Originally Posted by redietz View Post

I just wanted to correct kewlJ on one thing. I don't expect everyone to have read everything regarding the MDawg blather, so I don't expect everyone to have paid rapt attention.

About a year ago, I had a couple of posts over at WoV where I said there was no way MDawg had cumulative results as he's reported unless he was using a loss rebate. Then I think I mentioned some instances where I suspected non-whales had loss rebates. I mentioned Dancer and I may have mentioned some sports betting cartels that have negotiated 5% vig or less (which technically is a kind of loss rebate), but keep that info out of the public domain.

The bottom line is that I mentioned loss rebates somewhere around a year ago at WoV, because who didn't see that angle coming? Especially if and when MDawg would be tested in any way.

Just like who didn't see the DarkOz angle coming where he's allegedly learned or will learn about MDawg APing from the donation? I mean, c'mon, that was so obvious I didn't bother to post about it. Now DarkOz is part of the hokum. And Mission is now both existential (nothing matters) and uber capitalist (if it's about making money, it matters). Talk about twisting into an apologist pretzel.

I'm starting to see where blackhole is coming from. The WoV site is now hokum-focused. DarkOz is pushing hokum. Shackleford has gone all I-SPY and confidentiality -- LOL -- which contributes to clicks and views and MDawg mystique.

It's a massive joke. Which is cool. The place deserves to be a massive joke.
Quite frankly, you should be thanking me for posting anything in that thread since you are the one who both:

A.) Seems to care a ton.

AND:

B.) Keeps finding new and clever ways to get yourself banned.

If I cared half as much, then I'd want to make sure that I stayed able to participate in the discussion. On the contrary, my only post that could perhaps have an argument made for me to get banned was to attack some quackery directly. Of course, I wrote it and it's more than twenty words, so I doubt all that many people will be reading it. You must have just not seen it yet.

The only apologist anything I'm doing is saying that I'm in no position to prove or disprove MDawg's claims---which is true.

Anyway, it turns out that a non-zero amount of what he said is actually true...which is more than the precisely zero that some people thought. I'm sure you can't be thrilled with that, but then you're perhaps in the camp of people suggesting that there was no actual meetup whatsoever and Wizard/Dawg just made some deal to split the proceeds. Of course, instead of calling one person a liar without proof such a person in that camp would be calling two people who corroborate one another both liars, and again, without the tiniest shred of evidence.

You present the math. You say the best way to gamble is not to gamble. Every couple days--rinse and repeat. I don't have time to post the same thing every four minutes.