These anti-APer people are nuts! Alan and Singer are getting all excited because they think Monet is proving that he can win playing -EV at both VP and sports betting. Singer jumping on the statement I made that "I suspect Monet's play is +EV".

Several years ago Monet posted up some of the mailers he receives. He was receiving Thousands of dollars a month at some places like Arizona Charlies. I played some of those same places (lesser amounts than Monet) so I know what places gave out real good mail offers that were disproportionately high for the play to generate them. And obviously so did Monet. I bet he got those kinds of amounts from all the good mailer places. So yeah, Monet posts up some picture of big winner jackpots on some games that are -EV, but that doesn't mean his play, including the large free play amounts was -EV....ALAN!

I don't know Monet, and he doesn't seem to like me much anyway, so I am only speculating from what I read and see. He talks about and knows the math for everything he does. I think you people that are seeing -EV from his play, are seeing it because that is what you want to see.

Simple thing would be to ask him. Not sure if he will answer or not. Monet are you playing with an advantage at all or most things you do?