The Brett Weinstein three-hour podcast was pulled from Youtube. Many of his clips are being edited on Youtube, Instagram, and so on.
The problem I have with this is that the proper way to argue for vaccines and debunk what's being said on these podcasts is to go point by point and do your debunking. That's not what's happening. You get very little resembling counter-arguments in the news for the points being made. It's more censorship than debunking.
I hate to echo monet (no I don't, really), but when you have to sign away rights to sue, that is not a good thing in any universe. When you are told there is "no data" regarding Johnson & Johnson vaccine efficacy against the new Delta variant, that is really stretching truthfulness. There may not be clear-cut or comprehensive data, but there is data. The fact it's not being shared implies what that data implies.
It's not like I buy into half of what Brett Weinstein has to say. The whole Ivermectin idea is based mainly on speculative correlations rather than studies of any kind.
But because the criticisms being raised for the vaccines are not being met point for point publicly in a reasonable way, and because we are getting the Disney version of everything via partial censorship, I am less than confident in how this all turns out. The only clear reality is that the U.S. is hell bent on not crashing its dominant economy, no matter what. That's the way it has been from the beginning of the pandemic. Human health and individuals lives as priorities are way in the back of the bus. That's the overriding commonality between the Trump and Biden administrations.