Originally Posted by monet
I'm about halfway through the one you linked with Timothy Nguyen.Originally Posted by tableplay
Red, the FDA and the rest of these Fuckers have no proof about Masks working.
As a matter of fact the one actual study done on the situation proved that they show hardly any difference between not wearing a mask.
But that doesn't stop them from mandating us to wear them or wipe down our groceries lol.
Its a better safe than sorry reasoning.
Or it doesn't hurt you to wear them thinking.
So now when it comes to a very cheap medication that has hardly any side effects we aren't allowed to buy it or use it?
The only reason is because the powers in control can not profit off of Ivermectin.
And some people are claiming that particles from wearing the paper masks can be harmful to your lungs and cause cancer.
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines).
He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
I guess we can't trust what he says about Ivermectin.
Best to listen to Fauci.
Monet, I've been following the Brett Weinstein take on this for months. That's why I posted a bitch about censorship right before you posted the first link to the Weinstein three-hour podcast. I'm going through this podcast again, for the third time, tonight. The entrepreneur gets a little wound up at times, so I try to take breaks to absorb as much as I can.
Don't take the mask comments too seriously in this broadcast. It's not clear if the study mentioned, which is international, is talking about mask wearers deriving little benefit. That's always been the case. Mask wearing protects others from the wearer, but does little for the person wearing the mask. Double masking is necessary, and it helps some. The kinds of masks people were wearing in the U.S. were pretty much useless both ways. If you want to check out proper mask wearing, the South Koreans know what they're talking about.
The entrepreneur in this podcast has some good things to say, but he has to be reined in on occasion. He's a little too gung ho on the Ivermectin, but that's his business -- he repurposes available drugs, so he has some motive here.
Ivermectin is really a fungicide as I understand it. There appears to be a correlation with protection, but much more work would have to be done to say the evidence is solid. And then there is a dosage issue, as Ivermectin can cause bad headaches and can be poisonous in large doses, like a pesticide. I have no blessed idea if it works versus Covid, but it certainly can have bad side effects.
By the way, for the record, Brett Weinstein is left of me, which is saying something. That is probably one of the reasons I've been aware of him for awhile.
Reply With Quote