Originally Posted by
tableplay
I think I will limit my non-subject matter posts in this thread moving forward.
I hope this Jean Scott discussion isn't too much of a hijack. Playing on the road typically involves heavy doses of tribal casinos.
Now I understand the inference was rigged games. I naively assumed otherwise because I doubted she could accumulate sufficient data as an occasional visitor. Personally, I don't trust my perceptions at all. I'm hyper-aware of "bad" anomalies, while good anomalies slip through unnoticed.
But most gamblers aren't aware of their biases. Whatever the actual amount of riggage, public perception is higher. And whereas I don't want to play a rigged game, for them it's an invitation to be more creative. They can deviate from optimal strategy and play their hunches because the actual odds are unknown.