better poster Monet vs Tasha........gee I wonder. LANDSLIDE
Perhaps, but only on a limited basis as to limited posters and issues.
I swear, as do others: Crimm is as bad or worse, for example.
Many of my posts are "happy" and actually gambling related, whereas you seem to always post under a dark cloud.
Review your posting history, it could be an eye opener: you are way too disputatious, stirring the pot just to stir it.
Last edited by MisterV; 04-06-2021 at 04:54 PM.
What, Me Worry?
Many members here are argumentative.
I'm among the few that advocate for the minority viewpoint,
so my arguments may be viewed as disputatious.
But the discussions only become heated due to the hostility
of those who will not respectfully consider minority viewpoints,
those who advocate that the minority should be insulted.
You are among those who do that.
You're hostile, you initiate hostility.
Your hostility gave rise to this discussion.
Go review your posts just for this month,
you'll recognize your own hatred within your words.
Hatred?
Pshaw.
Dislike, yes; hatred, no.
To hate I'd have to take someone or something here seriously and I do not.
What, Me Worry?
I hate cancer.
I dislike DoofDawg, whom I compared to a cancer.
I don't hate the guy, he's just words on a screen to me.
Ridiculous words, but still just words.
What, Me Worry?
There are currently 75 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 75 guests)