Originally Posted by arcimede$ View Post
Alan, if someone told you that they had some great investment advice would you carry it on your website? Now, if that advice turned out to be a classic ponzi scheme would you remove it from your website?

I'll assume you would remove it once you understood it was not a good investment. Now, I can see you not understanding the math behind video poker. So, I can see you placing information that goes against the mathematics. However, now you have been given essentially the same type of information that you'd get about a ponzi scheme. However, instead of removing the bad information you continue to promote it.

In addition, you are now being made aware that this type of system could easily promote addiction.

Overall, this approach you are taking significantly reduces your credibility. If you can't accept this math why would anyone believe anything else they see on your website? Personally, I've not investigated any other part of your site for this very reason.

BTW, if you can't see the lies Singer stated on the videos and repeats in his posts then I guess I shouldn't be surprised you are so easily fooled.
Look Arc, there is nothing illegal about Rob Singer's system or strategy. It is nothing like a Ponzi scheme. YES it goes against the math of the game. He admits it. The math is presented: conventional plays vs. the Singer plays.

You say Singer's system is promoting addiction? How about all the books and authors who say that the longer you play at positive expectation games the more you can win? If you ask me, that is more likely to lead to addiction.