The Coronavirus Scam

[monet]

For starters, if Ivermectin were ineffective as a treatment, there would be no need for the current ongoing studies to investigate its efficacy (Monet had posted that there were 5 ongoing studies and I believe it is at least this number). Secondly, apparently Doctors were willing to risk their 8 years of med school in order to prescribe Vioxx,Thalidomide and fen-phen (tip of the iceberg here). All of them were quite effective in treating the primary ailment. The ancillary effects of having babies born with flippers instead of arms and legs (Thalidomide), heart attacks (Vioxx and other Cox 2 anti-inflammatories) and damaged heart valves (fen-phen) are indicative of the risks that new medications can have and which can manifest when they first come on the market. These medications went through the standard protocols (rigorous) for safety in order to receive FDA approval for wide-spread use. And yet despite this, you seem to think it is unreasonable to believe that a hastily deployed, poorly vetted mRNA vaccine that had no where near the vetting of these three medications would cause a good proportion of people to be reticent to take the "vaccine" (IIRC you referred to this as being used as some sort of anti-vaxxer psychological crutch). Now billboards and ads are going up all over the place encouraging children to get heart inflammation screens and the protocols for administering the "vaccine" now call for more spacing between shots due to this same concern for both adults and children.
Finally you link a study with a p-value of .25 as evidence that ivermectin-treated and untreated groups have no difference. That same study shows that it is half as likely to require a ventilator if one is taking Ivermecton and 50% more likely to require ICU care (if one is hospitalized) if one is not.
Ignoring the fact that there are several ongoing studies to see if Ivermectin is effective, many people would be satisfied with using Ivermectin for its prophylactic power alone (p-value < 0.0001). Even so, I had linked to several Covid treatment studies compared in a meta-analysis in an earlier post showing that it is effective as a treatment (which you ignored in your recent posts over the week).

Let's be real clear about something.
96% of people under 75 will never need to go to the hospital for this virus.
If you have access to Early Treatment Protocols like Trump, Rogan and others you will recover within 2 to 5 days.
95% of us either vaxxed or unvaxxed won't need anything but fluids and rest.
These people do realize the vaccine only lasts for 12 weeks before it rapidly declines in efficacy, don't they?
And we really can't believe most of the numbers being thrown around because they are completely skewed.
Its a big difference dying From covid or dying With Covid but they are only recently starting to separate the two.
No matter Vaxxed or UnVaxxed if you are under 75 you have less than a 1% chance of hospitalization.
One thing is for sure.
If you start eating better, exercise, lose weight, hydrate, and get 8 hours of rest per day your overall odds of living longer will skyrocket.
But you know, whatever... wear two masks, get 3 shots and stay away from life.
You might actually make it to 90 before you croak.
It's not the Plague.
Millions have not died FROM the virus.
They died WITH the virus.
Big Difference.
Many of them didn't even have the virus till they went to the hospital for some other reason and caught it.
As Dr. Fauci has already said... Everyone and I mean Everyone will likely catch this virus.
It is unavoidable.
My Uncle and Wife have been able to escape its clutches so far but they don't go anywhere.
That being said, they did go to the LVAC to shower every day for 5 months and still never caught it.
Which is pretty impressive being inside those locker rooms and showers around all those unmasked people who were sneezing and coughing.
Heck, they even were able to avoid it for the week that I had it in our house.
Although, according to one study, they only had a 12% chance to catch it from me anyway.