Originally Posted by redietz View Post
Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
Redietz I really can't help you. But if you really think Rob would accept the tax liability on someone else's $1.6+-million of wins then he has more money than anyone thinks.

Best of luck Perry White. You're the best editor. Great Caesars Ghost!
I wanted to correct one thing. I just got back from lunch. The book I bought was Frank Scoblete's, not Frank Kneeland's. I conflated the Franks' last names. I asked for Kneeland's email at some point, and I also asked for Scoblete's, which led to me getting Scoblete's book. Both Franks were very polite and easy to get along with.

And Alan, if you really think Person A hasn't accept Person B's tax liability on a regular basis, you haven't hung out at many racetracks or sports books the last 50 years. In other words, you're pretty naive for the son of mob lawyer.
Instead of playing games and trying to impress everyone with your highly secret knowledge why don't you explain to us the purpose of one gambler accepting the tax liability of another gambler.

I know one reason it's done but I don't think it's the same way you are talking about.