Originally Posted by redietz View Post

Check out the "Steve Stevens" clip I posted above. A lot of MDawg style with Mr. Stevens.

Let's assume (A) Shackleford witnesses MDawg's play, and MDawg unveils some methodology or psychic ability that wins. Shackleford will faithfully report it. WoV becomes semi-famous.

Now let's assume (B) Shackleford witnesses no methodology or psychic ability that enables MDawg to win. Will he just as faithfully report , "I witnessed no methodology or abilities that suggest he can win?"

If Shackleford witnesses B and does NOT explicitly say that he witnessed no methods or abilities, then he is being more than complicit in the nonsense. He is a direct accessory.

Anybody care to post odds on what will happen if (B) transpires?
I'd assume he's just going to report the session results without further commentary. Quite honestly, I'm surprised $500 was enough to get him to go.